Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Simulation Time Reduction with 2.5D FEM Analysis for Axial Flux Machines Cover

Simulation Time Reduction with 2.5D FEM Analysis for Axial Flux Machines

Open Access
|Mar 2023

References

  1. Dedden, R. (2012). Model Order Reduction using the Discrete Empirical Interpolation Method | TU Delft Repositories. Available at: https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:6f1531d7-a956-4c70-b8af-149111a9243d. (Last accessed on March 3rd 2023).
  2. Egea, A., Almandoz, G., Poza, J. and Gonzalez, A. (2010). Axial flux machines modelling with the combination of 2D FEM and analytic tools. In: The XIX International Conference on Electrical Machines – ICEM 2010 [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/icelmach.2010.5608115.
  3. Gołębiowski, M. (2018). Functional simulation model of the axial flux permanent magnet generator – Archives of Electrical Engineering – PAS Journals. Available at: https://journals.pan.pl/dlibra/publication/124745/edition/108845/content. (Last accessed on March 3rd 2023).
  4. Gulec, M. and Aydin, M. (2017). Implementation of Different 2D Finite Element Modelling Approaches in Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Disc Machines.” IET Electric Power Applications, 12(2), pp. 195–202. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-epa.2017.0434.
  5. Guo, B., Peng, F., Khedda, D. Z., Dubas, F. and Huang, Y. (2022). Transformation between Axial- and Radial- Flux Permanent-Magnet Machines. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, pp. 1–1. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/tte.2022.3218792.
  6. Hao, Z. (2022). A Review of Axial-Flux Permanent-Magnet Motors: Topological Structures, Design, Optimization and Control Techniques. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1702/10/12/1178.
  7. Hemeida, A., Lehikoinen, A., Rasilo, P., Vansompel, H., Belahcen, A., Arkkio, A. and Sergeant, P. (2019). A Simple and Efficient Quasi-3D Magnetic Equivalent Circuit for Surface Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 66(11), pp. 8318–8333. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2018.2884212.
  8. Ishikawa, T. (2015). Design of an axial-flux type permanent-magnet generator. 2015 IEEE Magnetics Conference (INTERMAG). [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/intmag.2015.7157417.
  9. Kim, K. H. and Woo, D. K. (2022). Novel Quasi-Three-Dimensional Modeling of Axial Flux In-Wheel Motor With Permanent Magnet Skew. IEEE Access, 10, pp. 98842–98854. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3206774.
  10. Löhlein, B. (2019). Mechatronische Antriebssysteme mit PM-Synchronmaschinen und ihr Entwurf. Shaker Verlag. https://www.shaker.de/de/content/catalogue/index.asp?lang=de&ID=8&ISBN=978-3-8440-8144-2&search=yes ISBN: 978-3-8440-8144-2
  11. Lubin, T., Mezani, S. and Rezzoug, A. (2013). Development of a 2-D Analytical Model for the Electromagnetic Computation of Axial-Field Magnetic Gears. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 49(11), pp. 5507–5521. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.2013.2267746.
  12. Parviainen, A., Niemela, M. and Pyrhonen, J. (2004). Modeling of Axial Flux Permanent-Magnet Machines. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 40(5), pp. 1333–1340. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/tia.2004.834086.
  13. Ponomarev, P., Keränen, J., Lyly, M., Westerlund, J. and Råback, P. (2016). Multi-slice 2.5D modelling and validation of skewed electrical machines using open-source tools. In: 2016 IEEE Conference on Electromagnetic Field Computation (CEFC) [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/cefc.2016.7815918.
  14. Simon-Sempere, V., Simón-Gómez, A., Burgos-Payán, M. and Cerquides-Bueno, J. R. (2021). Optimisation of Magnet Shape for Cogging Torque Reduction in Axial-Flux Permanent-Magnet Motors. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 36(4), pp. 2825–2838. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/tec.2021.3068174.
  15. Smoleń (2018). Computationally efficient method for determining the most important electrical parameters of axial field permanent magnet machine. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Technical Sciences - PAS Journals, Available at: https://journals.pan.pl/dlibra/publication/125943/edition/109885/content.
  16. Using Symmetry to Reduce Model Size (no date). Available at: https://www.comsol.com/support/learning-center/article/Using-Symmetry-to-Reduce-Model-Size-49411. (Accessed on January 18th 2023).
  17. Van Der Giet, M., Schlensok, C., Schmulling, B. and Hameyer, K. (2008). Comparison of 2-D and 3-D Coupled Electromagnetic and Structure-Dynamic Simulation of Electrical Machines. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 44(6), pp. 1594–1597. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.2007.916121.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pead-2023-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2543-4292 | Journal ISSN: 2451-0262
Language: English
Page range: 100 - 108
Submitted on: Jan 8, 2023
|
Accepted on: Mar 6, 2023
|
Published on: Mar 26, 2023
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Mike Königs, Haithem Baccouche, Steffen Breser, Tobias Jöns, Bernd Löhlein, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.