References
- Ablonczay, B. (2006): „Lándzsahegy”, néprokonság, small talk [“Spearhead,” ethnic kinship, small talk]. In: Pritz, P., Zeidler, M. & Sipos, B. (Eds): Magyar külpolitikai gondolkodás a 20. században [Hungarian foreign policy thinking in the 20th century]. Budapest: Magyar Történelmi Társulat, 60–74.
- Adamczyk, W. (2023): Investigative Journalism in the Era of a Crisis of Democracy: The Example of Hungary. Barometr Regionalny. Analizy i Prognozy, 19(1), 83–93.
- Adler, E. (2008): The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s Post—Cold War Transformation. European Journal of International Relations, 14(2), 195–230.
- Almond, G. (1960): The American People and Foreign Policy. New York: Praeger.
- Almond, G. A. (1956): Public Opinion and National Security. Public Opinion Quarterly, 20(2), 371–378.
- Balogh, P. (2022): Clashing geopolitical self-images? The strange co-existence of Christian bulwark and Eurasianism (Turanism) in Hungary. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 63(6), 726–752.
- Bán, Z. (2014): A német autóipar és az innovációs lemaradás problémája [The German Automotive Industry and the Problem of Innovation Lag]. HOLDBlog, <accessed online: https://hold.hu/holdblog/nemet-autoipar-tudasdeficit-europai-unio-gazdasag>.
- Bartha, D. (2018): Brussels cannot fire Hungary – Foreign policy of the new Orbán government. Centre for Euro-Atlantic Integration and Democracy, CEID, <accessed online: https://www.ceid.hu/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ceid-Perspectives-Foreign-policy-2018.pdf>.
- Baum, M.A. & Potter, P. B. K. (2015): War and Democratic Constraint: How the Public Influences Foreign Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Bibó, I. (2015): The Miseries of East European Small States. In: Dénes, Iván Z. & Pásztor, Péter (Eds): The Art of Peacemaking: Political Essays by István Bibó. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 130–180.
- Bieber, F. (2018): Patterns of competitive authoritarianism in the Western Balkans. East European Politics, 34(3), 337–354.
- Bíró-Nagy, A. (2017): Illiberal democracy in Hungary: The social background and practical steps of building an illiberal state. In: Morillas, P. (Ed.): Illiberal democracies in the EU: The Visegrad Group and the risk of disintegration. Barcelona: Barcelona Centre for International Affairs (CIDOB), 31–44.
- Bíró-Nagy, A., Juhász, V., Szászi, Á. & Varga, A. (2023): The World Through Hungarian Eyes – Foreign Policy Attitudes in Hungary in 2024. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung –PolicySolutions, <accessed online: https://www.policysolutions.hu/userfiles/elemzes/361/policy_solutions_the_world_through_hungarian_eyes_2024.pdf>.
- Boda, Zs. (2020): Ki dönt? Kormányzási stílusok és közpolitikai változás Magyarországon 2002–2014 [Who Decides? Governance Styles and Policy Change in Hungary, 2002–2014]. Budapest: Gondolat Kiadó.
- Braun, E., Kiss, T. & Sebestyén, T. (2020): A magyar járműipar kapcsolati szerkezetének vizsgálata: A német járműipartól való függőség alakulása [Analysis of the relationship structure of Hungary’s motor vehicle sector: The change in dependency on the German sector]. Közgazdasági Szemle, LXVII(6), 557–584.
- Deák, I. (2022): A kormányzat által létrehozott nem kormányzati szervezetek típusai [Types of Non-Governmental Organizations Created by the Government]. Pro Futuro, 12(2), 141–158.
- Deregözü, M. (2019): Hungary & Russia – Who really wants what? Köz-Gazdaság, 14(3), 227–238.
- Dreher, R. (2023): Viktor Orbán: West is ‘in a war with Russia.’ The American Conservative, <accessedonline:https://www.theamericanconservative.com/viktor-orban-we-are-in-a-war--with-russia>.
- Dudlák, T. (2023): Béke minden áron: Oroszország ukrajnai inváziója a magyar kormány diskurzusában [Peace at all costs: Hungarian Foreign Policy Discourse and the Russo-Ukrainian War]. Pólusok/Polarities, 4(2), 56–79.
- Efimova, A. & Strebkov, D. (2020): Linking Public Opinion and Foreign Policy in Russia. The International Spectator, 55(1), 93–111.
- Eichenberg, R. C. (2016): Public Opinion on Foreign Policy Issues. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Esen, B. & Gumuscu, S. (2016): Rising competitive authoritarianism in Turkey. Third World Quarterly, 37(9), 1581–1606.
- Farkas, Z. A., Pap, N. & Reményi, P. (2016): Hungary’s place on Eurasian rail land bridges and the Eastern Opening. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 65(1), 3–14.
- Flockhart, T. (2016): Constructivism and foreign policy. In: Smith, S., Hadfield, A. & Dunne, T. (Eds): Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 79–94.
- Forgas, J. P. & Williams, K. D. (2016): Social Influence. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315783031
- Gaston, S. & Aspinall, E. (2021): UK Public Opinion on Foreign Policy and Global Affairs: Annual Survey – 2021. British Foreign Policy Group, <accessed online: https://yorkshirebylines.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/BFPG-Annual-Survey-2021-Embargoed-00.01-17-02-Low-Res3876.pdf>.
- Gazdag, F. (2018): Három évtized magyar külpolitikája (1989–2018) [Three Decades of Hungarian Foreign Policy (1989–2018)]. Budapest: Ludovika Kiadó.
- Gizińska, I. & Sadecki, A. (2023): Hungary’s strained relations with the US: betting it all on Trump. Centre for Eastern Studies (OSW) – Commentary, 554, 1–5.
- Gizińska, I. & Uznańska, P. (2024): China’s European bridgehead. Hungary’s dangerous relationship with Beijing. Centre for Eastern Studies (OSW) – OSW Commentary, 590, 1–7.
- Gourevitch, P. (1986): Politics in Hard Times. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
- Griffen, S. (2020): Hungary: a lesson in media control. British Journalism Review, 31(1), 57–62.
- Hajdu, D., Klingová, K., Szicherle, P., Kazaz, J. & Musilová, V. (2024): Globsec Trends 2024: CEE – A Brave New Region? Globsec, <accessed online: https://www.globsec.org/what-we-do/publications/globsec-trends-2024-cee-brave-new-region>.
- Herner-Kovács, E. (2014): Nation Building Extended: Hungarian Diaspora Politics. Minority Studies, 17, 55–67.
- Hettyey, A. (2022): The illusion of autonomy and new others: role conflict and Hungarian foreign policy after 2010. Journal of International Relations and Development, 25(1), 260–294.
- Higgins, A. (2023): Orban’s Dream of an Illiberal Pan-European Alliance Is Fading. The New York Times, 8 November, <accessed online: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/08/world/europe/viktor-orban-hungary-europe-alliance.html>.
- Higgins, A. (2024): Hungary’s Parliament Approves Sweden’s NATO Bid After Stalling. The New York Times, 26 February, <accessed online: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/26/world/europe/sweden-nato-hungary.html>.
- Holsti, O. R. (1992): Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Challenges to the Almond-Lippmann Consensus Mershon. International Studies Quarterly, 36(4), 439–466.
- Jeszenszky, G. (2002): A magyar külpolitika fő irányai a század utolsó évtizedében [The Main Directions of Hungarian Foreign Policy in the Last Decade of the Century]. In: Pritz, P., Zeidler, M. & Sipos, B. (Eds): Magyarország helye a 20. századi Európában [Hungary’s Place in 20th--Century Europe]. Budapest: Magyar Történelmi Társulat, 169–184.
- Kákai, L. (2013): Nemzeti Civil Alapprogram és Nemzeti Együttműködési Alap: Hasonlóságok és különbségek a régi és az új támogatási alapok között [National Civil Fund and National Cooperation Fund: Similarities and Differences Between the Old and New Support Funds]. Civil Szemle, 10(3), 45–71.
- Kákai, L. & Glied, V. (2017): Sketch of the Hungarian non-profit sector after the regime change. Civil Szemle, 14(3), 13–33.
- Katzenstein, P. (1985): Small States in World Markets. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1985.
- Kertzer, J. D. (2023): Public opinion about foreign policy. In: Huddy, L., Sears, D. O., Lavy, J. S. & Jerit, J. (Eds): The Handbook of Political Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 447–485.
- Kleinberg, K. B. (2022): Public opinion surveys. In: Mello, P. A. & Ostermann, F. (Eds): Routledge Handbook of Foreign Policy Analysis Methods. London: Routledge, 370–384.
- Koenen, K. (2023): Hungary on its own path. Geopolitical Intelligence Services AG, <accessed online:https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/hungary-foreign-policy>.
- Krekó, P. (2015): Turn towards the East or a new equilibrium? Matters of debate in Hungarian foreign policy. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, 3–23.
- Krekó, P. (2018): Oroszország a magyar közvéleményben [Russia in the Hungarian public opinion]. In: Társadalmi Riport 2018. Budapest: TÁRKI, 382–396.
- Levitsky, S. & Way, L. A. (2002): Elections Without Democracy: The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 51–65.
- Lippmann, W. (1955): Essays in the Public Philosophy. Boston: Little, Brown.
- Matolcsy, G. (2023): Magyar jövőkép és stratégia – 2010–2030 [Hungarian vision and strategy – 2010–2030]. Budapest: Pallas Athéné Könyvkiadó.
- Milo, D., Klingová, K. & Hajdú, D. (2017): Globsec Trends 2017, <accessed online: https://www.globsec.org/sites/default/files/2017-09/globsec_trends_2017.pdf>.
- Morgenthau, H. (1948): Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace. New York: A.A. Knopf.
- Müller, P. & Gazsi, D: (2023): Populist Capture of Foreign Policy Institutions: The Orbán Government and the De-Europeanization of Hungarian Foreign Policy. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 61(2), 397–415.
- Orbán, B. (2023): Hussar Cut: The Hungarian Strategy for Connectivity. Budapest: MCC Press.
- Orenstein, M.A. & Kelemen, R. D. (2017): Trojan Horses in EU Foreign Policy. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(1), 87–102.
- Page, B. I. & Shapiro, R. Y. (1992): The rational public: Fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Panyi, S. (2020): How Orbán played Germany, Europe’s great power. Direkt36, <accessed online: https://www.direkt36.hu/en/a-magyar-nemet-kapcsolatok-rejtett-tortenete>.
- Pap, N. & Kitanics, M. (2014): Hungary and the Balkans. Megatrend Revija, 11(4), 219–240.
- Pew Research Center (2009): End of Communism Cheered but Now with More Reservations. Pew Research Center, <accessed online: https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2009/11/02/chapter-9-rating-the-eu-and-nato/>.
- Powlick, P. J. & Katz, A. Z. (1992): Defining the American Public Opinion/Foreign Policy Nexus. Mershon International Studies Review, 42(1), 29–61.
- Pritz, P. (2002): Magyarország helye a 20. századi Európában [Hungary’s place in 20th-century Europe]. In: Pritz, P., Zeidler, M. & Sipos, B. (Eds): Magyarország helye a 20. századi Európában [Hungary’s place in 20th-century Europe]. Budapest: Magyar Történelmi Társulat, 27–50.
- Pritz, P. (2006): Magyar külpolitikai gondolkodás a 20. században [Hungarian foreign policy thinking in the 20th century]. In: Pritz, P., Sipos, B. & Zeidler, M. (Eds): Magyar külpolitikai gondolkodás a 20. században [Hungarian foreign policy thinking in the 20th century]. Budapest: Magyar Történelmi Társulat, 4–38.
- Rényi, P. D. (2015): D. Kinizsi fekete serege [D. Kinizsi’s Black Army]. Magyar Narancs, <accessed online:https://magyarnarancs.hu/belpol/d-kinizsi-fekete-serege-93029>.
- Rényi, P. D. (2022): Ugyanolyan rossz véleménnyel vannak a magyarok Ukrajnáról, mint Oroszországról [Hungarians Have an Equally Negative Opinion of Ukraine as They Do of Russia]. 444, 9 May, <accessed online: https://444.hu/2022/05/09/ugyanolyan-rossz-velemennyel--vannak-a-magyarok-ukrajnarol-mint-oroszorszagrol>.
- Risse-Kappen, T. (1991): Public Opinion, Domestic Structure, and Foreign Policy in Liberal Democracies. World Politics, 43(4), 479–512.
- Rosenau, J. (1980): The Study of Global Interdependence: Essays on the Transnationalisation of World Affairs. New York: Nichols.
- Schlipphak, B. & Treib, O. (2017): Playing the blame game on Brussels: the domestic political effects of EU interventions against democratic backsliding. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(3), 352–365.
- Schmidt, A. & Glied, V. (2024): Pragmatic foreign policy of Hungary in the shadow of the Russian--Ukrainian war. Eastern Journal of European Studies, 15 (Special Issue), 247–267.
- Skonieczny, A. (2017): Corporate Lobbying in Foreign Policy. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–24.
- Standard Eurobarometer (2009): Standard Eurobarometer 71 – Spring. European Union, <accessed online: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/829>.
- Stumpf, A. (2024): Németh Zsolt: „Ha nem lennénk NATO-tagok, jelenleg nem Ukrajna védekezne egy orosz támadással szemben, hanem mi” [Zsolt Németh: “If We Were Not NATO Members, It Would Not Be Ukraine Defending Against a Russian Attack, but Us.”]. Válasz Online, 8 May, <accessedonline:https://www.valaszonline.hu/2024/05/08/nemeth-zsolt-nato-ukrajna--oroszorszag-magyar-atlanti-tanacs-konferencia-szuverenitas>.
- Stumpf, I. (2009): Az állam újrafelfedezése és a neoweberiánus állam [The rediscovery of the state and the neo-Weberian state]. In: Virág, G. (Ed): OKRI Szemle. Budapest: Országos Kriminológiai Intézet, 110–124.
- Stumpf, I. (2016): Reinventing government and the separation of powers. Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 77(1), 42–58.
- Tang, W. (2005): Public Opinion and Political Change in China. New York: Stanford University Press.
- TÁRKI (2000): Elemzések a gazdasági és társadalompolitikai döntések előkészítéséhez 10 [Analyses for the Preparation of Economic and Social Policy Decisions 10]. TÁRKI, <accessed online: https://www.tarki.hu/adatbank-h/kutjel/pdf/a102.pdf>.
- Tarrósy, I. & Solymári, D. (2022): Relations with the Global South, solidarity and pragmatism in Hungarian foreign policy since the 1960s – a focus on Africa. Eastern Journal of European Studies, 13(1), 106–122.
- TASZ (2024): KESMA-per: Kérdések és válaszok [KESMA Lawsuit: Questions and Answers]. Hungarian Civil Liberties Union,<accessedonline:https://tasz.hu/kesma-per-kerdesek-es--valaszok>.
- Varga, M. & Buzogány, A. (2021): The Foreign Policy of Populists in Power: Contesting Liberalism in Poland and Hungary. Geopolitics, 26(5), 1442–1463.
- Venne, F. (2022): China in Hungary: Real Threat or False Alarm? In Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA) (17+1). CEPA, <accessed online: https://cepa.org/comprehensive-reports/china-in-hungary-real-threat-or-false-alarm>.
- Visnovitz, P. & Jenne, E. K. (2021): Populist argumentation in foreign policy: the case of Hungary under Viktor Orbán, 2010–2020. Comparative European Politics, 19(6), 683–702.
- Waisová, Š. (2020): Central Europe in the new Millennium: The new Great Game? US, Russian and Chinese interests and activities in Czechia, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia. UNISCI Journal, 18(54), 29–48.
- Wajner, D. F. & Giurlando, P. (2023): Introduction to populist foreign policy (PFP). In: Populist Foreign Policy. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 1–35.
- Walt, S. M. (1998): International Relations: One World, Many Theories. Foreign Policy, 110, 29–46.
- Wittkopf, E. R. (1990): Faces of Internationalism: Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy. Duke University Press.
- Wu, Q. M. (2024): The embrace and resistance of Chinese battery investments in Hungary: The case of CATL. Asia Europe Journal, 22(2), 201–223.
- Zaller, J. R. (1992): The Nature and Origins of Mass Public Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Zimmerman, W. (2002): The Russian People and Foreign Policy: Russian Elite and Mass Perspectives, 1993–2000. Princeton: Princeton University Press.