Innovation trends in Romanian logistics providers industry
References
- Bratianu, C., & Bejinaru, R. (2019). The theory of knowledge fields: A thermodynamics approach. Systems, 7(2), 20, 1-12.
- Bratianu, C. & Bejinaru, R. (2020). Knowledge dynamics: A thermodynamics approach. Kybernetes, 49(1), 6-21.
- Brown, D., Kivimaa, P. & Sorrell, S. (2019). An energy leap? Business model innovation and intermediation in the ‘Energiesprong’ retrofit initiative. Energy Research & Social Science, 58, 101253.
- DB Schenker Innovation & Digitalization Insights, https://www.dbschenker.com/global/about/innovation-digitalization/innovation-digitalization-insights, accessed on 15 December 2019.
- DSV Forward Logistics Report 2019, https://www.dsv.com/downloads-and-services/forward-logistics-report, accessed on 17 December 2019.
- Edwards-Schachter, M. (2018). The nature and variety of innovation. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 2, 65-79.
- FM Logistic web page, http://sustainable-development.fmlogistic.com/en/index.html, accessed on 19 December 2019
- Frishammar, J., Richtner, A., Brattstrom, A., Magnusson, M. & Bjork, J. (2019). Opportunities and challenges in the new innovation landscape: Implications for innovation auditing and innovation management. European Management Journal, 37, 151-164.
- Khosravi, P., Newton, C. & Rezvani, A. (2019). Management innovation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of past decades of research. European Management Journal, 37, 694-707.
- Kontic, L. & Vidicki, D. (2018). Strategy for digital organization: Testing a measurement tool for digital transformation. Strategic Management, 23(2), 29-35.
- Kumaar, S. & Singh, B. (2019). Barriers to the international diffusion of technological innovations. Economic Modelling, 82, 74-86.
- Lii, P. & Kuo, F. (2016). Innovation-oriented supply chain integration for combined competitiveness and firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 174, 142-155.
- Masucci, M., Brusoni, S. & Cennamo, C. (2020). Removing bottlenecks in business ecosystems: The strategic role of outbound open innovation. Research Policy, 49, 103823.
- Mei, L., Zhang, T. & Chen, J. (2019). Exploring the effects of inter-firm linkages on SMEs’ open innovation from an ecosystem perspective: An empirical study of Chinese manufacturing SMEs. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 114, 118-128.
- Neutzling, D. M., Land, A., Seuring, S. & Machado do Nascimento, L. F. (2018). Linking sustainability-oriented innovation to supply chain relationship integration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3448-3458.
- Niewohner, N., Asmar, L., Wortmann, F., Roltgen, D., Kuhn, A. & Dumitrescu, R. (2019). Design fields of agile innovation management in small and medium sized enterprises. Procedia CIRP, 84, 826-831.
- Oliva de Farias, O. & Akabane, G. K. (2011). Innovation and creativity on logistics besides TRIZ methodology. Procedia Engineering, 9, 724-729.
- Pegkas, P., Staikouras, C. & Tsamadias, C. (2019). Does research and development expenditure impact innovation? Evidence from the European Union countries. Journal of Policy Modeling, 41, 1005-1025.
- Radnejad, A. M. & Vredenburg, H. (2019). Disruptive technological process innovation in a process-oriented industry: A case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 53, 63-79.
- Rodriguez, A. C., Martins, R. S., Wanke, P. F. & Siegler, J. (2018). Efficiency of specialized 3PL providers in an emerging economy. International Journal of Production Economics, 205, 163-178.
- Skippari, M., Laukkanen, M. & Salo, J. (2017). Cognitive barriers to collaborative innovation generation in supply chain relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 62, 108-117.
- To, C. K. M., Au, J. S. C. & Kan, C. W. (2019). Uncovering business model innovation contexts: A comparative analysis by fsQCA methods. Journal of Business Research, 101, 783-796.
- Torbacki, V & Kijewska, K. (2019). Identifying key performance indicators to be used in Logistics 4.0 and Industry 4.0 for the needs of sustainable municipal logistics by means of the DEMATEL method. Transportation Research Procedia, 39, 534-543.
- Vega, A. & Chiasson, M. (2019). A comprehensive framework to research digital innovation: The joint use of the systems of innovation and critical realism. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28, 242-256.
- Wagner, S. M. & Sutter, R. (2012). A qualitative investigation of innovation between third-party logistics providers and customers. International Journal of Production Economics, 140, 944-958.
- Wallenburg, C. M., Johne, D., Cichosz, M., Goldsby, T. J. & Knemeyer, A. M. (2019). Alignment mechanisms for supplier-initiated innovation: Results from the logistics service industry. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 25, 100-575.
- Wang, F. & Chen, K. (2020). Do product imitation and innovation require different patterns of organizational innovation? Evidence from Chinese firms. Journal of Business Research, 106, 60-74.
- Wang, X., Persson, G. & Huemer, L. (2016). Logistics Service Providers and Value Creation Through Collaboration: A Case Study. Long Range Planning, 49, 117-128.
- Zach, F. J., Nicolau, J. L. & Sharma, A. (2020). Disruptive innovation, innovation adoption and incumbent market value: The case of Airbnb. Annals of Tourism Research, 80, 102818.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2020-0077 | Journal eISSN: 2558-9652
Language: English
Page range: 807 - 818
Published on: Jul 27, 2020
Published by: Bucharest University of Economic Studies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2020 Cristian Negruţiu, Alexandra Onea, Ruxandra Bădescu, published by Bucharest University of Economic Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.