References
- Ahmed, M., Qureshi, M. N., Mallick, J., & Ben Kahla, N. (2019). Selection of sustainable supplementary concrete materials using OSM-AHP-TOPSIS approach. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, p. 2850480.
- Alshamrani, O. S., & Alshibani, A. (2020). Automated decision support system for selecting the envelope and structural systems for educational facilities. Building and Environment, 181, p. 106993.
- Ambrose, J. (1993). Building Structures. John Wiley & Sons, USA.
- Balali, V., Zahraie, B., & Roozbahani, A. (2014). A comparison of AHP and PROMETHEE family decision making methods for selection of building structural system. American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2(5), pp. 149–159.
- Bobylev, N. (2011). Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of selected underground construction technologies using the analytic network process. Automation in Construction, 20, pp. 1030–1040.
- Caterino, N., Iervolino, I., Manfredi, G., & Cosenza, E. (2009). Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods for seismic structural retrofitting. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 24(6), pp. 432–445.
- Chen, L., & Deng, X. (2018). A modified method for evaluating sustainable transport solutions based on AHP and dempster–shafer evidence theory. Applied Sciences, 8, p. 563.
- Dagilgan, S. (2019). Geniş açıklıkların örtülmesinde kullanılan taşıyıcı sistem seçimi için bir model önerisi. Master Thesis, Çukurova University. Institute of Applied Science, Adana.
- Dan, M. D. B. (2004). Multi-criteria decision model for retrofitting existing buildings. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science. Copernicus Publications on Behalf of the European Geosciences Union, 4(4), pp. 485–499.
- Ding, T., Liang, L., Yang, M., & Wu, H. (2016). Multiple attribute decision making based on cross-evaluation with uncertain decision parameters. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2016, p. 4313247.
- Evstratova, A. V., Krishtalevich, A. K., Belov, V. V., & Nikitin, S. E. (2021). Design of prefabricated reinforced concrete structures: Comparative analysis of prefabricated reinforced concrete floor slab. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1103(1), p. 012023.
- Fernandes, W. S., Greco, M., & Almeida, V. S. (2017). Application of the smooth evolutionary structural optimization method combined with a multi-criteria decision procedure. Engineering Structures, 143, pp. 40–51.
- Formisano, A., Castaldo, C., & Chiumiento, G. (2017). Optimal seismic upgrading of a reinforced concrete school building with metal-based devices using an efficient multi-criteria decision-making method. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 13(11), pp. 1373–1389.
- Golestanifar, M., Goshtasbi, K., Jafarian, M., & Adnani, S. (2011). A multi-dimensional approach to the assessment of tunnel excavation methods. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 48(7), pp. 1077–1085.
- Gonzalez-Libreros, J. H., Bertolazzi, A., Turrini, U., & Pellegrino, C. (2020). Assessment of an existing reinforced-concrete prefabricated building: The case of the procédé camus. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 26(3), p. 04020025.
- Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag, New York.
- Jiang, D., Hasan, M. M., Faiz, T. I., & Noor-E-Alam, M. (2019). A possibility distribution-based multicriteria decision algorithm for resilient supplier selection problems. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 27, pp. 203–223.
- Korkmaz, S., Ali, N. B. H., & Smith, I. F. (2012). Configuration of control system for damage tolerance of a tensegrity bridge. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 26(1), pp. 145–155.
- Kuzman, M. K., & Grošelj, P. (2012). Wood as a construction material: Comparison of different construction types for residential building using the analytic hierarchy process. Wood Research, 57(4), pp. 591–600.
- Lombera, J. T. S. J., & Aprea, I. G. (2010). A system approach to the environmental analysis of industrial buildings. Building and Environment, 45(3), pp. 673–683.
- Malekly, H., Mousavi, S. M., & Hashemi, H. (2010). A fuzzy integrated methodology for evaluating conceptual bridge design. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(7), pp. 4910–4920.
- Masters, L. W., & Brandt, E. (1987). Prediction of service life of building materials and components. Materials and Structures, 20(1), pp. 55–77.
- Nawy, E. G. (1985). Reinforced Concrete – A Fundamental Approach. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
- Pan, N. F. (2008). Fuzzy AHP approach for selecting the suitable bridge construction method. Automation in Construction, 17(8), pp. 958–965.
- Park, R., & Paulay, T. (1975). Reinforced Concrete Structures. John Wiley & Sons, USA.
- Pons, O., & Aguado, A. (2012). Integrated value model for sustainable assessment applied to technologies used to build schools in Catalonia, Spain. Building and Environment, 53, pp. 49–58.
- Pun, S. K., Liu, C., & Langston, C. (2006). Case study of demolition costs of residential buildings. Construction Management and Economics, 24(9), pp. 967–976.
- Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resources Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
- Saaty, T. L., & Özdemir, M. S. (2003). Why the magic number seven plus or minus two? Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 38, pp. 233–244.
- Trahair, N. S., Bradford, M. A., Nethercot, D. A., & Gardner, L. (2017). The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3. CRC Press, London.
- Yildirim, M. G. (2003). Taşıyıcı sistem seçimine yönelik çok ölçütlü bir yaklaşım, Master Thesis, Istanbul Technical University. Faculty of Architecture, Istanbul.
- Zhou, X., Hu, Y., Deng, Y., Chan, F. T. S., & Ishizaka, A. (2018). A DEMATEL-based completion method for incomplete pairwise comparison matrix in AHP. Annals of Operations Research, 271, pp. 1045–1066.