Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Drone monitoring improves nest detection of Squacco Herons Ardeola ralloides, but fails to assess its productivity Cover

Drone monitoring improves nest detection of Squacco Herons Ardeola ralloides, but fails to assess its productivity

Open Access
|Nov 2022

References

  1. Afán, I., Máñez, M. & Díaz-Delgado, R. 2018. Drone monitoring of breeding waterbird populations: the case of the Glossy Ibis. – Drones 2(4): 42. DOI: 10.3390/drones2040042
  2. Barbraud, C., Kayser, Y., Cohez, D., Gauthier-Clerc, M. & Hafner, H. 2004. Detection probability of nests of Squacco Herons in southern France. – Journal of Field Ornithology 75(2): 172–175. DOI: 10.1648/0273-8570-75.2.172
  3. Barr, J. R., Green, M. C., DeMaso, S. J. & Hardy, T. B. 2018. Detectability and visibility biases associated with using a consumer-grade unmanned aircraft to survey nesting colonial waterbirds. – Journal of Field Ornithology 89(3): 242–257. DOI: 10.1111/jofo.12258
  4. BirdLife International 2022. Species factsheet: Ardeola ralloides. – http://www.birdlife.org on 28/03/2022.
  5. Brichetti, P. & Fracasso, G. 2018. The Birds of Italy, Vol. 1. Anatidae-Alcidae. – Edizioni Belvedere
  6. Brisson-Curadeau, É., Bird, D., Burke, C., Fifield, D. A., Pace, P., Sherley, R. B. & Elliot, K. H. 2017. Seabird species vary in behavioural response to drone census. – Scientific Reports 17884. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-18202-3573833529263372
  7. Burger, J. & Gochfeld, M. 2009. Franklin’s Gull (Leucophaeus pipixcan), version 2.0. – The Birds of North America Online, 116.
  8. Carter, M. F., Hunter, W. C., Pashley, D. N. & Rosenberg, K. V. 2000. Setting conservation priorities for landbirds in the United States: the partners in flight approach. – Auk 117(2): 541–548. DOI: 10.1093/auk/117.2.541
  9. Chabot, D., Craik, S. R. & Bird, D. M. 2015. Population census of a large Common Tern colony with a small unmanned aircraft. – PloS One 10: e0122588. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122588439849125874997
  10. Collins, S. A., Giffin, G. J. & Strong, W. T. 2019. Using flight initiation distance to evaluate responses of colonial-nesting Great Egrets to the approach of an unmanned aerial vehicle. – Journal of Field Ornithology 90(4): 382–390. DOI: 10.1111/jofo.12312
  11. Corregidor-Castro, A., Holm, T. E. & Bregnballe, T. 2021. Counting breeding gulls with unmanned aerial vehicles: camera quality and flying height affects precision of a semi-automatic counting method. – Ornis Fennica 98: 33–45.
  12. del Hoyo, J., Elliot, A. & Sargatal, J. 1992. Handbook of the Birds of the World, Vol. 1. Ostrich to Ducks. – Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, Spain
  13. Delord, K., Kayser, Y., Barbraud, C. & Hafner, H. 2003. Variability in breeding parameters of the Squacco Heron Ardeola ralloides. – Bird Study 50(3): 300–305. DOI: 10.1080/00063650309461323
  14. Dundas, S. J., Vardanega, M., O’Brien, P. & McLeod, S. R. 2021. Quantifying waterfowl numbers: Comparison of drone and ground-based survey methods for surveying waterfowl on artificial waterbodies. – Drones 5(1): 5. DOI: 10.3390/drones5010005
  15. Dunn, M. J., Adlard, S., Taylor, A. P., Wood, A. G., Trathan, P. N. & Ratcliffe, N. 2021. Un-crewed aerial vehicle population survey of three sympatrically breeding seabird species at Signy Island, South Orkney Islands. – Polar Biology 44: 717–727. DOI: 10.1007/s00300-021-02831-6
  16. Ercole, S., Angelini, P., Carnevali, L., Casella, L., Giacanelli, V., Grignetti, A., La Mesa, G., Nardelli, R., Serra, L., Stoch, F., Tunesi, L. & Genovesi, P. 2021. Rapporti Direttive Natura (2013–2018). Sintesi dello stato di conservazione delle specie e degli habitat di interesse comunitario e delle azioni di contrasto alle specie esotiche di rilevanza unionale in Italia. [Summary of the conservation status of species and habitats of community interest and actions to combat exotic species of EU importance in Italy]. – ISPRA, Serie Rapporti 349/2021 (in Italian)
  17. Gallego, D. & Sarasola, J. H. 2021. Using drones to reduce human disturbance while monitoring breeding status of an endangered raptor. – Remote Sensing Ecology Conservation 7(3): 550–561. DOI: 10.1002/rse2.206
  18. Hafner, H. 1978. Le succès de reproduction de quatre espèces d’Ardeidés Egretta g. garzetta L., Ardeola r. ralloides Scop., Ardeola i. ibis L., Nycticorax n. nycticorax L. en Camargue. 1978. [The breeding success of four species of Ardeidae Egretta g. garzetta L., Ardeola r. ralloides Scop., Ardeola i. ibis L., Nycticorax n. nycticorax L. in the Camargue. 1978.]. – Revue d’Ecologie, Terre et Vie 34: 279–289. (in French with English Summary)10.3406/revec.1978.5008
  19. Henny, C. J., Anderson, D. R. & Pospahala, R. S. 1972. Aerial Surveys of Waterfowl Production in North America, 1955–71. – Special Scientific Report Wildlife No. 160. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D. C.
  20. Heron Conservation 2022. The IUCN-SSC Heron Specialist Group. Purple Heron Ardea purpurea. – http://heronconservation.org. Last access: 07/04/2022.
  21. Hodgson, J. C. & Koh, L. P. 2016. Best practice for minimizing unmanned aerial vehicle disturbance to wildlife in biological field research. – Current Biology 26(10): 404–405. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.04.00127218843
  22. Hodgson, J. C., Baylis, S. M., Mott, R., Herrod, A. & Clarke, R. H. 2016. Precision wildlife monitoring using unmanned aerial vehicles. – Scientific Report 6: 22574. DOI: 10.1038/srep22574479507526986721
  23. Hodgson, J. C., Mott, R., Baylis, S. M., Pham, T. T., Wotherspoon, S., Kilpatrick, A. D., Segaran, R. R., Reid, I., Terauds, A. & Koh, L. P. 2018. Drones count wildlife more accurately and precisely than humans. – Methods in Ecology & Evolution 9: 1–8. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12974
  24. Junda, J., Greene, E. & Bird, D. M. 2015. Proper flight technique for using a small rotary-winged drone aircraft to safely, quickly, and accurately survey raptor nests. – Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems 3: 222–236. DOI: 10.1139/juvs-2015-0003
  25. Kushlan, J. A. & Hancock, J. A. 2005. The Herons. – Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
  26. Lachman, D., Conway, C., Vierling, K. & Matthews, T. 2020. Drones provide a better method to find nests and estimate nest survival for colonial waterbirds: a demonstration with Western Grebes. – Wetlands Ecology & Management 28: 837–845. DOI: 10.1007/s11273-020-09743-y
  27. McKellar, A. E., Shephard, N. G. & Chabot, D. 2021. Dual visible-thermal camera approach facilitates drone surveys of colonial marshbirds. – Remote Sensing Ecology Conservation 7(2): 214–226. DOI: 10.1002/ rse2.183
  28. Mulero-Pázmány, M., Jenni-Eiermann, S., Strebel, N., Sattler, T., Negro, J. J. & Tablado, Z. 2017. Unmanned aircraft systems as a new source of disturbance for wildlife: A systematic review. – PLoS One 12: e0178448. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178448547952128636611
  29. Pöysä, H., Kotilainen, J., Väänänen, V. M. & Kunnasranta, M. 2018. Estimating production in ducks: a comparison between ground surveys and unmanned aircraft surveys. – European Journal of Wildlife Research 64: 74. DOI: 10.1007/s10344-018-1238-2
  30. Sardà-Palomera, F., Bota, G., Padilla, N., Brotons, L. & Sardà, F. 2017. Unmanned aircraft systems to unravel spatial and temporal factors affecting dynamics of colony formation and nesting success in birds. – Journal of Avian Biology 48(9): 1273–1280. DOI: 10.1111/jav.01535
  31. Sasse, D. B. 2003. Job-related mortality of wildlife workers in the United States, 1937–2000. – Wildlife Society B 31: 1015–1020.
  32. Scarton, F. & Valle, R. G. 2020. Drone assessment of habitat selection and breeding success of Gull-billed Tern Gelochelidon nilotica nesting on low-accessibility sites: a case study. – Research in Ornithology 90(2): 69–76. DOI: 10.4081/rio.2020.475
  33. Şekercioğlu, Ç. H., Daily, G. C. & Ehrlich, P. R. 2004. Ecosystem consequences of bird declines. – Proceedings National Academy of Science 101(52): 18042–18047. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.040804910153976815601765
  34. Thompson, W. L. 2002. Towards reliable bird surveys: accounting for individuals present but not detected. – Auk 119(1): 18–25. DOI: 10.1093/auk/119.1.18
  35. Valle, R. G. 2022. Rapid drone semi-automated counts of wintering Greater Flamingos (Phoenicopterus roseus) as a tool for amateur researchers. – Ibis 164(1): 320–328. DOI: 10.1111/ibi.12993.
  36. Valle, R. G. & Scarton, F. 2018. Uso dei droni nel censimento degli uccelli acquatici nidificanti nel nord Adriatico [Use of drones in surveys of breeding waterbirds along the north-western Adriatic Sea coasts (NE Italy)]. – Bollettino del Museo di Storia Naturale di Venezia 69: 69–75. (in Italian)
  37. Valle, R. G. & Scarton, F. 2019a Drones improve effectiveness and reduce disturbance of censusing Common Redshanks Tringa totanus breeding on salt marshes. – Ardea 107(3): 275–282. DOI: 10.5253/arde.v107i3.a3
  38. Valle, R. G. & Scarton, F. 2019b Plegadis falcinellus (Linnaeus, 1766): Nuova nidificazione in Laguna di
  39. Venezia (Vertebrata, Pelecaniformes, Threskiornitidae) [New nesting in the Venice Lagoon (Vertebrata, Pelecaniformes, Threskiornitidae)]. – Bollettino del Museo di Storia Naturale di Venezia 70: 147–148. (in Italian)
  40. Valle, R. G. & Scarton, F. 2020. Feasibility of counting breeding Pied Avocets and Black-winged Stilts using drones. – Wader Study 127(3): 257–265. DOI: 10.18194/ws.00204
  41. Valle, R. G. & Scarton, F. 2021. Drone-conducted counts as a tool for the rapid assessment of productivity of Sandwich Terns (Thalasseus sandvicensis). – Journal of Ornithology 162(3): 621–628. DOI: 10.1007/ s10336-020-01854-w
  42. Valle, R. G., Verza, E., Sattin, L. & Scarton, F. 2021. Data on the breeding biology of Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia in the northern Adriatic wetlands. – Bollettino del Museo di Storia Naturale di Venezia 72: 73–82.
  43. Valle, R. G. & Scarton, F. 2022. Rapid assessment of productivity of Purple Heron (Ardea purpurea) by drone conducted monitoring. – Ardeola 69(2): 231–248. DOI: 10.13157/arla.69.2.2022.ra4
  44. Verza, E., Scarton, F., Stival, E., Cassol, M., Mezzavilla, F., Sighele, M. & Valle, R. G. 2021. Risultati del censimento delle specie coloniali (Threskiornithidae – Ardeidae – Phalacrocoracidae) nidificanti in Veneto. Anno 2020. [Results of the census of colonial species (Threskiornithidae – Ardeidae – Phalacrocoracidae) nesting in Veneto. Year 2020]. – Birding Veneto, 2021. www.birdingveneto.eu/garzaie/index.html (in Italian)
  45. Weissensteiner, M. H., Poelstra, J. W. & Wolf, J. B. W. 2015. Low-budget ready-to-fly unmanned aerial vehicles: an effective tool for evaluating the nesting status of canopy-breeding bird species. – Journal of Avian Biology 46(4): 425–430. DOI: 10.1111/jav.00619
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/orhu-2022-0028 | Journal eISSN: 2061-9588 | Journal ISSN: 1215-1610
Language: English
Page range: 176 - 187
Submitted on: Aug 19, 2022
|
Accepted on: Oct 25, 2022
|
Published on: Nov 25, 2022
Published by: MME/BirdLife Hungary
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2022 Roberto G. Valle, Alejandro Corregidor-Castro, Emiliano Verza, Francesco Scarton, published by MME/BirdLife Hungary
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.