Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.
Figure 8.
Figure 9.
Figure 10.
Figure 11.
Figure 12.
Figure 13.
Figure 14.
Figure 15.
Figure 16.
Figure 17.
Figure 18.
Figure 19.
Quantitative performance comparison_
| Nominal Mode | Fault 1 | Fault 2 | Fault 3 | Fault 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| THD current (%) | 0.4 | 2.02 | 21.5 | 20.6 | 32 |
| Torque ripple (%) | 0.83 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 1.2 |
| Peak current (A) | 76 | 76 | 70 | 72 | 76 |
| THD voltage (%) | 26.7 | 40 | 46.8 | 42.2 | 60 |
Comparative analysis of the proposed architectures_
| OEWIM Two-level inverter | OEWIM Two cascaded Two-level inverters | DOESWIM Two-level inverter | DOESWIM Two cascaded Two-level inverters | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of voltage level | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
| DC voltage value | E/2 | E/4 | E/2 | E/4 |
| Sizing of inverter power | P/2 | Inverter A11: P/2 | P/4 | Inverter A11: P/2 |
| Inverter A12: P/4 | Inverter A12: P/4 | |||
| Current I (A) | I | I | I/2 | I/2 |
| THD voltage (%) | 44.27 | 24.99 | 43.86 | 26.77 |
| THD current (%) | 0.52 | 0.39 | 0.66 | 0.41 |
| ∆Tem (%) | 1.26 | 0.88 | 1.66 | 0.83 |