Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Stereotypes Determining Perceptions of Female Politicians: The Case of Poland Cover

Stereotypes Determining Perceptions of Female Politicians: The Case of Poland

Open Access
|Mar 2019

References

  1. Aalberg, Toril – Jenssen, Anders T. (2007): Gender Stereotyping of Political Candidates: An Experimental Study of Political Communication. Nordicom Review 28(1): 17–32.10.1515/nor-2017-0198
  2. Adams, William (1975): Candidate Characteristics, Office of Election, and Voter Responses. Experimental Study of Politics 4: 76–88.
  3. Alexander, Deborah – Andersen, Kristi (1993): Gender as a Factor in the Attribution of Leadership Traits. Political Research Quarterly 46(3): 527–545.10.1177/106591299304600305
  4. Atkeson, Lonna R. – Rapoport, Ronald B. (2003): The more things change the more they stay the same: examining gender differences in political attitude expression 1952–2000. Public Opinion Quarterly 67(4): 495–521.10.1086/378961
  5. Bakan, David (1966): The Duality of Human Existence: An Essay on Psychology and Religion. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
  6. Bartels, Larry M. (2000): Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952-1996. American Journal of Political Science 44(1): 35–50.10.2307/2669291
  7. Bauer, Nichole M. (2013): Rethinking stereotype reliance: Understanding the connection between female candidates and gender stereotypes. Politics and the life sciences 32(1): 22–42.10.2990/32_1_22
  8. Bauer, Nichole M. (2015): Emotional, Sensitive, and Unfit for Office? Gender Stereotype Activation and Support Female Candidates. Political Psychology 36(6): 691–708.10.1111/pops.12186
  9. Beaman, Lori, – Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra – Duflo, Esther – Pande, Rohini – Topalova, Petia (2009): Powerful Women: Does Exposure Reduce Bias? Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(4): 1497–1540.10.1162/qjec.2009.124.4.1497
  10. Bhavnani, Rikhil R. (2009): Do Electoral Quotas Work after They Are Withdrawn? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in India. American Political Science Review 103(1): 23–35.10.1017/S0003055409090029
  11. Brannon, Linda (2017): Gender: Psychological Perspectives. 7th ed., New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9781315621821
  12. Brown, Clyde – Heighberger, Neil – Shocket, Peter (1993): Gender-Based Differences in Perceptions of Male and Female City Council Candidates. Women and Politics 13: 1–17.10.1300/J014v13n01_01
  13. Burrell, Barbara C. (1994): A Woman’s Place Is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.14231
  14. Deaux, Kay – Lewis, Laurie L. (1984): Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender labels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46(5): 991–1004.10.1037/0022-3514.46.5.991
  15. Devroe, Robin – Wauters, Bram (2017): Political gender stereotypes in Flanders (Belgium): Competent men versus leftist women? Paper prepared for the European Consortium for Political Research general conference, 6–10 September 2017, Oslo, Norway.
  16. Dolan, Kathleen (2004): The Impact of Candidate Sex on Evaluations of Candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives. Social Science Quarterly 85(1): 206–217.10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.08501015.x
  17. Dolan, Kathleen (2010): The Impact of Gender Stereotyped Evaluations on Support for Women Candidates. Political Behavior 32(1): 69–88.10.1007/s11109-009-9090-4
  18. Dolan, Kathleen (2014): Gender Stereotypes, Candidate Evaluations, and Voting for Women Candidates: What Really Matters? Political Research Quarterly 67(1): 96–107.10.1177/1065912913487949
  19. Druckman, James N. – Kam, Cindy D. (2011): Students as Experimental Participants: A Defense of the ‘Narrow Data Base’, in Druckman, James N. – Green, Donald P. – Kuklinski, James H. – Lupia, Arthur, eds., Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, 1–57, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511921452.004
  20. Eagly, Alice H. (1987): Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  21. Falk, Erika – Kenski, Kate (2006): Issue Saliency and Gender Stereotypes: Support for Women as Presidents in Times of War and Terrorism. Social Science Quarterly 87(1): 1–18.10.1111/j.0038-4941.2006.00365.x
  22. Ferreira, Fernando – Gyourko, Joseph (2009): Do Political Parties Matter? Evidence from U.S. Cities-super. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(1): 399–422.10.1162/qjec.2009.124.1.399
  23. Filipiak, Grażyna (2001): Kompetencja emocjonalna kobiet i mężczyzn a życie rodzinne. Roczniki Socjologii Rodziny XIII: 197–207.
  24. Fiorina, Morris P. – Abrams, Samuel J. – Pope, Jeremy C. (2006): Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. 2nd. ed. New York, NY: Pearson Longman.
  25. Fisher, Robert J. (1993): Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning. Journal of Consumer Research 20(2): 303–315.10.1086/209351
  26. Flis, Jarosław (2012): Skuteczność parytetu, in Turska-Kawa, Agnieszka – Wojtasik, Waldemar, eds., Wybory parlamentarne 2011, 79–102, Katowice: REMAR.
  27. Fox, Richard L. – Smith, Eric R.A.N. (1998): The Role of Candidate Sex in Voter Decision-Making. Political Psychology 19(2): 405–419.10.1111/0162-895X.00110
  28. Fridkin, Kim L. – Kenney, Patrick J. (2009): The Role of Gender Stereotypes in U.S. Senate Campaigns. Politics & Gender 5(3): 301–324.10.1017/S1743923X09990158
  29. Fuszara, Małgorzata (2010): Kobiety w polityce w okresie transformacji w Polsce, in Sochańska--Frąckowiak, Monika – Królikowska, Sabina, eds., Kobiety w polskiej transformacji 1989–2009: podsumowania, interpretacje, prognozy, 19–41, Toruń: Adam Marszałek.
  30. Gawor, Agnieszka (2006): Stereotyp kobiety polityka a wybrane zmienne demograficzne i psychologiczne, in Bronowicka, Anna, ed., Wyzwania i zagrożenia demokracji w Polsce w obliczu wyborów 2005, 155–171, Opole: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Opolskiego.
  31. Głowacki, Antoni (2017): Czy młodzi Polacy są prawicowi?. Komunikat z badań nr 102. Warszawa: Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej.
  32. Goodman, Norman (1992): Wstęp do socjologii. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka.
  33. Grimm, Pamela (2010): Social Desirability Bias. Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing. DOI: 10.1002/9781444316568.wiem02057.10.1002/9781444316568.wiem02057
  34. Hoffman, Curt – Hurst, Nancy (1990): Gender Stereotypes: Perception or Rationalization? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58(2): 197–208.10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.197
  35. Huddy, Leonie – Terkildsen, Nayda (1993): Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates. American Journal of Political Science 37(1): 119–147.10.2307/2111526
  36. Huddy, Leonie – Feldman, Stanley – Capelos, Theresa – Provost, Colin (2002): The Consequences of Terrorism: Disentangling the Effects of Personal and National Threat. Political Psychology 23(3): 485–509.10.1111/0162-895X.00295
  37. Inter-Parliamentary Union (1995): Women in Parliaments, 1945–1995: A Word Statistical Survey. Geneva: Inter-Parliamentary Union.
  38. Jakubowska, Urszula (1999): Preferencje polityczne. Psychologiczne teorie badania. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Psychologii PAN.
  39. Jarymowicz, Maria (1976): Makiawelizm – osobowość ludzi nastawionych na manipulowanie innymi, in Reykowski, Janusz, ed., Osobowość a społeczne zachowanie się ludzi, 293–324, Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza.
  40. Kahn, Kim F. (1993): Gender Differences in Campaign Messages: The Political Advertisements of Men and Women Candidates for the U.S. Senate. Political Research Quarterly 46(3): 481–502.10.2307/448944
  41. Kahn, Kim F. (1996): The Political Consequences of Being a Woman: How Stereotypes Influence the Conduct and Consequences of Political Campaigns. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  42. Kardes, Frank R. (1996): In Defense of Experimental Consumer Psychology. Journal of Consumer Psychology 5 (3): 279–296.10.1207/s15327663jcp0503_04
  43. King, David C. – Matland, Richard E. (2003): Sex and the Grand Old Party: An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Candidate Sex on Support for a Republican Candidate. American Politics Research 31(6): 595–612.10.1177/1532673X03255286
  44. Koch, Jeffrey W. (1999): Candidate gender and assessments of senate candidates. Social Science Quarterly 80(1): 84–96.
  45. Koch, Jeffrey W. (2002): Gender Stereotypes and Citizens’ Impressions of House Candidates’ Ideological Orientation. American Journal of Political Science 46(2): 453–462.10.2307/3088388
  46. Krupnikov, Yanna – Bauer, Nichole M. (2014): The Relationship Between Campaign Negativity, Gender and Campaign Context. Political Behavior 36(1): 167–188.10.1007/s11109-013-9221-9
  47. Lambert, Alan J. – Wyer Jr/, Robert S. (1990): Stereotypes and social judgment: The effects of typicality and group heterogeneity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59(4): 676–691.10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.676
  48. Lau, Richard R. – Redlawsk, David P. (2001): Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision-making. American Journal of Political Science 45(4): 951–971.10.2307/2669334
  49. Lawless, Jennifer L. (2004): Women, War, and Winning Elections: Gender Stereotyping in the post-September 11th Era. Political Research Quarterly 57(3): 479–490.10.1177/106591290405700312
  50. Layman, Geoffrey C. – Carsey, Thomas M. – Horowitz, Juliana M. (2006): Party Polarization in American Politics: Characteristics, Causes and Consequences. Annual Review of Political Science 9: 83–110.10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.070204.105138
  51. Leeper, Mark S. (1991): The Impact of Prejudice on Female Candidates: An Experimental Look at Voter Inference. American Politics Quarterly 19(2): 248–261.10.1177/1532673X9101900206
  52. Lewis, Kristi M. (2000): When Leaders Display Emotions: How Followers Respond to Negative Emotional Expressions of Male and Female Leaders. Journal of Organizational Behavior 21: 221–234.10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200003)21:2<;221::AID-JOB36>3.0.CO;2-0
  53. Listhaug, Ola – Huseby, Beate – Matland, Richard E. (1995): Valgatferd blant kvinner og menn: 1957-1993, in Raaum, Nina C., ed., Kjønn og politick. Oslo, Norway: Tano Forlag.
  54. Lucas, Jeffrey W. (2003): Theory-testing generalization, and the problem of external validity. Sociological Theory 21(3): 236–253.10.1111/1467-9558.00187
  55. Mandal, Eugenia (1995): Podmiotowe i interpersonalne konsekwencje stereotypów związanych z płcią. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
  56. Marmola, Maciej – Olszanecka, Agata (2012): Partycypacja polityczna kobiet a wprowadzenie ustawowych kwot wyborczych. Preferencje Polityczne 3: 195–214.
  57. Marody, Mirosława – Giza-Poleszczuk, Anna (2000): Być kobietą, być mężczyzną – czyli o przemianach tożsamości związanej z płcią we współczesnej Polsce, in Marody, Mirosława, ed., Między rynkiem a etatem. Społeczne negocjowanie polskiej rzeczywistości, 44–74, Warszawa: Scholar.
  58. Marszałek, Lidia (2008): Kulturowe uwarunkowania roli kobiety we współczesnym społeczeństwie. Seminare. Poszukiwania naukowe 25: 267–279.10.21852/sem.2008.25.20
  59. Matland, Richard E. (1994): Putting Scandinavian Equality to the Test: An Experimental Evaluation of the Gender Stereotyping of Political Candidates in a Sample of Norwegian Voters. British Journal of Political Science 24(2): 273–292.10.1017/S0007123400009819
  60. McDermott, Monica L. (1998): Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections. Political Research Quarterly 51(4): 895–918.10.1177/106591299805100403
  61. Mouffe, Chantal (2005): On the Political. London: Routledge.
  62. Mueller, Carol M. (1988): The Politics of the Gender Gap. The Social Construction of Political Influence. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  63. Norton, Noelle H. (1999): Uncovering the Dimensionality of Gender Voting in Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly 24(1): 65–86.10.2307/440300
  64. Okimoto, Tyler G. – Brescoll, Victoria L. (2010): The Price of Power: Power Seeking and the Backlash Against Female Politicians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36(7): 923–936.10.1177/0146167210371949
  65. Paul, David – Smith, Jessi L. (2008): Subtle Sexism? Examining Vote Preferences When Women Run Against Men for the Presidency. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 29(4): 451–476.10.1080/15544770802092576
  66. Pew Research Center (2008): Men or Women: Who’s the Better Leader? A Paradox in Public Attitudes: available at http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2008/08/25/men-or-women-whos--the-better-leader/ (16 December 2016).
  67. Philpot, Tasha S. – Walton, Hanes (2007): One of Our Own: Black Female Candidates and the Voters Who Support Them. American Journal of Political Science 51(1): 49–62.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00236.x
  68. Pilch, Irena (2008): Makiawelista wśród ludzi. Nowe badania. Psychologia społeczna 3(8): 231–242.
  69. Prentice, Deborah A. – Carranza, Erica (2002): What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly 26: 269–281.10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00066
  70. Rahn, Wendy M. (1993): The role of partisan stereotypes in information processing about political candidates. American Journal of Political Science 37(2): 472–496.10.2307/2111381
  71. Reykowski, Janusz (2000): Psychologia polityczna, in Strelau, Jan, ed., Psychologia. Podręcznik akademicki. Gdańsk: GWP.
  72. Rosenthal, Cindy S. (1995): The Role of Gender in Descriptive Representation. Political Research Quarterly 48(3): 599–611.10.1177/106591299504800307
  73. Rosenwasser, Shirley M. – Dean, Norma G. (1989): Gender Role and Political Office: Effects of Perceived Masculinity/Femininity of Candidate and Political Office. Psychology of Women Quarterly 13(1): 77–85.10.1111/j.1471-6402.1989.tb00986.x
  74. Rosenwasser, Shirley M. – Seale, Jana (1988): Attitudes Toward a Hypothetical Male or Female Presidential Candidate: A Research Note. Political Psychology 9(4): 591–598.10.2307/3791529
  75. Sanbonmatsu, Kira (2002): Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice. American Journal of Political Science 46(1): 20–34.10.2307/3088412
  76. Sapiro, Virginia (1982): If U.S. Senator Baker Were a Woman: An Experimental Study of Candidate Images. Political Psychology 3(1–2): 61–83.10.2307/3791285
  77. Sapiro, Virginia (1983): The Political Integration of Women. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  78. Schneider, Monica C. – Bos, Angela L. (2014): Measuring Female Politician Stereotypes. Political Psychology 35(2): 245–266.10.1111/pops.12040
  79. Sears, David O. (1986): College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(3): 515–530.10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.515
  80. Siklova, Jirina (1993): Are women in Central and Eastern Europe conservative?, in Funk, Nanette – Mueller, Magda, eds., Gender Politics and Post-Communism: Reflections from Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union, 74–83, New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9780429425776-8
  81. Skarżyńska, Krystyna (2002): Podstawy psychologii politycznej. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka.
  82. Thomas, Sue (1991): The Impact of Women on State Legislative Policies. Journal of Politics 53(4): 958–976.10.2307/2131862
  83. Tiedens, Larissa Z. (2001): Anger and Advancement Versus Sadness and Subjugation: The Effect of Negative Emotion Expressions on Social Status Conferral. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80(1): 86–94.10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.86
  84. Turska-Kawa, Agnieszka (2011): Political activation of young people. On the importance of the humanities for social practice, in Bokus, Barbara, ed., The Humanities Today and the Idea of Interdisciplinary Studies, 267–280, Warszawa: MATRIX Publishers.
  85. Vasta, Ross M. – Haith, Marshall – Miller, Scott A. (1995): Psychologia dziecka. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Szkolne i Pedagogiczne.
  86. Verbrugge, Lois M. – Wingard, Deborah L. (1987): Sex Differences in Health and Mortality. Women and Health 12(2): 103–145.10.1300/J013v12n02_07
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2018-0016 | Journal eISSN: 2787-9038 | Journal ISSN: 1801-3422
Language: English
Page range: 7 - 30
Published on: Mar 16, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 Agnieszka Turska-Kawa, Agata Olszanecka-Marmola, published by Metropolitan University Prague
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.