Improvements in PD models. A case-study approach
References
- Abdemoula, A. K. (2015). Bank Credit Risk Analysis with K-Nearest-Neighbor Classifier: Case of Tunisian Banks. Accounting and Management Information Systems, 14(1), 79-106.
- Akcura, K., & Chhibber, A. (2018). Design and Comparison of Data Mining Techniques for Predicting Probability of Default on a Loan. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Korhan_Akcura2/publication/335173357_Design_and_Comparison_of_Data_Mining_Techniques_for_Predicting_Probability_of_Default_on_a_Loan/links/5d54a79d92851c93b630b8be/Design-and-Comparison-of-Data-Mining-Techniques-for-Pr.
- Bayraci, S., & Susuz, O. (2019). A Deep Neural Network (DNN) based Classification Model in Application to Loan Default Prediction. Theoretical and Applied Economics, XXV(4(621)), 75-84.
- Chawla, N., Bowyer, K., Hall, L., & Kegelmeyer, W. (2002). Smote: synthetic minority over- sampling technique. Journal Of Artificial Intelligence Research, 16, 321-357. doi:DOI: 10.1613/jair.953.
- Çığşar, B., & Ünal, D. (2019). Comparison of Data Mining Classification Algorithms Determining the Default Risk. Scientific Programming, 1-8.
- Coser, A., Maer-Matei, M., & Albu, C. (2019). Predictive Models for Loan Default Risk Assessment. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 53, 149-165. doi:10.24818/18423264/53.2.19.09.
- Green, R. F. (1976). Outlier-Prone and Outlier-Resistant Distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(354), 502-505. doi:10.2307/2285341.
- Gurný, P., & Gurný, M. (2013). Comparison of Credit Scoring Models on Probability of Default Estimation for Us Banks. Prague Economic Papers, 22(2), 163-181. doi:10.18267/j.pep.446.
- Härdle, W. K., Moro, R. A., & Schäfer, D. (2007). Estimating probabilities of default with support vector machines. Discussion Paper Series 2: Banking and Financial Studies, Deutsche Bundesbank.
- Hadad, S., and Bratianu, C. (2019). “Dematerialization of banking products and services in the digital era”. Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society, Vol. 14, Issue 3, 318-337.
- Hawkins, D. M. (1980). Identification of outliers (Monographs on applied probability and statistics). Chapman&Hall. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-3994-4.
- Kaya, M. E., Gurgen, F., & Okay, N. (2008). An Analysis of Support Vector Machines for Credit Risk Modeling. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Applications of Data Mining in E-Business and Finance, 25-33. IOS Press.
- Lending Club (n.d.). database. Retrieved March 2, 2021, from https://www.kaggle.com/wordsforthewise/lending-club.
- Nabende, P., & Senfuma, S. (2019). A study of machine learning models for predicting loan status from Ugandan loan applications. Athens.
- Nh, N., & Mai, N. (2018). Naïve Bayesian Classifier and Classification Trees for the Predictive Accuracy of Probability of Default Credit Card Clients. American Journal of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 3(1), 1-12. Retrieved from http://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajdmkd.20180301.11.pdf.
- Nnamoko, N., & Korkontzelos, I. (2020). Efficient treatment of outliers and class imbalance for diabetes prediction. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101815.
- Obare, D., & Muraya, M. (2018). Comparison of Accuracy of Support Vector Machine Model and Logistic Regression Model in Predicting Individual Loan Defaults. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 6(6), 266-271. doi:10.12691/ajams-6-6-8.
- Pop, I. D., Chicu, N., Radutu, A. (2018). “Non-performing loans decision making in the Romanian banking system”. Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society, Vol. 13, Issue 1, 761-776.
- Ramakrishnan, S., Mirzaei, M., & Bekri, M. (2015). Corporate Default Prediction with AdaBoost and Bagging Classifiers. Jurnal Teknologi, 73(2), 45-50. Retrieved from https://jurnalteknologi.utm.my/index.php/jurnalteknologi/article/view/4191/2954.
- Sariev, E., & Germano, G. (2020). Bayesian Regularized Artificial Neural Networks for the Estimation of the Probability of Default. Quantitative Finance, 20(0), 311-328.
- Sharma, P. K., Haleem, H., & Ahmad, T. (2015). Improving Classification by Outlier Detection and Removal. In S. C. Satapathy, A. Govardhan, K. S. Raju, & J. K. Mandal (Ed.), Emerging ICT for Bridging the Future - Proceedings of the 49th Annual Convention of the Computer Society of India CSI Volume 2, 621-628. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13731-5_67.
- Smith, M. R., & Martinez, T. (2011). Improving classification accuracy by identifying and removing instances that should be misclassified. The 2011 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2690-2697. San Jose, CA, USA. doi: 10.1109/IJCNN.2011.6033571.
- Tallón-Ballesteros, A. J., & Riquelme, J. C. (2014). Deleting or keeping outliers for classifier training? Sixth World Congress on Nature and Biologically Inspired Computing (NaBIC 2014), 281-286. Porto, Portugal. doi: 10.1109/NaBIC.2014.6921892.
- Turiel, J., & Aste, T. (2020). Peer-to-peer loan acceptance and default prediction with artificial intelligence. Royal Society Open Science, 7(6). doi:10.1098/rsos.191649.
- Turlík, T. (2018). Neural networks and tree-based credit scoring models. Prague: Charles University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies.
- Wang, X., Wang, X., & Wilkes, M. (2021). New Developments in Unsupervised Outlier Detection. Algorithms and Applications. Singapore: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-9519-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2021-0004 | Journal eISSN: 2558-9652
Language: English
Page range: 13 - 32
Published on: Dec 31, 2021
Published by: Bucharest University of Economic Studies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2021 Raluca Dana Caplescu, Manuela-Simona Cojocea, Daniel Traian Pele, Vasile Alecsandru Strat, published by Bucharest University of Economic Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.