Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Characteristics of the butterflies on various forms of land uses Cover

Characteristics of the butterflies on various forms of land uses

Environmental Protection and Natural Resources
Volume 30 (2019): Issue 3 (September 2019)
By:
Open Access
|Nov 2019

References

  1. AKITE P. 2008. Effects of anthropogenic disturbances on the diversity and composition of the butterfly fauna of sites in the Sango Bay and Iriiri areas, Uganda: implications for conservation. Afr J Ecol 46:3–13
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. BELLMANN H. 1999. Owady. Multico Oficyna Wydawnicza
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. BUSZKO J., MASŁOWSKI J. 1993. Atlas motyli Polski part1. Motyle dzienne. Publishing house: IMAGE
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. CHRZANOWSKI A. 2017. Motyle dzienne papilionoidea okolic słowińskiego parku narodowego. Acta Sci. Pol. Silv. Colendar. Ratio Ind. Lignar. 16(2) 2017, 85–93 Forestry and Wood Technology.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. CONCEPCION E. D., DIAZ M., BAQUERO R. A. 2008. Effects of landscape complexity on the ecological effectiveness of agri-environment schemes. Landsc. Ecol. 23, 135–148.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. CREMENE C., GROZA G., RAKOSY L., SCHILEYKO A. A., BAUR A., ERHARDT A., BAUR B. 2005. Alterations of steppe-like grasslands in Eastern Europe: a threat to regional biodiversity.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. DALE VH, BEYLER SC. 2001. Challenges in the development and use of ecological indicators. Ecol Indic 1:3–10
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. FITZHERBERT E, GARDNER T, DAVENPORT TRB, CARO T. 2006 Butterfly species richness and abundance in the Katavi ecosystem of Western Tanzania. Afr J Ecol 44(3):353–362
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. FRANZÉN M., NILSSON SG., JOHANSSON V., RANIUS T. 2013. Population fluctuations and synchrony of grassland butterflies in relation to species traits. PLoS One 8(10).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. JOHST K., DRECHSLER M., THOMAS J., SETTELE J. 2006. Influence of mowing on the persistence of two endangered large blue butterfly species. J. Appl. Ecol. 43, 333–342.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. KALARUS K. 2016. Wybrane problemy ochrony przyrody na przykładzie motyli (lepidoptera) jako grupy modelowej. Kosmos tome 65, No. 3.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. KĘDZIORA A., KARG J. 2010. Zagrożenia i ochrona różnorodności biologicznej. NAUKA 4/2010 pp. 107–114
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. MIELCZAREK S. 2016. Motyle dzienne (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) okolic Konina (Wielkopolska) Przegląd Przyrodniczy XXVII, 2 (2016): 63–79
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. MURPHY DD, FREAS KE, WEISS SB. 1990. An environment-metapopulation approach to population viability analysis for a threatened invertebrate. Conserv Biol 4:41–51
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. KRZYWICKI M. 1982. Monografia motyli dziennych Polski. Papilionoidea i Hesperioidea (Lepidoptera)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. NGONGOLO K, MTOKO S. 2013. Using butterflies to measure biodiversity health in Wazo hill restored quarry. Entomol Zool Stud 1(4):81–86
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. PLEWKA T. 2007. Określenie klas dominacji w strukturze dominacyjnej zgrupowań owadów, na przykładzie biegaczowatych (Coleoptera: Carbidae), Poznań, Materiały metodyczne i przeglądowe. Wiadomości entomologiczne, 26 (3)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. RENETZEDER C., SCHINDLER S., PETERSEIL J., PRINZ M. A., MUCHER S., WRBKA T. 2010. Can we measure ecological sustainability? Landscape pattern as an indicator for naturalness and land use intensity at regional national and European level.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. SAGWE R., MUVUI S., MUYA, MARANGA R. 2015. Effects of land use patterns on the diversity and conservation status of butterflies in Kisii highlands, Kenya. In Journal of Insect Conservation 19(6)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. SIELEZNIEW M., DZIEKAŃSKA I., 2010. Fauna Polski. Motyle dzienne. Wyd. Multico Oficyna Wydawnicza.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. SKÓRKA P., SETTELE J., WOYCIECHOWSKI M. 2007. Effects of management cessation on grassland butterflies in southern Poland. Agricult. Ecosys. Environ. 121, 319–324
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. SPITZER K, JORAS J, HAVELKA J. 1997. Effects of Small-scale disturbance on butterfly communities of an Indochinese montane rainforest. Biol Conserv 80:9–15
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. TIPLE A., KHURAD A., DENNIS R. 2007. Butterfly diversity in relation to a human-impact gradient on an Indian university campus. In Nota Lepidopterologica 30 (1): 179–188
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. TOLMAN T. 2007. Motyle Polski i Europy. Wyd I Dąbrowa Górnicza
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. TROJAN P. 1998. Nowe perspektywy w badaniach entomofaunistycznych. In: 43 Zjazd Polskiego Towarzystwa Entomologicznego, Poznań, Materiały Zjazdowe. Wiadomości entomologiczne, 17.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/oszn-2019-0012 | Journal eISSN: 2353-8589 | Journal ISSN: 1230-7831
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 15 - 22
Published on: Nov 19, 2019
Published by: National Research Institute, Institute of Environmental Protection
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
Butterfly,
land use,
human economic activity,
biodiversity
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Ecology

© 2019 Katarzyna Szyszko-Podgórska, published by National Research Institute, Institute of Environmental Protection
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 30 (2019): Issue 3 (September 2019)Next article