Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.
Figure 8.
Figure 9.
Figure 10.
Figure 11.
Figure 12.
Comparison of computational time_
| Techniques | Proposed technique (ANFIS-FBSO) | CFA-ANFIS (Daweri et al., 2020) | PSO-ANFIS (Robati and Iranmanesh, 2020) | EHO-FUZZY (Drias and Drias, 2024) | GWO-FUZZY (Sun et al., 2023) | ASO (Goud and Rao, 2021) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execution time (ms) | 480 | 497 | 510 | 510 | 514 | 590 |
THD comparison between existing and proposed method_
| Method | THD level | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 7 | 11 | 13 | 17 | 19 | 23 | 25 | 29 | |
| Proposed system without compensation | 25 | 29 | 23 | 49 | 19 | 9 | 20 | 9 | 5 |
| Proposed technique (ANFIS-FBSO) | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| CFA-ANFIS (Daweri et al., 2020) | 8 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 10 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 2 |
| PSO-ANFIS (Robati and Iranmanesh, 2020) | 14 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 13 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 2 |
| EHO-FUZZY (Drias and Drias, 2024) | 23 | 15 | 16 | 20 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| GWO-FUZZY (Sun et al., 2023) | 36 | 10 | 12 | 19 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 2 |
| ASO (Goud and Rao, 2021) | 12 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 10 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
Characteristics of proposed technique_
| Parameters | Techniques | Values |
|---|---|---|
| Nominal voltage | Battery | 26.4 V |
| Rated capacity | 6.6 Ah | |
| Discharge current | 2.86 A | |
| Voltage at open-circuit conditions | PV | 64.2 V |
| Current at short circuit conditions | 5.96 A | |
| Voltage at maximum power point | 54.7 V | |
| Current at maximum power point | 5.58 A | |
| Maximum value of current | WT | 19 A |
| Maximum value of voltage | 500 V | |
| Number of membership functions | ANFIS | 5 |
| Membership function | Gaussian bell | |
| No. of populations | FBSO | 50 |
| No. of iterations | 50 | |