Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Estimation of ideal construction duration in tender preparation stage for housing projects

Open Access
|Nov 2023

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1:

Comparison of the post-test BCD, ideal construction duration and contract durations. BCD, baseline construction duration.
Comparison of the post-test BCD, ideal construction duration and contract durations. BCD, baseline construction duration.

Fig. 2:

Comparison of the pre- and post-test delay times of public housing projects.
Comparison of the pre- and post-test delay times of public housing projects.

Comparison of the validity results of the regression, CHAID and CART methods_

Statistical methodsNumber of significant variablesEstimationStandard error
Regression636,495.9323,039.935
CHAID537,227.1863,109.763
CART333,379.6463,166.306

j_otmcj-2023-0014_tab_013

Project No.Construction project descriptionDistrictNumber of flatsNumber of working days with construction documentsNumber of working days with schematic designNumber of non-working daysContract duration (days)Number of time extensionDelay (days)
1North Ankara city entrance 7th stage 318 houses, 1 commercial centre, infrastructure and landscapingAltindağ31850055014550510
2North Ankara city entrance villas 584 houses, 3 elementary schools, 1 kindergarten and mosque, infrastructure and landscapingAltindağ5845005503885541681
3Elazig city centre 336 houses and social facilities (mosque, fountain, trade centre, library) infrastructure and landscapingCity centre33650055012036510
4Isparta 96 houses, 1 trade centre, infrastructure and landscapingYalvaç964004509050400
5Karabük 2nd region 432 houses, 1 primary school, 2 trade centres, 1 mosque, infrastructure and landscapingCity centre432500550105441359
6North Ankara city entrance 477 houses, infrastructure and landscapingAltindağ47750055016565110
7North Ankara city entrance 488 houses, 1 unit centre, 1 nursery, infrastructure and landscapingAltindağ48850055016565110
8North Ankara city entrance 799 houses, 1 unit centre, infrastructure and landscapingAltindağ79955060017565410
9Trabzon urban transformation project 96 houses, 1 health centre, infrastructure and landscapingÇağlayan964004509755410
10Trabzon Çamli area 88 houses, infrastructure and landscapingOf884004509745410
11Tunceli city centre Atatürk neighbourhood 222 houses, trade centre, infrastructure and landscapingCity centre22240045015048310
12Ankara upper Yurtçu Kuyupınar area, 3rd region 1272 houses, 1 commercial centre, infrastructure and landscapingCity centre1,27260065016051400
13North Ankara city entrance, 3rd stage 530 housesAltindağ5305005501205051730
14North Ankara city entrance 341 villas, infrastructure and landscapingAltindağ3415005503606021444
15Ankara 5th region 226 houses, 1 primary school, 1 high school, infrastructures and landscapingYapracik2264004503606541427
16Ankara 196 houses, trade centres, mosques, fountains, infrastructure and landscapingHaymana1964004503605541451
17Antalya revenue sharing business for urban service areaÇiplakli40650055005481478
18Antalya 892 houses, infrastructure and landscapingÇiplakli89255060003951539
19Bingöl 89 farm village houses, infrastructure and landscapingKiğı8940045015040400
20Bolu city centre Paşaköy 2nd stage 500 houses, 1 commercial centre, health centre, infrastructure and landscapingCity centre5005005502404541211

Description of factors used to determine the total construction duration for public housing projects_

FactorsDescription of factorsVariable type
F1 + F2 + F3 (standardised)BCDIndependent
F4Priority of projectIndependent
F5Complexity of projectIndependent
F6Special request for projectIndependent
F7Difficulty of projectIndependent
F8Financial risk of projectIndependent
F9Logistic conditions of project regionIndependent
F10Climatic conditions of project regionIndependent
F11Seismicity of project regionIndependent

Findings of the three statistical methods_

VariablesRegressionCHAIDCART
Standardised BCD (F1 + F2 + F3)SignificantSignificantSignificant
Priority of project (F4)SignificantSignificantSignificant
Complexity of project (F5)Significant--
Difficulty of project (F7)Significant--
Financial risk of project (F8)Significant--
Logistic conditions of project region (F9)-SignificantSignificant
Climatic conditions of project region (F10)SignificantSignificant-
Seismicity of project region (F11)-Significant-
Special request for project (F6)---

Validity of the CHAID method_

MethodEstimationStandard error
CHAID37,227.1863,109.763
10-fold cross-validation40,115.6513,524.340
Training set (70%)36,616.3345,011.920
Test set (30%)42,521.9164,823.904

Results of the regression analysis_

VariablesR2βtPVIF
Regression method0.356663.63021.0090.000**
Standardised BCD (F1 + F2 + F3) 146.44727.8330.000**1.160
Priority of project (F4) –48.437–3.7330.000**1.341
Complexity of project (F5) –47.053–4.0570.000**1.402
Special request for project (F6) –0.029–1.2490.2121.279
Difficulty of project (F7) 43.8703.8000.000**1.047
Financial risk of project (F8) –18.510–2.3260.020*1.011
Logistic conditions of project region (F9) –3.953–1.7160.0861.088
Climatic conditions of project region (F10) –13.676–4.7680.000**1.045
Seismicity of project region (F11) –0.024–1.2050.2281.115

Literature review of factors affecting construction duration_

AuthorsFactors affecting construction durationType of projectsSignificance level
Kaka and Price (1991)Project type, form and type of tenderPublic buildings and civil engineering projects
Chan and Kumaraswamy (1997)Project characteristics, ground conditions, project design complexity, procurement scheduling and environmental factorsBuilding and civil works
Kaming et al. (1997)Weather conditions, project location, inadequate planning and project designHigh-rise projects
Chan and Kumaraswamy (2002)Site condition, project characteristics, design aspects and pre-construction planningPublic housing, public non-residential buildings and private sector buildings
Meeampol and Ogunlan (2006)Construction method and schedule managementHighway construction projectsp = 0.000
Hoffman et al. (2007)Project cost, design/construction agent and temperatureFacility projectsp = 0.01, p = 0.0072 and p = 0.0028
Salleh (2009)Weather and site conditions, and inadequate planningResidential, office, hotel, academic buildings and mosquesp < 0.05
Mauriya et al. (2010)Geological condition, seismicity and difficult terrainTunnel construction
Doloi et al. (2012)Client’s influence and improper planningConstruction projectsp = 0.000 and p = 0.003
Dursun and Stoy (2012)Project type, project location, availability of construction area and market conditionsBuildingsp < 0.05
Shanmugapriya and Subramanian (2013)Market conditions, contract modification and project locationBuildings, roads and bridges, industrial projects and others
Sweis (2013)Planning and scheduling, and weather conditionsPublic construction projects
Faremi et al. (2016)Design and documentation issues, poor labour productivity and financial resource managementConstruction projectsp < 0.05
Oyedele (2017)Cash flow, type of design (complexity), project type, topography and geology, supply chain management and weatherConstruction projects
Nayak (2019)Environmental conditions, equipment and cash flowRural infrastructure projects
Mahmoodzadeh et al. (2022)Geological conditions and machineryTunnel constructionp = 0.000

Descriptive statistics for the ideal construction duration_

MethodsNumberAverage (days)Standard deviationMinimum
Regression1,530679.16133.20387
CHAID1,530704.38113.13635
CART1,530705.98109.50640

Test results for the developed calculation method_

Pre-testPost-test
Number of delayed housing projects4023
Delay percentage100%57.50%
Reduction amount of delayed housing projects (%)42.50

Results for the implementation of the proposed calculation method_

Before implementationAfter implementation
Number of delayed public housing projects720350285299
Percentage of delayed public housing projects (%)47.0622.8818.6319.54
Amount of decrease for delayed public housing projects (%)51.39 60.4258.47

Validity of the regression method_

Group 1 (enter method)Group 2 (stepwise method)
Btpβtp
Regression variables696.69618.8760.000**646.47321.5620.000**
Standardised BCD (F1 + F2 + F3)146.76527.5480.000**148.02028.5510.000**
Priority of project (F4)−55.102−3.9810.000**−50.401−3.8970.000**
Complexity of project (F5)−48.665−4.1790.000**−47.116−4.0600.000**
Special request for project (F6)−18.039−1.3290.184−0.033−1.4310.153
Difficulty of project (F7)43.6363.7810.000**47.5204.1850.000**
Financial risk of project (F8)−17.797−2.2310.026*−18.340−2.3040.021*
Logistic conditions of project region (F9)−4.285−1.8000.072−0.037−1.7160.086
Climatic conditions of project region (F10)−13.893−4.8350.000**−14.443−5.0810.000**
Seismicity of project region (F11)−5.978−1.2050.228−0.014−0.6800.496

List of factors affecting construction duration from the literature_

No.FactorsFactors encountered during the implementation stageFactors encountered during the bidding stageFactors caused by the contractorFactors caused by the ownerFactors selected for the calculation methodFactors encountered during the bidding stage and caused by the ownerAuthors
1Delivery of material on time++Alaghbari et al. (2007), Asnaashari et al. (2009) and Tunji-Olayeni et al. (2018)
2Productivity of labour++Faremi et al. (2016) and Smugala and Kubečková (2021)
3Using an effective construction programme (schedule)+++++Chan and Kumaraswamy (2002), Sweis (2013) and Lines et al. (2015)
4Design–implementation coordination++Faremi et al. (2016)
5Recruitment of labour++Ahuja and Nandakumar (1985)
6Changes in design+++Shanmugapriya and Subramanian (2013)
7Seismicity of project location++++++Mauriya et al. (2010) and Mahmoodzadeh et al. (2022)
8Sufficient number and experience of management staff++Lo et al. (2006)
9Selection of subcontractors++Polat et al. (2015)
10Project type and features++++Dursun and Stoy (2012) and Oyedele (2017)
11Effective organisation structure++Arditi et al. (1985)
12Company-based financial issues+++Lo et al. (2006) and Nayak (2019)
13Technology used in construction+++++Chan and Kumaraswamy (2002)
14Ensuring business continuity++Alfalasi (2016)
15Ensuring additional drawings, specifications and technical details provided on time++Ahuja and Nandakumar (1985)
16Scope changes++Arditi et al. (1985) and Shanmugapriya and Subramanian (2013)
17Maintaining coordination between subcontractors++Hwang et al. (2013)
18Motivation of labour++Nasirzadeh and Nojedehi (2013)
19Natural disastersFMFMNayak (2019)
20Degree of project difficulty++++++Kaka and Price (1991), Chan and Kumaraswamy (1997), Chan and Kumaraswamy (2002) and Oyedele (2017)
21Design-planning coordination++Walker and Vines (2000)
22Efficient auditing and control++Long et al. (2008)
23Delays in site handover+++Iyer et al. (2008)
24Rational use of construction equipment++Oleinik et al. (2019)
25Having experienced staff during design phase+++++Oyewobi and Ogunsemi (2010) and Lessing et al. (2017)
26Maintaining suitable site conditions++Dursun and Stoy (2012)
27Implementation mistakes++Kaliba et al. (2009)
28Extreme weather conditionsFMFMKaming et al. (1997), Salleh (2009) and Oyedele (2017)
29Sufficiency of design consultancy services+++++Le-Hoai et al. (2008)
30Efficiency of engineers+++Chan and Kumaraswamy (1995)
31Selection of suitable construction equipment++Mahmoodzadeh et al. (2022)
32Efficient use of information technologies++++Li et al. (2005)
33Experience in use of applied construction technology++Memon et al. (2012)
34Equipment failures++Aibinu and Odeyinka (2006) and Mahmoodzadeh et al. (2022)
35Excess bureaucracy+++++Abd El-Razek et al. (2008)
36Adaptation to work and willingness to learn tasks++Doloi et al. (2012)
37Selection of material++Koushki et al. (2005)
38Financial risk of project++++++Arditi et al. (1985), Türesoy (1989), Hoffman et al. (2007) and Musarat et al. (2021)
39Sufficiency of construction consultancy services+++Alaghbari et al. (2007) and Hwang et al. (2013)
40Claim issues and disputes between stakeholders+++Al-Khalil and Al-Ghafly (1999) and Aibinu and Jagboro (2002)
41Ground conditions and topography of construction site+++++Cheng, (2014) and Oyedele (2017)
42Communication with other authorities+++Doloi et al. (2012) and Hwang et al. (2013)
43Changes in importance levels of activities+++Woolery and Crandall (1983) and Nguyen et al. (2013)
44Emergency plans for unforeseen conditions, risk, and crisis management plans+++Hosseinian and Reinschmidt (2015)
45Document control and management++Faremi et al. (2016)
46Suitability of contract for project type++++Oyedele (2017)
47Using imported materials+++++Odeh and Battaineh (2002)
48Material storage facilities++Kumar and Cheng (2015)
49Project procedures+++++Williams (2008)
50Quality control+++Aliverdi et al. (2013)
51Distance to construction site+++++Ramli et al. (2018)
52Applied tax policies and government incentives to construction industry+Chan and Kumaraswamy (1995) and Girth and Lopez (2019)
53Legislative changes and legal regulations++Ahuja and Nandakumar (1985)
54Preparation of reliable project programme (schedule)+++++Meeampol and Ogunlan (2006) and Salleh (2009)
55Cultural, religious and social factors in project location+++++Assaf and Al-Hejji (2006) and Al-Sabah et al. (2014)
56Theft++Haas et al. (2022)
Total 50214829183

Validation of the CART method_

MethodEstimationStandard error
CART33,379.2643,166.306
10-fold cross-validation41,092.2163,860.222
Training set (70%)43,341.8015,111.257
Test set (30%)41,189.7585,133.594
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2023-0014 | Journal eISSN: 1847-6228 | Journal ISSN: 1847-5450
Language: English
Page range: 192 - 212
Submitted on: Jan 1, 2023
Accepted on: May 23, 2023
Published on: Nov 25, 2023
Published by: University of Zagreb
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Hakan Tirataci, Hakan Yaman, published by University of Zagreb
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.