Comparative assessment of deterministic methodologies for estimating excavation productivity
References
- AbouRizk, S. M., Knowles, P., & Hermann, U. A. (2001). Estimating labor production rates for industrial construction activities. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 127(6), pp. 502–511.
- Bai, S., Li, M., Kong, R., Han, S., Li, H., & Qin, L. (2019). Data mining approach to construction productivity prediction for cutter suction dredgers. Automation in Construction, 105, p. 102833.
- Bauer, H. (2007). Baubetrieb, 3rd edn. Springer, Germany.
- BML. (1983). Handbuch BML: Daten fur die Berechnung von Baumaschinen-Leistungen. Zeittechnik Verlag, Germany.
- Carmichael, D. G., Bartlett, B. J., & Kaboli, A. S. (2014). Surface mining operations: Coincident unit cost and emissions. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 28(1), pp. 47–65.
- Carmichael, D. G., & Mustaffa, N. K. (2018). Emissions and production penalties/bonuses associated with non-standard earthmoving loading policies. Construction Innovation, 18(2), https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-05-2017-0047.
- Caterpillar. (2016). Caterpillar Performance Handbook, 46th edn. Caterpillar Inc., USA.
- CECE. (1973). Section VI: Hydraulic excavators, Committee for European Construction Equipment, Internal Report, Brussels.
- Chaudari, R. S., Sarode, G. C., Bhangale, P. P., & Mali, S. T. (2022). Analysis of factors affecting construction labour productivity for Pune city. YMER, 21(11), pp. 2020–2028.
- Chen, C., Zhu, Z., Hammad, A., & Akbarzadeh, M. (2021). Automatic identification of idling reasons in excavation operations based on excavator – Truck relationships. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 35(5), p. 04021015.
- Cottrell, D. S. (2006). Contractor process improvement for enhancing construction productivity. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(2), pp. 189–196.
- DIN 18300. (2012). German Construction Contract Procedures (VOB) – Part C: General Technical Specifications in Construction Contracts (ATV) – Earthworks. Beuth Verlag, Germany.
- Edwards, D. J., & Holt, G. D. (2000). ESTIVATE: A model for calculating excavator productivity and output costs. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 7(1), pp. 52–62.
- Garbotz, G. (1966). Die Leistungen von Baumaschinen, Koln-Braunsfeld Muller.
- Girmscheidt, G. (2010). Leistungsermittlungshandbuch fur Baumaschinen und Bauprozesse, 4th edn. Springer, Germany.
- Hoffmann, M. (2006). Zahlentafeln fur den Baubetrieb, 7th edn. Teubner, Germany.
- Hüster, F. (2005). Leistungsberechnung der Baumaschinen. Shaker Verlag, Germany.
- Kassem, M., Mahamedi, E., Rogage, K., Duffy, K., & Huntingdon, J. (2021). Measuring and benchmarking the productivity of excavators in infrastructure projects: A deep neural network approach. Automation in Construction, 124, p. 103532.
- Komatsu. (2013). Specifications and Application Handbook, 31st edn. Komatsu, Japan.
- Kotte, G. (1997). Ermittlung der Nutzforderleistung von Hydraulikbaggern, TIS Tiefbau Ingenieurbau Strassenbau, Bertelsmann Fachzeitschriften.
- Kühn, G. (1984). Der maschinelle Erdbau. Teubner Verlag, Germany.
- Liebherr. (2003). Technical Handbook – Earthmoving. Liebherr, Germany.
- Naskoudakis, I., & Petroutsatou, K. (2016). A thematic review of main researches on construction equipment over the recent years. Procedia Engineering, 164, pp. 206–213.
- Ng, F., Harding, J. A., & Glass, J. (2016). An eco-approach to optimise efficiency and productivity of a hydraulic excavator. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, pp. 3966–3976.
- Nunnally, S. (2007). Construction Methods and Management, 7th edn. Prentice Hall, USA.
- Panas, A., & Pantouvakis, J. P. (2010a). Evaluating research methodology in construction productivity studies. The Built and Human Environment Review, 3(1), pp. 63–85.
- Panas, A., & Pantouvakis, J. P. (2010b). Comparative analysis of operational coefficients’ impact on earthmoving operations. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 17(5), pp. 461–475.
- Panas, A., & Pantouvakis, J. P. (2015). Efficiency multipliers for construction productivity: A comparative evaluation. Organisation, Technology and Management in Construction: An International Journal, 7(1), pp. 1186–1196.
- Pantouvakis, J. P., & Panas, A. (2013). Computer simulation and analysis framework for floating caisson construction operations. Automation in Construction, 36, pp. 196–207.
- Park, H., Thomas, S. R., & Tucker, R. L. (2005). Benchmarking of construction productivity. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(7), pp. 772–778.
- Peurifoy, R., & Schexnayder, C. (2002). Construction Planning, Equipment and Methods, 6th edn. McGraw-Hill, USA.
- SAE. (1993). Standard J296 – Excavator hoe bucket rating. In: SAE Handbook 1999: On-Highway Vehicles and Off-Highway Machinery. Society of Automotive Engineers Inc., Warrendale, USA.
- Schexnayder, C. J. (1997). Analysis of earth moving systems using discrete-event simulation – Discussion. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 123(2), p. 199.
- Sheikh, A., Lakshmipathy, M., & Prakash, A. (2016). Application of queuing theory for effective equipment utilization and maximization of productivity in construction management. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 11(8), pp. 5664–5672.
- Thomas, H. R., & Yiakoumis, I. (1987). Factor model of construction productivity. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 113(4), pp. 623–639.
- Volvo. (2015). Volvo Performance Manual, Ref. No. 21, Volvo Construction Equipment.
- Zayed, T. M., & Halpin D. W. (2004). Process versus data oriented techniques in pile construction productivity assessment. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(4), pp. 490–499.
Language: English
Page range: 63 - 78
Submitted on: Aug 31, 2022
Accepted on: Jan 29, 2023
Published on: Sep 11, 2023
Published by: University of Zagreb
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Related subjects:
© 2023 Antonios Panas, John-Paris Pantouvakis, Maria Kalogiannaki, published by University of Zagreb
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.