Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Trinitarianism In Didache, Barnabas, and the Shepherd: Sketchy, Scant, or Scandalous? Cover

Trinitarianism In Didache, Barnabas, and the Shepherd: Sketchy, Scant, or Scandalous?

Open Access
|Apr 2019

Abstract

A survey of works on the development of nascent trinitarianism, especially in the last several decades, reveals that most treatments cut a wide path around three of the earliest Christian writings: Didache, Barnabas, and Shepherd of Hermas. Because these writings straddle the apostolic/post-apostolic eras (c. AD 50-150), they should be regarded as essential links in any historical account of the development of trinitarian theology. Nevertheless, these writings have sometimes been regarded as having sketchy, scant, or scandalous christologies and pneumatologies. This article argues that the typical critical estimations of these writings as nontrinitarian are under-supported by the textual evidence. Rather, Didache, Barnabas, and the Shepherd of Hermas may very well presuppose a basic christocentric and trinitarian creation-redemption narrative. Far from scandalous, these texts provide a positive link in the continuity from seminal apostolic trinitarian thought to the later trinitarian growth of the second century.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/perc-2019-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2284-7308 | Journal ISSN: 1224-984X
Language: English
Page range: 23 - 40
Published on: Apr 6, 2019
Published by: Emanuel University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2019 Michael J. Svigel, published by Emanuel University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.