Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Breeding biology of Rufous-bellied Woodpecker (Dendrocopos hyperythrus) in Rudraprayag District (Western Himalayas), Uttarakhand, India

Open Access
|Oct 2025

References

  1. Cornelius, C., Cockle, K., Politi, N., Berkunsky, I., Sandoval, L., Ojeda, V., Rivera, L., Hunter Jr. M. & Martin, K. 2008. Cavity-nesting birds in neotropical forests: cavities as a potentially limiting resource. – Ornitologia Neotropical 19(Suppl): 253–268.
  2. de León, A. & Mínguez, E. 2003. Occupancy rates and nesting success of European Storm-petrels breeding inside artificial nest-boxes. – Scientia Marina 67(S2): 109–112. DOI: 10.3989/scimar.2003.67s2109
  3. Diamond, J. M. 2019. Cavity Nest Webs as a Template for Studying Non-Trophic Interactions in Invasion Ecology – Doctoral Dissertation, Florida International University
  4. Elchuk, C. L. & Wiebe, K. L. 2003. Home-range size of Northern Flickers (Colaptes auratus) in relation to habitat and parental attributes. – Canadian Journal of Zoology 81(6): 954–961. DOI: 10.1139/z03-077
  5. Fargallo, J. A., Blanco, G., Potti, J. & Viñuela, J. 2001. Nestbox provisioning in a rural population of Eurasian Kestrels: Breeding performance, nest predation and parasitism. – Bird Study 48(2): 236–244. DOI: 10.1080/00063650109461223
  6. Gorman, G. 2014. Woodpeckers of the World: The Complete Guide. – A&C Black
  7. Gorman, G. 2020a Attributes of Eurasian Green Woodpecker (Picus viridis) nest cavities in Hungary. – Ornis Hungarica 28(2): 204–211. DOI: 10.2478/orhu-2020-0025
  8. Gorman, G. 2020b Details of cavities used by Syrian Woodpeckers Dendrocopos syriacus in Hungary – Bird Study 67(2): 251–255. DOI: 10.1080/00063657.2020.1808588
  9. Gorman, G. 2021. Characteristics of nest cavities used by White-backed Woodpecker (Dendrocopos leucotos) in Hungary. – Ornis Hungarica 29(2): 139–150. DOI: 10.2478/orhu-2021-0025
  10. Heim, W., Thomas, A. & Wulf, T. 2016. Rufous-bellied Woodpecker Dendrocopos hyperythrus and Chinese Paradise Flycatcher Terpsiphone paradisi incei at Muraviovka Park, Far East Russia: first records for the Amur Oblast. – Amurian Zoological Journal 8(3): 217–222. DOI: 10.33910/1999-4079-2016-8-3-217-222
  11. Hogstad, O. 2006. Reproductive differences between woodpeckers and secondary hole-nesters. – Ornis Norvegica 29: 110–123. DOI: 10.15845/on.v29i0.183
  12. Kilham, L. 1974. Play in hairy, downy, and other woodpeckers. – The Wilson Bulletin 86(1): 35–42.
  13. Kozma, J. M. & Kroll, A. J. 2012. Woodpecker nest survival in burned and unburned managed ponderosa pine forests of the northwestern United States. – The Condor 114(1): 173–184. DOI: 10.1525/cond.2012.110034
  14. Kroll, J. C., Conner, R. N. & Fleet, R. R. 1980. Southern Pine Beetle Handbook: Woodpeckers and the Southern Pine Beetle. – Department of Agriculture No. 564.
  15. Kroll, J. C. & Fleet, R. 1979. Impact of woodpecker predation on over-wintering within-tree populations of the Southern Pine Beetle (Dendroctonus frontalis). – In: Dickson, J. G., Connor, R. N., Fleet, R. R., Jackson, J. A. & Croll, J. C. (eds.) The Role of Insectivorous Birds in Forest Ecosystems. – Academic Press, pp. 269–281.
  16. Kumar, A. 1999. Characteristics and significance of calls, songs and visual displays in two avian species viz. – Copsychus saularis and Pycnonotus cafer. – PhD Thesis, Gurukul Kangri University, Haridwar
  17. Mänd, R. & Tilgar, V. 2003. Does supplementary calcium reduce the cost of reproduction in the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca? – Ibis 145(1): 67–77. DOI: 10.1046/j.1474-919X.2003.00123.x
  18. Martin, T. E. & Li, P. 1992. Life history traits of open-vs. cavity-nesting birds. – Ecology 73(2): 579–592. DOI: 10.2307/1940764
  19. Mayfield, H. F. 1975. Suggestions for calculating nest success. – The Wilson Bulletin 87(4): 456–466.
  20. McCambridge, W. F. & Knight, F. B. 1972. Factors affecting spruce beetles during a small outbreak. – Ecology 53(5): 830–839. DOI: 10.2307/1934298
  21. Mendel, Z., Golan, Y. & Madar, Z. 1984. Natural control of the eucalyptus borer, Phoracantha semipunctata (F.) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), by the Syrian Woodpecker. – Bulletin of Entomological Research 74(1): 121–127. DOI: 10.1017/S0007485300009998
  22. Mikusiński, G., Gromadzki, M. & Chylarecki, P. 2001. Woodpeckers as indicators of forest bird diversity. – Conservation Biology 15(1): 208–217. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2001. 99236.x
  23. Murphy, E. C. & Lehnhausen, W. A. 1998. Density and foraging ecology of woodpeckers following a stand-replacement fire. – The Journal of Wildlife Management 62(4): 1359–1372. DOI: 10.2307/3802002
  24. Otvos, I. S. 1979. The effects of insectivorous bird activities in forest ecosystems: An evaluation. – In: Dickson, J. G., Connor, R. N., Fleet, R. R., Jackson, L. A. & Kroll, J. C. (eds.) The Role of Insectivorous Birds in Forest Ecosystems. – Academic Press, New York, San Francisco, London
  25. Rossmanith, E., Blaum, N., Grimm, V. & Jeltsch, F. 2007. Pattern-oriented modelling for estimating unknown pre-breeding survival rates: the case of the Lesser Spotted Woodpecker (Picoides minor). – Biological Conservation 135(4): 555–564. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.11.002
  26. Shahabuddin, G., Menon, T., Chanda, R. & Goswami, R. 2018. Ecology of Rufous-bellied Woodpecker Dendrocopos hyperythrus in Himalayan oak forests. – Forktail 34: 58–64.
  27. Short, L. L. 1979. Burdens of the picid hole-excavating habit. – The Wilson Bulletin 91(1): 16–28.
  28. Short, L. L. 1982. Woodpeckers of the World. – Delaware Museum of Natural History, Monograph Series Number 4. Greenville, Delaware
  29. Smith, K. W. 2006. The implications of nest site competition from Starlings Sturnus vulgaris and the effect of spring temperatures on the timing and breeding performance of Great Spotted Woodpeckers Dendrocopos major in southern England. – Annales Zoologici Fennici 43(2): 177–185.
  30. Winkler, H. & Christie, D. A. 2002. Picidae (Woodpeckers). – In: del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. & Sargatal, J. (eds.) Handbook of the Birds of the World, Vol. 7. Yacamars to Woodpeckers. – Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, pp. 296–555.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/orhu-2025-0031 | Journal eISSN: 2061-9588 | Journal ISSN: 1215-1610
Language: English
Page range: 238 - 247
Submitted on: Nov 29, 2024
Accepted on: Jun 24, 2025
Published on: Oct 31, 2025
Published by: MME/BirdLife Hungary
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2025 Parul Bhatnagar, Dinesh Bhatt, Ashish Kumar Arya, published by MME/BirdLife Hungary
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.