
Figure 1.
Research area (geoportal.powiat.kielce.pl; changed)
Table 1.
Comparison of measured and certified concentrations in KEJIM-15

Figure 2.
Meteorological conditions in Kielce in February 2023 (based on data from IMGW, station Kielce-Suków)

Figure 3.
Direction of air mass flows on 8–10 February 2023 (NOAA Hysplit)

Figure 4.
Number of days with snowfall and maximum snow cover thickness in 1996–2022 (data from IMGW, station Kielce-Suków)

Figure 5.
Physico-chemical properties of snow samples in Kielce in 2023

Figure 6.
Chemical composition of snow cover (selected ions)

Figure 7.
Spatial distribution of physico-chemical properties of snow from Kielce

Figure 8.
Spatial distribution of Cl and Ca concentrations in snow from Kielce

Figure 9.
Graphic image of relationships among PC1 and PC2 with a scree plot
Table 2.
Physico-chemical properties of water from melted snow
| No. | Cl | SO4 | NO3 | Na | NH4 | Mg | K | Ca | pH | EC | Snow cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mg·dm−3 | - | μS·cm−1 | cm | ||||||||
| 1 | 1.37 | 0.63 | 0.95 | 0.86 | 0.37 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.39 | 6.85 | 12.35 | 5 |
| 2 | 11.22 | 1.69 | 0.08 | 6.70 | 0.57 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 2.22 | 6.15 | 56.6 | 6 |
| 3 | 0.92 | 0.67 | 1.12 | 0.55 | 0.47 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 1.57 | 5.98 | 19.47 | 7 |
| 4 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 1.30 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.12 | 5.81 | 8.97 | 8 |
| 5 | 1.93 | 0.67 | 0.86 | 1.13 | 0.29 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 1.29 | 4.91 | 16.46 | 5 |
| 6 | 1.30 | 0.56 | 0.95 | 0.80 | 0.41 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.61 | 4.84 | 10.2 | 4 |
| 7 | 1.84 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 1.16 | 0.40 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.64 | 4.67 | 13.28 | 7 |
| 8 | 1.16 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.68 | 0.32 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 4.58 | 4.39 | 31.2 | 3 |
| 9 | 0.65 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 0.48 | 0.27 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 1.10 | 4.34 | 11 | 5 |
| 10 | 1.69 | 0.90 | 0.74 | 0.98 | 0.28 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 4.54 | 4.81 | 32.7 | 5 |
| 11 | 1.50 | 1.26 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.21 | 0.02 | 0.18 | 2.52 | 4.81 | 21.54 | 4 |
| 12 | 11.38 | 1.20 | 1.05 | 6.70 | 0.44 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 4.56 | 5.27 | 63.6 | 4 |
| 13 | 8.40 | 1.10 | 0.81 | 4.97 | 0.44 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 2.49 | 5.18 | 44.2 | 4 |
| 14 | 2.16 | 1.03 | 0.70 | 1.17 | 0.38 | 0.10 | 0.04 | 0.75 | 4.97 | 15.35 | 5 |
| 15 | 1.18 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.33 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.76 | 5.02 | 11.57 | 5 |
| 16 | 3.83 | 1.05 | 1.03 | 1.73 | 0.48 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.90 | 5.02 | 19.92 | 5 |
| 17 | 1.37 | 0.97 | 0.90 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.84 | 4.89 | 17.78 | 4 |
| 18 | 4.69 | 2.21 | 1.71 | 2.74 | 0.90 | 0.09 | 0.23 | 2.60 | 4.99 | 34.9 | 4 |
| 19 | 3.64 | 1.23 | 1.57 | 2.26 | 0.48 | 0.09 | 0.41 | 1.47 | 5.03 | 22.5 | 7 |
| 20 | 11.42 | 2.89 | 1.77 | 6.99 | 0.71 | 0.11 | 0.28 | 3.08 | 5.14 | 60.4 | 6 |
| 21 | 2.19 | 1.00 | 1.50 | 1.36 | 0.63 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.70 | 5.19 | 15.24 | 7 |
| 22 | 12.49 | 1.85 | 1.29 | 7.66 | 0.59 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 1.41 | 5.17 | 53.2 | 7 |
| 23 | 4.74 | 2.18 | 1.66 | 2.61 | 1.13 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 1.77 | 5.05 | 33.2 | 3 |
| 24 | 5.55 | 1.55 | 1.66 | 3.16 | 0.68 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 1.38 | 5.12 | 31.1 | 5 |
| MIN | 0.65 | 0.56 | 0.08 | 0.17 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.12 | 4.34 | 8.97 | 3 |
| MAX | 12.49 | 2.89 | 1.77 | 7.66 | 1.13 | 0.13 | 0.41 | 4.58 | 6.85 | 63.60 | 8 |
| MEAN | 4.06 | 1.18 | 1.05 | 2.38 | 0.46 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 1.76 | 5.15 | 27.36 | 5,2 |
| STD | 3.91 | 0.60 | 0.42 | 2.37 | 0.24 | 0.03 | 0.10 | 1.32 | 0.55 | 16.95 | 1,38 |
| Reference sample | 1.32 | 1.04 | 1.63 | 0.82 | 0.54 | 0.07 | 5.63 | 1.07 | 5.07 | 14.62 | 7 |
Table 3.
Principal component analysis (PCA) analysis of studied physico-chemical parameters
Table 4.
Selected physico-chemical properties of snow in different regions
| Parameter | Unit | Cement and lime industry | Metallurgical industry | Remote pollution | Urban area | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White Basin, Poland (Kozłowski et al. 2012, Kozłowski, Szwed 2016) | Kunda, Estonia (Kaasik et al. 2000) | Łagów, Poland (Szwed, Kozłowski 2021) | Ostrowiec Św., Poland (Jarzyna et al. 2017) | Świętokrzyski National Park, Poland (Kozłowski, Szwed 2016) | Kielce. Poland 2016/2023 (Kozłowski et al. 2017) | Poznań, Poland (Siudek et al. 2015) | Primorsky Krai, Russia (Kondrat’ev et al. 2015) | Svirsk, Russia (Grebenshchikova et al. 2017) | ||
| pH | (−) | 6.39 | 8.05 | 7.38 | 5.23 | 5.59/5.15 | 4.8 | 5.05 | 6.63 | |
| EC | (mS m−1) | 3.28 | 5.91 | 4.15 | 2.61 | 2.78/2.74 | 2.07 | 4.2 | ||
| Ca2+ | (mg L−1) | 4.4 | 18.8 | 10 | 4 | 2.5/1.8 | 2.5 | 8.7 | ||
| Mg2+ | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.2/0.1 | 0.4 | 1.4 | |||||
| SO42− | (mg L−1) | 3.2 | 18.8 | 1.7 | 3.6 | 1.8/1.2 | 4.9 | 14.9 | ||
| NO3− | 2.3 | 2 | 2.6 | 3.1/1.1 | 3.4 | 1.2 | ||||

Figure 10.
Pollution with PM10 and PM2.5 in Kielce – mean daily concentration (a) and hourly data (b). (Based on data from GIOŚ)