Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Does the shareholder salience influence the corporate social responsibility of entities from energy sector? Cover

Does the shareholder salience influence the corporate social responsibility of entities from energy sector?

Open Access
|Jul 2020

References

  1. Agle B.R., Mitchell, R. K. and Sonnenfeld, J.A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values, Academy of Management Journal, 42, 507–525.10.2307/256973
  2. Beck, C.A.; Campbell, D.; Shrives, P.J. (2010). Content analysis in environmental reporting research: Enrichment and rehearsal of the method in a British-German context, British Accounting Review, vol. 42, n. 2: 207–222.
  3. Bryson, J. (1995). Strategic planning for public and non-profit organization (Rev. Ed.), San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  4. Buysse, K., and Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective, Strategic Management Journal, 24, 453-470.10.1002/smj.299
  5. Caroll A. B. (1989). Business and society: ethics and stakeholder management, O.H.: South Western,Cincinatti.
  6. Cho, C.H. (2009). Legitimation strategies used in response to environmental disaster: A French case study of Total SA‟s Erika and AZF incidents, European Accounting Review, vol. 18, n. 1: 33–62.
  7. Clarkson, M. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance, Academy of Management Review, 20, 92-117.10.5465/amr.1995.9503271994
  8. Damak-Ayadi, S. and Pesqueux, Y. (2005). Stakeholder theory in perspective. Corporate Governance: The international Journal of Business in Society, 5-21.
  9. Donaldson. T. and Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications, Academy of Management Review, 20, 65-91.10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992
  10. Dooley, R. and Lerner, L. (1994). Pollution, profits and stakeholders: the constraining effect of economic performance on CEO concern with stakeholder expectations, Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 701–711.10.1007/BF00881329
  11. Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach, Boston: Pitman. Latest edition Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach.
  12. Gao, S.S. and Zhang, J.J. (2006). Stakeholder engagement, social auditing and corporate sustainability, Business Process Management Journal, 12, 722-740.10.1108/14637150610710891
  13. Guthrie, J. and Abeysekera, I. (2006). Using content analysis as a research method to inquire into social and environmental disclosure, Journal of Human Resource Costing and Accounting, 10, 114–126.10.1108/14013380610703120
  14. Harvey B.; Schaefer A. (2001). Managing relationships with environmental stakeholders: a study of U.K. water and electricity utilities. Journal of Business Ethics, 30, 243–260.10.1023/A:1006356928957
  15. Kaler, J. (2002). Morality and strategy in stakeholder identification, Journal of Business Ethics, 39, 91-99.10.1023/A:1016336118528
  16. Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content Analysis. An introduction to its methodology, Sage Comm Text Series, Beverly Hills, Ca.
  17. Lépineux F. (2003). Dans quelle mesure une entreprise peut-elle être responsable à l’égard de la cohésion sociale ?, Thèse de Doctorat en Sciences de Gestion, C.N.A.M., Paris.
  18. Magness, V. (2008). Who are the stakeholders now? An empirical examination of the Mitchell, Agle, and Wood theory of stakeholder salience. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 177-192.10.1007/s10551-007-9610-2
  19. Mercier S. (1999). L’éthique dans les entreprises, Editions La Découverte, collection “Repères”, Paris.
  20. Milne, M.J.; Adler, R.W. (1999). Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis, Accounting Auditing Accountability Journal, vol. 12, n. 2: 237–256.
  21. Mitchell, R. K.,Agle, B. R. and Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts, Academy of Management Review, 22, 853-886.10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105
  22. Morsing, M., Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15 (4), 323–3.10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00460.x
  23. Nutt, P.; Backoff, R. (1992). Strategic management of public and third sector organizations: a handbook for leaders, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bas.
  24. Owen, C.L, Scherer, RF, 1993, Social responsibility and market share, Review of Business, 15(1), 11-17.
  25. Parent, M.M. and Deephouse, D.L. (2007). A case study of stakeholder identification and prioritization by managers, Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 1-23.10.1007/s10551-007-9533-y
  26. Pedersen, E.R.G. (2011) All animals are equal, but…Management perceptions of stakeholder relationships and societal responsibilities in multinational corporations. Business Ethics: A European Review, 20 (2), 177–191.10.1111/j.1467-8608.2011.01618.x
  27. Pelle Culpin C. I. (1998). Du paradoxe de la diffusion d’informations environnementales par les entreprises européennes, Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Paris IX Dauphine.
  28. Ryan, L. V. and Schneider, M. (2003). Institutional investor power and heterogeneity: implications for agency and stakeholder theories, Business & Society, 42, 398-429.10.1177/0007650303260450
  29. Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22, 887–910.10.5465/amr.1997.9711022107
  30. Stephens, K.K., Malone, P. C. and Bailey, C.M. (2005). Communicating with stakeholders during a crisis: evaluating message strategies, Journal of Business Communication, 42, 390-419.10.1177/0021943605279057
  31. Ullmann A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory, a critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of US firms. The Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 540–557.
  32. Winn, M.I. and Keller, L.R. (2001). A modelling methodology for multiobjective multistakeholder decisions: Implications for research, Journal of Management Inquiry, 10, 166-182.10.1177/1056492601102020
  33. Weber, J. and Marley, K.A. (2012). In search of stakeholder salience: Exploring corporate social and sustainability reports, Business & Society, 51, 626–649.10.1177/0007650309353061
  34. Wood, D. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited, The Academy of Management Review, 16, 691–717.10.2307/258977
Language: English
Page range: 225 - 235
Published on: Jul 27, 2020
Published by: The Bucharest University of Economic Studies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year

© 2020 Bogdan-Ștefan Ionescu, Liliana Feleagă, Luminița-Mihaela Dumitraşcu, published by The Bucharest University of Economic Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.