Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Drivers of cost and time overruns: A client and contractor perspective Cover
By: Peter Dahlin and  Ossi Pesämaa  
Open Access
|May 2021

References

  1. Ahmed, M. O., El-Adaway, I. H., Coatney, K. T., & Eid, M. S. (2016). Construction bidding and the winner’s curse: Game theory approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(2), pp. 04015076.
  2. Cantarelli, C. C., Flyvbjerg, B., & Buhl, S. L. (2012). Geographical variation in project cost performance: The Netherlands versus worldwide. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, pp. 324–331.
  3. Cantarelli, C. C., Flyvbjerg, B., Molin, E. J. E., & Wee, B. (2010). Cost overruns in large-scale transportation infrastructure projects: Explanations and their theoretical embeddedness. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure, 10(1), pp. 30–41.
  4. Cantarelli, C., van Wee, B., Molina, E. J. E., & Flyvbjerg, B. (2012). Different cost performance: Different determinants? The case of cost overruns in Dutch transport infrastructure projects. Transport Policy, 22, pp. 88–95.
  5. Flyvbjerg, B., Holm, M. S., & Buhl, S. (2002). Underestimating costs in public works projects: Error or lie? Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(3), pp. 279–295.
  6. Flyvbjerg, B., Skamris Holm, M. K., & Buhl, S. L. (2003). How common and how large are cost overruns in transport infrastructure projects? Transport Reviews, 23(1), pp. 71–88.
  7. Ghoddousi, P., Hosseini, M. R. (2012). A survey of the factors affecting the productivity of construction projects in Iran. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 18(1), pp. 99–116.
  8. Gustafsson, A. (2016, 14 November). Notan för Nya Karolinska skulle räcka till två Slussen. Dagens Nyheter. Available at https://www.dn.se/sthlm/notan-for-nya-karolinska-skulle-racka-till-tva-slussen/
  9. Heravi, G., & Charkhakan, M. H. (2014). Predicting and tracing change-formation scenarios in construction projects using the DEMATEL technique. Journal of Management in Engineering, 30(6), pp. 04014028.
  10. Idrottens Affärer. (2013, 25 December). Arenakostnaderna uppe i 8 miljarder. Available at www.idrottensaffarer.se
  11. Johnson, R. M., & Babu, R. I. I. (2020). Time and cost overruns in the UAE construction industry: A critical analysis. International Journal of Construction Management, 20(5), pp. 402–411.
  12. Kamminga, P. (2015). Rethinking contract design: Why incorporating non-legal drivers of contractual behavior in contracts may lead to better results in complex defense systems procurement. Journal of Public Procurement, 15(2), pp. 208–235.
  13. Keane, P., Sertyesilisik, B., & Ross, A. D. (2010). Variations and change orders on construction projects. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 2(2), pp. 89–96.
  14. Khanzadi, M., Nasirzadeh, F., & Dashti, M. S. (2018). Fuzzy cognitive map approach to analyze causes of change orders in construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(2), pp. 04017111.
  15. Lehtinen, J., Peltokorpi, A., & Artto, K. (2019). Megaprojects as organizational platforms and technology platforms for value creation. International Journal of Project Management, 37(1), pp. 43–58.
  16. Littorin, J. (2015). Hallandsåstunneln öppnar – 18 år försenat. Dagens Nyheter. 8 December. Available at http://dn.se
  17. Liu, J., Zuo, J., Sun, Z., Zillante, G., & Chen, X. (2013). Sustainability in hydropower development—A case study. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 19, pp. 230–237.
  18. Makovšek, D., Tominc, P., & Logožar, K. (2012). A cost performance analysis of transport infrastructure construction in Slovenia. Transportation, 39(1), pp. 197–214.
  19. Odeck, J. (2004). Cost overruns in road construction—What are their sizes and determinants? Transport Policy, 11(1), pp. 43–53.
  20. Park, Y., & Papadopoulou, T. (2012). Causes of cost overruns in transport infrastructure projects in Asia: Their significance and relationship with project size. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 2(2), pp. 195–216.
  21. Pesämaa, O., Dahlin, P., & Öberg, C. (2018). Reduction of tension effects on partner evaluation. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 36(4), pp. 425–439.
  22. Pesämaa, O., Larsson, J., & Eriksson, P. E. (2018). Role of performance feedback on process performance in construction projects: Client and contractor perspectives. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34(4), pp. 04018023.
  23. Qiu, Y., Chen, H., Sheng, Z., & Cheng, S. (2019). Governance of institutional complexity in megaproject organizations. International Journal of Project Management, 37(3), pp. 425–443.
  24. Rokkan, A. I., Heide, J. B., & Wathne, K. H. (2003). Specific investments in marketing relationships: Expropriation and bonding effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(2), pp. 210–224.
  25. Ruoslahti, H. (2018). Co-creation of knowledge for innovation requires multi-stakeholder public relations. Public Relations and the Power of Creativity, Advances in Public Relations and Communication Management, 3, pp. 115–133.
  26. Segelod, E. (2017). Project Cost Overrun: Causes, Consequences, and Investment Decisions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. doi: 10.1017/9781316779675.009
  27. Senescu, R. R., Aranda-Mena, G., & Haymaker, J. R. (2013). Relationships between project complexity and communication. Journal of Management in Engineering, 29(2), pp. 183–197.
  28. Shehu, Z., Endut, I. R., Akintoye, A., & Holt, G. D. (2014). Cost overrun in the Malaysian construction industry projects: A deeper insight. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), pp. 1471–1480.
  29. Swedbank. (2013). Ny Nationalarena i Solna AB: Swedbank Arena. Stockholm. Available at https://www.swedbank.se/idc/groups/public/@i/@sbg/@gs/@com/documents/article/fm_478566.pdf
  30. Themsen, T. N. (2019). The processes of public megaproject cost estimation: The inaccuracy of reference class forecasting. Financial Accountability & Management, 35(4), pp. 337–352.
  31. Tsai, W. H., Lin, S. J., Liu, J. Y., Lin, W. R., & Lee, K. C. (2011). Incorporating life cycle assessments into building project decision-making: An energy consumption and CO2 emission perspective. Energy, 36(5), pp. 3022–3029.
  32. Wathne, K. H., & Heide, J. B. (2000). Opportunism in interfirm relationships: Forms, outcomes, and solutions. Journal of Marketing, 64(4), pp. 36–51. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.64.4.36.18070.
  33. Wu, C. H., Hsieh, T. Y., & Cheng, W. L. (2005). Statistical analysis of causes for design change in highway construction on Taiwan. International Journal of Project Management, 23(7), pp. 554–563.
  34. Zhang, J., Li, H., Olanipekun, A. O., & Bai, L. (2019). A successful delivery process of green buildings: The project owners’ view, motivation and commitment. Renewable Energy, 138, pp. 651–658.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2021-0006 | Journal eISSN: 1847-6228 | Journal ISSN: 1847-5450
Language: English
Page range: 2374 - 2382
Submitted on: May 6, 2020
|
Accepted on: Jan 12, 2021
|
Published on: May 18, 2021
Published by: University of Zagreb
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Peter Dahlin, Ossi Pesämaa, published by University of Zagreb
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.