Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Method for Base Estimation of Construction Time for Linear Projects in Front-end Project Phases Cover

Method for Base Estimation of Construction Time for Linear Projects in Front-end Project Phases

Open Access
|Jan 2021

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1

Simplified outline of the construction plan based on condensed work packages.Source: Nkado (1992).

Fig. 2

Example of controlling activity path (CAP) in time–location diagram.Source: Mattila and Park (2003).

Fig. 3

Graphical representation of the equation of total project time in LSM for continuous full-span activities.Source: Radujkovic (2012).

Fig. 4

Representative pipeline project from the analyzed sewer system.Source: project technical documentation

Fig. 5

Task links and the three possible variations between two activities.

Leading activities and their related variables of another pipeline project from the same sewer system

Leading activitiesΔQUpΔlα, β (tan−1)ta (days)Task linkky
1Pulverizing and grinding of existing roadway asphalt or concrete curtain4500292.0821130.007316F-F18
2Mechanical excavation5653.52669.7621130.00409F-F17
3Manual excavation1413.38669.7621130.00103F-F02
4Replacement of low foundation material559.98878.4021130.00031S-S11
5Trimming, leveling, and grading the landfill base16102927.921130.00031S-S11
6Spreading filter pedestrian finishing base209878.4021130.00011S-S11
7Installation of manholes1332.0021130.019742S-S00
8Lowering pipe into trench2113.636.4021130.027559F-F158
9Spreading rounded gravel above the pipes1071.1296878.4021130.00062S-S11
10Backfill24801152.921130.00103F-F12
11Embankment-road compacting20801112.621130.00092S-S11
12Base pavement-base course layer51951145.421130.00215S-S11
13Surface pavement-binder and wearing course51951145.421130.00215

Total time: 88 days

Linear continuous activities of the analyzed pipeline project and their related variables

Leading activitiesFirst three variables determined from technical documentation

ΔQUpΔlα, β (tan−1)tn (days)Task linkky
1Pulverizing and grinding of existing roadway asphalt or concrete curtain2662.807292.089200.00990910F-F16
2Mechanical excavation2949.962669.769200.0047875F-F14
3Manual excavation737.49669.769200.0011992F-F01
4Replacement of low foundation material474.896878.409200.0005881S-S11
5Trimming, leveling, and grading of the landfill base1637.0472927.99200.0006081F-F11
6Spreading filter pedestrian finishing base248.39878.409200.000301S-S11
7Installation of manholes472.009200.01277124S-S00
8Lowering of pipe into trench849.3836.409200.02535824F-F123
9Spreading rounded gravel above the pipes1273.79878.409200.0015762S-S11
10Backfill2815.451152.99200.0026543F-F13
11Embankment-road compacting941.311112.69200.0009201S-S11
12Base pavement-base course layer2344.7971145.49200.0022253S-S11
13Surface pavement-binder and wearing course2344.7971145.49200.0022253

Total time 46d

The equations for calculation of time buffer and duration of two adjacent activities

Situation 1. α = βProduction rate: tasks A1 and A2 are equal. Recommended task link: Start–Start (S–S) Total duration: T = k + t(A2) Time buffer: y = kSituation 2. α < βProduction rate: task A1 is faster than task A2.Recommended task link:Start–Start (S–S)Total duration: T = k + t(A2)Time buffer: y = k
Situation 3. α > βProduction rate: task A2 is faster than task A1.Recommended task link: Finish–Finish (F–F)Total duration: T = k + t(A1) - t(A2) + t(A2)Time buffer: y = k + Δt = k + t(A1) - t(A2)

Comparison of the new LSM-based method for time estimation with the two existing methods

Integrated CPM–LOB model (Ammar, 2013)PSM (Lucko, 2007, 2008)LSM-based method for early time estimation
1) LOB calculationsThis step consists of (at least) four (sub)steps. First is to draw a unit network (of repetitive activities for single work unit); second is to estimate the crew size for each activity; third is to establish a target rate of output (this (sub)step can be further divided into smaller steps); fourth is to derive the LOB diagram.1) Initial equationsThe execution of PSM starts with describing all activities in the Macaulay bracket notation (e.g., singularity functions). However, no links are considered for the initial equations (one equation for each activity).1) Activity listBased on available technical documentation, devise the list of linear activities of the projects, along with their parameters of work quantity and work group productivity (average). Work quantity is spread through work units using linear interpolation to make every activity continuous. Their sequence must be established unambiguously.
2) Calculating activity durationOverlapping activities are generalized to represent repetitive activities. For this generalization to be possible, the duration is assumed constant in all units of a repetitive activity.2) Buffer equationsIn the second step, the singularity functions for buffers are set up (one equation for each buffer).2) Calculating activity durations and slopesCalculate durations and unit production rates (e.g., slopes) for every linear continuous activity.
3) Specifying logical relationships using overlapping activities (buffer time)To specify relationships, the actual progress rate of each activity is compared with that of its successors. Three scenarios can be encountered: diverging, converging, and parallel activities. Based on the scenario, the buffer time is placed on the first or the last unit.3) Initial stackingIn the third step, the initial activity and buffer equations are stacked up in the order of precedence with the set of singularity functions (one equation for each activity).3) Using the newly developed algorithm for determination of buffers between activitiesPair of activities can converge, can diverge, or be parallel depending on the relation of production rates of two adjacent activities. Depending on this relation, the equation for every buffer y is determined, and calculation of the buffer is performed.
4) Time scheduling1. Forward pass – the early timings (belong to the first and last units only) are determined for each activity. 2. Backward pass – the late timings (belong to the first and last units only) are determined for each activity.4) Minimum differencesIn the fourth step, the differences between neighboring predecessor buffer equations and successor equations are taken and the minima of these difference equations are determined across all positive values of x (one equation for each activity–buffer link).4) Using the newly developed algorithm for calculation of project durationBased on the determined buffer times, the project duration is calculated as the sum of the buffers and the duration of the last activity.
5) Criticality analysis5) DifferentiationDifferences are differentiated using equations to confirm the nature of the vertices (set of equations)
6) Final consolidationIn the sixth step, the vertex distances between a neighboring predecessor buffer equation and successor equation are compared to identify the overall minimum distance (set of equations).
7) Criticality analysisThe equivalent of a critical path from CPM is calculated (set of equations).

Time–cost performance for civil engineering projects in the expanded Hong Kong sample

Project typeKBRTotal projects
Total civil works250.50.2060.79148
Roadworks251.20.2250.8757
Other civil works262.50.1850.6991
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2018-0026 | Journal eISSN: 1847-6228 | Journal ISSN: 1847-5450
Language: English
Page range: 2312 - 2326
Submitted on: Dec 24, 2019
|
Accepted on: Sep 17, 2020
|
Published on: Jan 29, 2021
Published by: University of Zagreb
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Ivana Burcar Dunovic, Kristijan Robert Prebanic, Pavao Durrigl, published by University of Zagreb
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.