Key factors affecting disposal of radioactive waste in the sustainable development approach
References
- Beken T., Dorn N., Van Daele S. (2010). Security risks in nuclear waste management: Exceptionalism, opaqueness and vulnerability.
Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 940-948. - Choi S., Nam H., Ko W. (2016). Environmental life cycle risk modeling of nuclear waste recycling systems,
Energy , 112, 836-851. - Davidson D.J., Freudenburg W.R. (1996). Gender and environmental risk concern - a review and analysis of available research.
Environmental Behaviour , 28, 302–339. Retrieved from10.1177/0013916596283003">http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916596283003 . - Devine-Wright P. (2011). Public engagement with large-scale renewable energy technologies: Breaking the cycle of NIMBYism.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 2 , 1(2011), 19–26. - Flynn J., Slovic P., Mertz C.K. (1994). Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks.
Risk Anal , 14, 1101-1108. - Harris J., Hassall M., Muriuki, G., Warnaar-Notschaele C., McFarland E., Ashworth P. (2018). The demographics of nuclear power: Comparing nuclear experts’, scientists’ and non- science professionals’ views of risks, benefits and values.
Energy Research & Social Science , 46, 29-30. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.035">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.035 . - Hirsch H., Becker O., Schneider M., Froggatt A. (2005). Nuclear reactor hazards. Ongoing dangers of operating nuclear technology in the 21st century.
Report prepared for Greenpeace International , Amsterdam, 128. - Lehtonen M., Kojo M., Jartti T., Litmanen T., Kari M. (2020). The roles of the state and social licence to operate? Lessons from nuclear waste management in Finland, France, and Sweden.
Energy Research & Social Science , 61. - Moser C., Stauffacher M., Smieszek T., Seidl R., Krütli P., Scholz R. (2013). Psychological factors in discounting negative impacts of nuclear waste.
Journal of Environmental Psychology , 35, 121-131. - Nguyen V.P., Yim M.-S. (2018). Examination of different socioeconomic factors that contribute to the public acceptance of nuclear energy.
Nuclear Engineering and Technology , 50(5), 767-772. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.02.005">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.02.005 . - Ramana M. (2013). Shifting strategies and precarious progress: Nuclear waste management in Canada,
Energy Policy , 61, 196-206. - Rempe N. (2007). Permanent underground repositories for radioactive waste.
Progress in Nuclear Energy , 49 (5), 365–374. Retrieved from10.1016/j.pnucene.2007.04.002">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2007.04.002 . - Segelod E. (2006). The cost of the Swedish nuclear waste program.
Progress in Nuclear Energy , 48, 314-324. - Slovic P. (1999). Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: surveying the risk-assessment battlefield.
Risk Anal , 19, 689-701. - Stefanelli A., Seidl., Siegrist M. (2017). The discursive politics of nuclear waste: Rethinking participatory approaches and public perceptions over nuclear waste storage repositories in Switzerland.
Energy Research & Social Science , 34, 72-81. - Streimikiene D. (2012). Comparison of carbon dioxide and nuclear waste storage costs in Lithuania.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , 16, 2434-2445. - Yano K., Mao K., Wharry J., Porterfield M. (2018). Investing in a permanent and sustainable nuclear waste disposal solution.
Progress in Nuclear Energy , 108, 474-479.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2020-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2558-9652
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 15
Published on: Jul 27, 2020
Published by: The Bucharest University of Economic Studies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2020 Adrian Tantau, Greta-Marilena Vitioanu, published by The Bucharest University of Economic Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.