Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Cabinet formation under semi-presidentialism: European countries in comparison Cover

Cabinet formation under semi-presidentialism: European countries in comparison

Open Access
|Dec 2023

References

  1. Almeida, A. – Cho, S.-J. (2003): Presidential Power and Cabinet Membership Under Semi-Presidentialism. Paper at the Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, 3–6 April.
  2. Amorim Neto, O. (2003): Portugal: Changing Patterns of Delegation and Accountability under the President’s Watchful Eyes, in Strøm, K. – Müller, W.C. – Bergman, T., eds., Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies, 552–572, Oxford University Press.
  3. Amorim Neto, O. (2022): Semi-Presidentialism in Portugal: Academic Quarrels amidst Institutional Stability, in Fernandes, J.M. – Magalhães, P. C. – Costa Pinto, A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Portuguese Politics, 122–136, Oxford University Press.
  4. Amorim Neto, O. – Strøm, K. (2006): Breaking the Parliamentary Chain of Delegation: Presidents and Non-partisan Cabinet Members in European Democracies. British Journal of Political Science 36 (4): 619–643.
  5. Anckar, C. (2022): Presidents, Monarchs, and Prime Ministers: Executive Power Sharing in the World, Palgrave Macmillan.
  6. Anckar, C. – Fredriksson, C. (2019): Classifying Political Regimes 1800–2016: A Typology and a New Dataset. European Political Science 18 (2): 84–96.
  7. Armingeon, K. – Engler, S. – Leemann, L. (2022): Supplement to the Comparative Political Data Set – Government Composition 1960–2019, University of Zurich: available at: https://www.cpds-data.org/index.php/data (17 March 2023).
  8. Bahro, H.– Bayerlein, B.H. – Veser, E. (1998): Duverger’s Concept: Semi-Presidential Government Revisited. European Journal of Political Research 34 (2): 201–224.
  9. Bahro, H. – Veser, E. (1995): Das Semiprasidentielle System – “Bastard” oder Regierungsform sui Generis? Zeitschrift fur Parlamentsfragen 26 (3): 471–485.
  10. Bergman, T. (1993a): Constitutional Design and Government Formation: The Expected Consequences of Negative Parliamentarism. Scandinavian Political Studies 16 (4): 285–304.
  11. Bergman, T. (1993b): Formation Rules and Minority Governments. European Journal of Political Research 23 (1): 55–66.
  12. Bergman, T. – Ersson, S. – Hellström, J. (2015): Government Formation and Breakdown in Western and Central Eastern Europe. Comparative European Politics 13 (3): 345–375.
  13. Boban, D. (2007): “Minimalist” Concepts of Semi-Presidentialism: Are Ukraine and Slovenia Semi-PresidentialStates.Politička misao XLIV (5): 155–177.
  14. Boyron, S. (2020): Semi-Presidentialism: The Rise of an “Accidental” Model, in Cane, P., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Administrative Law, 315–338, Oxford University Press.
  15. Brunclík, M. – Kubát, M. (2016): Contradictory Approaches: Discussing Semi-Presidentialism in Central Europe. Analele Universităţii din Bucureşti. Seria Ştiinţe Politice 18 (1): 67–79.
  16. Brunclík, M. – Kubát, M. (2018): Semi-presidentialism, Parliamentarism and Presidents: Presidential Politics in Central Europe, Routledge.
  17. Canas, V. (1982): A Forma de Governo Semi-Presidencial e Suas Caracteristicas. Revista Jurldica 1: 98–103.
  18. Canas, V. (2004): The Semi-Presidential System. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 64 (1): 95–124.
  19. Ceccanti, S. – Massari, O. – Pasquino, G. (1996): Semipresidenzialismo. Analisi delle Esperienze Europee, II Mulino.
  20. Cheibub, J.A. – Chernykh, S. (2009): Are Semi-Presidential Constitutions Bad for Democratic Performance? Constitutional Political Economy 20 (3–4): 202–229.
  21. Cheibub, J.A. – Elkins, Z. – Ginsburg, T. (2014): Beyond Presidentialism and Parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science 44 (3): 515–544.
  22. Cheibub, J.A. – Martin, Shane – Rasch, Björn Erik (2021): Investiture Rules and Formation of Minority Governments in European Parliamentary Democracies. Party Politics 27 (2): 351–362.
  23. Cheibub, J.A. – Martin, S. – Rasch, B.E. (2013): The Investiture Vote and the Formation of Minority Parliamentary Governments. Paper at the 7th ECPR General Conference, Bordeaux, 4–7 September.
  24. Collier, D. – Levitsky, S. (1997): Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research. World Politics 49 (3): 430–451.
  25. Collier, D. – Mahon, J.E. (1993): Conceptual “Stretching” Revisited: Adapting Categories in Comparative Analysis. American Political Science Review 87 (4): 845–855.
  26. Duverger, M. (1980): A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government. European Journal of Political Research 8 (2): 165–187.
  27. Duverger, M. (1986): Le Concept de Régime Semi-Présidentiel, in Duverger, Maurice, ed., Les RégimesSemi-Présidentiels, 7–17, Presses Universitaires de France.
  28. Elgie, R. (1999a): Semi-Presidentialism and Comparative Institutional Engineering, in Elgie, R., ed., Semi-Presidentialism in Europe, 281–299, Oxford University Press.
  29. Elgie, R. (1999b): The Politics of Semi-Presidentialism, in Elgie, R., ed., Semi-PresidentialisminEurope, 1–21, Oxford University Press.
  30. Elgie, R. (2004): Semi-Presidentialism: Concepts, Consequences and Contesting Explanations. Political Studies Review 2 (3): 314–330.
  31. Elgie, R. (2005): Variations on a Theme: A Fresh Look at Semi-Presidentialism. Journal of Democracy 16 (3): 98–112.
  32. Elgie, R. (2007): What is Semi-presidentialism and where is it Found, in Elgie, R. – Moestrup, S., eds., Semi-presidentialism Outside Europe: A Comparative Study, 1–13. Routledge.
  33. Elgie, R. (2009): Duverger, Semi-presidentialism and the Supposed French Archetype. West European Politics 32 (2): 248–267.
  34. Elgie, R. (2011): Semi-Presidentialism: An Increasingly Common Constitutional Choice, in Elgie, R. – Moestrup, S. – Yu-Shan,W., eds., Semi-Presidentialism and Democracy, 1–20, Palgrave.
  35. Elgie, R. (2016): Three Waves of Semi-Presidential Studies. Democratisation 23 (1): 49–70.
  36. Elkins, Z. – Ginsburg, T. (2022): Characteristics of National Constitutions: Version 3.0, Comparative Constitutions Project: available at: https://comparativeconstitutionsproject.org/download-data/ (17 March 2023).
  37. Feijó, R.G. (2020): Presidents in Semi-Presidential Regimes: Moderating Power in Portugal and Timor-Leste, Palgrave Pivot.
  38. Frye, T. (1997): A Politics of Institutional Choices: Post-Communist Presidencies. Comparative Political Studies 30 (5): 523–552.
  39. Ganghof, S. (2021): Beyond Presidentialism and Parliamentarism: Democratic Design and the Separation of Powers, Oxford University Press.
  40. Huber, J.D. (1996): The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies. American Political Science Review 90 (2): 269–282.
  41. Kang, S.-G. (2008): Government Formation and Termination in European Democracies with Presidential Heads of State. PhD thesis, University of Rochester.
  42. Kang, S.-G. (2009): The Influence of Presidential Heads of State on Government Formation in European Democracies: Empirical Evidence. European Journal of Political Research 48 (4): 543–572.
  43. Kopeček, L. – Brunclík, M. (2019): How Strong Is the President in Government Formation? A New Classification and the Czech Case. East European Politics and Societies 33 (1): 109–134.
  44. Laurent, A. (2016): Duverger’s Concept of Semi-Presidentialism in France: Lots of Shadow and Very Little Light. French Politics 14: 139–152.
  45. Leston-Bandeira, C. (1998): Relationship between Parliament and Government in Portugal: An Expression of the Maturation of the Political System, in Norton, P., ed., Parliaments and Governments in Western Europe, 142–166, Frank Cass.
  46. Louwerse, T. (2014): Unpacking “positive” and “negative” parliamentarism. Paper at the workshop “The Evolution of Parliamentarism and Its Political Consequences” of the European Consortium of Political Research, Salamanca, 10–15 April.
  47. Lupia, A. (2003): Delegation and Its Perils, in Strøm, K. – Müller, W.C. – Bergman, T., eds., Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies, 33–54, Oxford University Press.
  48. Lytvyn, V. (2018): Categorisation and Systematisation of Institutionally-Procedural and Politically-Behavioural Attributes and Features of Semi-Presidentialism: Theoretical and Methodological Cut. Studium Europy Srodkowej i Wschodniej 10: 158–179.
  49. Lytvyn, V. (2021): Cabinet Responsibility as an Institutional, Procedural, Political and Behavioural Attribute of Semi-Presidentialism in European Countries. Studium Europy Srodkowej i Wschodniej 15: 30–49.
  50. Lytvyn, V. – Romanyuk, A. – Osadchuk, I. (2020): Attributes, Logics, and Reasons for the Choice of Semi-Presidentialism: A Verification and Systematisation on the Example of European Countries. Studia Politica: Romanian Political Science Review XX (4): 469–497.
  51. Magni-Berton, R. (2013): Reassessing Duvergerian Semi-Presidentialism: An Electoral Perspective. Comparative European Politics 11 (2): 222–248.
  52. Metcalf, L.K. (2000): Measuring Presidential Power. Comparative Political Studies 33 (5): 660–685.
  53. Mitchell, P. – Nyblade, B. (2008): Government Formation and Cabinet Type in Parliamentary Democracies, in Strøm, K. – Müller, W.C. – Bergman, T., eds., Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining: The Democratic Life Cycle in Western Europe, 201–236. Oxford University Press.
  54. Morgan-Jones, E. – Schleiter, P. (2004): Governmental Change in a President-Parliamentary Regime: The Case of Russia 1994–2003. Post-SovietAffairs 20 (2): 123–163.
  55. Müller, S. (2006): Presidential Power in Semi-Presidential Systems: The Case of Romania, Universität Freiburg.
  56. Noguiera Alcala, H. (1986): El Regimen Semipresidencial. Una Nueva Forma de Gobierno Democratico, Andante.
  57. Nousiainen, J. (1988): Bureaucratic Tradition, Semi-Presidential Rule and Parliamentary Government: The Case of Finland. European Journal of Political Research 16 (2): 229–249.
  58. Paloheimo, H. (2003): The Rising Power of the Prime Minister in Finland. Scandinavian Political Studies 26 (3): 219–243.
  59. Pasquino, G. (1997): Nomination: Semi-presidentialism: A Political Model at Work. European Journal of Political Research 31 (1): 128–146.
  60. Pasquino, G. (2005): Duverger and the Study of Semi-Presidentialism. French Politics 3 (3): 310–322.
  61. Pegoraro, L. – Rinella, A. (1997): Semipresidenzialismi, CEDAM.
  62. Protsyk, O. (2005): Prime Ministers’ Identity in Semi-Presidential Regimes: Constitutional Norms and Cabinet Formation Outcomes. European Journal of Political Research 44 (5): 721–748.
  63. Rasch, B.E. (2014): Institutional Foundations of Legislative Agenda-Setting, in Martin, S. – Saalfeld, T. – Strøm, K., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies, 455–480. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  64. Rasch, B.E. – Martin, S. – Cheibub, J.A. (2015): Parliaments and Government Formation: Unpacking Investiture Rules, Oxford University Press.
  65. Raunio, T. – Sedelius, T. (2020): Semi-Presidential Policy-Making in Europe: Executive Coordination and Political Leadership, Palgrave Macmillan.
  66. Raunio, T. – Wiberg, M. (2003): Finland: Polarised Pluralism in the Shadow of a Strong President, in Strøm, K. – Müller, W.C. – Bergman, T., eds., Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies, 301–324, Oxford University Press.
  67. Russo, F. – Verzichelli, L. (2014): The Adoption of Positive and Negative Parliamentarism: Systemic or Idiosyncratic Differences? Paper at the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Salamanca, 10–15 April.
  68. Saalfeld, T. (2008): Institutions, Chance and Choices: The Dynamics of Cabinet Survival, in Strøm, K. – Müller, W.C. – Bergman, T., eds., Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining: The Democratic Life Cycle in Western Europe, 327–368. Oxford University Press.
  69. Sartori, G. (1970): Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. American Political Science Review 64 (4): 1033–1053.
  70. Sartori, G. (1991): Comparing and Miscomparing. Journal of Theoretical Politics 3 (3): 243–257.
  71. Sartori, G. (1995): Elogio del Semi-Presidenzialismo. Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica 25 (1): 3–20.
  72. Sartori, G. (1997): Comparative Constitutional Engineering. An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes, Macmillan.
  73. Schleiter, P. – Morgan-Jones, E. (2005): Semi-Presidential Regimes: Providing Flexibility or Generating Representation and Governance Problems? Paper at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, 1–4 September.
  74. Schleiter, P. – Morgan-Jones, E. (2009a): Citizens, Presidents and Assemblies: The Study of Semi-Presidentialism Beyond Duverger and Linz. British Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 871–892.
  75. Schleiter, P. – Morgan-Jones, E. (2009b): Constitutional Power and Competing Risks: Monarchs, Presidents, Prime Ministers, and the Termination of East and West European Cabinets. American Political Science Review 103 (3): 496–512.
  76. Schleiter, P. – Morgan-Jones, E. (2009c): Party government in Europe? Parliamentary and semi-presidential democracies compared. European Journal of Political Research 48 (5): 665–693.
  77. Schleiter, P. – Morgan-Jones, E. (2010): Who’s in Charge? Presidents, Assemblies, and the Political Control of Semipresidential Cabinets. Comparative Political Studies 43 (11): 1415–1441.
  78. Sedelius, T. – Ekman, J. (2010): Intra-Executive Conflict and Cabinet Instability: Effects of Semi-presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe. Government and Opposition 45 (4): 505–530.
  79. Shugart, M.S. (2005): Semi-Presidential Systems: Dual Executive and Mixed Authority Patterns. French Politics 3 (3): 323–351.
  80. Shugart, M.S. – Carey, J.M. (1992): Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics, Cambridge University Press.
  81. Siaroff, A. (2003): Comparative Presidencies: The Inadequacy of the Presidential, Semi-Presidential and Parliamentary Distinction. European Journal of Political Research 42 (3): 287–312.
  82. Sieberer, U. (2015): Hire or Fire? The Link Between Cabinet Selection and Removal in European Democracies, in Rasch, B.E. – Martin, S. – Cheibub, J.A., eds., Parliaments and Government Formation: Unpacking Investiture Rules, 309–330, Oxford University Press.
  83. Skach, C. (2005): Borrowing Constitutional Designs. Constitutional Law in Weimar Germany and the French Fifth Republic, Princeton University Press.
  84. Steffani, W. (1995): Semi-Präsidentialismus: Ein Eigenständiger Systemtyp? Zur Unterscheidung von Legislative und Parlament. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 26 (4): 621–641.
  85. Strøm, K. (2003): Parliamentary democracy and delegation, in Strøm, K. – Müller, W.C. – Bergman, T., eds., Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies, 55–106, Oxford University Press.
  86. Thiebault, J.-L. (2003): France: Delegation and Accountability in the Fifth Republic, in Strøm, K. – Müller, W.C. – Bergman, T., eds., Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies, 325–346, Oxford University Press.
  87. Tsai, J.-H. (2021): Presidents, Unified Government and Legislative Control, Palgrave Macmillan.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2023-0033 | Journal eISSN: 2787-9038 | Journal ISSN: 1801-3422
Language: English
Page range: 725 - 765
Published on: Dec 18, 2023
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Vitaliy S. Lytvyn, Anatoliy S. Romanyuk, published by Metropolitan University Prague
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.