Have a personal or library account? Click to login
On-site inspections: the shift from forms to digital capture Cover

On-site inspections: the shift from forms to digital capture

Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: an International Journal
Volume 12 (2020): Issue 1 (January 2020)
By: Christian Nordahl Rolfsen and  Ann Karina Lassen  
Open Access
|Mar 2020

References

  1. Azhar, S., Jackson, A., & Sattineni, A. (2015). Construction apps: A critical review and analysis. In: ISARC Proceedings of the Conference: 32nd International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction. ISSN: 0926-5805
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 11(3), pp. 369–386. doi: 10.2307/248684.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Bowden, S., Dorr, A., Thorpe, T., & Anumba, C. (2006). Mobile ICT support for construction process improvement. Automation in Construction, 15(5), pp. 664–676. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2005.08.004.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Davies., R., & Harty, C. (2013). Implementing ‘Site BIM’: A case study of ICT innovation on a large hospital project. Automation in Construction, 30, pp. 15–24. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2012.11.024.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Davis, F. D. (1985). A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results. Sloan School of Management, MIT.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13(3), pp. 319–340. doi: 10.2307/249008.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Davis, D., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), pp. 982–1003. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (2006). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), pp. 1111–1132. doi: 10.1111/j.15591816.1992.tb00945.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Josephson, P., & Hammarlund, Y. (1999). The causes and costs of defects in construction: A study of seven building projects. Automation in Construction, 8(6), pp. 681–687. doi: 10.1016/S09265805(98)001149.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Lowry, G. (2002). Modelling user acceptance of building management systems. Automation in Construction, 11(6), pp. 695–705. doi: 10.1016/S0926-5805(02)00010-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Merschbrock, C. (2012). Unorchestrated symphony: The case of inter – organizational collaboration in digital construction design. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 17(22), pp. 320–337. ISSN: 1874-4753.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Merschbrock, C., & Rolfsen, C. (2016). BIM technology acceptance among reinforcement workers – The case of Oslo Airport’s Terminal 2. Electronic Journal of Information Technology in Construction 21(1)1–12. ISSN: 1403-6835.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Miettinen, R., & Paavola, S. (2014). Beyond the BIM utopia: Approaches to the development and implementation of building information modelling. Automation in Construction, 43, pp. 84–91. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2014.03.009.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Nguyen, L., Koufakou, A., & Mitchell, C. (2015). A smart mobile app for site inspection and documentation. In: Proceedings of ICSC15 5th International/11th Construction Specialty Conference. doi: 10.14288/1.0380326.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1) pp. 145–179. doi: 10.5465/amr.1991.4279002.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. RIB. (2019). RIB capture - Digital snagging, inspections, safety rounds and QA. RIB website. Retrieved from: https://www.rib-software.co.uk/rib-capture on 29 March, 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Rogers, F. D. (2010). Diffusion of Innovations. Simon and Schuster, New York.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Rolfsen, C., Lassen, A., Mohamed, M., Shakari, A., & Yosefi, H. (2019). On-site quality assurance: Moving from forms to digital capture. In: Proceedings of the Creative Construction Conference (2019) 122. Budapest, Hungary. doi: 10.3311/CCC2019-122.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Rolfsen, C., & Merschbrock, C. (2016). Acceptance of construction scheduling visualizations: Barcharts, flowline charts, or perhaps BIM. In: Proceedings of the 5th Creative Construction Conference (CCC 2016), Budapest, Hungary 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.658.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Vaxevanidis, N., & Petropoulos, G. (2008). A literature survey of cost of Quality models. Journal of Engineering. doi: 10.1155/3962.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), pp. 186–204. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 27(3), pp. 425–478. doi: 10.2307/30036540.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Wixom, B., & Todd, P. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16(1), pp. 85–102. doi: 10.1287/isre.1050.0042.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Yue, K., Huber, D., Akinci, B., & Krishnamurti, R. (2019). The ASDMC project: The challenge of detecting defects on construction sites. In: Third International Symposium on 3D Data Processing, Visualization, and Transmission. Available at https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/4155837 on 28 March, 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2020-0003 | Journal eISSN: 1847-6228 | Journal ISSN: 1847-5450
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 2064 - 2071
Submitted on: Dec 16, 2019
|
Accepted on: Feb 10, 2020
|
Published on: Mar 25, 2020
Published by: University of Zagreb
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
on-site inspection,
defect management systems,
technology acceptance model
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Introductions and overviews,
Engineering, other

© 2020 Christian Nordahl Rolfsen, Ann Karina Lassen, published by University of Zagreb
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 12 (2020): Issue 1 (January 2020)Next article