Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A structured literature review on construction conflict prevention and resolution: A modified approach for engineering Cover

A structured literature review on construction conflict prevention and resolution: A modified approach for engineering

By: Omar Sabri,  Ola Lædre and  Amund Bruland  
Open Access
|May 2022

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1

Selected articles for this literature review by database and publication year. ASCE, American Society for Civil Engineers.

Fig. 2

The MORISE flow diagram for database search and literature selection. MORISE, Modified Reporting Items for Structured Reviews in Engineering and Technology.

Construction conflict prevention and construction conflict resolution strategies_

AuthorContribution to construction conflict

PreventionResolution
Leung et al. (2002)Effective and reasonable conflict prevention enhances team productivity and creativity, which helps overcome obstacles. A manager needs to build a relationship between conflict and satisfaction levels. Determining the best stage of conflict is key to a successful project because it provides a stimulus.Positive interaction between participants of the project is essential to prevent negative conflict or to enable its resolution at least. Conflicts are stimulated in multiple tasks at a predetermined level to eliminate obstacles, leading to high participant satisfaction. Excessive task conflict should be prevented in the decision process.
Wang et al. (2005)Goal setting is a major task that helps prevent negative conflict. The most appropriate method for construction, cultural, and legal issues in arbitration after the negotiation is to resolve disputes.No universal formula exists to resolve conflicts except that the parties should respect each other to gain the contract's trust.
Harmon (2009)Parties should oblige to work in good faith. A focus on DRBs helps reduce the cost of construction.New claims and orders expedite the resolution of issues. Daily and hourly payments save cost and time, resolve problems, and eradicate conflicts.
Fenn and Gameson (1992)Improvement in training and education of construction panels prevents conflicts.Less-conflictual attitudes of parties and technical education overcome obstacles to the resolution of conflicts.
Udechukwu et al. (2018)The role of technology is very crucial for the prevention of construction conflicts.The rule of law is considered the most moderate method to eliminate conflicts.
Kanishka et al. (2019)Conflict arises at pre-contract stages and, therefore, should be resolved at that stage to avoid later problems.Observation of pre-contract practice may eliminate conflicts in construction plans.
Hemanth et al. (2019)Keeping a proper check on the contract document helps eliminate disputes.Categorization of reason, which helps in recognizing the root problems of the obstacle, provides a suitable solution. Litigation is helpful in the resolution of conflicts.

Summary of research on the prevention of construction conflicts_

AuthorsMethodologiesContribution in dispute prevention
Ojiako et al. (2018)ODRHelped identified four factors: demographics, ADR culture, personal culture, and layout and design issues – all of which combined provide a suitable study framework for examining the many interrelated risks to ODR effectiveness.
Jones (2006)Dispute resolution processConflicts may be avoided through traditional dispute resolution procedures like litigation and arbitration. These approaches are also useful for preventing construction-related disputes in the first place.
Leung et al. (2002)Case studyAppropriate level of conflicts enhances team productivity and creativity, which prevent obstacles; managers need to build a relationship between conflict and satisfaction; determining the best stage of conflict is the key to a successful project because it provides a stimulus; goal setting is one of the major tasks that helps prevent negative conflict
Chaphalkar et al. (2015)Case StudyA set of neural model systems; both MLP and GFF were used in this study. The system worked impartially and did not favor any of the disputing parties. Thus, the decision-maker was free from prejudice.
Lee et al. (2016)Theory of Planned BehaviorADR selection and usage may be linked to a number of different characteristics. TPB's attitude construct may be used to reclassify the inherent benefits and advantages of ADR, dispute complexity, transactional costs, and current project risks.
Yousefi et al. (2010)Attitude-based negotiation methodologyNegotiation techniques could be acquired via observation and experience to avoid disputes. Therefore, the management must create a negotiation support system with the assistance of negotiation to prevent conflicts due to multiple attitudes.
Ren and Anumba (2002)Mixed-method approachProvides ease of negotiation among diverse participants in the construction task
Akintoye et al. (2015)Web-based systemTo minimize disagreement, payment delays and short-term partnerships should be avoided; unfair payment practices should be abolished.
Kalyan and Prakash (2019)Development of an Expert SystemCategorization of causes aids in determining the root cause of the issue and developing an appropriate remedy.
Mohammadi and Birgonul (2016)RII approachPotential legal hazards associated with sustainable development assist in avoiding future conflict risks; professional development of construction professionals reduces the degree of all disputes.
Boateng et al. (2015)Qualitative studyConflicts are avoided via the use of analytical networks; projects should be classified to minimize the potential of conflict, and project owners and financiers must establish a good relationship.
Arditi and Pattanakitchamroon (2006)Qualitative StudyConflicts are avoided by having a variety of suitable analytical techniques that are both fair and effective; float ownership should be stated in the contract.
Menassa and Mora (2010)Qualitative studyDRB's efficacy as a preventative approach was shown on roughly 50% of the 810 projects where no disagreements were ever resolved via a formal hearing before a DRB panel.
Gajaman et al. (2019)Interview-based questionnaireThe contractor should prepare a realistic program, and the work should be correctly identified when pricing. The contractor should send tender questionnaires for clarifications in the tender document and define a completion date as an important practice among all practices identified through a survey.
Chan and Suen (2005)Interview-based questionnaireArbitration after the negotiation is the best way to settle international conflicts in China to avoid construction, cultural, and legal problems.
Tabassi et al. (2019)Questionnaire surveyRealistic team objectives must be set; otherwise, equity-based, win-win outcomes in relationships may be illusory. An ideal of normative mutuality in relationships can never be achieved by the members of the temporary organization and the project's team.
Alaloul et al. (2019)Questionnaire surveyAssisting the parties in the development of effective conflict prevention methods, this DRB provided value.

Summary of theoretical research on prevention and resolution of construction disputes_

AuthorMethodologyResearch contribution
Liu et al. (2019)A practical method for making settlement of dispute for international construction projects grounded on CBR and validates the CBR model in certain dispute casesThe dispute settlement approach improves the theoretical framework and also relies on the case study method
Jagannathan and Delhi (2020)Objective and analytical researchDirection for the construction industry to reduce the adoption of litigation to solve disputes
Zhu et al. (2020)Measurement theoryFive ways to manage conflicts and reduce disputes – the quality of construction, fairness perception, conflict prevention, acceptable resolution result, and post-conflict influence
Lee et al. (2016)Application of the theory of planned behaviorAn alternative dispute resolution (ADR) method is suggested to mitigate conflicts
O’Connor et al. (1993)Utilization of hierarchal decompositionCreative management of conflict and change can provide benefits to eliminate construction disputes
Stipanowich (1997)SOIThe AAA has commenced some reforms to the dispute resolution process that minimize conflicts
Li et al. (2012)A framework with a questionnaire survey and multiple interviews with several respondentsPolicy and decision-makers need to struggle for resolving at least the common conflicts that arise throughout the lifecycle of main projects
Eyad and Ali (2014)Qualitative researchExecuting possible measures as early as possible to evade conflicts in the partnership
Akiner (2014)Theoretical frameworkAnalyzing multicultural or multinational presentations in construction projects can be a somber tool for the avoidance of disputes between the involved parties
Gardiner and Simmons (1992)ARDAvoiding disputes through the application of documentation policies and cooperative communication between parties is considered worthy of avoiding and resolving disputes
Alaloul et al. (2019)Questionnaire survey to gather dataConflict is perhaps not a context-based effect on project presentation, and comprehending it helps in its resolution
Essex (1996)SurveyEscrow bid documents, DRBs, and partnerships help in the prevention and resolution of conflicts in construction projects
Brower (2005)The theoretical model, along with an organized questionnaire surveyContractual elasticity (term and process elasticity) are interrelated and eliminated disputes by expressively and definitely affecting the accomplishment of construction projects
Hosseini et al. (2017)Qualitative researchDisputes can be resolved or at least avoided when construction project owners go through the deficit of the transactional agreement models when executing a problematic project with tentative scope
Arditi and Pattanakitchamroon (2006)Questionnaire surveyClaims can be prevented through rigorous reviews of policies and specifications and by necessitating greater project planning work on the part of the contractor
Wu et al. (2018)Application of the theory of conflict managementDevelop trust relations between project crews based on equivalent collaboration to take benefit of the positive effects of project conflict and to resolve the negative effects of procedure and correlation conflicts
John (1987)SurveyOwners and contractors should retain suitable levels of employment during claim disputes
Zhu and Cheung (2020)Case studyIncentivization in governing the slits in risks and control among manager, contractor, and involved parties during project construction
Apt and Witzel (2009)Measurement theoryFive proportions in the administration of quality of conflict: fairness perception, effective resolution result, procedure, conflict prevention, post-conflict influence, and integrated resolution.
Tazelaar and Snijders (2010)Questionnaire surveyDispute Resolution Board Foundation model helps eliminate disputes
Bröchner et al. (2002)Theoretical approachAn open doubt of elitism and tough occupations has been conveyed as a propensity for two construction parties to resolve disputes without mentioning it to impartial third parties
Mohamed et al. (2014)Questionnaire surveyBehavioral, contractual, and operational matters to avoid altering claims into disputes
Akintoye et al. (2015)Web-based systemThe web-based system serves as a communication platform among owners, contractors, and planners to help resolve conflicts
Alpkokin and Capar (2019)Questionnaire surveyADR has been established in the worldwide construction division to reduce disputes and prevent litigation; an alternate solution is the DRB
Charkhakan and Heravi (2019)Application of risk management theoryHealthy association between causes of conflict, factors, construction project parties, and consistency between project participants and conflict help avoid disputes
You et al. (2018)Application of pattern classification theorySuitable behavior of similar construction parties helps avoid conflicts
Elziny et al. (2016)Application of TCE approachA healthy association between uncertainty and the supplier's positive attitude helps overcome disputes
Hamimah et al. (2012)Application of planned behavior theoryA well-drafted contract may be essential but not adequate to stimulate friendly resolution of disputes between contract participants. Factors affecting conflicts should be understood well
Junying and Martin (2019)Utilization of the ITA frameworkWorking productive groups and examples of good behavior help eliminate conflicts
Adnan et al. (2012)Questionnaire methodEvaluation of literature throws light on the significance of dealing with the people and their attitude to make construction tasks less prone to litigation
Malak et al. (2020)Application of the analytical frameworkCorporate office, high competency, and qualification of parties avoid and resolve conflicts

Iterative development of the search string_

Search numberAddition to the search string (Scopus search format)ScienceDirectScopusASCE
1TITLE-ABS-KEY (“dispute” AND avoidance AND “construction”)2069 (12)69 (11)1865 (34)
2OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“conflict” AND avoidance AND “construction”)10211 (17)43 (13)4497 (17)
3OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“dispute” AND prevention AND “construction”)3539 (4)57 (22)1418 (14)
4OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“conflict” AND prevention AND “construction”)20132 (23)91 (19)3567 (9)
5OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“dispute” AND “avoidance” AND roads OR tunnels)139 (1)4 (1)6 (0)
6OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“conflict” AND “prevention” AND roads OR tunnels)968 (0)237 (3)15 (0)
7OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“dispute” AND “resolve” AND construction)9172 (19)106 (8)2342 (8)
8OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“conflict” AND “resolve” AND construction)37073 (29)117 (6)3679 (3)
9OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“conflict” AND “resolution” AND “construction”)35171 (14)290 (12)3680 (6)
10OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“dispute” AND “resolution” AND construction)7709 (9)589 (10)2342 (4)
11OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“claims” AND “construction”)175367 (18)2446 (15)6757 (21)

Summary of research on the resolution of construction conflicts_

AuthorsMethodologiesContribution in dispute resolution
Ojiako et al. (2018)ODRA platform from which to develop a variety of practical recommendations for assessing the possible role of technology-mediated interfaces in resolving disputed claims.
Jones (2006)Dispute resolution processThe dispute resolution process as a whole discusses the most effective method for the various ADR tools to work together to create an overall conflict settlement procedure.
Leung et al. (2002)Case studyConflicts are generated in various activities at a preset level, leading to high participant satisfaction and eliminating barriers due to positive interaction between project participants. inability to make decisions and a high level of task conflict reduce conflict
Chaphalkar et al. (2015)Case StudyIdentified 16 fundamental variables that affect arbitrators’ decision-making in settling claims of variance in Indian building contracts
Lee et al. (2016)Theory of Planned BehaviorBy asking disputants about their salient behavioral beliefs about various conflict resolution methods such as mediation, arbitration, and adjudication, it is possible to better understand and explain their differing attitudes toward each other.
Yousefi et al. (2010)Attitude-based negotiation methodologyPositive attitude of the manager is mandatory for implementation and the best outcome from negotiation.
Ren and Anumba (2002)Mixed-method approachBayesian learning approach is assimilated into negotiation methods to resolve the conflicts in construction projects; multi-agent systems reduce conflict among human ideas.
Akintoye et al. (2015)Web-based systemThe web-based system serves as a communication platform among owners, contractors, and planners to help resolve conflicts.
Kalyan and Prakash (2019)Development of an Expert SystemAlternative solutions to the problem are provided based on its nature and the variables taken into account, including its fault. It helps.
Mohammadi and Birgonul (2016)RII approachFailure to achieve third-party certification lost incentives due to certification failure, warranty breach (violation), decertification of projects later in the project life cycle, and the elevated standard of care of various professionals were all identified as risk factors to be taken into account in the evaluation.
Boateng et al. (2015)Qualitative studyDevelopers may use this method to prioritize risks throughout the project supply network and begin mitigating them in a timely manner before they have major financial and schedule implications for the success of the megaproject.
Arditi and Pattanakitchamroon (2006)Qualitative StudyPolicies and specifications should be thoroughly reviewed to avoid claims, and the contractor's project planning should be increased.
Menassa and Mora (2010)Qualitative studyA study comparing the number of disputes resolved as a result of DRB recommendations with those that were heard at a DRB hearing session showed that DRB's effectiveness as an ADR method was >90%.
Gajaman et al. (2019)Interview-based questionnaireClassifies construction techniques and offers a framework for integrating the practices in order to remove the root problems.
Chan and Suen (2005)Interview-based questionnaireIt was suggested that no universal formula exists to resolve conflicts except that the parties should respect each other to gain the contract's trust.
Tabassi et al. (2019)Questionnaire surveyThe mediating effects of group coordination were studied in relation to conflict management and group performance.
Alaloul et al. (2019)Questionnaire surveyUnderstanding conflict helps in its resolution, even if it does not impact project presentation context-based.

Summary of methodologies and their contributions_

MethodologiesContribution in dispute preventionContribution in dispute resolution
  • ODR

  • Dispute resolution process

  • Case study approach

  • Theory of Planned Behavior

  • Attitude-based negotiation methodology

  • Mixes-method approach

  • Web-based system

  • Expert System

  • RII

  • Qualitative study

  • Interview-based questionnaire

  • Questionnaire survey

  • An examination of the numerous interconnected threats to ODR efficacy is proposed.

  • It encourages the use of conventional conflict resolution methods such as litigation and arbitration.

  • Identifying the most productive stage of a dispute is essential for a project's success.

  • The impartial system was built using MLP as well as GFF.

  • Using TPB's attitude construct, the inherent advantages of ADR, dispute complexity, transaction costs, and existing project risks may all be reclassified in a more useful manner.

  • In order to avoid disputes caused by different attitudes, management should put in place a framework to facilitate negotiations.

  • Facilitates negotiations among the various building project parties.

  • When it comes to figuring out the core of a problem, DRB's effectiveness as a preventive measure has been shown.

  • Suggested that arbitration is the best method to resolve international disputes when negotiations have failed

  • The dispute resolution process as a whole addresses the most effective way for integrating the different ADR tools into a unified framework for resolving conflicts.

  • Identified 16 critical factors that influence arbitrators’ decision-making when resolving variance claims

  • It is said that a manager's positive attitude is required for implementation and the best result from negotiation.

  • A web-based system may serve as a platform for communication between owners, contractors, and planners, assisting in resolving disputes.

  • Encourages careful examination of policies and requirements

  • Provides a framework for combining practices in order to address the underlying issues

  • The mediating effects of group coordination on conflict resolution and group performance were investigated.

  • Understanding conflict helps in its resolution, even if it has no context-dependent effect on the presentation of the project.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2022-0006 | Journal eISSN: 1847-6228 | Journal ISSN: 1847-5450
Language: English
Page range: 2616 - 2630
Submitted on: Mar 11, 2021
|
Accepted on: Jan 18, 2022
|
Published on: May 10, 2022
Published by: University of Zagreb
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Omar Sabri, Ola Lædre, Amund Bruland, published by University of Zagreb
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.