Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Open Access
|Aug 2024

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1:

Poor project performance leads towards high costs.
Poor project performance leads towards high costs.

Fig. 2:

Cost versus quality level (Barlow 2009).
Cost versus quality level (Barlow 2009).

Fig. 3:

Overall contribution of all three attributes.
Overall contribution of all three attributes.

Fig. 4:

Variation in factor loading on the basis of project quality management factor.
Variation in factor loading on the basis of project quality management factor.

Fig. 5:

Variation in factor loading on the basis of organisation change management.
Variation in factor loading on the basis of organisation change management.

Fig. 6:

Variation in factor loading on the basis of project site management.
Variation in factor loading on the basis of project site management.

The impact of quality management system on different aspects of construction project performance

Attributes codeTotal responsesTotal scoreRIIVarianceRange of validityAttribute name
A11526370.850.120.78–0.92Impact of quality on reduction in rework
A31526220.820.150.75–0.89Impact of quality on project performance
A101525920.780.180.70–0.86Impact of quality on cost
A41525770.760.140.69–0.83Impact of quality on safety
A111525700.750.170.67–0.83Role of employee training on quality management and control in construction project
A121525630.740.160.66–0.82Impact of organisational culture on the quality performance of the project
A81525390.710.130.64–0.78Impact of effective quality assurance on the quality performance of the project
A91525380.710.150.63–0.79Quality increase labour productivity
A151525320.700.140.62–0.78Impact of emphasising quality instead of price in the selection of supplier on the quality performance of the construction project
A161525240.690.160.61–0.77Impact of management commitment on the quality performance of the project
A51525160.680.170.60–0.76Impact of continuous improvement in quality management on the performance of the construction project
A131525090.670.150.60–0.74Impact of an effective safety programme on the quality performance of the project
A141525090.670.180.59–0.75Impact of quality on profitability
A21524940.650.140.58–0.72Impact of physical environment of the site on the quality performance of the project
A61524780.630.190.54–0.72Impact of competency of a subcontractor on the project performance
A71524710.620.130.55–0.69Impact of site management and supervision staff on the project performance
A171524670.620.150.54–0.70Competency of project management team

Reliability analysis for the study

Cronbach’s alpha valueNo. of attributesNo. of samples
0.81617152

Selected attributes for analysis

Attribute codesAttributes selected for the studyReferences
A1Impact of quality on reduction in reworkDoloi et al. (2012) and Arashpour et al. (2014)
A2Impact of physical environment of the site on the quality performance of projectAziz and Hafez (2013), Banawi and Bilec (2014) and Sezer and Bröchner (2014)
A3Impact of quality on project performanceIkediashi and Ogwueleka (2016), Carvalho and Rabechini (2017), Dabirian et al. (2017) and Nguyen and Watanabe (2017)
A4Impact of quality on safetyYuen (2004), Zou et al. (2007), Gatti et al. (2010), Zou et al. (2012) and Pandey et al. (2017)
A5Impact of continuous improvement in quality management on the performance of the construction projectHowell (1999), Mostafa et al. (2016), Sweis et al. (2016) and Tezel and Aziz (2017)
A6Impact of competency of a subcontractor on the project performanceIyer and Jha (2005a), Powl and Skitmore (2005), Bardhan et al. (2007) and Olaniran (2015)
A7Impact of site management and supervision staff on the project performanceAje (2012), Salunkhe and Patil (2014) and Karimi et al. (2017)
A8Impact of effective quality assurance on quality performance of projectIyer and Jha (2005b), Backes-Gellner and Veen (2009), Vogl and Abdel-Wahab (2015) and Dixit and Saurabh (2019)
A9Quality increase in labour productivityKuykendall (2007), Minde (2012), Nasir et al. (2014) and Poirier (2015)
A10Impact of quality on costKannan and Tan (2005), Glavan et al. (2009), Aithal (2015) and York Bigazzi and Rouleau (2017)
A11Role of employee training on quality management and control in construction projectBertelsen (2004), Doloi et al. (2012) and Mishra et al. (2016)
A12Impact of organisational culture on the quality performance of the projectNasirzadeh and Nojedehi (2013), Poirier et al. (2015), Pheng et al. (2016) and Nima (2019)
A13Impact of an effective safety programme on the quality performance of the projectZou et al. (2007), Shan et al. (2011) and Chalker and Loosemore (2016)
A14Impact of quality on profitabilityGrau et al. (2009), Oral and Oral (2010) and Chancellor and Lu (2012)
A15Impact of emphasising quality instead of price in the selection of supplier on the quality performance of the construction projectXue et al. (2008), Aje (2012), El Refai et al. (2015) and Naganathan et al. (2015)
A16Impact of management commitment on the quality performance of the projectRuddock and Ruddock (2009), Arashpour et al. (2014) and Singh et al. (2018)
A17Competency of the project management teamAbdel-Wahab and Vogl (2011), Ling et al. (2013) and Zhang and Chen (2016)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2024-0012 | Journal eISSN: 1847-6228 | Journal ISSN: 1847-5450
Language: English
Page range: 150 - 169
Submitted on: Sep 15, 2023
Accepted on: Jun 26, 2024
Published on: Aug 8, 2024
Published by: University of Zagreb
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Dhruva Choudhary, Priyanka Singh, Saurav Dixit, published by University of Zagreb
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.