Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Public's perception regarding the major impacts of radioactive nuclear waste. A research study in Romania Cover

Public's perception regarding the major impacts of radioactive nuclear waste. A research study in Romania

Open Access
|Jun 2018

References

  1. Andersson P., Garnier-Laplace J., Beresford N.A., Copplestone D., Howard J. B., Howe P., Oughton Deborah and Whitehouse P. (2009). Protection of the environment from ionising radiation in a regulatory context (protect): proposed numerical benchmark values. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 100(2009), 1100-1108.10.1016/j.jenvrad.2009.05.010
  2. Bond A., Bussell M., O'Sullivan P., Palerm J. (2003). Environmental Impact Assessment and the Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Plants - a Review and Suggestion for a Best Practicable Approach. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 23, (3), 197-217.10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00091-4
  3. Carl J. and Fedor D. (2017). Keeping the lights on at the American's Nuclear Power Plant, Standford, Hoover Institution at Leland Standford Junior University. CNE CANDU (2015). Retrieved from http://www.nuclearelectrica.ro/cne/relatiipublice/ghid-pentru-situatii-de-urgenta/informatii-utile/cne-candu/.
  4. Cohen L., Bernard & W. Lewis, Harold. (1984). Before It's Too Late-A Scientist's Case for Nuclear Energy. American Journal of Physics. 52. 860-860.10.1119/1.13534
  5. INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY. (2006). Stakeholder Involvement. In Nuclear Issues. Vienna: INSAG-20 / a report by the International Nuclear Safety Group.
  6. INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY. (2015). World Energy Outlook 2015. Paris, France.
  7. INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY. (2017, December). IAEA PRIS. Retrieved from www.iaea.org/PRIS/CountryStatistics/CountryDetails.aspx?current=RO.
  8. NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR NUCLEAR ACTIVITIES CONTROL. (2005). Norms related to Radioactive Waste Classification. Bucharest: The Official Monitor.
  9. Ojovan. M .I. and Lee W. E. (2014). An Introduction to Nuclear Waste Immobilisation. Second Edition. London: Elsevier, pp xiii.10.1016/B978-0-08-099392-8.00020-6
  10. ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY (NEA) in collaboration with INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION. (2003) Summary Report of the NEA Forum on Radiological Protection of the Environment: The Path Forward to a New Policy. Paris, France.
  11. ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY. (2012). The Role of Nuclear Energy in a Low-carbon Energy Future. France.
  12. Slovic P. (1987). "Perception of risk". Science 236:280-285.10.1126/science.3563507
  13. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (SDC). (2006). Landscape, environment and community impacts of nuclear power. The role of nuclear power in a low carbon economy, Chapter 3.
  14. WORLD NUCLEAR ASSOCIATION (WNA). (2016, June). World Nuclear Performance Report 2016. World IAEA PRIS publications, 001. Retrieved from http://worldnuclear.org/getmedia/b9d08b97-53f9-4450-92ff-945ced6d5471/world-nuclear-performancereport-2016.pdf.aspx.
  15. Xueliang Y., Jian Z., Rujian M., Yutao W. (2015). How would social acceptance affect nuclear power development? A study from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 163, 179-186. Retrieved from http://www.nuclearfiles.org/menu/key-issues/nuclearenergy/issues/climate-change/sustainable_development_commission_2006.pdf.10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.049
Language: English
Page range: 1012 - 1025
Published on: Jun 15, 2018
Published by: Bucharest University of Economic Studies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Greta-Marilena Vitioanu, published by Bucharest University of Economic Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.