Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Reproductive stages effects on nest morphology and reproductive success of Yellow-legged Gull on Oued Charef Dam Island, Northeast Algeria Cover

Reproductive stages effects on nest morphology and reproductive success of Yellow-legged Gull on Oued Charef Dam Island, Northeast Algeria

Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. Angehr, G. R., Kushlan, J. A. & Hines, K. N. 2014. Nesting sites and population estimates of seabirds and other waterbirds of the Gulf of Chiriquí, Panamá. – Waterbirds 37(4): 426–431. DOI: 10.1675/063.037.0410
  2. Baaloudj, A., Samraoui, F., Alfarhan, A. H. & Samraoui, B. 2014. Phenology, nest-site selection and breeding success of a North African colony of the Yellow-legged Gull, Larus michahellis. – African Zoology 49(2): 213–221. DOI: 10.1080/15627020.2014.11407637
  3. Bensch, S. & Hasselquist, D. 1992. Evidence for female choice in a polygynous warbler. – Animal Behaviour 44(2): 301–311. DOI: 10.1016/0003-3472(92)90036-9
  4. Borgmann, K. L., Conway, C. J. & Morrison, M. L. 2013. Breeding phenology of birds: Mechanisms underlying seasonal declines in the risk of nest predation. – PLoS One 8(6): e65909. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065909
  5. Both, C., Bouwhuis, S., Lessells, C. M. & Visser, M. E. 2006. Climate change and population declines in a long-distance migratory bird. – Nature 441(7089): 81–83. DOI: 10.1038/nature04539
  6. Boukrouma, N., Touarfia, M., Derablia, L. & Touahria, S. 2021. Breeding ecology of the Yellow-legged Gull (Larus michahellis) in Oued Charef Dam (Souk Ahras, northeastern Algeria). – Analele Universităţii din Oradea, Fascicula Biologie 28(2): 137–142.
  7. Capilla-Lasheras, P., Bondia, B. & Aguirre, J. I. 2021a Environmental conditions but not nest composition affect reproductive success in an urban bird. – Ecology and Evolution 11(7): 3084–3092. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7234
  8. Capilla-Lasheras, P., Dominoni, D., Babayan, S. A., O’Shaughnessy, P. J., Mladenova, M., Woodford, L., Pollock, C. J., Barr, T., Baldini, F. & Helm, B. 2017b Elevated immune gene expression is associated with poorer reproductive success of urban Blue Tits. – Frontiers in Ecology & Evolution 5: 64. DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2017.00064
  9. Chokri, M. A., Hamza, F., Bennour, C., Almalki, M. & Besnard, A. 2023. Disturbance-dependent Yellow-legged Gull (Larus michahellis) predation on Larid chicks decreases with chick age. – Ibis 165(1): 96–110. DOI: 10.1111/ibi.13122
  10. del Hoyo, J., Collar, N. J., Christie, D. A., Elliott, A. & Fishpool, L. D. C. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Vol. 1. Non-passerines. – Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, Spain
  11. Durant, J. M., Hjermann, D. Ø., Ottersen, G. & Stenseth, N. C. 2007. Climate and the match or mismatch between predator requirements and resource availability. – Climate Research 33(3): 271–283. DOI: 10.3354/cr033271
  12. Encabo, S. I., Barba, E., Gil-Delgado, J. A. & Monrós, J. S. 2002. Geographical variation in egg size of the Great Tit (Parus major): a new perspective. – Ibis 144(4): 623–631. DOI: 10.1046/j.1474-919X.2002.00099.x
  13. Hansell, M. 2000. Bird Nests and Construction Behaviour, 2nd ed. – Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom
  14. Heenan, C. B., Goodman, B. A. & White, C. R. 2015. The influence of climate on avian nest construction across large geographical gradients. – Global Ecology and Biogeography 24(11): 1203–1211. DOI: 10.1111/geb.12378
  15. Hoyt, D. F. 1979. Practical methods of estimating volume and fresh weight of bird eggs. – The Auk 96(1): 73–77. DOI: 10.1093/auk/96.1.73
  16. Jetz, W., Şekercioğlu, Ç. H. & Böhning-Gaese, K. 2008. The worldwide variation in avian clutch size across species and space. – PLoS Biology 6(12): e303. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060303
  17. Lambrechts, M. M., Blondel, J., Hurtrez-Boussès, S., Maistre, M. & Perret, P. 1997. Adaptive inter-population differences in Blue Tit life-history traits on Corsica. – Evolutionary Ecology 11(5): 599–612. DOI: 10.1007/s10682-997-1515-0
  18. Martin, T. E. 1995. Avian life history evolution in relation to nest sites, nest predation, and food. – Ecological Monographs 65(1): 101–127. DOI: 10.2307/2937160
  19. McRae, S. B. 2024. Ecological correlates of alternative reproductive tactics: conspecific brood parasitism rates vary with nest predation and seasonal effects influenced by climate change – Journal of Avian Biology 2024(7–8): e03289. DOI: 10.1111/jav.03289
  20. Monaghan, P. & Nager, R. G. 1997. Why don’t birds lay more eggs? –Trends in Ecology & Evolution 12(7): 270–274. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(97)01094-x
  21. Nwaogu, C. J., Tieleman, B. I. & Cresswell, W. 2018. Weak breeding seasonality of a songbird in a seasonally arid tropical environment arises from individual flexibility and strongly seasonal moult. – Ibis 161(3): 533–545. DOI: 10.1111/ibi.12661
  22. Perrins, C. M. 1970. The timing of birds’ breeding seasons. – Ibis 112(2): 242–255. DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1970.tb00096.x
  23. R Core Team 2025. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. – R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienne, Austriahttps://www.R-project.org/
  24. Spelt, A., Soutar, O., Williamson, C., Memmott, J., Shamoun-Baranes, J., Rock, P. & Windsor, S. 2021. Urban gulls adapt foraging schedule to human-activity patterns. – Ibis 163(2): 274–282. DOI: 10.1111/ibi.12892
  25. Verhulst, S., Tinbergen, J. M. & Daan, S. 1997. Multiple breeding in the Great Tit. A trade-off between successive reproductive attempts? – Functional Ecology 11(6): 714–722. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1 997.00145.x
  26. Verhulst, S., van Balen, J. H. & Tinbergen, J. M. 1995. Seasonal decline in reproductive success of the Great Tit: Variation in time or quality? – Ecology 76(8): 2392–2403. DOI: 10.2307/2265815
  27. Visser, M. E., Holleman, L. J. M. & Gienapp, P. 2006. Shifts in caterpillar biomass phenology due to climate change and its impact on avian breeding success. – Oecologia 147(1): 164–172. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-005-0299-6
  28. Williams, T. D. 1994. Intraspecific variation in egg size and egg composition in birds: effects on offspring fitness. – Biological Reviews 69(1): 35–59. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1994.tb01485.x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/orhu-2026-0029 | Journal eISSN: 2061-9588 | Journal ISSN: 1215-1610
Language: English
Page range: 408 - 422
Submitted on: Jun 8, 2025
Accepted on: Feb 27, 2026
Published on: Jun 6, 2026
Published by: MME/BirdLife Hungary
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2026 Nadhra Boukrouma, published by MME/BirdLife Hungary
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.