Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Effect of Collective Narcissism, Populism and Trust of Older Adults on Conspiracy Mentality: Evidence from Poland Cover

The Effect of Collective Narcissism, Populism and Trust of Older Adults on Conspiracy Mentality: Evidence from Poland

Open Access
|Oct 2025

References

  1. Akkerman, A., Mudde, C. & Zaslove, A. (2014): How Populist Are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters. Comparative Political Studies, 47(9), 1324–1353.
  2. Bergmann, E. (2018): Conspiracy & Populism: The Politics of Misinformation. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  3. Bertin, P., Ionescu, O., Green, R., Abts, K., Rogenhofer, J., Delouvée, S., Yzerbyt, V. & Klein, O. (2024): Conspiracy blaming in the aftermath of group relative deprivation: The moderating role of national narcissism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 54(6), 1393–1415.
  4. Bertin, P., Marinthe, G., Biddlestone, M. & Delouvée, S. (2022): Investigating the identification-prejudice link through the lens of national narcissism: The role of defensive group beliefs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 98, 104252.
  5. Bordeleau, J.-N. & Stockemer, D. (2024): On the relationship between age and conspiracy beliefs. Political Psychology, 0(0), 1–16
  6. Brotherton, R. (2015): Suspicious Minds. Why We Believe Conspiracy Theories. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  7. Brotherton, R., French, C. C. & Pickering, A. D. (2013): Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: the generic conspiracist beliefs scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 279.
  8. Cargnino, M. (2021): The interplay of online network homogeneity, populist attitudes, and conspiratorial beliefs: Empirical evidence from a survey on German Facebook users. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 33(2), 337–353.
  9. Cichocka, A. (2016): Understanding defensive and secure in-group positivity: The role of collective narcissism. European Review of Social Psychology, 27(1), 283–317.
  10. Cichocka, A., Marchlewska, M., Golec de Zavala, A. & Olechowski, M. (2016): “They will not control us”: In-group positivity and belief in intergroup conspiracies. British Journal of Psychology, 107(3), 556–576.
  11. Cisłak, A., Pyrczak, M., Mikiewicz, A. & Cichocka, A. (2020): Brexit and Polexit: Collective narcissism is associated with support for leaving the European Union. Social Psychological Bulletin, 15(1), 1–21.
  12. Czech, F. & Ścigaj, P. (2023): Popularność narracji spiskowych w Polsce po rosyjskiej agresji na Ukrainę [The popularity of conspiracy narratives in Poland after Russian aggression against Ukraine]. Kraków: Jagiellonian University.
  13. Dennis, N. A., Hayes, S. M., Prince, S. E., Madden, D. J., Huettel, S. A. & Cabeza, R. (2008): Effects of aging on the neural correlates of successful item and source memory encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(4), 791–808.
  14. Eberl, J.-M., Huber, R. A. & Greussing, E. (2021): From populism to the “plandemic”: Why populists believe in COVID-19 conspiracies. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 31(S1), 272–284.
  15. Enders, A., Klofstad, C., Diekman, A., Drochon, H., Rogers de Waal, J., Littrell, S., Premaratne, K., Verdear, D., Wuchty, S. & Uscinski, J. (2024): The sociodemographic correlates of conspiracism. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 1–16.
  16. Federico, Ch. M. & Golec de Zavala, A. (2018): Collective Narcissism and the 2016 US Presidential Vote. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(1), 110–121.
  17. Gligorić, V., da Silva, M. M., Eker, S., van Hoek, N., Nieuwenhuijzen, E., Popova, U. & Zeighami, G. (2021): The usual suspects: How psychological motives and thinking styles predict the endorsement of well-known and COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs. Applied cognitive psychology, 35(5), 1171–1181.
  18. Golec de Zavala, A. (2024): The Psychology of Collective Narcissism: Insights from Social Identity Theory. London: Routledge.
  19. Golec de Zavala, A., Bierwiaczonek, K. & Ciesielski, P. (2022): An interpretation of meta-analytical evidence for the link between collective narcissism and conspiracy theories. Current Opinion in Psychology, 47, 101360.
  20. Golec de Zavala, A. G. & Cichocka, A. (2012): Collective narcissism and anti-Semitism in Poland. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(2), 213–229.
  21. Golec de Zavala, A., Cichocka, A. & Bilewicz, M. (2013): The Paradox of In-Group Love: Differentiating Collective Narcissism Advances Understanding of the Relationship Between In-Group and Out-Group Attitudes. Journal of Personality, 81(1), 16–28.
  22. Golec de Zavala, A., Cichocka, A. & Iskra-Golec, I. (2013): Collective narcissism moderates the effect of in-group image threat on intergroup hostility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(6), 1019–1039.
  23. Golec de Zavala, A., Cichocka, A., Eidelson, R. & Jayawickreme, N. (2009): Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1074–1096.
  24. Golec de Zavala, A., Peker, M., Guerra, R. & Baran, T. (2016): Collective narcissism predicts hypersensitivity to in-group insult and direct and indirect retaliatory intergroup hostility. European Journal of Personality, 30, 532–551.
  25. Goreis, A. & Voracek, M. (2019): A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological research on conspiracy beliefs: Field characteristics, measurement instruments, and associations with personality traits. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 205.
  26. Green, R. & Douglas, K. M. (2018): Anxious attachment and belief in conspiracy theories. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 30–37.
  27. Guan, T. & Yang, Y. (2020): Diversifying Conspiracy Beliefs and Populist Ideologies in the Chinese Context. Social Science Quarterly, 101(2), 459–472.
  28. Hollander, B.A. (2018): Partisanship, individual differences, and news media exposure as predictors of conspiracy beliefs. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(3), 691–713.
  29. Jost, J. T., Napier, J. L., Thorisdottir, H., Gosling, S. D., Palfai, T. P. & Ostafin, B. (2007): Are Needs to Manage Uncertainty and Threat Associated With Political Conservatism or Ideological Extremity? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(7), 989–1007.
  30. Keenan, O. & de Zavala, A. G. (2021): Collective narcissism and weakening of American democracy. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 21(1), 237–258.
  31. Kim, S. & Kim, S. (2021): Searching for General Model of Conspiracy Theories and Its Implication for Public Health Policy: Analysis of the Impacts of Political, Psychological, Structural Factors on Conspiracy Beliefs about the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 266.
  32. Kofta, M. & Soral, W. (2019): Belief in the Round Table Conspiracy and Political Division in Poland. Social Psychological Bulletin, 14(4), 1–19.
  33. Kofta, M., Soral, W. & Bilewicz, M. (2020): What breeds conspiracy antisemitism? The role of political uncontrollability and uncertainty in the belief in Jewish conspiracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(5), 900–918.
  34. Lantos, D. & Forgas, J. P. (2021): The role of collective narcissism in populist attitudes and the collapse of democracy in Hungary. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 5(2), 65–78.
  35. Leman, P. J. & Cinnirella, M. (2013): Beliefs in conspiracy theories and the need for cognitive closure. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 378.
  36. Marmola, M. & Olszanecka-Marmola, A. (2024): Party Affiliation and Belief in Conspiracy Theories: Case Study of Smolensk Plane Crash. Journal of Comparative Politics, 17(2), 17–35.
  37. Mudde, C. (2004): The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563.
  38. Pilch, I., Turska-Kawa, A., Wardawy, P., Olszanecka-Marmola, A. & Smołkowska-Jędo, W. (2023): Contemporary trends in psychological research on conspiracy beliefs. A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1075779.
  39. Poulin, M. J. & Haase, C. M. (2015): Growing to trust: Evidence that trust increases and sustains well-being across the life span. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(6), 614–621.
  40. Putnam, R. D. (2000): Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  41. Rothstein, B. & Stolle D. (2008): The State and Social Capital: An Institutional Theory of Generalized Trust. Comparative Politics, 40(4), 441–459.
  42. Rotter, J. B. (1980): Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35(1), 1–7.
  43. Siwiak, A., Szpitalak, M. & Polczyk, R. (2019): Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale – Polish adaptation of the method. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 50(3), 259–269.
  44. Soral, W., Cichocka, A., Bilewicz, M. & Marchlewska, M. (2018): The Collective Conspiracy Mentality in Poland. In: Uscinski, J. (ed.): Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 372–384.
  45. Šrol, J., Čavojová, V. & Ballová Mikušková, E. (2022): Finding Someone to Blame: The Link Between COVID-19 Conspiracy Beliefs, Prejudice, Support for Violence, and Other Negative Social Outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 726076.
  46. Stanley, B. (2008): The thin ideology of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13, 95–110.
  47. Stano, S. (2020): The Internet: The Spread of Conspiracy Contents. In: Butter, M. & Knight, P. (eds.): Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories. London: Routledge, 483–496.
  48. Stecula, D. A. & Pickup, M. (2021): How populism and conservative media fuel conspiracy beliefs about COVID-19 and what it means for COVID-19 behaviors. Research & Politics, 8(1).
  49. Sternisko, A., Cichocka, A., Cislak, A. & Van Bavel, J. J. (2023): National Narcissism predicts the Belief in and the Dissemination of Conspiracy Theories During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence From 56 Countries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 49(1), 48–65.
  50. St. Jacques, P., Dolcos, F., & Cabeza, R. (2010): Effects of aging on functional connectivity of the amygdala during negative evaluation: A network analysis of fMRI data. Neurobiology of Aging, 31(2), 315–327.
  51. Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1979): An integrative theory of inter-group conflict. In: Austin, W. G. & Worchel, S. (eds.): The social psychology of inter-group relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 33–47.
  52. United Nations (2019): World Population Ageing 2019: Highlights. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
  53. van der Linden, S., Panagopoulos, C., Azevedo, F. & Jost, J. T. (2021): The paranoid style in American politics revisited: An ideological asymmetry in conspiratorial thinking. Political Psychology, 42, 23–51.
  54. van Prooijen, J. W. & Douglas, K. M. (2017): Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations. Memory Studies, 10(3), 323–333.
  55. van Prooijen, J. W. (2022): Psychological benefits of believing conspiracy theories. Current Opinion in Psychology, 47, 101352.
  56. Vitriol, J. A. & Marsh, J. K. (2018): The illusion of explanatory depth and endorsement of conspiracy beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 955–969.
  57. Zmerli, S., Newton, K. & Montero, J. R. (2007): Trust in people, confidence in political institutions and satisfaction with democracy. In: Van Deth, J. W., Montero, J. R & Westholm, A. (eds.): Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies: A Comparative Analysis. London: Routledge, 35–65.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2025-0018 | Journal eISSN: 2787-9038 | Journal ISSN: 1801-3422
Language: English
Page range: 457 - 471
Published on: Oct 31, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Agata Olszanecka-Marmola, Maciej Marmola, Dariusz Niedbała, published by Metropolitan University Prague
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.