Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A correlation of the measurement techniques and their outputs in the study of the subnational level of politics Cover

A correlation of the measurement techniques and their outputs in the study of the subnational level of politics

Open Access
|Mar 2023

References

  1. Beer, Caroline and Neil J. Mitchell (2004): Democracy and Human Rights in the Mexican States: Elections or Social Capital? International Studies Quarterly 48 (2): 293–312.10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.00302.x
  2. Behrend, Jacqueline (2011): The Unevenness of Democracy at the Subnational Level: Provincial Closed Games in Argentina. Latin American Research Review 46 (1): 150–176.10.1353/lar.2011.0013
  3. Borges, Andre (2007). Rethinking State Politics: The Withering of State Dominant Machines in Brazil. Brazilian Political Science Review 1 (2): 108–136.
  4. Dahl, Robert (1972): Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition, Yale University Press.
  5. Fox, Jonathan (1994): Latin America’s Emerging Local Politics. Journal Of Democracy 5 (2): 105–116. Freidenberg, Flavia and Julieta Suárez-Cao, eds. (2014): Territorio y Poder: Nuevos actores y competencia política en los sistemas de partidos multinivel en América Latina, Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.
  6. Galeano, Franco (2018): Democracia municipal en la provincia de Salta (1987–2015), Tesis Doc-torado, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, Buenos Aires, Argentina: available at https://www. academia.edu/37324201/Democracia_Municipal_en_Salta_Tesis (23 August 2022).
  7. Gervasoni, Carlos (2008): Conceptualizing and Measuring Subnational Democracy. An Expert Survey Approach. The Committee on Concepts and Methods, IPSA-CIDE, Working Paper No. 23.
  8. Gervasoni, Carlos (2010): A Rentier Theory of Subnational Regimes: Fiscal Federalism, Democracy, and Authoritarianism in the Argentine Provinces. World Politics 62 (2): 302–340.10.1017/S0043887110000067
  9. Gervasoni, Carlos (2011): A Rentier Theory of Subnational Democracy: The Politically Regressive Effects of Fiscal Federalism in Argentina, Thesis Doctoral, University of Notre Dame du Lac, South Bend, United States: available at https://curate.nd.edu/downloads/und:1n79h417h58 (23 August 2022).
  10. Gervasoni, Carlos (2018): Hybrid Regimes within Democracies: Fiscal Federalism and Subnational Rentier States, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108590679
  11. Gibson, Edward L. (2005): Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism in Democratic Countries. World Politics 58 (1): 101–132.10.1353/wp.2006.0018
  12. Gibson, Edward L. and Julieta Suárez-Cao (2010): Federalized Party Systems and Subnational Party Competition: Theory and an Empirical Application to Argentina. Comparative politics 43 (1): 21–39.10.5129/001041510X12911363510312
  13. Giraudy, Agustina, Eduardo Moncada and Richard Snyder, eds. (2019): Inside Countries: Subnational Research in Comparative Politics, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108678384
  14. Giraudy, Agustina. (2009): Subnational undemocratic regime continuity after democratization: Argentina and Mexico in comparative perspective, PhD dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA: available at https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/concern/dissertations/gq67jr790 (23 August 2022).
  15. Goertz, Gary (2006): Social science concepts: A user’s guide, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  16. Goldberg, Ellis, Erik Wibbels and Eric Mvukiyehe (2008): Lessons from Strange Cases: Democracy, Development, and the Resource Curse in the U.S. States. Comparative Political Studies 41 (4–5): 477–514.10.1177/0010414007313123
  17. Hall, Peter A. (2003): Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Research, in Mahoney, James and Dietrich Rueschemeyer eds., Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences, 373–404. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Harrison, John (2007): From competitive regions to competitive city-regions: a new orthodoxy, but some old mistakes. Journal of Economic Geography 7 (3): 311–332.10.1093/jeg/lbm005
  19. Hendriks, Frank, John Loughlin and Anders Lidstrom, eds. (2011): European subnational democracy: Comparative reflections and conclusions, in The Oxford handbook of local and regional democracy in Europe, 715–743. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199562978.003.0031
  20. Hernández Valdez, Alfonso (2000): Las Causas Estructurales de la Democracia Local en México, 1989-1998. Política y gobierno 7 (1): 101–144.
  21. Hnatiuk, Volodymyr (2019a). A History and Methodology of Research of the Subnational Topic in Political Science. Politologija 96 (4): 92-139.10.15388/Polit.2019.96.4
  22. Hnatiuk, Volodymyr (2019b): Subnational Political Regimes in Ukraine on the Example of the Transcarpathian, Lviv and Chernivtsi Region in the Period 2010–2015: the Institutional Measurement. Scientific notes of the Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 98 (2): 126–154.
  23. Hnatiuk, Volodymyr (2019c): Subnational Political Regimes in Ukraine on the Example of the Transcarpathian, Lviv and Chernivtsi Region in the 2010: the Subjective Measurement. Visnyk of the Lviv University. Series Philos.-Political Studies 27 (6): 63–70.10.30970/2307-1664.2019.27.8
  24. Hnatiuk, Volodymyr (2020): Subnational Political Regimes in Ukraine on the Example of the Transcarpathian, Lviv and Chernivtsi Region in the 2015: the Subjective Measurement. Uzhgorod National University. Regional Studies 20 (1): 7–11.10.32782/2663-6170/2020.20.1
  25. Hnatiuk, Volodymyr (2021a): Features of functioning of political processes at the regional level in Ukraine on the example of Transcarpathian, Lviv and Chernivtsi regions in 2010–2015, PhD dissertation, Ivan Franko National University, Lviv, Ukraine: available at https://lnu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/dis_hnatiuk.pdf (23 August 2022).
  26. Hnatiuk, Volodymyr (2021b): Principles, stages and options for studying subnational issues in political science, Odesa: Helvetica Publishing House.
  27. Karmazina, Maria, Tetyana Bevz and Natalia Rotar, eds. (2018): Regional political regimes in Ukraine: grounds for formation, specifics of functioning, features of transformation, Kyiv: Scientific notes of the Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.
  28. Lijphart, Arend (1971): Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method. American Political Science Review 65 (3): 682–693.10.2307/1955513
  29. Makara, Sabiti (2018): Decentralisation and good governance in Africa: A critical review. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations 12 (2): 22–32.
  30. Marshall, Monty G., Ted R. Gurr and Keith Jaggers (2016): Polity IV: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2015, Center for Systemic Peace.
  31. McMann, Kelly M. (2006): Economic Autonomy and Democracy: Hybrid Regimes in Russia and Kyrgyzstan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511510281
  32. McMann, Kelly M. and Nikolai Petrov (2000): A Survey of Democracy in Russia’s Regions. Post-Soviet Geography and Economics 41 (3): 155–182.10.1080/10889388.2000.10641137
  33. O’Donnell, Guillermo (1993): On the State, Democratization and Some Conceptual Problems: A Latin American View with Glances at Some Postcommunist Countries. World Development 21 (8): 1355–69.10.1016/0305-750X(93)90048-E
  34. O’Donnell, Guillermo (1999): Polyarchies and the (Un)Rule of Law in Latin America: A Partial Conclusion, in Mendez, Juan, Paulo Pinheiro and Guillermo O’Donnell, eds., The (Un)Rule of Law and the Underprivileged in Latin America, 303–338. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
  35. Pino Uribe, Juan (2013): Regimen y territorio. Trayectorias de desarrollo del regimen politico a nivel subnacional en Colombia 1988–2011. Serie Documentos del Departamento de Ciencia Política No. 23 (34).
  36. Rokkan, Stein (1970): Citizens, Elections, Parties: Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Processes of Development, New York: David McKay.
  37. Salas, Azuara P. and Erwin A. M. García (2018): Medios de comunicación en la Huasteca Poto-sina: entre el monopolio del mercado y las presiones del poder local, Revista Caribeña de Ciencias Sociales 71 (6): available at https://www.eumed.net/rev/caribe/2018/06/me dios--comunicacion-huasteca.html (23 August 2022).
  38. Sevilla, José A. (2016a, agosto 3–6): Transición hacia la democracia en los regímenes subnacionales de México. IV Congreso Internacional de la Asociación Mexicana de Ciencia Política (AMECIP), Monterrey, México.
  39. Sevilla, José A. (2016b, septiembre 14–15): Identificando a las unidades subnacionales como tipos de régimen politico: una forma de medir su democratización. Workshop «Calidad de democracia: Nueva agenda de investigación», Santiago, Chile.
  40. Sevilla, José A. (2018): Democratización subnacional: reflexiones acerca de su conceptualización, dimensiones constitutivas y métodos de identifícación. Revista legislativa de estudios sociales y de opinión pública 23 (11): 113–142.
  41. Sevilla, José A. (2019): El poder de los gobernadores. Conceptualización y medición en los ejecutivos locales mexicanos. Colombia Internacional 100 (4): 201–235.
  42. Snyder, Richard (2001): Scaling Down: The Subnational Comparative Method. Studies In Comparative International Development 36 (1): 93–110.10.1007/BF02687586
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2022-0023 | Journal eISSN: 2787-9038 | Journal ISSN: 1801-3422
Language: English
Page range: 531 - 572
Published on: Mar 10, 2023
Published by: Metropolitan University Prague
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Volodymyr Hnatiuk, Svitlana Bula, published by Metropolitan University Prague
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.