Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Political and Economic Context Contributing to the Problem of Political (Dis)Trust in Slovenia Cover

The Political and Economic Context Contributing to the Problem of Political (Dis)Trust in Slovenia

By: Marko Hočevar  
Open Access
|Oct 2025

References

  1. Behnke, J. (2009): Vertrauen und Kontrolle: Der Einfluss von Werten auf Einstellungen zu politischen Institutionen [Trust and control: The influence of values on attitudes toward political institutions]. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 40(2), 397–413.
  2. Benczes, I. (2022): Taking back control over the economy: From economic populism to the economic consequences of populism. European Policy Analysis, 8(1): 109–123.
  3. Benczes, I. (2024): Introduction. Economic policy of populist leaders in Central and Eastern Europe. In: Benczes, I. (ed.): Economic Policies of Populist Leaders A Central and Eastern European Perspective. London, New York: Routledge, 1–11.
  4. Bembič, B. (2017): Procesi v kapitalističnem gospodarstvu in razredna kultura delavcev [Processes in the capitalist economy and the class culture of workers]. Doctoral dissertation. Ljubljana: Faculty of Arts.
  5. Bembič, B. (2018): Slovenia: is the weakening of industrial relations taking its toll on social convergence? In: Vaughan-Whitehead, D. (ed.): Industrial relations in Europe: fostering equality at work and cross-country convergence? Geneva: International Labour Office, 315–343.
  6. Berg, M. (2021): The Decline of Political Trust and the Rise of Populism in the United States. In: Leypoldt, G. & Berg, M. (eds.): Authority and Trust in US Culture and Society. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, 37–59.
  7. Bertsou, E. (2019): Rethinking political distrust. European Political Science Review, 11(2), 213–230. Bonica, A., McCarty, N., Poole, K. T. & Rosenthal, H. (2013): Why hasn’t democracy slowed rising inequality? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 103–124.
  8. Božič, A. (2025): Podpora vladi na eni najnižjih točk, SDS krepko pred GS [Government support at one of its lowest points, SDS well ahead of GS]. 24ur.com, 26 January, <accessed online: https://www.24ur.com/novice/slovenija/podpora-vladi-na-eni-najnizjih-tock-sds-krepko-pred-gs.html>.
  9. Center za raziskovanje javnega mnenja in množičnih komunikacij [CRJMMK] (2023): Slovensko javno mnenje: medletne primerjave izbranih indikatorjev [Slovenian public opinion: year-on-year comparisons of selected indicators]. CJM, <accessed online: https://www.cjm.si/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/SJM23_2_sum_medletni_s_povprecji_2.0.pdf>.
  10. Citrin, J. (1974): Comment: The political relevance of trust in government. American Political Science Review, 68(3), 973–988.
  11. Citrin, J. & Stoker, L. (2018): Political trust in a cynical age. Annual Review of Political Science, 21(1), 49–70.
  12. Cole, R. L. (1973): Toward a model of political trust: A causal analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 17(4), 809–817.
  13. Crowley, S. & Stanojević, M. (2011): Varieties of capitalism, power resources, and historical legacies: explaining the Slovenian exception. Politics and Society, 39(2), 268–295.
  14. Dahl, R. (1971): Polyarchy: participation and opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  15. Dahl, R. (1998): On democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press
  16. Dalton, R. J. (2004): Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  17. Dawson, A. & Krakoff, I. L. (2024): Political trust and democracy: the critical citizens thesis re-examined, Democratization, 31(1), 90–112.
  18. Devine, D. (2024): Does Political Trust Matter? A Meta-analysis on the Consequences of Trust. Political Behaviour, 46, 2241–2262.
  19. DIGI EMPL (2025): Flexicurity. European Commission, <accessed online: https://employment-social-affairs.ec.europa.eu/policies-and-activities/european-employment-strategy/flexicurity_en>.
  20. Easton, D. (1975): A re-assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, 5(4), 435–457.
  21. Eurostat (2025): General government expenditure by function. Eurostat, <accessed online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/gov_10a_exp/default/table?lang=en&category=gov.gov_gfs10.gov_10a>.
  22. Filipovič Hrast, M. & Kopač Mrak, A. (2016): Slovenia: Continuous Gradual Change of the Welfare State? In: Schubert, K., de Villota, P. & Kuhlmann, J. (eds.): Challenges to European Welfare Systems. Cham: Springer, 693–718.
  23. Fink-Hafner, D. (2020): Destabilizacija slovenskega strankarskega sistema po letu 2000 [Destabilization of the Slovenian party system after 2000]. In: Krašovec, A. & Deželan, T. (eds.): Volilno leto [Election year]. Ljubljana: Faculty of Social Sciences, 5–35.
  24. Fink-Hafner, D. (2024): Party system changes and challenges to democracy: Slovenia in a comparative perspective. Cham: Springer.
  25. Fukuyama, F. (1992): The End of History and the Last Man. Los Angeles: Free press. Ginsburg, T. & Huq, A. Z. (2020): How to Save a Constitutional Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  26. Haček, M. & Brezovšek, M. (2013): The processes of democratisation and trust in political institutions in Slovenia: comparative analysis. Annales, 24(1), 1–12.
  27. Hadenius, A. (ed.) (1997): Democracy’s victory and crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  28. Harvey, D. (2005): A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  29. Haughton, T., Krašovec, A. & Cutts, D. (2024): Jumping on the new party bandwagon: the 2022 elections and the development of party politics in Slovenia. Europe-Asia Studies, 76(10), 1526–1550.
  30. Hirsch, J. (1995): Der nationale Wettbewerbsstaat [The National Competition State]. Berlin, Amsterdam: ID-Archiv.
  31. Hočevar, M (2025): Od nacionalnega do kompradorskega kapitalizma: politično-ekonomski projekti v Sloveniji (1991–2018) [From national to comprador capitalism: political-economic projects in Slovenia (1991–2018)]. Ljubljana: založba */cf (upcoming).
  32. Hočevar, M. (2021): The crisis of 2008 and the rise of the Slovenian consolidation state. Teorija in praksa, 58(2), 305–321.
  33. Hočevar, M. (2024a): Growth models, industrial relations institutions and labour market policies in Ireland, Portugal and Slovenia: explaining capitalist convergence and divergence. Ljubljana: Faculty of Social Sciences.
  34. Hočevar, M. (2024b): Industrial relations and labour market policies in Ireland, Portugal and Slovenia: from institutional diversity to policy similarity? Teorija in praksa, 61(3), 623–647.
  35. Hooghe, M. (2018): Trust and elections. In: Uslaner, E. M. (ed.): The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 617–632.
  36. Hooghe, M. & Dassonneville, R. (2018): A spiral of distrust: A panel study on the relation between political distrust and protest voting in Belgium. Government and Opposition, 53(1), 104–130.
  37. Hooghe, M. & Marien, S. (2013): A comparative analysis of the relation between political trust and forms of political participation in Europe. European Societies, 15(1), 131–152.
  38. Huguenot-Noël, R. & Corti. F. (2024): A Eurozone Reinsurance Union to tackle inequality? SURE as a pathway through fiscal solidarity hurdles. In: Briere, C. & Crespy, A. (eds.): Inequality and the European Union: new frontiers in political science and law. Abingdon; New York: Routledge, 140–156.
  39. Huntington, S. (1991): The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century. Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press.
  40. Jessop, B. (2002): The Future of the Capitalist State: Cambridge, Malden: Polity Press.
  41. Kanjuo-Mrčela, A. & Ignjatović, M. (2015): Od prožnosti do prekarnosti dela: stopnjevanje negativnih sprememb na začetku 21. Stoletja [From flexibility to precarious work: the escalation of negative changes at the beginning of the 21st century]. Teorija in praksa, 52(3), 350–381.
  42. Klanjšek, R. (2020): Poročilo ZN: 40 odstotkov Slovencev danes prejme realno manj kot leta 1980 [UN report: 40 percent of Slovenians today receive less in real terms than in 1980]. Finance Manager, 5 March, <accessed online: https://www.finance.si/manager/porocilo-zn-40-odstotkov-slovencev-danes-prejme-realno-manj-kot-leta-1980/a/8958488>.
  43. Kordež, B. (2025): Obvezni prispevek mora biti pravičnejši, kakšen je alternativni predlog? [The mandatory contribution needs to be fairer, what is the alternative proposal?]. Delo, Sobotna priloga, <accessed online: https://www.delo.si/novice/slovenija/pravicnejsa-obremenitev-z-obveznim-zdravstvenim-prispevkom>.
  44. Krašovec, A. & Broder, Ž. (2020): Volivci novih strank v Sloveniji: razočarani demokrati, apatični državljani ali kdo drug? [Voters of new parties in Slovenia: disappointed democrats, apathetic citizens or someone else?]. In: Krašovec, A. & Deželan, T. (eds.): Volilno leto [Election year]. Ljubljana: Faculty of Social Sciences, 37–61.
  45. Krašovec, A. & Johannsen, L. (2016): Recent developments in democracy in Slovenia. Problems of post-communism, 63(5/6), 313–322.
  46. Krašovec, A. & Johannsen, L. (2017): Social dialogue between transition and the great recession. Teorija in praksa, 54(special issue), 30–44.
  47. Krašovec, A. (2017): A hint at entrepreneurial parties? The case of four new successful parties in Slovenia. Politologický časopis, 24(2), 158–178.
  48. Kolarič, Z. (2012): Dvajset let postopnega spreminjanja slovenske socialne države [Twenty years of gradual changes of the Slovenian welfare state]. In: Prunk, J. & Deželan, T. (eds.): Dvajset let slovenske države [Twenty years of the Slovenian state]. Maribor: Aristej, Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede, 283–298.
  49. Linz, J. J. & Stepan, A. (1996): Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
  50. Malčič, M. & Krašovec, A. (2019): New parties and democracy in Slovenia. Politics in Central Europe, 15(1), 115–137.
  51. Mencinger, J. (2012): Slovenija med zlomom socializma in krizo kapitalizma [Slovenia between the collapse of socialism and the crisis of capitalism]. In: Prunk, J. & Deželan, T. (eds.): Dvajset let slovenske države [Twenty years of the Slovenian state]. Maribor: Aristej, Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede, 57–80.
  52. Merkel, W. & Kneip, S. (eds.) (2018): Democracy and Crisis. Challenges in Turbulent Times. Cham: Springer.
  53. Merkel, W. (2014): Is capitalism compatible with democracy? Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 8(2), 109–128.
  54. Mishler, W. & Rose, R. (1997): Trust, Distrust and Skepticism: Popular Evaluations of Civil and Political Institutions in Post-Communist Societies. The Journal of Politics, 59, 418–451.
  55. Mounk, Y. (2018): The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom is in Danger and how to save it. Cambridge (Ma.): Harvard University Press.
  56. Newton, K., Stolle, D. & Zmerli, S. (2018): Social and Political Trust. In: Uslaner, E. M. (ed.): The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 37–56.
  57. Norris, P. (2011): Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  58. Norris, P. (2022): In praise of skepticism: Trust but verify. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  59. Novak, M. & Lajh, D. (2023): Challenges facing organised interests under a populist right-wing government in Slovenia. Politics and governance, 11(1), 28–38.
  60. Offe, C. (2000): Democracy and Trust. Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, 96, 1–13.
  61. Parvin, P. (2015): Is Deliberative Democracy Feasible? Political Disengagement and Trust in Liberal Democratic States. The Monist, 98(4), 407–423.
  62. Podvršič, A. (2023): Iz socializma v periferni kapitalizem [From socialism to peripheral capitalism]. Ljubljana: založba */cf.
  63. Przeworski, A. (2019): Crises of Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  64. Runciman, D. (2018): How Democracy Ends. New York: Basic Books.
  65. Schäfer, A. & Zürn, M. (2024): The Democratic Regression: The Political Causes of Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Polity.
  66. Schäfer, A. (2010): 2010: Die Folgen sozialer Ungleichheit für die Demokratie in Westeuropa [The consequences of social inequality for democracy in Western Europe]. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 4(1), 131–156.
  67. Schäfer, A. (2015): Der Verlust politischer Gleichheit. Warum die sinkende Wahlbeteiligung der Demokratie schadet [The loss of political equality: Why declining voter turnout harms democracy]. Campus: Frankfurt am Main.
  68. Stanojević, M. & Krašovec, A. (2011): Slovenia: social pacts and political exchange. In: Avdagic, S., Rhodes, M. & Visser, J. (eds.): Social pacts in Europe: emergence, evolution, and institutionalization. New York: Oxford University Press, 232–256.
  69. Stanojević, M. & Krašovec, A. (2022): The crisis and the changing nature of political exchange in Slovenia. In: Ebbinghaus, B. & Weishaupt, T. (eds.): The role of social partners in managing Europe’s great recession: crisis corporatism or corporatism in crisis? Abingdon; New York: Routledge, 212–234.
  70. Stanojević, M. (2014): Conditions for a neoliberal turn. The cases of Hungary and Slovenia. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 20(2), 1–16.
  71. Stanojević, M. (2015): Sindikalne strategije v obdobju krize [Trade union strategies in times of crisis]. Teorija in praksa, 52(3), 394–416.
  72. State election commission (2025): President of the Republic and The National Assembly. State election commission, <accessed online: https://www.dvk-rs.si/>.
  73. Statistical office of Republic of Slovenia (2025a): Gini coefficient. Statistical office of Republic of Slovenia, <accessed online: https://pxweb.stat.si/SiStatData/pxweb/en/Data/-/H153S.px/table/tableViewLayout2/>.
  74. Statistical office of Republic of Slovenia (2025b): At-risk-of-poverty rate (% of persons) and number of persons at-risk-of-poverty. Statistical office of Republic of Slovenia <accessed online: https://pxweb.stat.si/SiStatData/pxweb/sl/Data/-/0867206S.px>.
  75. Streeck, W. (2011): The Crisis of Democratic Capitalism. New Left Review, 71, 5–29. Streeck, W. (2014): Buying Time: The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism. London; New York: Verso.
  76. Streeck, W. (2016): How will Capitalism End. Essays on a Failing System. London; New York: Verso. Šiljak, D. (2024): Slovenia: The rise and fall of Janez Janša? In: Benczes, I. (ed.): Economic Policies of Populist Leaders A Central and Eastern European Perspective. London; New York: Routledge, 148–168.
  77. Tarča (2025): Davek bo ali ne bo? [Will there be a tax or not?]. Radiotelevizija Slovenije, 23 January, <accessed online: https://365.rtvslo.si/arhiv/tarca/175103746>.
  78. Torcal, M. & Montero, J. R. (eds.) (2006): Political Disaffection in Contemporary Democracies: Social Capital, Institutions and Politics. London; New York: Routledge.
  79. Toš, N. (ed.) (2018): Vrednote v prehodu XII. Slovenija v mednarodnih in medčasovnih primerjavah [Values in Transition XII. Slovenia in International and Intertemporal Comparisons]. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede.
  80. Toš, N. (ed.) (2021): Vrednote v prehodu XIII. Slovenija v mednarodnih in medčasovnih primerjavah [Values in Transition XIII. Slovenia in International and Intertemporal Comparisons]. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede.
  81. Uslaner, E. M. (2018): The Study of Trust. In: Uslaner, E. M. (ed.): The Oxford Handbook of Social and political Trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–14.
  82. Valgardsson, V. O., Stoker, G., Devine, D., Gaskell, J. & Jennings, W. (2021): Disengagement and political trust: Divergent pathways. In Grasso, M. T. & Giugni, M. (eds.): Oxford Handbook of Political Participation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  83. van der Meer, T. & Zmerli, S. (2017): The deeply rooted concern with political trust. In: Zmerli, S. & van der Meer, T. (eds.): The Handbook on Political Trust. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 1–16.
  84. Warren, M. E. (2018): Trust and Democracy. In: Uslaner, E. M. (ed.): The Oxford Handbook of Social and political Trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 75–94.
  85. Warren, M. E. (ed.) (1999): Democracy and Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  86. World Inequality Database (2025): Slovenia. World Inequality Database, <accessed online: https://wid.world/country/slovenia/>.
  87. Žerdin, A. (2012): Omrežje moči: epicentri slovenske politične in gospodarske elite [The network of power: epicenters of the Slovenian political and economic elite]. Ljubljana: Mladinska knjiga.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2025-0016 | Journal eISSN: 2787-9038 | Journal ISSN: 1801-3422
Language: English
Page range: 401 - 432
Published on: Oct 31, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Marko Hočevar, published by Metropolitan University Prague
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.