Have a personal or library account? Click to login
On-site inspections: the shift from forms to digital capture Cover

References

  1. Azhar, S., Jackson, A., & Sattineni, A. (2015). Construction apps: A critical review and analysis. In: ISARC Proceedings of the Conference: 32nd International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction. ISSN: 0926-5805
  2. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 11(3), pp. 369–386. doi: 10.2307/248684.
  3. Bowden, S., Dorr, A., Thorpe, T., & Anumba, C. (2006). Mobile ICT support for construction process improvement. Automation in Construction, 15(5), pp. 664–676. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2005.08.004.
  4. Davies., R., & Harty, C. (2013). Implementing ‘Site BIM’: A case study of ICT innovation on a large hospital project. Automation in Construction, 30, pp. 15–24. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2012.11.024.
  5. Davis, F. D. (1985). A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results. Sloan School of Management, MIT.
  6. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13(3), pp. 319–340. doi: 10.2307/249008.
  7. Davis, D., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), pp. 982–1003. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.
  8. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (2006). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), pp. 1111–1132. doi: 10.1111/j.15591816.1992.tb00945.x.
  9. Josephson, P., & Hammarlund, Y. (1999). The causes and costs of defects in construction: A study of seven building projects. Automation in Construction, 8(6), pp. 681–687. doi: 10.1016/S09265805(98)001149.
  10. Lowry, G. (2002). Modelling user acceptance of building management systems. Automation in Construction, 11(6), pp. 695–705. doi: 10.1016/S0926-5805(02)00010-9.
  11. Merschbrock, C. (2012). Unorchestrated symphony: The case of inter – organizational collaboration in digital construction design. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 17(22), pp. 320–337. ISSN: 1874-4753.
  12. Merschbrock, C., & Rolfsen, C. (2016). BIM technology acceptance among reinforcement workers – The case of Oslo Airport’s Terminal 2. Electronic Journal of Information Technology in Construction 21(1)1–12. ISSN: 1403-6835.
  13. Miettinen, R., & Paavola, S. (2014). Beyond the BIM utopia: Approaches to the development and implementation of building information modelling. Automation in Construction, 43, pp. 84–91. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2014.03.009.
  14. Nguyen, L., Koufakou, A., & Mitchell, C. (2015). A smart mobile app for site inspection and documentation. In: Proceedings of ICSC15 5th International/11th Construction Specialty Conference. doi: 10.14288/1.0380326.
  15. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1) pp. 145–179. doi: 10.5465/amr.1991.4279002.
  16. RIB. (2019). RIB capture - Digital snagging, inspections, safety rounds and QA. RIB website. Retrieved from: https://www.rib-software.co.uk/rib-capture on 29 March, 2019.
  17. Rogers, F. D. (2010). Diffusion of Innovations. Simon and Schuster, New York.
  18. Rolfsen, C., Lassen, A., Mohamed, M., Shakari, A., & Yosefi, H. (2019). On-site quality assurance: Moving from forms to digital capture. In: Proceedings of the Creative Construction Conference (2019) 122. Budapest, Hungary. doi: 10.3311/CCC2019-122.
  19. Rolfsen, C., & Merschbrock, C. (2016). Acceptance of construction scheduling visualizations: Barcharts, flowline charts, or perhaps BIM. In: Proceedings of the 5th Creative Construction Conference (CCC 2016), Budapest, Hungary 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.658.
  20. Vaxevanidis, N., & Petropoulos, G. (2008). A literature survey of cost of Quality models. Journal of Engineering. doi: 10.1155/3962.
  21. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), pp. 186–204. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
  22. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 27(3), pp. 425–478. doi: 10.2307/30036540.
  23. Wixom, B., & Todd, P. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16(1), pp. 85–102. doi: 10.1287/isre.1050.0042.
  24. Yue, K., Huber, D., Akinci, B., & Krishnamurti, R. (2019). The ASDMC project: The challenge of detecting defects on construction sites. In: Third International Symposium on 3D Data Processing, Visualization, and Transmission. Available at https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/4155837 on 28 March, 2019.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2020-0003 | Journal eISSN: 1847-6228 | Journal ISSN: 1847-5450
Language: English
Page range: 2064 - 2071
Submitted on: Dec 16, 2019
Accepted on: Feb 10, 2020
Published on: Mar 25, 2020
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year

© 2020 Christian Nordahl Rolfsen, Ann Karina Lassen, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.