Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Assessing operational risk while using the logic of the included middle Cover

Assessing operational risk while using the logic of the included middle

By: Răzvan Tudor  
Open Access
|Nov 2019

References

  1. Badea D., Tudor R., (2016), Operational risk assessment with Bayesian beliefs networks – successful application in other industries. New approaches that could fit Solvency 2, Retrieved February 09, 2017, from http://www.ectap.ro/supliment/international-finance-and-banking-conference-fi-ba-2016-xivth-edition/26/.
  2. Birkhoff, G., & Von Neumann, J. (1936). The Logic of Quantum Mechanics. Annals of Mathematics, 37(4), second series, 823-843. doi:10.2307/196862110.2307/1968621
  3. Brenner, J. E. (2010). The philosophical logic of Stéphane Lupasco (1900–1988). Logic and Logical Philosophy, 19(3). doi:10.12775/llp.2010.00910.12775/LLP.2010.009
  4. Cushing, J. T. (2007). Philosophical concepts in physics: The historical relation between philosophy and scientific theories. Cambridge: International Society for Science and Religion.
  5. Delegated Regulation (Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35
  6. Dumitriu, A., & Stíhi, T. (1971). Logica polivalentǎ. Editie nouǎ, complet refǎcutǎ si adǎugitǎ de autor cu colaborarea lui Teodor Stíhi. Bucuresti: Editura enciclopedieǎ românǎ.
  7. EIOPA. (2015, September 14). Guidelines on Own Risk Solvency Assessment (ORSA). Retrieved February 25, 2019, from https://eiopa.europa.eu/GuidelinesSII/EIOPA_Guidelines_on_ORSA_EN.pdf
  8. Ertas, A. (2018). Transdisciplinary engineering design process. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  9. Institute of Operational Risk, Operational Risk Sound Practice Guidance, Risk Control Self Assessment (RCSA), March 2010
  10. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2000). Choices, values, and frames. New York: Russell sage Foundation.10.1017/CBO9780511803475
  11. Legea nr. 237/2015 privind autorizarea și supravegherea activității de asigurare și reasigurare
  12. Norma nr. 4/2018 privind gestionarea riscurilor operaționale generate de sistemele informatice utilizate de entitățile autorizate/avizate/înregistrate, reglementate şi/sau supravegheate de către ASF, RO, ASF. (2018, March 19) Retrieved February 25, 2019 from https://asfromania.ro/legislatie/legislatie/6278-norma-nr-4-2018-privind-gestionarea-riscurilor-operationale-generate-de-sistemele-informaticeutilizate-de-entitatile-autorizate-avizate-inregistrate-reglementate-si-sausupravegheate-de-catre-autoritatea-de-supraveghere-financiara
  13. Lindley, D. (2008). Uncertainty: Einstein, Heisenberg, Bohr, and the struggle for the soul of science. New York: Anchor Books.
  14. Lupasco, S., 1935, Du devenir logique et de l’affectivité; Vol. 1: Le dualismeantagoniste; Vol. 2: Essai d’une nouvelle théorie de la connaissance, Paris: Vrin; 2nd edition 1973.
  15. Lupasco, S., 1947, Logique et contradiction, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  16. Lupasco, S., 1951, Le principe d’antagonisme et la logique de l’énergie, Paris: Éditions Hermann. 2nd edition Paris: Éditions du Rocher, 1987.
  17. Lupaşcu, Ş, Noica, C., & Sporici, V. (1982). Logica dinamica a contradictoriului. Bucureşti: Editura Politică.
  18. Morgan, S. 2015 Scientists show future events decide what happens in the past Retrieved February 27, 2019, from http://www.digitaljournal.com/science/experiment-shows-future-events-decide-what-happens-in-the-past/article/434829#ixzz5gjpIqyOvhttp://www.digitaljournal.com/science/experiment-shows-future-events-decide-what-happens-in-the-past/article/434829#ixzz5gjoRBq7z
  19. Potorac, A. D. (2002). Bazele proiectării circuitelor numerice. Bucureşti: Matrix Rom.
  20. Reichenbach, M. (1971). The Direction of Time.
  21. Slovic, P. & Weber, E. (2002). Perception of Risk Posed by Extreme Events. Science. Retrieved February 25, 2019 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/209805350_Perception_of_Risk_Posed_by_Extreme_Events
  22. Solvency II Directive (Directive 2009/138/EC [recast])
  23. Tudor, R., & Badea, D. (2017). Operational risk quantification and modelling within Romanian insurance industry. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence,11(1), 637-648. doi:10.1515/picbe-2017-006810.1515/picbe-2017-0068
  24. Wheeler’s delayed-choice gedanken experiment with a single atom (2015). Retrieved February 27, 2019, from http://www.nature.com/articles/nphys3343; https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys334310.1038/nphys3343
Language: English
Page range: 1204 - 1215
Published on: Nov 29, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Răzvan Tudor, published by Bucharest University of Economic Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.