Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Network analysis of interconnections between theoretical concepts associated with principal–agent theory concerning construction projects Cover

Network analysis of interconnections between theoretical concepts associated with principal–agent theory concerning construction projects

By:  and    
Open Access
|Aug 2021

Figures & Tables

Tab. 1

Top construction management journals according to authors (Bröchner and Björk, 2008)

JournalAcronymPublisher
Automation in ConstructionAICElsevier
Building Research and InformationBRITaylor and Francis
Construction InnovationCIEmerald
Construction Management and EconomicsCMETaylor and Francis
Engineering, Construction, and Architectural ManagementECAMEmerald
International Journal of Project ManagementIJPMElsevier
Journal of Construction Engineering and ManagementJCEMASCE
Tab. 2

Incidence of keyword ‘principal–agent’ in selected journals

Keyword/JournalAICBRICICMEECAMIJPMJCEM
Papers15723177025
Titles0000031
Abstracts0104485
Keywords0102263

[i] P–A, principal–agent.

Tab. 3

Papers cited

AcronymPapers cited
AICXu et al. (2019)
BRILützkendorf and Speer (2005), Ürge-Vorsatz et al. (2007), Sha (2013), Zhang et al. (2016), Ströbele and Lützkendorf (2019)
CIDavidson (2009), Vennström and Eriksson (2010), Van Duren et al. (2015), Saini et al. (2018), Saini et al. (2019), Van den Berg et al. (2020), Van Oorschot et al. (2020)
CMEBoukendour (2007), Bowen et al. (2007), Ward and Chapman (2008), Yung and Lai (2008), Hossain (2009a), Tuuli et al. (2010), Sha (2011), Bowen et al. (2012), Ling and Tran (2012), Rose and Manley (2012), Chang (2013a), Espinoza and Morris (2013), Javed et al. (2014), Fu et al. (2015), De Valence and Runeson (2015), Winch (2015), Snippert et al. (2015), De Biasio and Murray (2017), Liu et al. (2017), Odoemena and Horita (2018), Gao and Liu (2019), Sha (2019), Zhang et al. (2020b)
ECAMHsieh and Forster (2006), Eriksson and Laan (2007), Badenfelt (2008), Bemelmans et al. (2012), Hughes et al. (2012), Hosseinian and Carmichael (2014), Li et al. (2014), Chong and Oon (2016), Adam et al. (2017), Mei et al. (2017), Chen et al. (2019), Han et al. (2019), Hasan and Jha (2019), Laryea (2019), Lee (2019), Wang and Shi (2019), Zhang et al. (2020a)
IJPMWard et al. (1991), Ward and Chapman (1991), Williams (1993), Ogunlana (1996), Farrell (2003), Turner and Müller (2003), Müller and Turner (2005), Yu et al. (2005), Jensen et al. (2006), Koch and Buser (2006), Smyth and Morris (2007), Turner et al. (2008), Hossain (2009b), Hossain and Wu (2009), Huang and Chang (2009), Pinto et al. (2009), Corvellec and Macheridis (2010), Hölzle (2010), Mahaney and Lederer (2010), Müller and Turner (2010), Bakker et al. (2011), Kapsali (2011), Koppenjan et al. (2011), Eriksson (2012), Hsu et al. (2012), Ika et al. (2012), Bond-Bernard et al. (2013), Braun et al. (2013), Chang (2013b), Chang (2013c), Flyvbjerg (2013), Ahola et al. (2014), Biesenthal and Wilden (2014), Carbonara et al. (2014), Floricel et al. (2014), Guo et al. (2014), Liu et al. (2014), Pinto (2014), Toivonen and Toivonen (2014), Chang (2015), Shen et al. (2015), Wang and Liu (2015), Xiang et al. (2015), Zwikael and Smyrk (2015), Badewi (2016), Conforto et al. (2016), Joslin and Müller (2016), Laursen and Svejvig (2016), Liu et al. (2016), Müller et al. (2016), Näsänen and Vanharanta (2016), Samset and Volden (2016), Cao et al. (2017), Musawir et al. (2017), Niknazar and Bourgault (2017), Teo and Bridge (2017), Zheng et al. (2017), Bryde et al. (2018), Cui et al. (2018), Pilkienė et al. (2018), Pollack et al. (2018), Sirisomboonsuk et al. (2018), Sydow and Braun (2018), Vuorinen and Martinsuo (2018), Wang et al. (2018), Daniel and Daniel (2019), Volden (2019), Hedborg et al. (2020), Musawir et al. (2020), Picciotto (2020)
JCEMCheah et al. (2004), Ho (2006), Puddicombe (2009), Zhang (2009), Xiang et al. (2012), Hosseinian and Carmichael (2013), Chang (2014), Chang and Chou (2014), Chen et al. (2014), Le et al. (2014), Van Buiten and Hartmann (2015), Chang and Chen (2016), Szentes and Eriksson (2016), Xiong and Zhang (2016), Chang et al. (2017), Shen et al. (2017), Wen et al. (2017), Shrestha et al. (2018), Tembo-Silungwe and Khatleli (2018), Solheim-Kile and Wald (2019), Yao et al. (2019), Hosseinian et al. (2020), Li et al. (2020), Yao et al. (2020), Zhu et al. (2020)
Tab. 4

Incidence of associated keywords in selected journals

Keyword/JournalAICBRICICMEECAMIJPMJCEMSum
Adverse selection11
Agency theory1427
Change management112
Cooperation/collaboration111126
Communication1315
Contracts7521226
Corruption213
Financial management123
Governance2214119
Hold-up112
Incentives243615
Information asymmetry11125
Information systems112329
Institutional theory11
Moral hazard11
Opportunism1315
Organisation theory11
Partnership533920
Procurement211116
Professional ethics/professionalism112
Reputation11
Risk management2210620
Social capital11
Social networks3216
Social theories11
Stewardship theory123
Strategic planning2114
Supply chain management3227
Temporary organisations22
Transaction costs315110
Trust11136
Uncertainty1247
Fig. 1

Network visualisation of interconnected keywords in Gephi.

Tab. 5

Node characteristics, data from Gephi

NodeDegreeWeighted degreeCloseness centralityBetweenness centrality
Adverse selection33.00.440.0
Agency theory813.00.545.3
Change management00.00.00.0
Cooperation711.00.569.04
Communication58.00.522.78
Contracts1846.00.7261.63
Corruption00.00.00.0
Financial management46.00.480.28
Governance1224.00.6440.0
Hold-up22.00.440.0
Incentives1327.00.6530.26
Information asymmetry810.00.588.06
Information systems911.00.5437.42
Institutional theory11.00.350.0
Moral hazard22.00.430.0
Opportunism55.00.520.9
Organisation theory11.00.380.0
Partnership1428.00.6439.53
P–A theory1628.00.768.26
Procurement912.00.5210.82
Professionalism34.00.450.0
Reputation22.00.440.0
Risk management1124.00.6115.92
Social capital45.00.471.23
Social networks45.00.470.38
Social theories00.00.00.0
Stewardship theory47.00.490.56
Strategic planning22.00.420.0
Supply chain management44.00.51.18
Temporary organisations00.00.00.0
Transaction costs1023.00.639.07
Trust1114.00.5615.62
Uncertainty610.00.542.76

[i] P–A, principal–agent.

Keywords123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233Sum
1. Adverse selection1113
2. Agency theory11311213114
3. Change management22
4. Cooperation/collaboration231211111
5. Communication1222119
6. Contracts122413151173251163150
7. Corruption22
8. Financial management12126
9. Governance339112113214233
10. Hold-up112
11. Incentives3513111361211130
12. Information asymmetry1111221110
13. Information systems121122111113
14. Institutional theory11
15. Moral hazard112
16. Opportunism1111116
17. Organisation theory112
18. Partnership17221312121311230
19. Principal–agent theory1123162111121213130
20. Procurement121121112113
21. Professional ethics/Professionalism1124
22. Reputation112
23. Risk management25232113241228
24. Social capital11215
25. Social networks211318
26. Social theories11
27. Stewardship theory31217
28. Strategic planning1124
29. Supply chain management111418
30. Temporary organisations22
31. Transation costs164111322223
32. Trust1113121111114
33. Uncertainty121222212

[i] P–A, principal–agent.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2021-0025 | Journal eISSN: 1847-6228 | Journal ISSN: 1847-5450
Language: English
Page range: 2450 - 2464
Submitted on: Apr 13, 2021
Accepted on: May 3, 2021
Published on: Aug 24, 2021
Published by: University of Zagreb
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Anita Ceric, Ivona Ivic, published by University of Zagreb
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.