References
- Ágh, A. (2000): Early Consolidation and the Crisis of the Fragmented Democracy: The Majoritarian--Consensual Democracy Debate in Hungary. ECPR Copenhagen Joint Sessions, workshop paper.
- Applebaum, A. (2020): The Disturbing Campaign Against Poland’s Judges. The Atlantic, <accessed online:https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/01/disturbing-campaign-against--polish-judges/605623/>.
- Bajomi -Lázár, P. (2017): Tekintélyelvűség és szabadelvűség között – paradigmaváltások a Magyarországi politika és média viszonyában [Between Authoritarianism and Liberalism Paradigm Shifts in the Relationship of Hungarian Politics and Media]. Politikatudományi Szemle, 26(1), 79–104.
- Bánkuti, M., Halmai, G. & Scheppele, K. L. (2012): Hungary’s Illiberal Turn: Disabling the Constitution. Journal of Democracy, 23(3), 138–46.
- Bátorfy, A. & Urbán, A. (2020): State Advertising as an Instrument of Transformation of the Media Market in Hungary. East European Politics, 36(1), 44–65.
- Batory, A. (2016): Populists in Government? Hungary’s ‘System of National Cooperation.’ Democratization, 23(2), 283–303.
- Beinart, P. (2016): Trump Takes Aim at the Independent Judiciary, The Atlantic, 1 June, <accessed online:https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/06/the-gop-front-runner-takes--aim-at-the-independent-judiciary/485087/>.
- Bellisle, M. (2017): Trump attacks on judiciary raise safety concerns for judges. PBS, 11 February.
- Benedek, I. (2024a): Populist Autocratization and Populist Electoral Autocracies: Towards a Unified Conceptual Framework. Comparative European Politics, Online First.
- Benedek, I. (2024b): Transforming the Political Public Sphere: The Media System of the Orbán Regime in Hungary. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 17(2), 469–89.
- Bermeo, N. (2016): On Democratic Backsliding. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 5–19.
- Blake, A. (2017): Trump is not -so -subtly threatening the judicial system, and even his Supreme Court nominee is upset. Washington Post, 8 February.
- Bohle, D., Greskovits, B. & Naczyk, M. (2023): The Gramscian Politics of Europe’s Rule of Law Crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 31(7), 1775–98.
- Borkowski, G. (ed.) (2016): Nadzwyczajny Kongres Sędziów Polskich [Extraordinary Congress of Polish Judges]. Cracow: National Council of the Judiciary, <accessed online: http://krspl.home.pl/admin/files/nksp%20wersja%20polska%20%2020170117%202.pdf>.
- Bozóki, A. (2008): Consolidation or Second Revolution? The Emergence of the New Right in Hungary. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 24(2), 191–231.
- Bozóki, A. (2015): Broken Democracy, Predatory State, and Nationalist Populism. In: Krasztev, P. & Van Til, J. (eds.): The Hungarian Patient: Social Opposition to an Illiberal Democracy, 3–36. Budapest: Central European University Press.
- Bozóki, A. & Benedek, I. (2024): Politics in Hungary: Two critical junctures. In: Sabrina Ramet P. & Kürti László (eds.): Civic and Uncivic Values in Hungary: Value Transformation, Politics, and Religion. London: Routledge, 17–42.
- Bozóki, A. & Kriza, B. (2003): Party -system and Public Discourse: The Hungarian Semi -loyal Parties. Naukovy Zapisky, 4, 18–26.
- Bozóki, A. & Hegedűs, D. (2018): An Externally Constrained Hybrid Regime: Hungary in the European Union. Democratization, 25(7), 1173–89.
- Bozóki, A. & Fleck, Z. (2024): Embedded Autocracy: Hungary in the European Union. Lanham – London – New York: Lexington Books.
- Brennan Center for Justice (2020): In His Own Words: The President’s Attacks on the Courts, 14 February.
- Buchanan, M. J. (2020): Trump’s Politicization of the Justice System. Center for American Progress, 20 February.
- Bueno de Mesquita, B. & Smith, A. (2011): The Dictator’s Handbook: Why Bad Behavior Is Almost Always Good Politics. New York: Public Affairs.
- Burns, A. (2017): From a Placid Judge, a Cutting Rejection of Trump’s Travel Ban. New York Times, 16 March.
- Chronowski, N. (2014): Alkotmányjogi panasz és alkotmányvédelem [Constitutional Complaint and Protection of the Constitution]. Fundamentum, 2014(1–2), 91–95.
- Coglianese, C. (2020): Dissing the Supreme Court. The Regulatory Review, 10 August.
- Collins, P. M., Jr. & Eshbaugh -Soha, M. (2020): Trump attacked the Supreme Court again. Here are 4 things to know. Washington Post, 27 February.
- Coppedge, M. et al. (2024a): V -Dem Country -Year Dataset V14. V -DemInstitute, <accessed online: https://v-dem.net/data/the-v-dem-dataset/>.
- Coppedge, M. et al. (2024b): V -Dem Methodology. V -DemInstitute, <accessed online: https://v--dem.net/documents/39/v-dem_methodology_v14.pdf>.
- Dorn, L. (2013): Anatomia słabości [The Anatomy of Weakness]. Warsaw: Czerwone i Czarne. Dudek, A. (2011): Instytut: osobista historia IPN [The Institute: Personal history of the Institute of National Remembrance]. Warsaw: Czerwone i Czarne.
- Duncan, A. & Macy, J. (2020): The Collapse of Judicial Independence in Poland: A Cautionary Tale. Judicature, 104(3).
- Dwyer, D. (2020): Donald Trump accuses Supreme Court justices of bias in 1st direct attack as president. ABC News, 25 February.
- Enyedi, Z. (2024): Concept and Varieties of Illiberalism. Politics and Governance, 12, Online First.
- Epps, G. (2020): Trump Is at War With the Whole Idea of an Independent Judiciary. The Atlantic, 4 March.
- Epstein, R. J. (2016): Trump Attacks Federal Judge in Trump U Case, Wall Street Journal, 27 May.
- Friedman, P. L. (2019): Threats to Judicial Independence and the Rule of Law, Flannery Lecture. Washington, D. C., 6 November.
- Gliszczyńska -Grabias A. & Sadurski W. (2021): The Judgment That Wasn’t (But Which Nearly Brought Poland to a Standstill): ‘Judgment’ of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal of 22 October 2020, K1/20, European Constitutional Law Review, 17(1): 130–153.
- Goldmacher, S. et al. (2023): Trump’s Second Term Goal: Shattering the Norms He Didn’t Already Break. New York Times, 11 May.
- Goudsward, A. (2023): Trump puts courts in bind with criticism of judges, legal system. Reuters, 13 October.
- Halmai, G. (2019): Dismantling Constitutional Review in Hungary. Rivista Di Diritti Comparati, 2019(1), 31–47.
- Hanley, S. & Vachudova, M.A. (2018): Understanding the Illiberal Turn: Democratic Backsliding in the Czech Republic. East European Politics, 34(3), 276–96.
- Janicki, M. & W. Władyka. (2016): Pisowska machina do niszczenia wrogów [L & N’s enemy destroying machine]. Polityka weekly, 2 December.
- Jenkins, C. (2020): Trump slams Supreme Court decision to throw out election lawsuit. The Hill, 12 December.
- Judd, K. & Waters, K. (2018): Trump’s attacks on courts undermine judicial independence. ABA Journal, 28 June.
- Kaczyński J. (1991): Odwrotna strona medalu: Z Jarosławem Kaczyńskim rozmawia Teresa Bochwic [The other side of the medal: Teresa Bochwic in conversation with Jarosław Kaczyński]. ‘Most’, ‘Verba’: Warszaw & Chotomów.
- Kaczyński, J., & Kaczynski, L. (2006): Alfabet braci Kaczyńskich [Kaczyński brothers’ alphabet]. Crakow: Wydawn M.
- Kaczyński J. (2016): Porozumienie przeciw monowładzy: z dziejów PC [The alliance against the mono -power: history of the PC]. Poznań: Zysk i S -ka Wydawnictwo.
- Kim, S. (2021): … Because the Homeland Cannot Be in Opposition: Analysing the Discourses of Fidesz and Law and Justice (PiS) from Opposition to Power. East European Politics, 37(2), 332–51.
- Kis, J. (2019): Demokráciából autokráciába. A rendszertipológia és az átmenet dinamikája [From Democracy to Autocracy]. Politikatudományi Szemle, 28(1), 45–74.
- Kornai, J. (2015): Hungary’s U -Turn: Retreating from Democracy. Journal of Democracy, 26(3), 34–48.
- Körösényi, A., Illés, G. & Gyulai, A. (2020): The Orbán Regime: Plebiscitary Leader Democracy in the Making. London: Routledge.
- Körösényi, A. (2001): Parlamentáris vagy ‘elnöki’ kormányzás? Az Orbán -kormány összehasonlító perspektívából [Parliamentary or ‘presidential’ governance? The Orbán government from a comparative political perspective]. Századvég, 20, 3–38.
- Körösényi, A. (2015): Alkotmányozás és Alaptörvény [Constitutional process and Fundamental Law]. In: Körösényi, A. (ed.): A magyar politikai rendszer – Negyedszázad után [The Hungarian political system – after a quarter of a century], 85–107. Budapest: Osiris -MTA TK PTI.
- Krastev, I. (2004): Shifting Obsessions: Three Essays on the Politics of Anticorruption. Budapest: Central European University Press.
- Levitz, E. (2017): Trump Just Declared the ‘Court System’ a Threat to National Security. New York Magazine, 6 February.
- Liptak, A. (2016): Donald Trump Could Threaten U.S. Rule of Law, Scholars Say. New York Times, 3 June.
- Liptak, A. (2017): Appeals Court Panel Appears Skeptical of Trump’s Travel Ban. New York Times, 7 February.
- Lührmann, A. & Lindberg, S. I. (2019): A third wave of autocratization is here: what is new about it? Democratization, 26(7), 1095–1113.
- Magyar, B. (2016): Post -Communist Mafia State: The Case of Hungary. Budapest: CEU Press – Noran Libro.
- Müller, J. W. (2016): What Is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Nalepa, M. (2010): Skeletons in the closet: transitional justice in post -communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Olander, O. (2022): Trump denies he suggested ‘termination’ of Constitution, without deleting post. Politico, 5 December.
- Palonen, E. (2009): Political Polarisation and Populism in Contemporary Hungary. Parliamentary Affairs, 62(2), 318–34.
- Pech, L., Wachowiec, P. & Mazur, D. (2021): Poland’s Rule of Law Breakdown: A Five -Year Assessment of EU’s (In)Action. Hague J Rule Law, 13, 1–43.
- PEGA Committee (2023): REPORT of the investigation of alleged contraventions and maladministration in the application of Union law in relation to the use of Pegasus and equivalent surveillance spyware. European Parliament, A9-0189/2023.
- Piccirilli, G. (2023): Una nuova procedura di infrazione nei confronti della Polonia: la problematica vicenda della c.d. «Lex Tusk» [A new infringement procedure against Poland: the problematic affair of the so -called «Lex Tusk»]. Quaderni costituzionali, Rivista italiana di diritto costituzionale 3/2023, 659–661.
- Pócza, K. (2015): Az Alkotmánybíróság [The Constitutional Court]. In: Körösényi, A. (ed.): A magyar politikai rendszer – negyedszázad Után [The Hungarian political system – after a quarter of a century], 159–182. Budapest: Osiris -MTA TK PTI.
- Political Capital (2003): A liberalizmustól a Polgári Szövetségig [From liberalism to Civic Alliance], May 23, <accessed online: https://politicalcapital.hu/kereses.php?article_read=1&article_id=1049>.
- Polyák, G. (2015): The Hungarian Media System. Stopping Short or Re -Transformation? Comparative Southeast European Studies, 63(2), 272–318.
- Reilly, K. (2018): President Trump Escalates Attacks on ‘Obama Judges’ After Rare Rebuke From Chief Justice. Time, 21 November.
- Rymarz, F. (2012): Autokratyczne tendencje w zarządzaniu partiami politycznymi a demokratyczne państwo prawa i społeczeństwo obywatelskie [Authoritarian tendencies in managing political parties and the democratic rule of law state and civic society]. In: Kardas, P., Sroka, T. & Włodzimierz, W. (eds): Państwo prawa i prawo karne. Księga jubileuszowa Profesora Andrzeja Zolla [Rule of law state and the criminal law. Jubilee book for Professor Andrzej Zoll], Vol. I. Warsaw: Lex a Wolters Kluwer business.
- Sadurski, W. (2019a): Poland’s constitutional breakdown. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 58–95.
- Sadurski, W. (2019b): Polish Constitutional Tribunal Under PiS: From an Activist Court, to a Paralysed Tribunal, to a Governmental Enabler. Hague J Rule Law, 11, 63–84.
- Sadurski W. (2022) Institutional Populism, Courts, and the European Union. In: Krygier M, Czarnota A, Sadurski, W. (eds.): Anti-Constitutional Populism. Cambridge Studies in Law and Society. Cambridge University Press: 506–542.
- Safjan, M. (2008): Politics and Constitutional Courts a Judge’s Personal Perspective. EUI Working Papers LAW, No. 2008/10.
- Sárközy, T. (2014): Kétharmados túlkormányzás [Over -Governance with Two -Thirds Majority]. Budapest: Park Kiadó.
- Scheppele, K. L. (2013): The Rule of Law and the Frankenstate: Why Governance Checklists Do Not Work. Governance, 26(4), 559–562.
- SKBB (2011): Report of the Parliamentary Investigative Committee on Blida’s Death. Parliamentary document, Sejm paper ref. no. 4553, Sixth parliamentary term.
- SKSS (2011): Report of the Parliamentary Investigative Committee on Unlawful ‘Influences’. Parliamentary document, Sejm paper ref. no. 4642, Sixth parliamentary term.
- Soral, W., Cichocka, A., Bilewicz, M. & Marchlewska, M. (2018): The Collective Conspiracy Mentality in Poland. In: Uscinski, J. (ed.): Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them. New York, <accessed online: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0025>.
- Swan, J. (2022): A radical plan for Trump’s second term, Axios, 22 July.
- Tóth, C. (2015): Választási rendszer [Electoral system]. In: Körösényi, A. (ed.): A magyar politikai rendszer – negyedszázad Után [The Hungarian political system – after a quarter of a century], 231–48. Budapest: Osiris -MTA TK PTI.
- Tóth, G. A. (2017): Illiberal Rule of Law? Changing Features of Hungarian Constitutionalism? In: Adams, M., Meuwese, A. & Hirsch, B. E. (eds.): Constitutionalism and the Rule of Law: Bridging Idealism and Realism, 386–417. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Warzecha, L. & Kaczynski, L. (2011): Lech Kaczyński – ostatni wywiad [Lech Kaczyński: The last interview]. Warsaw: Prószyński i S -ka.
- Whipple, C. (2023): The Fight of His Life: Inside Joe Biden’s White House. New York: Scribner.
- Wyrzykowski, M. (2019): Experiencing the Unimaginable: The Collapse of the Rule of Law in Poland. Hague J Rule Law, 11, 417–422.