Time to act: discourse on time in crowdfunding for social entrepreneurship project
References
- Adger, W.N. (2000). Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Progress in Human Geography, 24 (3), 347–364.
- Alderete, M.V. (2017). The age of prosumerism: some micro-economic analysis. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 12(3), 1-12.
- Barr, S., & Devine-Wright, P. (2012). Resilient communities: sustainabilities in transition. Local Environment, 17(5), 525-532.
- Beck, U. (1992). Risk society. Towards a new modernity. London, UK: Sage Publications.
- Burtch, G., Ghose, A., & Wattal, S. (2015). The hidden cost of accommodating crowdfunder privacy preferences: a randomized field experiment. Management Science, 61(5), 949-962.
- Burtch, G., Ghose, A., & Wattal, S. (2014). Cultural differences and geography as determinants of online prosocial lending. MIS Quarterly, 38(3), 773-794.
- Calic, G., & Mosakowski, E. (2016). Kicking off social entrepreneurship: how a sustainability orientation influences crowdfunding success. Journal of Management Studies, 53(5), 738-767.
- Cecere, G., Le Guel, F., & Rochelandet, F. (2017). Crowdfunding and social influence: an empirical investigation. Applied Economics, 49(57), 5802-5813.
- Council of the European Union (2014). Draft conclusions of the Council and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting with the Council, on a Work Plan for Culture (2015-2018). Retrieved from http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-16094-2014-INIT/en/pdf.
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Retrieved from http://www.ode.state.or.us/opportunities/grants/nclb/title_i/a_basicprograms/schoolimprovement/transformation7flow.pdf.
- Davidson, R., & Poor, N. (2015). The barriers facing artists’ use of crowdfunding platforms: personality, emotional labor, and going to the well one too many times. New Media & Society, 17(2), 289-307.
- Davis, B.C., Hmieleski, K.M., Webb, J.W., Coombs, J.E. (2017). Funders’ positive affective reactions to entrepreneurs’ crowdfunding pitches: the influence of perceived product creativity and entrepreneurial passion. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(1), 90-106.
- Flaherty, M. (2003). Time work: customizing temporal experience. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(1), 17-33.
- Fundaţia Comunitară Bucureşti (2018). Annual reports on Swimathon. Retrieved from https://fundatiacomunitarabucuresti.ro/2016/08/05/swimathonbucuresti/.
- Fundaţia Comunitară Cluj (2018). Annual reports on Swimathon. Retrieved from http://www.fundatiacomunitaracluj.ro/.
- Fundaţia Comunitară Iaşi (2018). Annual reports on Swimathon. Retrieved from https://www.fundatiacomunitaraiasi.ro/fondurile/fondul-swimathon/.
- Howe, J. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine, 14(6), 1-4.
- Kaartemo, V. (2017). The elements of a successful crowdfunding campaign: a systematic literature review of crowdfunding performance. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 15(3), 291-318.
- Kshetri, N. (2015). Success of crowd-based online technology in fundraising: an institutional Perspective. Journal of International Management, 21(2), 100-116.
- Kuppuswamy, V., & Bayus, B.L. (2017). Does my contribution to your crowdfunding project matter? Journal of Business Venturing, 32(1), 72-89.
- Lukkarinen, A., Teich, J., Wallenius, H., & Wallenius, J. (2016). Success drivers of online equity crowdfunding campaigns. Decision Support Systems, 87, 26-38.
- Mataira, P., Morelli, P., Matsuoka, J., & Uehara-McDonald, S. (2014). Shifting the paradigm: new directions for non-profits and funders in an era of diminishing resources. Social Business, 4(3), 231-244.
- Mejía-Dugand, S. (2016). The evolution of Sweden’s urban sustainability marketing tool: a comparative study of two major international events. Journal of Urban Technology, 23(2), 65-80.
- Meyskens, M., & Bird, L. (2015). Crowdfunding and value creation. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 5(2), 155-166.
- Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: an exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1-16.
- Palacios, M., Martinez-Corral, A., Nisar, A., & Grijalvo, M. (2016). Crowdsourcing and organizational forms: emerging trends and research implications. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1834-1839.
- Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: time, agency, and science. Chicago, US: University of Chicago Press.
- Preda, M. (2013). Time capital and social gravity: two new concepts for sociology of time. In Pirani, B., Smith, T. (Eds.), Body and time: bodily rhythms and social synchronism in information flood. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
- Ritzer, G., & Jurgenson, N. (2010). Production, consumption, prosumption: the nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer’. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1), 13–36.
- Rogers, J. (2015). Sustainability storylines and the politics of distribution. The International Journal of Sustainability in Economic, Social, and Cultural Context, 11(1), 13-27.
- Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. New York, US: Bantam.
- Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond societies: mobilities for the twenty-first century. London, UK: Routledge.
- Vasileiadou, E., Huijben, J., & Raven, R. (2016). Three is a crowd? Exploring the potential of crowdfunding for renewable energy in the Netherlands. Journal of Cleaner Production, 128, 142-155.
- Veit Wohlgemuth, E., & Berger, M. (2016). More than just financial performance: trusting investors in social trading. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4970-4974.
- Wooffitt, R. (2005). Conversation analysis and discourse analysis. A comparative and critical introduction. London, UK: Sage Publications.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2019-0102 | Journal eISSN: 2558-9652
Language: English
Page range: 1162 - 1172
Published on: Nov 29, 2019
Published by: Bucharest University of Economic Studies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2019 Oana Mara Stan, Mina Fanea-Ivanovici, published by Bucharest University of Economic Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.