Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Evaluation of chemical composition and radioactivity of slags in terms of their potential for reuse for fertilizer purposes — a literature review Cover

Evaluation of chemical composition and radioactivity of slags in terms of their potential for reuse for fertilizer purposes — a literature review

Open Access
|Dec 2025

Full Article

1.
INTRODUCTION

In recent years, the issue of using industrial waste in the production of agricultural fertilizers has been gaining attention, especially in the context of the growing need for sustainable development, recycling of raw materials and a closed-loop economy. One such material that has found wide application in this field is slag generated from the combustion of coal in industrial furnaces (furnace slag). The amount of combustion waste generated depends on the weight of the fuel used, its type and quality, the method of combustion (type of furnace), and the efficiency of the dust-collection elements installed in the system [Olszewski et al. 2012]. The amount of slag generated from coal combustion in thermal power plants and thermal waste conversion facilities is about 30% [Skoko et al. 2017, Poranek et al. 2021]. For example, in China, 244 million tons of municipal waste were generated in 2022, of which 195 million were thermally converted. China also produces huge amounts of phosphoric and steelmaking slags, 80 million tons/year of phosphoric slag, and 160 million tons/year of steelmaking slag, putting it at the forefront of these industries globally. It has a fairly low reuse rate of these resources, however, at less than 40% [Shi et al. 2022, Sai et al. 2024, Du et al. 2025].

It is worth mentioning slags produced from waste from the metal smelting industry, such as blast furnace slags (from the production of so-called pig iron) and converter slags (from the steel smelting process). Slags from metallurgical plants (including iron) have a high potential for metal recovery in reuse processes, with each ton of iron and steel producing about 0.10–0.23 tons of slag [Sitko 2014, Choi et al. 2021].

Slags have mainly been used as a sealing material, as an element of mortars and binders used in mining, and in landfills, road construction and geotechnical work, to improve soil structure and stability [Iwanek et al. 2008, Hycnar 2006, Koda et al. 2010, Gawlicki et al. 2013, Poranek et al. 2021, Vukanac et al. 2022, Zhang et al. 2025]. In the case of slags classified as hazardous substances (mainly from the incineration of municipal waste and sewage sludge), popular management methods include cementation, geopolymerization, or composite formation [Mikuła et al. 2017, Zhang et al. 2023, Sai et al. 2024, Kuranlı et al. 2024]. An important and developing direction of slag management (especially steelmaking slags) is their reprocessing during the recovery of elements from the waste material. As part of the expansion of knowledge and opportunities for the recovery of elements from slags, initiatives have been established, like the H2020 CHROMIC project in Europe, which focuses on the development of new technologies for the recovery of elements such as chromium or molybdenum. Slags subjected to recovery processes can also be an important source of rare earth elements [Jonczy 2018].

There are indications of the possibility of using slags as an ingredient in fertilizers and soil conditioners, but this management direction is controversial and requires further research to confirm the environmental safety of using these wastes. This is especially important in light of the potential radioactivity of slag, which depends on the origin of the incinerated substrate, among other factors [Hycnar et al. 2014, Skoko et al. 2017].

2.
PURPOSE OF THE WORK

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the chemical composition and radioactivity of slags from various types of combustion and feedstock in terms of their fertilizer potential.

Physicochemical composition of slags by combustion source.

Table 1 above provides summary data on the chemical composition of slags by type of feedstock and source, according to Polish authors Sybilski et al. [2004], Giergiczny et al. [2004], Smarzewski et al. [2015], Jonczy [2013], Baran et al. [2017], Ostrowski [2018], Adamczyk et al. [2013], Soltys [2016], and Czop et al. [2022]. The table distinguishes slags from the combustion of hard coal, lignite, steel processing, iron, zinc, and municipal waste. Furnace slags from combustion in fluidized bed boilers (EC Żerań) were evaluated, and converter slags were taken directly from incineration plants and heaps.

Table 1.

Chemical composition [% by weight] of slags by type of fuel used and type of combustion (examples from Poland)

Fuel and type of combustionHard coalLigniteSteel plantCopper smelterSteel mill (iron)Zinc smelterSteel plantMunicipal waste
ComponentSourceCombined heat and power plant – furnace slagEC Żerań – slag from combustion in fluidized bed boilersEC Żerań – slag from combustion in fluidized bed boilersDabrowa Gornicza heap – converter slagsDabrowa Gornicza heap – blast furnace slagsCopper slag – shaft and granulatedBlast furnace slag (Katowice and Sandzimir Steelworks)„Silesian Town”Steel- making slag (converter slag)Waste incineration plant with sliding grate (capacity: 210,000-220,000 t/year)Waste incineration plant with reciprocating grate (capacity: 94,000 t/year)
SiO250.1031.00–46.0047.50–52.0010.80–14.4139.57–45.0335.24–42.7636.84–39,6624.829.4054.2054.20
Fe2O34.943.37–3.736.20–8.5026.52–32.4514.64–17.7717.38–18.570.49–2.50·33.844.994.19
Al2O323.707.92–16.1922.10–23.602.99–4.177.56–10.3012.31–15.566.30–7.808.291.9911.056.53
MnO0.04··2.40–3.340.42–0.48···4.11··
Mn2O3······0,17–0,24··0.120.13
TiO21.22··0.45–0.550.42–0.59-0.42–0.80··0.730.66
CaO2.134.20–48.206.30–33.8035.81–37.5319.24–20.5811.88–21.2742.27–45.7517.4337.6414.5016.30
MgO1.461.00–3.100.70–2.307.01–7.825.33–5.637.29–7.774.57–8.032.689.061.751.80
SO30.850.30–27.701.10–9.10··0.12–0.160.08–1.122.840.441.071.67
P2O50.64··0.99–1.370.06–0.09····0.930.99
Na2O0.45··< 0.020.25–0.28·0.42–0.55··5.395.62
K2O2.27··< 0.020.23–0.26·0.35–0.84··0.901.05
Cl0.13····0.002–0.0150.03–0.07····
Source[Smarzewski et al. 2015]Sybilski et al. 2004][Sybilski et al. 2004][Jonczy et al. 2013][Jonczy et al. 2013][Kuterasińska et al. 2014][Baran et al. 2017], [Ostrowski 2018], [Giergiczny et al. 2004], [Różycka et al. 2008][Adamczyk 2013][Sołtys, 2016][Czop et al. 2022][Czop et al. 2022]

· = no data

There have been a number of studies in which slag composition is analysed with an eye toward its further use in construction (mainly for the production of cements). In addition to their physical properties relevant for construction use, the slags’ chemical properties were also studied according to PN-EN 15167-1:2006. In most examples, the chemical composition is dominated by SiO2, with the highest content for slag from municipal waste combustion, at 54.20%; CaO, which is most abundant in slag from ironworks (42.27–45.75%); and Al2O3, which is dominant in coal-combustion slag (23.60%).

Similar relationships were obtained by Jia et al. [2024] for slag from municipal waste incineration plants; Choi et al. [2021] and Bulut et al. [2022] for blast-furnace slag (steel industry); and Huang et al. [2025] for silico-manganese slag (smelter slag). Tao et al. (2024) and Feng et al. [2023] found this type of relationship in blast furnace slag for phosphogypsum production. Du et al. [2025] and Shi et al. [2022] found the highest CaO content for steelmaking slags, at 36.33–63.30%.

The composition of slags strictly depends on the substrates used in combustion and processing, in addition to the place and way in which the slags are produced. For example, Fe2O3 was found to have the highest content in slag obtained after the production of tin and coal, at 37.64%–42.30%, followed by SiO2 and CaO [Zulkeplee et al. 2023; Lai et al. 2022]. The highest content of TiO2 was found in titanium slag formed after the smelting of vandanium-titanium magnetite (21.46%), followed by CaO and SiO2 [Wang et al. 2023], and manganese slag, where, in addition to a high proportion of SiO2 and Al2O3, 11.63% MnO content was found [Hu et al. 2024].

Table 2 shows the results for the elemental composition of slags from the Ruda Śląska and Chorzów dumps, as well as granulated blast-furnace slag. The highest contents were recorded for Zn (62.70–83.70 mg/kg) and Pb (53.40–293.85 mg/kg) in slag from the Ruda Śląska dump. For slags from the Chorzów dump, the highest Mn was in the range of 87.30–866.00 mg/kg and Zn (1–108.00 mg/kg), and the lowest for Cd and Ni [Jonczy 2012, Król 2017].

Table 2.

Elemental composition of heap slags compared to blast furnace slag

Elemental composition [mg/kg]
ElementSlag heap Ruda Śląska (after Zn-Pb, pre- metallurgy)Slag heap Chorzow (steelmaking slags)Granulated blast furnace slag
Mn430–2223873–866001978
Zn6270–837001–1080036–1580
Pb5340–293856–3200<83
Cd32–262<0.3–13619-3
Cr16–6915–292012–372
Cu66–18593–83722
Ni25–146<1–102<2,5
V41–746–91910–94
Mo6–25<1–82–4
Ag55–140<0.3–3.50.9

In the granulated slag from metallurgical processes, the maximum values are much lower for Mn (19.78 mg/kg) and Zn (36 mg/kg), and the lowest for Pb and Ni. Jonczy et al. [2013] also examined the content of other metals (including lanthanides and actinides) in blast-furnace and converter slags. They found a high Cr content for converter slag (11.20–15.50 mg/kg), and a significant amount of As for blast furnace slags (11.80–16.00 mg/kg). By way of comparison, at HCM and Boleslaw smelters, 2.2 mg/kg of As was found in converter slags, and a trace amount, < 0.14%, for metallurgical slags [Jonczy 2018]. Also worth mentioning are the contents of Ni in blast-furnace slag (107–133 mg/kg), as well as Sr (239–240 mg/kg) and V (8.16–11.50 mg/kg) in converter slags [Jonczy, 2013].

Table 3 shows data on the elemental composition of slags from municipal waste incineration in different types of incinerators, from different locations, and metal leachability, according to authors Czop et al. [2022] and Martysz et al. [2021]. High zinc content (1621.00–2787,00 mg/kg) and particularly high copper content (21,608.00 mg/kg), as well as 766.00 mg/kg lead content, were found for slag from the waste incineration plant with a sliding grate. Also significant is the chromium content, at 277.00–605.00 mg/kg. However, the composition of municipal waste incineration slag is largely determined by the type of feedstock, and this is also the case in metallurgical slags.

Table 3.

Elemental composition of slags from municipal waste incineration by type and location of incineration plants

Slags from Municipal waste
Source/ElementResults on a dry weight basis [mg/kg]Leachability [mg/l]
Waste incineration plant with sliding grateWaste incineration plant with sliding grateWaste incineration plant with reciprocating grateIncinerator Bydgoszcz (0–8mm grain size)Warsaw incineration plant (0–31.5mm grain size)
Zn2787,001621,002337,000.060.03
Cu21608,001918,00867,000.030,04
Pb766.00687.00437.000.030.02
Ni73.6081.00211.00< 0.01< 0.01
Cr277.00342.00605.000.010.05
Cd5.803.350.96< 0.01< 0.01
As5.3016.506.07--
V31.8030.0030.70--
Tl< 1.00< 1.00---
Hg0.040.24< 0.01--

- = no data

Kijowska et al. [2024], in a study of chromium content in steelmaking slags from municipal waste incineration and heaps, showed an average chromium concentration of < 440.00 μg/g, with an additional decrease in chromium concentration after the storage period. Adamczyk and Nowak (2012) found chromium content in the range of 80–190 mg/kg for furnace slag. Interestingly, in that study, the authors also found a upward trend in chromium concentration over 10 years after slag management for reclamation purposes. The cadmium concentration for municipal waste incineration slag is relatively low (0.96–5.80 mg/kg), comparable to the results for biomass incineration slag, which achieved concentrations of 0.95–2.57 mg/kg [Ma et al. 2023].

In addition to the elemental content of slag dry matter, elemental leachability studies are crucial for evaluating this material as a potential fertilizer additive. Kubiss et al. (2019) and Zhang et al. (2025) investigated the content of selected elements in copper slag — Cr(VI), Cd, Pb, Hg — as well as chloride, fluoride and sulphate in the aqueous extract. None of the parameters exceeded the permissible standard for national regulations (Journal of Laws 2015, item 1277), and hence it can be concluded that the introduction of copper slags into the environment would not pose a threat to aquatic organisms — provided that their chemical properties are checked each time. Czop et al. [2022] and Martysz et al. [2021] found similar results for municipal waste incineration slag (Table 3), as did Sai et al. [2024] for phosphate slag. Yu et al. [2024] obtained different results, investigating the leaching rate of heavy metals from silicate-manganese slag using the HVM method, along with TCLP, which stimulates the natural processes of element migration from landfill materials and leachate (as in the case of slag in landfills). In the analysed case, the TCLP method showed particularly high excesses of leached Mn and Cr, reaching the IV class of the Chinese standard for groundwater quality GB/T 14848, indicating a threat to the aquatic environment [Yu et al. 2024].

Table 4.

Results of γ-spectrometric analysis (Bq/kg) and radionuclide concentrations in different types of slag and other materials

Electric plant40K232Th226Raf1f2
CHP plant Siekierki254.00–731.0057.30–124.0052.90–113.000.47–1.1257.30–124.00
CHP plant Żerań364.00–691.0044.20–113.0039.10–89.700.46–1.0144.20–113.00
Municipal waste incineration plant (Bydgoszcz and Warsaw)···< 0.61< 75.3
Copper slags749.00–961.0240.10–50.47320.19–400.001.62–1.65320.19–344.08
Steel production (Croatia)45.30–62.9012.90–15.4015.20–21.40··
Ground granulated blast furnace slag235.6066.50167.40··
Non-ferrous Metal Slag171.5915.7442.74··
Slag (coal)97.8695.99145.43··
Phosphorus slag221.6023.48153.08··
Blast Furnace Slag (Mixed Material)121.54102.13157.33··
Slag (bituminous coal)177.657.3623.44··
Solid Waste Contaminated Soil663.9547.8433.77··
Soil269.00–561.0026.20–73.3033.20–120.00··
River sand404.3028.1026.70··

· = no data

The above table shows the concentrations of natural radionuclides 40K, 232Th, 226Ra, along with radioactivity indicators, where f1 is the natural radioactive isotope content (taking into account potassium, radium and thorium) as a dimensionless indicator; f2 is the radium content of 226Ra in Bq/kg. In the case of f1, a value of no more than 1.2 is considered acceptable, while the acceptable limit for the activity index f2 is 240 Bq/kg according to the EU criteria adopted for constructed materials (OJ/L 157 of 27.5.2014, p.76) [Isajenko et al. 2014].

Analysing the above indicators, particularly high results were shown for post-copper slags, with f1 in the range of 1.62–1.65 and f2 ranging from 320.19–344.08 Bq/kg. These results would preclude the possibility of managing these slags in light of existing regulations. Radionuclides present in the environment can pose a threat as a type of external radiation, as the decay products of radium and thorium emitting γ-rays can damage the body’s cells [Wang et al. 2025]. The results of radionuclide activity measurements for various types of slags can be compared with those for soils or naturally-occurring sands, as well as with averages of concentrations of global radionuclide activity available in the literature for granulated blast furnace slag. For 226Ra, the average is 35 Bq/kg, and for 232Th, it is 30 Bq/kg. Higher values were found in almost all cases analysed. Meanwhile, the global average for 40K is 420 Bq/kg, with values higher than this average also found in CHP Siekierki and Żerań (furnace slag) and copper slags [Bulut et al. 2022].

Radionuclide concentrations obtained for slags are similar to or lower than those found in soils of various origins, including Croatia and China [Skoko et al. 2017, Wang et al. 2025]. In the context of using slags for fertilizer purposes in light of their potential radioactive properties, Skoko et al. [2019] used the ERICA tool to estimate an ash and slag storage site’s radiological risk to flora and fauna. Several groups of plants, and all types of organisms present, were studied. The risk of impact on plants in the study area was considered negligible, with animals such as earthworms and small mammals hypothesized to have reduced reproductive capacity or higher mortality.

3.
CONCLUSIONS

The chemical composition of slags varies depending on the source, combustion method and feedstock. The high content of alkali oxides in slags may determine their potential in regulating the pH of acidic soils, while their macronutrient content after thermal conversion processes is relatively low.

Most of the smelter and furnace slags analysed show unacceptable levels of heavy metals such as lead, zinc, copper and chromium, and thus cannot be used as substrates for the production of mineral-organic fertilizers or other soil improvers. The leachability of the above-mentioned elements depends on a number of factors, however, and this aspect should be studied more extensively in the context of the possibility of using slags for fertilizer purposes (especially since most of the available analyses refer to the use of slag in construction).

Slags, depending on their origin, can be successfully managed for the recovery of metals and other elements; metallurgical and potassium slags are particularly important sources.

The radioactive properties of most slags indicate no risks to the aforementioned wastes in terms of their radioactivity. The values of f1 and f2 are within the limits of the standard according to the criteria adopted for construction materials, although this aspect should be studied more extensively due to the low availability of data. The isotope content for the slags in this study is close to the values naturally occurring in the soil (except in the slags from municipal waste incineration). From this perspective, no negative environmental impact can thus be expected from using slag.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/oszn-2025-0011 | Journal eISSN: 2353-8589 | Journal ISSN: 1230-7831
Language: English
Page range: 10 - 17
Published on: Dec 26, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2025 Adriana Solecka, Gworek Barbara, Igor Kondzielski, Paulina Chaber-Jarlachowicz, published by National Research Institute, Institute of Environmental Protection
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.