Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Can the Media Discourse Surrounding the Paralympic Games Alter the Perception of Disability Held by Children With Disabilities and Their Families? Cover

Can the Media Discourse Surrounding the Paralympic Games Alter the Perception of Disability Held by Children With Disabilities and Their Families?

Open Access
|Dec 2022

References

  1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge: Perseus.
  2. Anaby, D., Hand, C., Bradley, L., Direzze, B., Forhan, M., Digiacomo, A., & Law, M. (2013). The effect of the environment on participation of children and youth with disabilities: a scoping review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 35(19), 1589–1598. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.74884010.3109/09638288.2012.74884023350759
  3. Bailey, S. (2008). Athlete first: a history of the Paralympic movement. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester. https://doi.org/10.1080/0261436090282703110.1080/02614360902827031
  4. Banas, J. A., Bessarabova, E., & Massey, Z. B. (2020). Meta-analysis on mediated contact and prejudice. Human Communication Research, 46(2–3), 120–160. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqaa00410.1093/hcr/hqaa004
  5. Barnes, C. (1992). Disabling imagery and the media: an exploration of the principles for media representations of disabled people. Keele University Press. https://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/40/library/Barnes-disabling-imagery.pdf
  6. Berg, K. L., Shiu, C. S., Msall, M. E., & Acharya, K. (2015). Victimization and depression among youth with disabilities in the US child welfare system. Child: Care, Health and Development, 41(6), 989–999. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.1223310.1111/cch.1223325761940
  7. Berger, R. J. (2008). Disability and the dedicated wheelchair athlete : beyond the “ supercrip” critique. J. Contemp. Ethnogr, 37(6), 647–678.10.1177/0891241607309892
  8. Biduski, G. M., Seron, B. B., Bertoli, J., Rossato, M., & Freitas, C. de la R. (2016). Barreiras e facilitadores para a prática de esportes adaptados na Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina [Barriers and facilitators perceived by people with disabilities that practice sports]. V Congresso Paradesportivo Internacional [V International Parasports Congress], 481–486. https://doi.org/10.19177/ren.v6e32013105-124
  9. Bond, B. J. (2020). The development and influence of parasocial relationships with television characters: a longitudinal experimental test of prejudice reduction through parasocial contact. Communication Research, 48(4), 573–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365021990063210.1177/0093650219900632
  10. Botelho, L., & Porciúncula, K. (2018). Os desafios para a produção de indicadores sobre a pessoa com deficiência – ontem, hoje e amanhã. [Challenges for the production of indicators about people with disabilities – yesterday, today and tomorrow]. In A. Simões, L. Athias, & L. Botelho (Eds.), Panorama nacional e internacional da produção de indicadores sociais. Grupos populacionais específicos e uso do tempo [National and international overview of the production of social indicators. Specific population groups and time use]. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. [Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics – IBGE], 114–167.
  11. Brasil. Senado Federal. (2010). Condições de vida das pessoas com deficiência no Brasil [Living conditions of people with disabilities in Brazil]. Brasília. Avaliable at: https://www.senado.gov.br/senado/datasenado/pdf/datasenado/DataSenado-Pesquisa-Condicao_de_vida_das_pessoas_com_deficiencia_no_Brasil.pdf
  12. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. APA handbook of research methods in psychology. Research designs: quantitative, qualitative,neuropsychological, and biological. Whashington DC: American Psycological Association, (2), 57–71.10.1037/13620-004
  13. Brittain, I., & Beacom, A. (2016). Leveraging the London 2012 Paralympic Games: what legacy for disabled people? Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 40(6), 499–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/019372351665558010.1177/0193723516655580
  14. Bush, A., Silk, M., Porter, J., & Howe, P. D. (2013). Disability [sport] and discourse: Stories within the Paralympic legacy. Reflective Practice, 14(5), 632–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2013.83572110.1080/14623943.2013.835721
  15. Campbell, F. K. (2009). Contours of ableism: the production of disability and abledness. London: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1057/9780230245181
  16. Dane-Staples, E., Lieberman, L., Ratcliff, J., & Rounds, K. (2013). Bullying experiences of individuals with visual impairment: the mitigating role of sport participation. Journal of Sport Behavior, 36(4), 365–386.
  17. Darcy, S. (2018). The paralympic movement: a small number of behemoths overwhelming a large number of also-rans – a pyramid built on quicksand? Brittain & Beacom (Eds.), Handbook of Paralympic Studies, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 218–246. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47901-310.1057/978-1-137-47901-3
  18. Davis, L. J., Sanchez, R., & Luft, A. (2021). The disability studies reader. The Disability Studies Reader. https://doi.org/10.4324/978100308258310.4324/9781003082583
  19. dos Santos, A. D. P., Ferrari, A. L. M., Medola, F. O., & Sandnes, F. E. (2022). Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairment. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 17(2), 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.176830810.1080/17483107.2020.176830832501732
  20. Francisco, R., & Marques, R. (2016). A contribuição dos Jogos Paralímpicos para a promoção da inclusão social : o discurso midiático como um obstáculo [The contribution of the Paralympic Games to the promotion of social inclusion: the media discourse as an obstacle]. Revista USP [USP Journal], n. 107, 87–96.10.11606/issn.2316-9036.v0i108p87-96
  21. Fujioka, Y. (1999). Portrayals and African – of television effects when direct. J&MC Quarterly, 76(1), 52–75.10.1177/107769909907600105
  22. Gaudenzi, P., & Ortega, F. (2016). Problematizando o conceito de deficiência a partir das noções de autonomia e normalidade [Questioning the concept of disability based on the notions of autonomy and normality]. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva [Science & Collective Health], 21(10), 3061–3070. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320152110.1664201610.1590/1413-812320152110.1664201627783779
  23. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Erving Goffman. Penguin Brooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/978042943132610.4324/9780429431326
  24. Harwood, J., Qadar, F., & Chen, C. Y. (2016). Harmonious contact: stories about intergroup musical collaboration improve intergroup attitudes. Journal of Communication, 66(6), 937–959. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.1226110.1111/jcom.12261
  25. Herek, G. M. (2007). Confronting sexual stigma and prejudice: Theory and practice. Journal of Social Issues, 63(4), 905–925. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00544.x10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00544.x
  26. Hilgemberg, T. (2014). Primeiro o esporte, depois a deficiência? Análise da cobertura midiática dos Jogos Paralímpicos de 2012 [First sport, then disability? Analysis of the media coverage of the Paralympics Games 2012], Intercom – Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Interdisciplinares da Comunicação [Intercom – Brazilian Society for Interdisciplinary Communication Studies]. 1–14.
  27. Hilgemberg, T. (2021). Corpos abjetos : a repercussão do ensaio da paratleta Camille Rodrigues na Playboy [Abject bodies: the repercussion of Camille Rodrigues’ photoshoot on Playboy magazine]. Logos, 28(2), 55–71.
  28. Hodges, C. E. M., Jackson, D., Scullion, R., Thompson, S., & Molesworth, M. (2014). Tracking changes in everyday experiences of disability and disability sport within the context of the 2012 London Paralympics. Retrived from http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/21596/1/ParaReport.pdf
  29. Hopkins, P. D. (2008). A moral vision for transhumanism. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 19(1), 3–7. https://jet-press.org/v19/hopkins.htm
  30. Hunt, P. A. (1966). Stigma: the experience of disability. London: Geoffrey Chapman.
  31. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2012). Censo demográfico (2010). Características gerais da população, religião e pessoas com deficiência [General characteristics of the population, religion and people with disabilities]. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE) [Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE)]. Avaliabre in: http://www.sidra.ibge.gov.br/bda/orcfam/default.asp
  32. Kearney, S., Brittain, I., & Kipnis, E. (2019). “Superdisabilities” vs “disabilities”? Theorizing the role of ableism in (mis)representational mythology of disability in the marketplace. Consumption Markets & Culture, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2018.156270110.1080/10253866.2018.1562701
  33. Kolotouchkina, O., Llorente-Barroso, C., García-Guardia, M. L., & Pavón, J. (2021). Disability, sport, and television: Media visibility and representation of paralympic games in news programs. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1301025610.3390/su13010256
  34. Kong, L., Gao, Z., Xu, N., Shao, S., Ma, H., He, Q., Zhang, D., Xu, H., & Qu, H. (2020). The relation between self-stigma and loneliness in visually impaired college students: Self-acceptance as mediator. Disability and Health Journal, 14(2), 101054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.10105410.1016/j.dhjo.2020.10105433358607
  35. Legood, R., Scuffham, P., & Cryer, C. (2002). Are we blind to injuries in the visually impaired? A review of the literature. Injury Prevention, 8(2), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.8.2.15510.1136/ip.8.2.155173086412120837
  36. Lemmer, G., & Wagner, U. (2005). Can we really reduce ethnic prejudice outside the lab? A meta-analysis of direct and indirect contact interventions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 72(1), 92–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.207910.1002/ejsp.2079
  37. Magalhães, R. de C. B. P., & Cardoso, A. P. L. B. (2010). A pessoa com deficiência e a crise das identidades na contemporaneidade [People with disability and identity crisis in contemporary times]. Cadernos de Pesquisa [Research Notebooks], 40(139), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-1574201000010000310.1590/S0100-15742010000100003
  38. Marmeleira, J. F. F., Fernandes, J. M. G. de A., Ribeiro, N. C., Teixeira, J. de A., & Gutierres Filho, P. J. B. (2018). Barriers to physical activity among people with visual impairment. Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Do Esporte, 40(2), 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbce.2017.12.00110.1016/j.rbce.2017.12.001
  39. Martín, R., & Vega Fuente, A. (1999). Los medios ante la discapacidad: más allá de los estereotipos [The media in the face of disability: beyond stereotypes]. Comunicar [To communicate], 6(12), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.3916/2525010.3916/C12-1999-17
  40. Martins, J. A.., & Barsaglini, R. A.. (2011). Aspects of identity in the experience of physical disabilities: A social-anthropological view. Interface: Communication, Health, Education, 15(36), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-3283201000500004310.1590/S1414-32832010005000043
  41. Martins, J. A., Merighi, M. A. B., Jesus, M. C. P. de, & Watanabe, H. A. W. (2018). Aging with physical disabilities: experience intersected by stigma, social isolation and finitude. Escola Anna Nery, 22(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-9465-ean-2018-012810.1590/2177-9465-ean-2018-0128
  42. Massey, Z. B., Wong, N. C. H., & Barbati, J. L. (2021). Meeting the (Trans)parent: test of parasocial contact with trans-gender characters on reducing stigma toward transgender people. Communication Studies, 72(2), 232–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2021.187612510.1080/10510974.2021.1876125
  43. McPherson, G., O’Donnell, H., McGillivray, D., & Misener, L. (2016). Elite athletes or superstars? Media representation of para-athletes at the Glasgow 2014 Commonwealth Games. Disability and Society, 31(5), 659–675. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.119782310.1080/09687599.2016.1197823
  44. Mello, A. G. de, Carniel, F., & Block, P. (2021). Quem escreve pela deficiência na sociologia brasileira? [Who writes for disability in Brazilian Social Theory?] Contemporânea – Revista de Sociologia da UFSCar [Contemporânea – UFSCar Journal of Sociology ], 11(2), 490–525. https://doi.org/10.4322/2316-1329.202100110.4322/2316-1329.2021001
  45. Nelson, J. A. (1994). The Disabled, the media, and the information age. Westport, Conn : Greenwood Press. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v42i0.8745410.47197/retos.v42i0.87454
  46. Oliveira, A. P. V. de, Poffo, B. N., & Souza, D. L. de. (2019). “É melhor ser super-herói do que ser a vítima”: um estudo sobre a percepção de atletas e ex-atletas com deficiência visual sobre a cobertura midiática [Better a superhero than a victim’: a study about perceptions by athletes and former athletes with visual impairment about media coverage]. Movimento [Movement] (ESEFID/UFRGS), 24(4), 1179. https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8918.8423710.22456/1982-8918.84237
  47. Oliver, M. (2004). The social model in action: if I had a hammer. Implementing the Social Model of Disability: Theory and Research, 32(2), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.1249710.1111/bioe.1249730106163
  48. Ortiz, M., & Harwood, J. (2007). A social cognitive theory approach to the effects of mediated intergroup contact on intergroup attitudes. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 51(4), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/0883815070162648710.1080/08838150701626487
  49. Paolini, S., Harwood, J., & Rubin, M. (2010). Negative intergroup contact makes group memberships salient: Explaining why intergroup conflict endures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(12), 1723–1738. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616721038866710.1177/014616721038866721051766
  50. Park, S. Y. (2012). Mediated Intergroup Contact: Concept Explication, Synthesis, and Application. Mass Communication and Society, 15(1), 136–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2011.55880410.1080/15205436.2011.558804
  51. Pérez-Garín, D., Recio, P., & Molero, F. (2021). Consequences of perceived personal and group discrimination against people with hearing and visual impairments. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(17), 9064.10.3390/ijerph18179064843057934501653
  52. Pérez-Garín, D., Recio, P., Magallares, A., Molero, F., & García-Ael, C. (2018). Perceived Discrimination and Emotional Reactions in People with Different Types of Disabilities: A Qualitative Approach. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 21(12), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2018.1310.1017/sjp.2018.1329759090
  53. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediatorsy. European Journal of Social Psychology Eur., 38(6), 922–934. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.50410.1002/ejsp.504
  54. Ploeg, H. P. van der, Beek, A. J. van der B., Woude, L. H. V. van der, & Mechelen, W. van. (2004). Physical activity for people with a disability. Sports Med, 34(10), 639–649. https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-09-19-506010.31128/AJGP-09-19-506032233342
  55. Poffo, B. N., Velasco, A. P., Kugler, A. G., Furtado, S., Dos Santos, S. M., Fermino, A. L., & De Souza, D. L. (2017). Mídia e Jogos Paralímpicos no Brasil: investigando estigmas na cobertura jornalística da Folha de S. Paulo [Media and Paralympic Games in Brazil: investigating stigma in Folha de S. Paulo’s coverage]. Movimento [Movement], 23(4), 1353–1366. https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8918.6794510.22456/1982-8918.67945
  56. Quinn, D. M., Williams, M. K., Quintana, F., Gaskins, J. L., Overstreet, N. M., Pishori, A., Earnshaw, V. A., Perez, G., & Chaudoir, S. R. (2014). Examining effects of anticipated stigma, centrality, salience, internalization, and outness on psychological distress for people with concealable stigmatized identities. PLoS One, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.009697710.1371/journal.pone.0096977401620124817189
  57. Ramasubramanian, S., & Costantini, R. (2020). Intergroup Contact. Jan Van den Bulck (Eds.). The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119011071.iemp020410.1002/9781119011071.iemp0204
  58. Saleem, M., & Anderson, C. A. (2013). Arabs as terrorists: effects of stereotypes within violent contexts on attitudes, perceptions, and affect. Psychology of Violence, 3(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/a003003810.1037/a0030038
  59. Schiappa, E., Gregg, P. B., & Hewes, D. E. (2005). The parasocial contact hypothesis. Communication Monographs, 72(1), 92–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/036377505200034254410.1080/0363775052000342544
  60. Seron, B. B., Arruda, G. A. De, & Greguol, M. (2015). Facilitadores e barreiras percebidas para a prática de atividade física por pessoas com deficiência motora [Perceived facilitators and barreirs to physical activity for people with disabilities]. Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Do Esporte [Brazilian Journal of Sports Sciences], 37(3), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbce.2013.09.00310.1016/j.rbce.2013.09.003
  61. Shakespeare, T. (2010). The Social Model of Disability. New York: The Disability Studies Reader, 266–273.
  62. Silva, C. F., & Howe, P. D. (2012). The (in)validity of supercrip representation of paralympian athletes. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 36(2), 174–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/019372351143386510.1177/0193723511433865
  63. Silva, L. M. da. (2006). O estranhamento causado pela deficiência: preconceito e experiência [The estrangement caused by disability: prejudice and experience]. Revista Brasileira de Educação [Brazilian Journal of Education], 11(33), 424–434. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-2478200600030000410.1590/S1413-24782006000300004
  64. Smith-Chandler, N., & Swart, E. (2014). In their own voices: Methodological considerations in narrative disability research. Qualitative Health Research, 24(3), 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973231452384110.1177/104973231452384124572012
  65. Souza, D. L., & Brittain, I. (2020). The Rio 2016 Paralympic Games: The Visibility of People With Disabilities in Brazil as a Possible Legacy. Communication and Sport, 10(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/216747952094273910.1177/2167479520942739
  66. Souza, D. L., Colere, J., & Vieira, Y. V. (2021). O contato com o esporte paralímpico como um meio para a mudança de percepção [Contact with Paralympic sport as a means to change children’s perception of people with disabilities]. Retos, 20(41), 396–405. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v42i0.8745410.47197/retos.v42i0.87454
  67. Titchkosky, T., & Michalko, R. (2009). Rethinking Normalcy: A Disability Studies Reader. Canadian Scholars’Press, 354.
  68. Vieira, Y. V., Colere, J., & Souza, D. L. (2021). Facilitadores e barreiras para a prática esportiva por parte de atletas com comprometimentos no Brasil [Facilitators and barriers for sports practice by athletes with impairments in Brazil]. Retos, 41, 812–822. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v41i0.8549710.47197/retos.v41i0.85497
  69. Wahat, N. W. A., Ahrari, S., D’Silva, J. L., Mohamed, N., & Hassan, S. A. (2021). Validity and reliability of a self-acceptance scale for youth with physical disabilities. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 29, 57–75. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.s1.0410.47836/pjssh.29.s1.04
  70. Wendell, S. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of disability. Sherwin, S.; Parish, B. Women, Medicine, Ethics and the Law, 373–394. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003073789-1810.4324/9781003073789-18
  71. Wojcieszak, M., & Azrout, R. (2016). I saw you in the news: mediated and direct intergroup contact improves outgroup attitudes. Journal of Communication, 66(6), 1032–1060. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.1226610.1111/jcom.12266
  72. World Health Organization. (2011). Summary: World report on disability 2011. World Health, 1–24 www.who.int/about/licensing/copyright_form/en/index.html%0Ahttp://www.larchetoronto.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/launch-of-World-Report-on-Disability-Jan-27-121.pdf
  73. Zhang, L., & Haller, B. (2013). Consuming image: how mass media impact the identity of people with disabilities. Communication Quarterly, 61(3), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2013.77698810.1080/01463373.2013.776988
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pcssr-2022-0023 | Journal eISSN: 1899-4849 | Journal ISSN: 2081-2221
Language: English
Page range: 53 - 64
Submitted on: Jul 26, 2022
Accepted on: Dec 12, 2022
Published on: Dec 30, 2022
Published by: Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Jackeline Colere, Yasmin Vicente Vieira, Doralice Lange de Souza, published by Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.