Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Advantage of Incumbency among Czech Mayors: Analysis of Election Results in the 128 Largest Cities in the Czech Republic Cover

The Advantage of Incumbency among Czech Mayors: Analysis of Election Results in the 128 Largest Cities in the Czech Republic

By: Jakub Čapek  
Open Access
|Jul 2025

References

  1. Ade, F., Freier, R. & Odendahl, C. (2014): Incumbency effects in government and opposition: Evidence from Germany. European Journal of Political Economy, 36, 117–134.
  2. Akhtari, M., Moreira, D. & Trucco, L. (2022): Political turnover, bureaucratic turnover, and the quality of public services. American Economic Review, 112(2), 442–493.
  3. Ansolabehere, S., Hansen, J. M., Hirano, S. & Snyder, J. M. (2007): The incumbency advantage in U.S. primary elections. Electoral Studies, 26(3), 660–668.
  4. Ansolabehere, S. & Snyder, J. M. (2002): The Incumbency Advantage in U.S. Elections: An Analysis of State and Federal Offices, 1942–2000. Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 1(3), 315–338.
  5. Ashworth, S. & Bueno De Mesquita, E. (2008): Electoral Selection, Strategic Challenger Entry, and the Incumbency Advantage. The Journal of Politics, 70(4), 1006–1025.
  6. Balík, S. (2009): Komunální politika: Obce, aktéři a cíle místní politiky. Praha: Grada Publishing as.
  7. Balík, S. (2010): Politická a stranická stabilita obecních orgánů 1990–2010. Případová studie obcí okresu Šumperk. Acta Politologica, 2(3), 17–29.
  8. Balík, S., Gongala, P., & Gregor, K. (2015): Dvacet let komunálních voleb v ČR. Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury a Masarykova univerzita.
  9. Bernard, J. (2012): Individuální charakteristiky kandidátů ve volbách do zastupitelstev obcí a jejich vliv na volební v.sledky. Sociologický Časopis/Czech Sociological Review, 48(04), 613–640.
  10. Bernard, J. & Šafr, J. (2016): Incumbency in multi-level political systems and recruitment advantage: The case of the Czech regional assemblies. Sociologický Časopis/Czech Sociological Review, 52(3), 267.
  11. Besley, T. J. & Case, A. (1992): Incumbent behavior: Vote seeking, tax setting and yardstick competition. Mass., USA: National bureau of economic research Cambridge.
  12. Brambor, T. & Ceneviva, R. (2011): Incumbency advantage in Brazilian mayoral elections. Paper presented at the APSA 2011 Annual Meeting, <accessed online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1903410>.
  13. Calabrese, M. & van Leeuwen, B. (2024): ‘Time in Office’ of City Mayors and Economic Convergence, c. 1870–Present. The Journal of European Economic History, 53(2), 43–65.
  14. Campbell, J. E., Dettrey, B. J. & Yin, H. (2010): The Theory of Conditional Retrospective Voting: Does the Presidential Record Matter Less in Open-Seat Elections? The Journal of Politics, 72(4), 1083–1095.
  15. Čapek, J. (2019): Čeští starostové – Případová studie okresu Písek v letech 2006–2014 (Bachelor’s thesis). Charles University, <accessed online: https://dspace.cuni.cz/handle/20.500.11956/107349>.
  16. Čapek, J. (2021): Starostenský bonus v kontextu obecních a krajských voleb (Master’s thesis). Charles University, <accessed online: https://dspace.cuni.cz/handle/20.500.11956/127424>.
  17. Carson, J. L., Sievert, J. & Williamson, R. D. (2020): Nationalization and the Incumbency Advantage. Political Research Quarterly, 73(1), 156–168.
  18. Coviello, D. & Gagliarducci, S. (2017): Tenure in office and public procurement. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 9(3), 59–105.
  19. Cox, G. W. & Katz, J. N. (1996): Why did the incumbency advantage in US House elections grow? American Journal of Political Science, 40(2): 478–497.
  20. Cummings, M. C. (1966): Congressmen and the Electorate; Elections for the U. S. House and the President, 1920–1964. New York: Free Press.
  21. Czech Statistical Office (2023): Number of inhabitants in municipalities to date—1. 1. 2023. CZSO, <accessed online: https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/pocet-obyvatel-v-obcich-k-112023>.
  22. Dahlgaard, J. O. (2016): You just made it: Individual incumbency advantage under Proportional Representation. Electoral Studies, 44, 319–328.
  23. De Benedictis-Kessner, J. (2018): Off-Cycle and Out of Office: Election Timing and the Incumbency Advantage. The Journal of Politics, 80(1), 119–132.
  24. De Magalhaes, L. (2015): Incumbency effects in a comparative perspective: Evidence from Brazilian mayoral elections. Political Analysis, 23(1), 113–126.
  25. Erikson, R. S. (1971): The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections. Polity, 3(3), 395–405.
  26. Freier, R. (2011): Incumbency as the major advantage: The electoral advantage for parties of incumbent mayors. DIW Berlin Discussion Paper No. 1147.
  27. Freier, R. (2015): The mayor’s advantage: Causal evidence on incumbency effects in German mayoral elections. European Journal of Political Economy, 40, 16–30.
  28. García-Vega, M. & Herce, J. A. (2011): Does tenure in office affect regional growth? The role of public capital productivity. Public Choice, 146, 75–92.
  29. Gendźwiłł, A. & Swianiewicz, P. (2017): Breeding Grounds for Local Independents, Bonus for Incumbents: Directly Elected Mayors in Poland. In: Sweeting, D. (ed.): Directly Elected Mayors in Urban Governance: Impact and Practice. Bristol: Policy Press, 179–200.
  30. Gordon, S. C. & Landa, D. (2009): Do the Advantages of Incumbency Advantage Incumbents? The Journal of Politics, 71(4), 1481–1498.
  31. Hogan, R. E. (2004): Challenger Emergence, Incumbent Success, and Electoral Accountability in State Legislative Elections. The Journal of Politics, 66(4), 1283–1303.
  32. Jacobson, G. C. (2015): It’s Nothing Personal: The Decline of the Incumbency Advantage in US House Elections. The Journal of Politics, 77(3), 861–873.
  33. King, G. & Gelman, A. (1991): Systemic consequences of incumbency advantage in US House elections. American Journal of Political Science, 35(1): 110–138.
  34. Kotakorpi, K., Poutvaara, P. & Terviö, M. (2017): Returns to Office in National and Local Politics: A Bootstrap Method and Evidence from Finland. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 33(3), 413–442, <accessed online: https://academic.oup.com/jleo/article/33/3/413/4080838>.
  35. Kouba, K. & Lysek, J. (2023): The return of silent elections: Democracy, uncontested elections and citizen participation in Czechia. Democratization, 30(8), 1527–1551.
  36. Lebeda, T. (2009): Komunální volby klamou. Krátké zastavení nad problematickỳmi aspekty volebního systému pro obecní zastupitelstva. Acta Politologica, 1(3), 332–343.
  37. Lee, D. S. (2008): Randomized experiments from non-random selection in US House elections. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 675–697.
  38. Lewis, B. D., Nguyen, H. T., & Hendrawan, A. (2020): Political accountability and public service delivery in decentralized Indonesia: Incumbency advantage and the performance of second term mayors. European Journal of Political Economy, 64, 101910.
  39. Linek, L., & Škvrňák, M. (2024): Beyond the second-order national elections model: Incumbency effects in regional elections in the Czech Republic. Regional & Federal Studies, 34(3), 379–403.
  40. Lucas, J. (2021): The Size and Sources of Municipal Incumbency Advantage in Canada. Urban Affairs Review, 57(2), 373–401.
  41. Lukáčová, J. & Maličká, L. (2023): Women mayors in the Slovak Republic in the last two decades: The municipalities size category perspective. Geografický Časopis – Geographical Journal, 75(2), 177–195.
  42. Macdonald, B. (2014): Incumbency disadvantages in African politics? Regression discontinuity evidence from Zambian elections. Stanford University, Department of Political Science, <accessed online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2325674>.
  43. Maškarinec, P. (2020): Anal.za prostorové podpory a stranického nahrazení na příkladu hnutí Starostové a nezávislí (STAN): Vstup nového subjektu do stranického systému České republiky. Politické Vedy, 23(1), 8–31.
  44. Maškarinec, P. & Klimovsk., D. (2017): Determinants of Women’s Descriptive Representation in the 2014 Czech and Slovak Local Elections. Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government, 15(3), Article 3.
  45. Maškarinec, P., Klimovsk., D. & Danišová, S. (2018): Politická reprezentace žen na pozicích starostek v Česku a na Slovensku v letech 2006–2014: Srovnávací anal.za faktorů úspěšnosti. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review. 54(4), 529–560.
  46. Mazurkiewicz, M. (2021): Non-competitive Elections at the Local Level and the Incumbency Advantage of Mayors-Research Experiences from Poland. Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government, 19(4).
  47. Mazurkiewicz, M. (2022): Polish local democracy in crisis? Non-competitive elections and the supply of candidates for councillors. Border and Regional Studies, 10(4), Article 4.
  48. Moral, M., Ozen, H. E. & Tokdemir, E. (2015): Bringing the incumbency advantage into question for proportional representation. Electoral Studies, 40, 56–65.
  49. Parliament of the Czech Republic (2000): Act No. 131/2000 Coll., on the Capital City of Prague. Zákony pro lidi, <accessed online: https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/cs/2000-131>.
  50. Parliament of the Czech Republic (2001): Act No. 491/2001 Coll., on Elections to Municipal Councils. Zákony pro lidi, <accessed online: https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/cs/2001-491>.
  51. Redmond, P., & Regan, J. (2015): Incumbency advantage in a proportional electoral system: A regression discontinuity analysis of Irish elections. European Journal of Political Economy, 38, 244–256.
  52. Ryšav., D. (2006): Komunální je komunální a velká je velká! K hypotéze politizace lokálních politick.ch elit. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 42(05), 953–970.
  53. Ryšav., D. (2016): Career politicians a dozen years after regionalisation of the Czech Republic (2000–13). The Journal of Legislative Studies, 22(1), 54–82.
  54. Ryšav., D., & Bernard, J. (2013): Size and Local Democracy: The Case of Czech Municipal Representatives. Local Government Studies, 39(6), 833–852.
  55. Šaradín, P. (2010): Direct elections of mayors in the Czech Republic? Data from research and political support. Contemporary European Studies, 02, 77–87.
  56. Sloboda, M. (2015): Women’s participation and the Incumbency Advantage in Slovak Cities: The Case Study of the Mayoral elections in Slovakia. Socialiniai Tyrimai, 38(1), 101–112.
  57. Sloboda, M. (2017): Incumbent’s Advantage in Slovak Cities: The Effect of More Terms in Office on Incumbency Advantage. Working Paper. Bratislava: Public Policy Institute.
  58. Smrek, M. (2020). Do female legislators benefit from incumbency advantage? Incumbent renomination in a flexible-list PR system. Electoral Studies, 66, 102189.
  59. Vavrečková, K. (2016): Starostování v obcích v okrese Šumperk – je vítězství ve volbách opravdová výhra? (Bachelor’s thesis). Masaryk University, Faculty of Social Studies.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2025-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2787-9038 | Journal ISSN: 1801-3422
Language: English
Page range: 183 - 209
Published on: Jul 5, 2025
Published by: Metropolitan University Prague
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Jakub Čapek, published by Metropolitan University Prague
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.