Differences in the Perceived Attractiveness of Non-contact and Combative Athletes' Facial Pictures

Vajda, Petr; Strašilová, Kateřina; Reguli, Zdenko

doi:10.2478/pcssr-2019-0006

Abstract

Female mating strategies and partner preferences are influenced by many factors. Depending on the life context, the preference for either a long-term or a short-term relationship, the willingness to have off-spring, or the current fertility conditions can be key factors. Differences can largely be traced to the perception of physical masculinity and the ability to provide and raise offspring. This study seeks to obtain data that will help to describe changes in the female perception of the attractiveness of facial photographs of male elite golfers (non-contact sport) and MMA fighters (combative sport) in connection with the following factors: age, sexual activity/passivity, use of hormonal contraceptives, duration of actual relation-ship, and number of children. Data for this study were collected using an anonymous questionnaire that included photos of the athletes in a random order and a 1-10 rating scale (10 indicating the most attractive). The research sample consisted of 1,035 female participants. The statistical significance was analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests, Eta2, and Cohen's d for the average ratings of the contact and non-contact athletes. The female participants slightly preferred the golfers’ pictures. This preference grew significantly with age and number of children. A possible explanation for these results may be the participants’ decreasing fertility or the willingness to have another child in the Czech socio-culture. In such cases, the strong masculine features typical of combative athletes could be less important. In contrast to some earlier findings, contraceptive use did not affect the perception of male attractiveness compared to the entire sample's average ratings, furthermore, neither did sexual activity/passivity.

References

Alvergne, A., & Lummaa, V. (2010). Does the contraceptive pill alter mate choice in humans? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25(3), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.08.00310.1016/j.tree.2009.08.003
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Baker, R.R. (1993). Human sperm competition: copulation, masturbation, and infertility. London: Chapman and Hall.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brown, M., & Sacco, D.F. (2017). Unrestricted sociosexuality predicts preferences for extraverted male faces. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 123–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.12.02310.1016/j.paid.2016.12.023
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brown, M., Sacco, D.F., & Medlin, M.M. (2019). Sociosexual attitudes differentially predict men and women’s preferences for agreeable male faces. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 248–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.01.02710.1016/j.paid.2019.01.027
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Buss, D.M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(01), 1. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0002399210.1017/S0140525X00023992
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Buss, D. M. (1998). Sexual Strategies Theory: Historical Origins and Current Status. Journal of Sex Research, 35(1), 19–31.10.1080/00224499809551914
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Buss, D.M., & Schmitt, D.P. (1993). Sexual Strategies Theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.20410.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Carre, J.M., & McCormick, C.M. (2008). In your face: facial metrics predict aggressive behavior in the laboratory and in varsity and professional hockey players. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275, 2651–2656. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.087310.1098/rspb.2008.0873
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Carré, J.M., McCormick, C.M., & Mondloch, C.J. (2009). Facial Structure Is a Reliable Cue of Aggressive Behavior. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1194–1198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02423.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cashdan, E. (1996). Women’s mating strategies. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 5(4), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(1996)5:4<134::AID-EVAN3>3.0.CO;2-G10.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(1996)5:4<;134::AID-EVAN3>3.0.CO;2-G
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ČSÚ. (2018). Aktuální populační vývoj v kostce /Current population development in a nutshell/. Retrieved from https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/aktualni-populacni-vyvoj-v-kostce 1 z
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1989). Human ethology. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Escasa-Dorne, M.J., Manlove, H., & Gray, P.B. (2017). Women Express a Preference for Feminized Male Faces after Giving Birth. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 3(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-016-0048-610.1007/s40750-016-0048-6
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gildersleeve, K., Haselton, M.G., & Fales, M.R. (2014). Do women’s mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(5), 1205–1259. https://doi.org/10.1037/a003543810.1037/a0035438
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gladue, B.A., & Delaney, H.J. (1990). Gender Differences in Perception of Attractiveness of Men and Women in Bars. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 16(2), 378.10.1177/0146167290162017
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Huh, H., Yi, D., & Zhu, H. (2014). Facial width-to-height ratio and celebrity endorsements. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.04410.1016/j.paid.2014.03.044
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kelly, S., & Dunbar, R.I.M. (2001). Who dares, wins. Human Nature, 12(2), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-001-1018-610.1007/s12110-001-1018-6
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kramer, R.S.S. (2015). Facial Width-to-Height Ratio in a Large Sample of Commonwealth Games Athletes. Evolutionary Psychology, 13(1), 147470491501300. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491501300112
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kruger, D.J. (2006). Male facial masculinity influences attributions of personality and reproductive strategy. Personal Relationships, 13(4), 451–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00129.x10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00129.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lefevre, C.E., Lewis, G.J., Perrett, D.I., & Penke, L. (2013). Telling facial metrics: facial width is associated with testosterone levels in men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(4), 273–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.03.00510.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.03.005
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lewis, G.J., Lefevre, C.E., & Bates, T.C. (2012). Facial width-to-height ratio predicts achievement drive in US presidents. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(7), 855–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.03010.1016/j.paid.2011.12.030
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Little, A.C., Burt, D.M., Penton-Voak, I.S., & Perrett, D.I. (2001). Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 268(1462), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.132710.1098/rspb.2000.1327
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Little, A.C., Jones, B.C., Penton-Voak, I.S., Burt, D.M., & Perrett, D.I. (2002). Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 269(1496), 1095–1100. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.198410.1098/rspb.2002.1984
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Little, Anthony C., Třebický, V., Havlíček, J., Roberts, S.C., & Kleisner, K. (2015). Human perception of fighting ability: facial cues predict winners and losers in mixed martial arts fights. Behavioral Ecology, 26(6), 1470–1475. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv08910.1093/beheco/arv089
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mileva, V.R., Cowan, M.L., Cobey, K.D., Knowles, K.K., & Little, A.C. (2014). In the face of dominance: Self-perceived and other-perceived dominance are positively associated with facial-width-to-height ratio in men. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 115–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.05.01910.1016/j.paid.2014.05.019
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Penton-Voak, I.S., & Perrett, D.I. (2001). Male facial attractiveness: Perceived personality and shifting female preferences for male traits across the menstrual cycle. In Advances in the Study of Behavior (Vol. 30, pp. 219–259). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(01)80008-510.1016/S0065-3454(01)80008-5
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Penton-Voak, I.S., Jacobson, A., & Trivers, R. (2004). Populational differences in attractiveness judgements of male and female faces. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(6), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.06.00210.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.06.002
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Postma, E. (2014). A relationship between attractiveness and performance in professional cyclists. Biology Letters, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2013.096610.1098/rsbl.2013.0966
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Puts, D.A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(3), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.00510.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.005
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Puts, D.A., Jones, B.C., & DeBruine, L.M. (2012). Sexual Selection on Human Faces and Voices. The Journal of Sex Research, 49(2–3), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.65892410.1080/00224499.2012.658924
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rhodes, G., Simmons, L.W., & Peters, M. (2005). Attractiveness and sexual behavior: Does attractiveness enhance mating success? Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(2), 186–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.08.01410.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.08.014
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Smoliga, J.M., & Zavorsky, G.S. (2015). Faces and fitness: attractive evolutionary relationship or ugly hypothesis? Biology Letters, 11(11), 20150839. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0839
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vajda, P. (2017). Perception of facial attractivity of non-contact and combative athletes. In Proceedings of the 11^th International Conference on Kinanthropology.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vajda, P., & Reguli, Z. (2018). Sexual Behaviour of Combative Athletes – Is There a Greater Risk? Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research, 78(1), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.2478/pcssr-2018-001310.2478/pcssr-2018-0013
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Waynforth, D., Delwadia, S., & Camm, M. (2005). The influence of women’s mating strategies on preference for masculine facial architecture. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(5), 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.03.00310.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.03.003
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Weiss, P. (2010). Sexuologie. Praha: Grada.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Differences in the Perceived Attractiveness of Non-contact and Combative Athletes' Facial Pictures

Abstract

Paradigm

My account