Exploration vs. Exploitation: How Innovation Strategies Impact Firm Performance and Competitive Advantage
References
- Abernathy, W. J., & Utterback, J. M. (1978). Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review, 64, 254-228.
- Amin, S., & Aslam, S. (2017). Intellectual Capital, Innovation and Firm Performance of Pharmaceuticals: A Study of the London Stock Exchange. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 16(2), 2017.
- Andreeva, T., & Garanina, T. (2016). Do all elements of intellectual capital matter for organizational performance? Evidence from Russian context. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17(2), 397-412.
- Auh, S., & Menguc, B. (2005). Balancing exploration and exploitation: the moderating role of competitive intensity. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1652-61.
- Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., Sambrook, S., & Davies, D. (2012). Food sector SMEs and innovation types. British Food Journal, 114(11), 1640-1653.
- Battilana, J., & Casciaro, T. (2013). Overcoming resistance to organizational change: strong ties and affective cooptation. Management Science, 59(4), 819-836.
- Bekkers, V., Edelenbos, J., & Steijn, B. (2011). Innovation in Public Sector: Linking Capacity and Leadership. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. (2002). Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 676–707.
- Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28, 238–256.
- Bernal, P., Maicas, J.P., & Vargas, P. (2019). Exploration, exploitation and innovation performance: disentangling the evolution of industry. Industry and Innovation, 26(3), 295-320.
- Boiko, K. (2021). R&D activity and firm performance: mapping the field. Management Review Quarterly, 1, 1-37.
- Calantone, R.J., Garcia, R., & Droge, C. (2003). The effects of environmental turbulence on new product development strategy planning. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(2), 90-103.
- Canibano, L., Garcia-Ayuso, M., & Sanchez, P. (2000). Accounting for intangibles: a literature review. Journal of Accounting Literature, 19(1), 102-130.
- Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20, 781–796.
- Chen, M., Yang, Z., Dou, W., & Wang, F. (2018). Flying or dying? Organizational change, customer participation, and innovation ambidexterity in emerging economies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35, 97-119.
- Cheng, J.H., Lin, L.W., & Lee, L.C. (2019). Influence of ambidextrous governance mechanisms and risk management on repurchase intention in social commerce. Internet Research, 29(6), 1301-1323.
- Chiang, C.C., & Mensah, Y.M. (2004). The determinants of investor valuation of R&D expenditure in the software industry. Review of Quantitative Finance Account, 22(4), 293-313.
- Child, J., Hsieh, L., Elbanna, S., Karmowska, J., Marinova, S., Puthusserry, P., Tsai, T., Narooz, R., & Zhang, Y. (2017). SME international business models: the role of context and experience. Journal of World Business, 52(5), 664-679.
- Constant, F., Calvi, R., & Johnsen, T.E. (2020). Managing tensions between exploitative and exploratory innovation through purchasing function ambidexterit. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 26(4), 6-45.
- Corrado, C.A., Hulten, C.R., & Sichel, D. (2005). Measuring Capital and Technology: An Expanded Framework, in Measuring Capital in the New Economy, Vol. 65, Ed.s. Carol A. Corrado, John Haltiwanger, and Daniel Sichel, (11-45). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Corrado, C.A., Hulten, C.R., & Sichel, D. (2009). Intangible Capital and U.S. Economic Growth. Review of Income and Wealth, 5(3), 661-85.
- Corrado C.A., & Hulten, C.R. (2010). Measuring intangible Capital. How Do You Measure a “Technological Revolution?, American Economic Review, 10(1), 99-104.
- Dai, L., Maksimov, V., Gilbert, B.A., & Fernhaber, S.A. (2013). Entrepreneurial orientation and international scope: the differential roles of innovativeness, proactiveness, and risktaking. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(4), 511-524.
- Dai, Y., Roundy, P.T., Chok, J.I., Ding, F., & Byun, G. (2016). Who knows what?’ in new venture teams: transactive memory systems as a micro-foundation of entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Management Studies, 53(8), 1320-1347.
- Danneels, E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1095-1121.
- Davila, T., Epstein, M. J., & Shelton, R. (2007). The creative entreprise: Managing innovative organizations and people. London: Preager Publishing.
- Dess, G.G., & Beard, D.W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administration Science Quarterly, 29, 52-73.
- Droge, C., Calantone, R., & Harmancioglu, N. (2008). New product success: is it really controllable by managers in highly turbulent environments?. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(3), 272-286.
- Fang, C., Lee, J., & Schilling, M.A. (2010). Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design: the isolation of subgroups and organizational learning. Organization Science, 21, 625-642.
- Gelb, D.S., & Siegel, P. (2000). Intangible assets and corporate signaling. Review of Quantitative Finance Account, 15(4), 307-323.
- Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The Antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 209–226.
- Gomezel, A.S., & Aleksic, D. (2020). The relationships between technological turbulence, flow experience, innovation performance and small firm growth. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 21(3), 760-782.
- Greve, H. R. (2007). Exploration and exploitation in product innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, 945–975.
- Gupta, A. K., Smith, K., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 693–706.
- Habersang, S., Kueberling-Jost, J., Reihlen, M., & Seckler, C. (2019). A process perspective on organizational failure: a qualitative meta-analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 56(1), 19-56.
- Han, I., & Chuang, C. (2011). The impacts of R&D investment on company performance: US vs Taiwanese technology intensive industry. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 14(1), 171-194.
- Hanvanich, S., Sivakumar, K., & Hult, G.T.M. (2006). The relationship of learning and memory with organizational performance: the moderating role of turbulence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(4), 600-612.
- Harmancioglu, N., Sksjrvi, M., & Hultink, E.J. (2020). Cannibalize and combine? the impact of ambidextrous innovation on organizational outcomes under market competition. Industrial Marketing Management, 85, 44-57.
- Hartono, R., & Sheng, M.L. (2016). Knowledge sharing and firm performance: the role of social networking site and innovation capability. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 28(3), 335-347.
- He, Z., & Wong, P. (2004). Exploration and exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481-94.
- Hughes, M. (2018). Organisational ambidexterity and firm performance: burning research questions for marketing scholars. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(2), 178-229.
- Hung, K.P., & Chou, C. (2013). The impact of open innovation on firm performance: the moderating effects of internal R&D and environmental turbulence. Technovation, 33(11), 368-380.
- Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Sirmon, D. G. (2003). Strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management, 29, 963–989
- Jansen, J.J.P., Van den Bosch, F.A.J., & Volberda, H.W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. ERIM Report Series Research in Management, 52(11), 1661-1674.
- Jiang, C.Y., & Zhao, S.M. (2006). The relationship between social capital, company enterprise and company performance: the medium role of organizational learning – a case study of the new and developing enterprises in Jiangsu and Guangdong. Management World, 10, 90-9.
- Jimenez-Jimenez, D., & Sanz Valle, R. (2011). Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 64, 408-417.
- Kandemir, D., Yaprak, A., & Cavusgil, S.T. (2006). Alliance orientation: conceptualization, measurement, and impact on market performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(3), 324-340.
- Knott, A.M. (2002. Exploration and exploitation as complements, in Choo, C.W., & Bontis, N. (Eds), The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge (pp 339-358), Oxford University Press.
- Kollmann, T., & Stockmann, C. (2014). Filling the entrepreneurial orientation-performance gap: the mediating effects of exploratory and exploitative innovations. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 38(5), 1001-1026.
- Lant, T.K., & Mezias, S.J. (1992). An organizational learning model of convergence and reorientation. Organization Science, 3(1), 47-71.
- Lavie, D., Uriel, S., & Tushman, M.L. (2010). Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 4, 109-155.
- Le Mens, G., Hannan, M., & Polos, L. (2015). Organizational obsolescence, drifting tastes and age dependence in organizational life chances. Organization Science, 26(2), 550-570.
- Lee, G.K. (2008). Relevance of organizational capabilities and its dynamics: what to learn from entrants’ product portfolios about the determinants of entry timing. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12), 1257-1280.
- Lee, J., Lee, J., & Lee, H. (2003). Exploration and exploitation in the presence of network externalities. Management Science, 49, 553-70.
- Lee, S.U., Park, G., & Kang, J. (2018). The double-edged effects of the corporate venture capital unit’s structural autonomy on corporate investors’ explorative and exploitative innovation. Journal of Business Research, 88, 141-149.
- Lev, B., & Zambon, S. (2003). Intangibles and intellectual capital: an introduction to a special issue. European Accounting Review, 12(4), 597-603.
- Lev, B., & Zarowin, P. (1999). The boundaries of financial reporting and how to extend them. Journal of Accounting Research, 37(2), 353-385.
- Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95-112.
- Li, C. R., Lin, C. J., & Chu, C. P. (2008). The nature of market orientation and the ambidexterity of innovations. Management Decision, 46, 1002–1026.
- Li, H., Wu, Y., Cao, D., & Wang, Y. (2021). Organizational mindfulness towards digital transformation as a prerequisite of information processing capability to achieve market agility. Journal of Business Research, 122, 700-712.
- Liang, T., You, J., & Liu, C. (2010). A resource-based perspective on information technology and firm performance: A meta analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110, 1138-1158.
- Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32, 646–672.
- Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21, 135-173
- Lumpkin, G.T., & Dess, G.G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: the moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 429-51.
- Ma, C., Liu, H., Gu, J., & Dou, J. (2018). How entrepreneurs’ Zhong-yong thinking improves new venture performance. Chinese Management Studies, 12(2), 323-345.
- March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
- Markides, C. C., & Charitou, C. D. (2004). Competing with dual business models: A contingency approach. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 22-36.
- Menguc, B., & Auh, S. (2008). The asymmetric moderating role of market orientation on the ambidexterity-firm performance relationship for prospectors and defenders. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(4), 455-70.
- Miller, D., & Friesen, P.H. (1983). Strategy-making and environment: the third link. Strategic Management Journal, 4, 221-35.
- Miller, D., Droge, C., & Toulouse, J.M. (1988). Strategic process and content as mediators between organizational context and structure. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 544-569.
- Mudambi, R., & Swift, T. (2011). Proactive R&D management and firm growth: A punctuated equilibrium model. Research Policy, 40(3), 429-440.
- Mukherjee, T., & Sen, S. (2018). Sustainable growth rate and its determinants: A study on some selected companies in India. Global Multidisciplinary, 10(1), 100-108.
- Ocak, M., & Fındık, D. (2019). The impact of intangible assets and sub-components of intangible assets on sustainable growth and firm value: evidence from Turkish listed firms. Sustainability, 11, 53-59.
- Oliveira, L., Rodrigues, L., & Craige, L. (2010). Intangible assets and value relevance: evidence from the Portuguese stock exchange. The British Accounting Review, 44, 241-252.
- Prajogo, D., & McDermott, C.M. (2014). Antecedents of service innovation in SMEs: comparing the effects of external and internal factors. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(3), 521-540.
- Prange, C., & Schlegelmilch, B.B. (2010). Heading for the next innovation archetype?. Journal of Business Strategy, 31(1), 46-55.
- Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M.L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685-695.
- Rothaermel, R.T., & Deeds, D.L. (2004). Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: a system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 201-21.
- Santos, L.L.D., Borini, F.M., & Pereira, R.M. (2020). Bricolage as a path towards organizational innovativeness in times of market and technological turbulence. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 1, 20-39
- Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25, 217-26.
- Shanker, R., Bhanugopan, R., VAN DER Heijden, B.I., & Farrell, M. (2017). Organizational climate for innovation and organizational performance: the mediating effect of innovative work behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 67-77.
- Sheng, M.L. (2017). A dynamic capabilities-based framework of organizational sense making through combinative capabilities towards exploratory and exploitative product innovation in turbulent environments. Industrial Marketing Management, 65, 28-38.
- Siegel, P., & Borgia, C. (2007). The measurement and recognition of intangible assets. Journal of Bussiness and Public Afferis, 1(1), 1-19.
- Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J.F., & Souder, D. (2009). A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity’s conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 864-894.
- Sirén, C., Kohtamäki, M., & Kuckertz, A. (2012). Exploration and exploitation strategies, profit performance and the mediating role of strategic learning: Escaping the exploitation trap. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6, 18–41.
- Skinner, D. (2008). Accounting for intangibles: a critical review of policy recommendations. Accounting and Bussiness Research, 38(3), 191-204.
- Soto-Acosta, P., Popa, S., & Martinez-Conesa, I. (2018). Information technology, knowledge management and environmental dynamism as drivers of innovation ambidexterity: a study in SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(4), 931-948.
- Swanson, Z.L., & Singer, R. (2002). Are investor reactions to R&D influenced by the corporate headquarter’s location. Review of Quantitative Finance Account, 18(1), 5-19.
- Tahat, Y.A., Ahmed, A.H., & Alhadab, M.M. (2018). The impact of intangibles on firms’ financial and market performance: UK evidence. Review of Quantitative Finance Account, 50(1), 1147-1168.
- Tang, Q., Gu, F.F., Xie, E., Wu, Z., & Ghauri, P. (2020). Exploratory and exploitative OFDI from emerging markets: impacts on firm performance. International Business Review, 29(2), 16-31.
- Turulja, L., & Bajgoric, N. (2019). Innovation, firms’ performance and environmental turbulence: is there a moderator or mediator?. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(1), 213-232.
- Tushman, M.L., & O’Reilly, C.A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38, 8-29.
- Uotila, J. (2018). Exploratory and exploitative adaptation in turbulent and complex landscapes. European Management Review, 15(4), 505-519.
- Uotila, J., Maula, M. V. J., Keil, T., & Zahra, S. A. (2009). Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: Analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 221–231.
- Van Ark, B., Hao, J., Corrado, C., & Hulten, C. (2009). Measuring intangible capital and its contribution to economic growth in Europe. EIB Papers, 14, 62–93.
- Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2004). Strategic leadership and organization learning. Academy of Management Review, 29, 222-40.
- Villalonga, B. (2004). Intangible Resources, Tobin’s q, and sustainability of performance differences. Journal of Economic Behaviour, 54, 205–230.
- Wang, M.-C., & Fang, S.-C. (2012). The moderating effect of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between network structures and the innovative performance of a new venture. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 27(4), 311-323.
- Wang, M.C., Chen, P.C., & Fang, S.C. (2021). How environmental turbulence influences firms’ entrepreneurial orientation: the moderating role of network relationships and organizational inertia. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 36(1), 48-59
- Wang, Y., & Wang, K.Y. (2017). How do firms tackle strategic change? A theoretical model of the choice between dynamic capability-based and ad hoc problem-solving approaches. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 30(5), 725-743.
- Wei, Z., Yi, Y., & Yuan, C. (2011). Bottom-up learning, organizational formalization, and ambidextrous innovation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(3), 314-329.
- Xu, J., & Wang, B. (2018). Intellectual capital, financial performance and companies’ sustainable growth: Evidence from the Korean manufacturing industry. Sustainability, 10(1), 46-51
- Zaheer, H., Breyer, Y., & Dumay, J. (2019). Digital entrepreneurship: an interdisciplinary structured literature review and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 148, 73-85.
- Zahra, S.A. (1993). Environment, corporate entrepreneurship, and financial performance: a taxonomic approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(4), 319-340.
- Zhou, K.Z., & Tse, Y.D.K. (2005). The effects of strategic orientations on technology- and market- based breakthrough innovations. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 42-60.
- Zhou, Y., Lu, L., & Chang, X. (2016). Averting risk or embracing opportunity? Exploring the impact of ambidextrous capabilities on innovation of Chinese firms in internationalization. Cross Cultural and Strategic Management, 23(4), 569-589.
- Zhou, Y., Shu, C., Jiang, W., & Gao, S. (2019). Green management, firm innovations, and environmental turbulence. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(4), 567-581.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2022-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2558-9652
Language: English
Page range: 31 - 46
Published on: Aug 8, 2022
Published by: Bucharest University of Economic Studies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2022 Cătălin Gabriel Ioniţă, published by Bucharest University of Economic Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.