Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Open Access
|Aug 2024

References

  1. Ádám, B. Á. & Sebestyén, Z. (2023). Comparison of OEE-based manufacturing productivity metrics. In: Creative Construction Conference 2023, pp. 432–439.
  2. Ahmed, M. H. (2013). OEE can be your key. Industrial Engineer, 45(8), pp. 43–48.
  3. Árva, G., Tóth, Z. E., Jónás, T., & Surman, V. (2019). Will the Likert scale pass the final exam? A novel, fuzzy-number-based evaluation of supervisors’ performance. Proceedings of Feb Zagreb 10th International Odyssey Conference on Economics and Business, 1(1), pp. 300–316.
  4. Ashkanani, S., & Franzoi, R. (2022). An overview on megaproject management systems. Management Matters, 19(2), pp. 129–148.
  5. Association for Project Management (APM). (2012). APM Body of Knowledge – Definitions (Association for Project Management), 7th edn. Association for Project Management, Buckinghamshire.
  6. Association for Project Management (APM). (2019). APM – A CostE Estimating Guide. Association for Project Management. Association for Project Management, Buckinghamshire.
  7. Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management: Cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), pp. 337–342.
  8. Badewi, A. (2016). The impact of project management (PM) and benefits management (BM) practices on project success: Towards developing a project benefits governance framework. International Journal of Project Management, 34(4), pp. 761–778.
  9. Baker, B. N., Murphy, D. C. & Fisher, D. (1997). Factors affecting project success. In Cleland, D. I. & King, W. R. (Ed.), Project Management Handbook, Wiley, New York, NY, pp. 902–919.
  10. Basu, R. (2014). Managing quality in projects: An empirical study. International Journal of Project Management, 32(1), pp. 178–187.
  11. Blaskovics, B. (2014). Impact of leadership styles on project success – The case of a multinational company. Dynamic Relationships Management Journal, 3(2), pp. 21–36.
  12. Cerchiello, P., & Giudici, P. (2012). An integrated statistical model to measure academic teaching quality. Open Journal of Statistics, 2(5), pp. 491–497.
  13. Chan, A. P. C., Scott, D., & Lam, E. W. M. (2002). Framework of success criteria for design/build projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 18(3), pp. 120–128.
  14. Cserháti, G., & Szabó, L. (2014). The relationship between success criteria and success factors in organisational event projects. International Journal of Project Management, 32(4), pp. 613–624.
  15. Davis, K. (2014). Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), pp. 189–201.
  16. Dvir, D., Raz, T., & Shenhar, A. J. (2003). An empirical analysis of the relationship between project planning and project success. International Journal of Project Management, 21(2), pp. 89–95.
  17. Freeman, M. A., & Beale, P. (1992). Measuring project success. Project Management Journal, 23(1), pp. 8–17.
  18. Galjanić, K., Marović, I., & Hanak, T. (2023). Performance measurement framework for prediction and management of construction investments. Sustainability, 15(18), p. 13617.
  19. Hajdu, M., & Isaac, S. (2016), Sixty years of project planning: history and future, Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: An International Journal, 8(1), pp. 1499–1510.
  20. Holt, G. D. (2014). Asking questions, analysing answers: Relative importance revisited. Construction Innovation, 14(1), pp. 2–16.
  21. Ilić, I., & Veličković, V. M. (2019). A process of project quality improvement. Filomat, 33(6), pp. 1833–1844.
  22. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2015a). ISO 9000:2015 Quality Management Systems – Fundamentals and Vocabulary. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  23. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2015b). ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management Systems — Requirements. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  24. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2021). ISO 21500:2021, Project, Programme and Portfolio Management — Context and Concepts. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  25. International Project Management Association (IPMA). (2015). Individual Competence Baseline for Project, Programme & Portfolio Management, 4th edn. International Project Management Association, Zurich, Switzerland.
  26. Jaqin, C., Rozak, A., & Hardi Purba, H. (2020). Case study in increasing overall equipment effectiveness on progressive press machine using plan-do-check-act cycle. International Journal of Engineering, 33(11), pp. 2245–2251.
  27. Juran, J. M., & Godfrey, A. B. (1998). Juran’s Quality Handbook, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill Publishing, New York, USA.
  28. Kerzner, H. (2009). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling, 10th edn. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA.
  29. Kumar, V., Pandey, A., & Singh, R. (2023). Project success and critical success factors of construction projects: Project practitioners’ perspectives. Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, 15(1), pp. 1–22.
  30. Lorenzini, E., & Cerchiello, P. (2013). Measuring the success factors of a website: Statistical methods and an application to a “Web District”. In: Benedetti, A. & Di Ciaccio, A. (Ed.), Statistical Models for Data Analysis, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 201–208.
  31. Moorthy, A. K., Wang, Z., & Bovik, A. C. (2011). Visual perception and quality assessment. In: Gonzalez, R. C. & Woods, R. E. (Ed.), Optical and Digital Image Processing: Fundamentals and Applications, Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA, pp. 419–439.
  32. Morris, R. A., & Sember, B. M. (2008). Project Management that Works: Real-World Advice on Communicating, Problem-Solving, and Everything Else you Need to Know to Get the Job Do. AMACOM, New York, USA.
  33. Mussini, M. (2018). On measuring polarization for ordinal data: An approach based on the decomposition of the LetI Index. Statistics in Transition New Series, 19(2), pp. 277–296.
  34. Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5) pp 625–632
  35. Pinto, J. K. (2016). Project Management: Achieving Competitive Advantage, 4th edn. Pearson, United States of America.
  36. Pollack, J., Helm, J., & Adler, D. (2018). What is the iron triangle, and how has it changed? International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 11(2), pp. 527–547.
  37. Ponkanti, B. R., & Madoun, M. (2015). An approach to bridging the gap between quality, value and services marketing. In: Proceedings of the 1999 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference, Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer. pp. 60–60.
  38. Project Management Institute. (2017). Project Management Book of Knowledge, 6th edn. Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, USA.
  39. Sebestyen, Z. (2017). Further considerations in project success. Procedia Engineering, 196, pp. 571–577.
  40. Sebestyén, Z., Erdei, J., & Alfreahat, D. (2022). Impact of methodologies and standards on the owner’s economic benefit in projects. Heliyon, 8(2), p. e08843.
  41. Sebestyén, Z., Erdei, J., & Hajdu, M. (2023). A fundamental overview of the concept of quality in project management. In: Creative Construction Conference 2023, pp. 720–724.
  42. Shenhar, A. J., & Dvir, D. (2007). Reinventing Project Management: The Diamond Approach to Successful Growth and Innovation. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston, MA, USA.
  43. Shenhar, A. J., Dvir, D., Levy, O., & Maltz, A. C. (2001). Project success: A multidimensional strategic concept. Long Range Planning, 34(6), pp. 699–725.
  44. The Office of Government Commerce (OGC). (2009). Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2. The Stationery Office, UK.
  45. Turner, J. R., Anbari, F., & Bredillet, C. (2013). Perspectives on research in project management: The nine schools. Global Business Perspectives, 1(1), pp. 3–28.
  46. Turner, R., & Zolin, R. (2012). Forecasting success on large projects: Developing reliable scales to predict multiple perspectives by multiple stakeholders over multiple time frames. Project Management Journal, 43(5), pp. 87–99.
  47. Van Wyngaard, C. J., Pretorius, J. H. C., & Pretorius, L. (2012). Theory of the triple constraint – A conceptual review. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, pp. 1991–1997.
  48. Van Wyngaard, C. J., Pretorius, J. H. C., & Pretorius, L. (2013). Deliberating the triple constraint trade-offs as polarities to manage – A refreshed perspective. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, pp. 1265–1272.
  49. Vargha, A. (2002). Független minták összehasonlítása új rangso-rolásos eljárásokkal. Statisztikai Szemle, 80(4), pp. 328–353.
  50. Vijayabanu, C., Karthikeyan, S., & Vijay Surya, P. (2022). Total quality management practices and its impact on Indian construction projects. Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, 14(1), pp. 2697–2709.
  51. Williams, P., Ashill, N. J., Naumann, E., & Jackson, E. (2015). Relationship quality and satisfaction: Customer-perceived success factors for on-time projects. International Journal of Project Management, 33(8), pp. 1836–1850.
  52. Wright, J. N. (1997). Time and budget: The twin imperatives of a project sponsor. International Journal of Project Management, 15(3), pp. 181–186.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2024-0015 | Journal eISSN: 1847-6228 | Journal ISSN: 1847-5450
Language: English
Page range: 224 - 236
Submitted on: Sep 5, 2023
Accepted on: May 21, 2024
Published on: Aug 14, 2024
Published by: University of Zagreb
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 János Erdei, Zoltán Sebestyén, Dina Alfreahat, published by University of Zagreb
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.