Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Trajectories of social democracy in the Baltic countries: choices and constraints Cover

Trajectories of social democracy in the Baltic countries: choices and constraints

Open Access
|Mar 2020

References

  1. Auers, D. (2015): Comparative Politics and Government of the Baltic States: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania in the 21st Century. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  2. Ágh, A. (2018): The long road from Neoliberalism to Neopopulism in ECE: The social paradox of neopopulism and decline of the Left. Baltic Journal of Political Science (7–8): 6–26.10.15388/BJPS.2018.7-8.1
  3. Bozóki, A. and Ishiyama, J.T., eds. (2002): The Communist Successor Parties of Central and Eastern Europe. New York: Sharpe.
  4. Brunalas B. (2020): „Naujausi partijų reitingai: konservatorių nedžiugina, o valstiečiams – tragiški“.. Accessed January 14, 2020.
  5. Bucur, C. and McMenamin, I. (2015): „Poland: The Presidentialization of Parties in a Young Democracy“, In: Passarelli G., ed. The Presidentialization of Political Parties: Organizations, Institutions and Leaders. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 107–123.10.1057/9781137482464_6
  6. Cabada, L. (2015): Changes in Mutual Relations between Czech Social Democrats and Communists after 2000 and Strengthening of Anti-Communism in Czech Society and Politics. Politické vedy / Political Sciences, 18(4): 8–31.
  7. Cabada, L., Hloušek, V. and Jurek, P. (2014): Political Parties in East Central Europe. Lanham: Lexington Books.
  8. Cook, L.J., Orenstein, M.A. and Rueschemeyer, M., eds. (1999): Left Policies and Social Policy in Postcommunist Europe. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  9. Coppieters, B., Deschouwer, K. and Waller, M., eds. (1994): Social Democracy in a Post ‑Communist Europe. Ilford and Portland: Frank Cass & Co. Ltd.
  10. Curry, J.L. and Urban, J.B., eds. (2003): The Left Transformed in Post ‑Communist Societies: The Cases of East ‑Central Europe, Russia, and Ukraine. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  11. Dauderstädt, M. (1999): Troubled Transition: Social Democracy in East Central Europe. Bonn: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
  12. Dauderstädt, M. (2005): The Communist Successor Parties of Eastern and Central Europe and European Integration. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 21(1): 48–66.10.1080/13523270500055348
  13. De Waele, J.-M. and Soare, S. (2011): The Central and Eastern European Left: A Political Family under Construction. In: J. Cronin, G. Ross and J. Shoch, eds. What’s Left of the Left: Democrats and Social Democrats in Challenging Times. Durham: Duke University Press, 290–318.10.1215/9780822394518-012
  14. Enyedi Z. (2005): The role of agency in cleavage formation. European Journal of Political Re‑ search, 44: 697–720.10.1111/j.1475-6765.2005.00244.x
  15. Gerrits, A. W. M. (2002): The Social Democratic Tradition of East Central Europe. East European Politics and Societies 16(1): 54–108.10.1177/0888325402016001004
  16. Greskovits, B. (2015): The Hollowing and Backsliding of Democracy in East Central Europe. Global Policy 6(1): 28–37.10.1111/1758-5899.12225
  17. Grzymala-Busse, A. (2002): Redeeming the Communist Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613388
  18. Grzymala-Busse A. (2018): Victims of Their Own Success: The Paradoxical Fate of the Communist Successor Parties. In: Loxton J. and Mainwarring S, eds. Authoritarian Successor Parties, New York: Cambridge University Press, 145–174.10.1017/9781108560566.006
  19. Grzymala-Busse A. (2019): Hoist on Their Own Petards? The Reinvention and Collapse of Authoritarian Successor Parties. Party Politics 25(4): 2019: 569–582.10.1177/1354068817740336
  20. Hloušek V. (2014): Is the Czech Republic on its Way to Semi-Presidentialism? Baltic Journal of Law & Politics 7(2): 95–118.10.1515/bjlp-2015-0004
  21. Hloušek, V. and Kopeček, L. (2010): Origin, Ideology and Transformation of Political Parties East ‑Central and Western Europe Compared. Abingdon and New York: Ashgate Publishing.
  22. Hloušek, V. and Kopeček, L. (2017): Entrepreneurial Parties: A Basic Conceptual Framework. Czech Journal of Political Science 24(2): 83–91.10.5817/PC2017-2-83
  23. Hloušek V. and Kopeček L. (2019): How to run an efficient political machine: the billionaire Andrej Babiš and his political-business project. Politics in Central Europe 15(1): 35–54.10.2478/pce-2019-0002
  24. Holmes, M. and Lightfoot, S. (2011): Limited Influence? The Role of the Party of European Socialists in Shaping Social Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. Government and Op‑ position 45(1): 32–55.10.1111/j.1477-7053.2010.01328.x
  25. Hopkin, J. and Paolucci, C. (1999): The business firm model of party organisation: Cases from Spain and Italy. European Journal of Political Research 35: 307–339.10.1111/1475-6765.00451
  26. Hough, D., Paterson, W.E. and Sloan, J., eds. (2006): Learning from the West: Policy Transfer and Programmatic Change in the Communist Successor Parties of East Central Europe. London: Routledge.10.1080/13523270500054911
  27. Ikstens, J. (2013): Latvia. In: J.-M. De Waele, F. Escalona and M. Vieira, eds. The Palgrave Handbook of Social Democracy in the European Union. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  28. Jastramskis, M., Kavaliauskaitė, J., Morkevičius, V., Petronytė-Urbonavičienė, I. ir Ramonaitė, A. (2018): Ar galime prognozuoti Seimo rinkimus? Trijų kūnų problema Lietuvos politikoje. Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla.
  29. Keman, H. (2017): Social Democracy: A Comparative Account of the Left ‑Wing Party Family. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315166247
  30. Kitschelt, H. (1994): The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511622014
  31. Kopeček L. (2016): „I’m paying, so I decide“: Czech ANO as an Extreme Form of a Business-Firm Party. East European Politics and Societies 30(4): 725–749.10.1177/0888325416650254
  32. Krupavičius, A. (2013): Lithuania. In: J.-M. De Waele, F. Escalona and M. Vieira, eds. The Palgrave Handbook of Social Democracy in the European Union. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  33. Kudrnáč A. and Petrúšek I. (2018): Czech Republic: Political development and data for 2017. European Journal of Political Research Political Data Yearbook. 1–11.10.1111/2047-8852.12223
  34. Mair, P. (2013): Ruling the Void. The Hollowing of Western Democracy. London: Verso.
  35. Malova D. (2013): Slovakia. In: J.-M. De Waele, F. Escalona and M. Vieira, eds. The Palgrave Handbook of Social Democracy in the European Union. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 550–574.10.1111/2047-8852.12029
  36. Orenstein, M.A. (1998): A genealogy of Communist successor parties in East Central Europe and the determinants of their success. East European Politics and Societies 12(3): 472–99.10.1177/0888325498012003004
  37. Panebianco, A. (1988): Political Parties: Organization and Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  38. Passarelli G. (2015): Parties’ Genetic Features: The Missing Link in the Presidentialization of Parties. In: Passarelli G., ed. 2015. The Presidentialization of Political Parties: Organizations, Institutions and Leaders. Basingstoke: Palgrave. 1–24.10.1057/9781137482464_1
  39. Perottino M. and Polášek M. (2013): Czech Republic. In: De Waele J.-M., Escalona F., Vieira M., eds. The Palgrave Handbook of Social Democracy in the European Union, Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 416–433.
  40. Pettai, V. and Saharov, J. (2013): Estonia. In: J.-M. De Waele, F. Escalona and M. Vieira, eds. The Palgrave Handbook of Social Democracy in the European Union. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  41. Poguntke T. and Webb, P. D. (2018): Presidentialization, Personalization, and Populism: The Hollowing Out of Party Government. In: Cross, W. P., Katz – R.S., Pruysers S. (eds.), 2018. The Personalization of Democratic Politics and the Challenge for Political Parties, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 181–196.
  42. Ramonaitė, A., Jastramskis, M., Kavaliauskaitė, J., Nevinskaitė, L. ir Žiliukaitė, R. (2014): Kaip renkasi Lietuvos rinkėjai? Idėjos, interesai ir įvaizdžiai politikoje. Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla.
  43. Saarts, T. (2011): Comparative Party System Analysis in Central and Eastern Europe: The Case of The Baltic States. Studies of Transition States and Societies 3(3): 83–104.
  44. Schmidt, I., ed. (2016): The Three Worlds of Social Democracy: A Global View. London: Pluto Press.10.2307/j.ctt1dwstk8
  45. Social Inclusion Monitor Europe (2017): Social Justice in the EU – Index Report 2017. Bertelsmann Stiftung.
  46. Tarrow, S. (2010): The strategy of paired comparison: toward theory of practice. Comparative Political Studies 43(2): 230–259.10.1177/0010414009350044
  47. Tavits, M. (2013): Post ‑Communist Democracies and Party Organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139565196
  48. Toots, A. (2019): 2019 Parliamentary Elections in Estonia. Riga: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
  49. TS-LKD (2018): Declaration: We believe in Europe. .(7July2019).
  50. Vachudova, M.A. (2015): The positions and fortunes of social democratic parties in East Central Europe. In: M. Keating and D. McCrone, eds. The Crisis of Social Democracy in Europe. Edinburg: Edinburgh University Press. 47–67.
  51. Žvaliauskas, G. (2007): Ar partijos Lietuvoje yra demokratiškos? Kaunas: Technologija.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2020-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2787-9038 | Journal ISSN: 1801-3422
Language: English
Page range: 211 - 230
Published on: Mar 31, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Liutauras Gudžinskas, published by Metropolitan University Prague
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.