Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A methodological approach to developing and validating IFRS 9 -LGD parameters Cover

A methodological approach to developing and validating IFRS 9 -LGD parameters

Open Access
|Dec 2021

References

  1. Azzaz, J., Loisel, S., & Therond, P. E. (2015). Some characteristics of an equity security next-year impairment, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 45, 111-135.10.1007/s11156-014-0432-x
  2. Barth, M. E., & Landsman, W. R. (2010). How did financial reporting contribute to the financial crisis?, European Accounting Review, 19(3), 399-423.10.1080/09638180.2010.498619
  3. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (1988). International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards, https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs04a.htm.
  4. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2005). International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: A Revised Framework, BIS, Updated November 2005, https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs107.htm.
  5. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2005a). Validation, Newsletter No. 4., https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs_nl4.htm.
  6. Basel committee on banking supervision (2015). Guidance on credit risk and accounting for expected credit losses, https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d350.pdf.
  7. Bischof, J., Daske, H. (2016). Interpreting the European Union’s IFRS endorsement criteria: the case of IFRS 9, Accounting in Europe, 13(2), 129-168.10.1080/17449480.2016.1210181
  8. Bolton, P., Freixas, X., & Shapiro, J. (2012). The credit ratings game, The Journal of Finance, 67, 85-111.10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01708.x
  9. Buchanan, M. (2009). Why money messes with your mind, New Scientist.
  10. Carlehed, M., & Petrov, A. (2012). A methodology for point-in-time-through-the-cycle probability of default decomposition in risk classification systems, Journal of Risk Model Validation, 6(3), 3-25.10.21314/JRMV.2012.091
  11. Cheng, M., & Neamtiu, M. (2009). An empirical analysis of changes in credit rating properties: Timeliness, accuracy and volatility, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 47, 108-130.10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.11.001
  12. Edwards, G.A. (2016). Supervisors’ key roles as banks implement expected credit loss provisioning SEACEN, Financial Stability Journal, 7(1), 1-25.
  13. European Banking Authority (2017). Guidelines on credit institutions’ credit risk management practices and accounting for expected credit losses.
  14. European Banking Authority (2017). Guidelines on PD estimation, LGD estimation and the treatment of defaulted exposures.
  15. European Banking Authority (2016). Guidelines on the application of the definition of default under Article 178 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
  16. Gaurav, C., Forest, Jr. L. R., & Aguais, S.D. (2016). Point-in-time loss-given default rates and exposures at default models for IFRS 9/CECL and stress testing, Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, 9(3), 249-263.
  17. Global Public Policy Committee (2016). The implementation of IFRS 9 impairment requirements by banks.
  18. International accounting standards Board (2014). International Financial reporting standard 9 Financial instruments.
  19. Lando, D. (1998). On cox processes and credit risky securities, Review of Derivatives research, 2, 99-120.10.1007/BF01531332
  20. Magnan, M., & Markarian, G. (2011). Accounting, governance and the crisis: is risk the missing link?, European Accounting Review, 20, 215-231.10.1080/09638180.2011.580943
  21. Morgenson, G. (2008). Debt watchdogs: Tamed or caught napping?. New York Times.
  22. Pool, S., De Haan, L., Jacobs, J.P. (2015). Loan loss provisioning, bank credit and the real economy, Journal of Macroeconomics, 45(1), 124-136.10.1016/j.jmacro.2015.04.006
  23. Reitgruber, W. (2015). Methodological thoughts on expected loss estimation for IFRS 9 impairment: hidden reserves, cyclical loss predictions and LGD back testing, Credit Technology by Serasa Experian, 92, 7-29.
  24. Temim, J. (2016). The IFRS 9 impairment model and its interaction with the Basel framework, Moody’s Analytics Risk Perspectives, 8(1), 13-33.
  25. Weij, W., & Hollander, M. (2009). Improving PD and LGD models: following the changes in the market, SNS Real, Utrecht.
  26. Yang, B.H. (2017). Point-in-time PD term structure models for multi-period scenario loss projection: methodologies and implementations for IFRS 9 ECL and CCAR stress testing, Journal of Risk Model Validation, 11(3), 1-17.
  27. Yang, B. H. & Tkachenko, M. (2012). Modeling exposure at default and loss given default: empirical approaches and technical implementation, The Journal of Credit Risk, 8(2), 81-102.10.21314/JCR.2012.139
Language: English
Page range: 683 - 694
Published on: Dec 31, 2021
Published by: The Bucharest University of Economic Studies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year

© 2021 Luminita-Georgiana Achim, Elena Mitoi, Ioan-Codrut Turlea, published by The Bucharest University of Economic Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.