Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Converging Narratives on the European Green Deal: Polarised Homogeneity in Central European MEPs’ Facebook Discourse Cover

Converging Narratives on the European Green Deal: Polarised Homogeneity in Central European MEPs’ Facebook Discourse

By: Piotr Walewicz  
Open Access
|Dec 2025

References

  1. Aral, Ö. H. & López-Sintas, J. (2023): Environmental behavior patterns across clusters of European Union countries: Uncovering heterogeneity in the attitude-behavior-context relationship. Journal of Cleaner Production, 388, 135936.
  2. Barton Hronešová, J. & Kreiss, D. (2024): Strategically Hijacking Victimhood: A Political Communication Strategy in the Discourse of Viktor Orbán and Donald Trump. Perspectives on Politics, 22(3), 717–735.
  3. Bomberg, E. (1998): Green parties and politics in the European Union. London: Routledge.
  4. Bouza García, L. (2017): Introduction: a narrative turn in European studies. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 25(3), 285–290.
  5. Brosch, T. (2021): Affect and emotions as drivers of climate change perception and action: a review. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 42, 15–21.
  6. Brosch, T. & Sauter, D. (2023): Emotions and the Climate Crisis: A Research Agenda for an Affective Sustainability Science. Emotion Review, 15(4), 253–257.
  7. Chabada, T., Krajhanzl, J., Lechnerová, Z., Protivínský, T., Dědinová, T., Modráková, T., & Tabášková, A. (2023): Slovenská klíma, transformácia a Green Deal 2023. Institut 2050, <accessed online: https://institut2050.cz/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/SKTGD2023-11.pdf>.
  8. Czarniawska, B. (2004): Narratives in Social Science Research. London: SAGE.
  9. Davies, W. (2020): Green Populism? Action and Mortality in the Anthropocene. Environmental Values, 29(6), 647–668.
  10. De Vries, C. E. (2018): Euroscepticism and the Future of European Integration. Oxford: Oxford Academic.
  11. European Commission (2023): Special Eurobarometer 538: Climate Change. Publications Office of the European Union, <accesssed online: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2834/653431>.
  12. Fairclough, N. & Fairclough, I. (2012): Political Discourse Analysis: A method for advanced students. New York: Routledge.
  13. Falkenberg, M., Galeazzi, A., Torricelli, M., Di Marco, N., Larosa, F., Sas, M., Mekacher, A., Pearce, W., Zollo, F., Quattrociocchi, W. & Baronchelli, A. (2022): Growing polarization around climate change on social media. Nature Climate Change, 12, 1114–1121.
  14. Feindt, P. H. & Oels, A. (2005): Does discourse matter? Discourse analysis in environmental policy making. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7(3), 161–173.
  15. Finlayson, A. (2007): From beliefs to arguments: interpretative methodology and rhetorical political analysis. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 9(4), 545–563.
  16. Fischer, F. & Forester, J. (1993). The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham: Duke University Press.
  17. Forchtner, B. (2019): Climate change and the far right. WIREs Climate Change, 10(5), e604.
  18. Garzón-Velandia, D. C., Barreto-Galeano, M. I. & Sabucedo-Cameselle, J. M. (2024): When political elites talk, citizens reply. Affective polarization through temporal orientation and intergroup emotions. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 24(3), 621–644.
  19. Goffman, E. (1974): Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  20. Guiso, L., Herrera, H., Morelli, M. & Sonno, T. (2024): Economic insecurity and the demand for populism in Europe. Economica, 91(362), 588–620.
  21. Haas, T. (2024): On the links between climate scepticism and rightwing populism (RWP): an explanatory approach based on cultural political economy (CPE). New Political Economy, 29(3), 464–477.
  22. Hahnel, U. J. J., Mumenthaler, Ch. & Brosch, T. (2020): Emotional foundations of the public climate change divide. Climatic Change, 161, 9–19.
  23. Hine, D. W., Phillips, W. J., Driver, A. B. & Morrison, M. (2017): Audience Segmentation and Climate Change Communication. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science, March 29, accessed online: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.390>.
  24. Hogget, P. & Thompson, S. (2012): Politics and the Emotions: The affective turn in contemporary political studies. New York: Continuum.
  25. Hooghe, L., Marks, G. & Wilson, C. J. (2002): Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration? Comparative Political Studies, 35(8), 965–989.
  26. Jackson Inderberg, T. H. & Bailey, I. (2019): Changing the record: Narrative policy analysis and the politics of emissions trading in New Zealand. Environmental Policy and Governance, 29(6), 409–421.
  27. Johnstone, B. (2001): Discourse analysis and narrative. In: Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D. & Hamilton, H. E. (eds.): Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Malden, Oxford: Blackwell, 635–649.
  28. Jylhä, K. M. & Hellmer, K. (2020): Right-Wing Populism and Climate Change Denial: The Roles of Exclusionary and Anti-Egalitarian Preferences, Conservative Ideology, and Antiestablishment Attitudes. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 20(1), 315–335.
  29. Kligler-Vilenchik, N., Baden, Ch. & Yarchi, M. (2020): Interpretative Polarization across Platforms: How Political Disagreement Develops Over Time on Facebook, Twitter, and WhatsApp. Social Media + Society, 6(3).
  30. Kovács, L. N., Jordan, G., Berglund, F., Holden, B., Niehoff, E., Pohl, F., Younssi, M., Zevallos, I., Ágoston, C., Varga, A. & Kökönyei, Gyöngyi (2024): Acting as we feel: Which emotional responses to the climate crisis motivate climate action. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 96, 102327.
  31. Kułakowska, M. (2020): Interpretive Theories in Political Science. Teoria Polityki, 4, 31–41.
  32. Ladrech, R. (2002): Europeanization and Political Parties: Towards a Framework for Analysis. Party Politics, 8(4), 389–403.
  33. Laver, M. (2005): Policy and the Dynamics of Political Competition. American Political Science Review, 99(2), 263–281.
  34. Lees, J. & Cikara, M. (2021): Understanding and combating misperceived polarization. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1822), 20200143.
  35. Linde, S. (2020): The Politicization of Risk: Party Cues, Polarization, and Public Perceptions of Climate Change Risk. Risk Analysis, 40(1), 2002–2018.
  36. Lockwood, M. (2018): Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda: exploring the linkages. Environmental Politics, 27(4), 712–732.
  37. Margalit, Y. (2019): Economic Insecurity and the Causes of Populism, Reconsidered. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(4), 152–70.
  38. Montesano Montessori, N. (2014): The potential of narrative strategies in the discursive construction of hegemonic positions and social change. In: Kaal, B., Maks, I. & van Elfrinkhof, A. (eds). From Text to Political Positions: Text analysis across disciplines. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 171–187.
  39. Norris, P. & Inglehart, R. (2019): Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  40. Papermans, Y. & Maeseele, P. (2016): The politicization of climate change: problem or solution? WIREs Climate Change, 7(4), 478–485.
  41. Pierzchalski, F. & Golinowski, J. (eds.) (2016): Socjotechnika lęku w polityce [The sociotechnique of fear in politics]. Bydgoszcz: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Kazimierza Wielkiego.
  42. Pirro, A. L. P. & Taggart, P. (2018): The populist politics of Euroscepticism in times of crisis: A framework for analysis. Politics, 38(3), 253–262.
  43. Poletta, F. (2015): Characters in Political Storytelling. Storytelling, Self, Society, 11(1), 34–55.
  44. Rhodes, R. A. W. (2018): Narrative Policy Analysis: Cases in Decentred Policy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  45. Schlaufer, C., Kuenzler, J., Jones, M. D. & Shanahan, E. A. (2022): The Narrative Policy Framework: A Traveler’s Guide to Policy Stories. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 63, 249–273.
  46. Simmons, E. S. & Smith, N. R. (2021): Rethinking comparison: innovative methods for qualitative political inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  47. Stibbe, A. (2015): Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By. Abingdon: Routledge.
  48. Stibbe, A. (2021): Chapter 6. Ecolinguistics as a transdisciplinary movement and a way of life. In: Burkette, A. & Warhol, T. (eds.). Crossing Borders, Making Connections: Interdisciplinarity in Linguistics. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 71–88.
  49. Thalberg, K., Defard, C., Chopin, Th., Barbas, A. & Kerneïs, K. (2024): The European Green Deal in the face of rising radical right-wing populism. Policy Paper n. 296. Paris: Jacques Delors Institute.
  50. Thomsen, J. P. F. & Thomsen, A. H. (2023): Intergroup contact reduces affective polarization but not among strong party identifiers. Scandinavian Political Studies, 46(4), 241–263.
  51. Tyagi, A., Uyheng, J. & Carley, K. M. (2021): Heated conversations in a warming world: affective polarization in online climate change discourse follows real-world climate anomalies. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 11, 87.
  52. Urban, J. & Kaiser, F. G. (2022): Environmental Attitudes in 28 European Countries Derived From Atheoretically Compiled Opinions and Self-Reports of Behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 875419.
  53. Van Boven, L. & Sherman, D. K. (2021): Elite influence on public attitudes about climate policy. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 42, 83–88.
  54. Van der Duin, D., Nicoli, F. & Burgoon, Brian (2023): How sensitive are Europeans to income losses related to climate policies?. Breugel, <accessed online: https://www.bruegel.org/analysis/how-sensitive-are-europeans-income-losses-related-climate-policies>.
  55. van Eck, C. W. (2024): Opposing positions, dividing interactions, and hostile affect: A systematic review and conceptualization of “online climate change polarization”. WIREs Climate Change, e906.
  56. van Hulst, M., Metze, T., Dewulf, A., de Vries, J., van Bommel, S. & van Ostaijen, M. (2024): Discourse, framing and narrative: three ways of doing critical, interpretive policy analysis. Critical Policy Studies, 1(23).
  57. Vasilopoulou, S. (2018): The Radical Right and Euroskepticism. In: Rydgren, J. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right. New York: Oxford Academic, 122–140.
  58. Wagner, S. (2022): Euroscepticism as a radical left party strategy for success. Party Politics, 28(6), 1069–1080.
  59. Walewicz, P. (2024): Nationalism, Capitalism and Hostility Towards Environmental Policies: A Theoretical Study. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 53(3), 5–19.
  60. Wang, C. & Keith, D. (2020): The greening of European radical left parties: red and green politics. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 28(4), 494–513.
  61. Wedeen, L. (2002): Conceptualizing Culture: Possibilities for Political Science. American Political Science Review, 96(4), 713–728.
  62. Wittels, M. & Traczyk, A. (2024): Polityka klimatyczna z ludzką twarzą. Oczekiwania Polek i Polaków wobec zielonej transformacji [Climate policy with a human face. The expectations of Poles towards the green transition]. Warsaw: More in Common Polska.
  63. Wodak, R. (2015): The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: SAGE.
  64. Zachová, A. (2022): Half of Czechs fear EU Green Deal will harm economy. Euractiv, September 21, <accessed online: https://www.euractiv.com/section/energy-environment/news/half-of--czechs-fear-eu-green-deal-will-harm-economy/>.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2025-0021 | Journal eISSN: 2787-9038 | Journal ISSN: 1801-3422
Language: English
Page range: 521 - 541
Published on: Dec 26, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Piotr Walewicz, published by Metropolitan University Prague
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.