Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Analysis of skull morphometric characters in diurnal raptors (Accipitriformes and Falconiformes) Cover

Analysis of skull morphometric characters in diurnal raptors (Accipitriformes and Falconiformes)

Open Access
|Jul 2019

References

  1. Adams, D. C., Rohlf, F. J. & Slice, D. E. 2004. Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the ‘revolutionʼ. – Italian Journal of Zoology 71(1): 5–16. DOI: 10.1080/1125000040935654510.1080/11250000409356545
  2. Anderson, R. A., McBrayer, L. D. & Herrel, A. 2008. Bite force in vertebrates: opportunities and caveats for use of a nonpareil whole-animal performance measure. – Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 93(4): 709–720. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00905.x10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00905.x
  3. Andersson, M. & Norberg, R. Å. 1981. Evolution of reversed sexual size dimorphism and role partitioning among predatory birds, with a size scaling of flight performance. – Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 15(2): 105–130. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1981.tb00752.x10.1111/j.1095-8312.1981.tb00752.x
  4. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. – Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ Ballejo, F., Lambertucci, S. A., Trejo, A. & De Santis, L. J. 2018. Trophic niche overlap among scavengers in Patagonia supports the condor-vulture competition hypothesis. – Bird Conservation International 28(3): 390–402. DOI: 10.1017/S095927091700021110.1017/S0959270917000211
  5. Bakaloudis, D. E., Vlachos, C. G. & Holloway, G. J. 1998. Habitat use by Short-toed Eagles Circaetus gallicus and their reptilian prey during the breeding season in Dadia Forest (north-eastern Greece). – Journal of Applied Ecology 35(6): 821–828. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.1998.tb00001.x10.1111/j.1365-2664.1998.tb00001.x
  6. Barker, F. K., Cibois, A., Schikler, P., Feinstein, J. & Cracraft, J. 2004. Phylogeny and diversification of the largest avian radiation. – Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101(30): 11040–11045. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.040189210110.1073/pnas.040189210150373815263073
  7. Baumel, J. J. 1993. Handbook of avian anatomy: Nomina Anatomica Avium. – Publications of the Nuttall Ornithological Club (USA), no. 23.
  8. Benkman, C. W. 2003. Divergent selection drives the adaptive radiation of Crossbills. – Evolution 57(5): 1176–1181. DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00326.x10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00326.x12836833
  9. Bergmann, F., Amaral, H., Pinto, D., Chivittz, C. & Tozetti, A. 2013. Foraging activity of the Snail Kite, Rostrhamus sociabilis (Aves: Accipitridae) in wetlands of southern Brazil. – Brazilian Journal of Biology 73(2): 245–252. DOI: 10.1590/s1519-6984201300020000410.1590/s1519-69842013000200004
  10. Bielefeldt, J., Rosenfield, R. N. & Papp, J. M. 1992. Unfounded assumptions about diet of the Cooper’s Hawk. – The Condor 94(2): 427–436. DOI: 10.2307/136921510.2307/1369215
  11. Bijleveld, M. 1974. Birds of prey in Europe. – Macmillan International Higher Education10.1007/978-1-349-02393-6
  12. Brathwaite, D. H. 1992. Notes on the weight, flying ability, habitat, and prey of Haast’s Eagle (Harpagornis moorei). – Notornis 39(4): 239–247.
  13. Brown, C. J. & Plug, I. 1990. Food choice and diet of the Bearded Vulture Gypaetus barbatus in southern Africa. – South African Journal of Zoology 25: 169–177. DOI: 10.1080/02541858.1990.1144820710.1080/02541858.1990.11448207
  14. Cade, T. J. & Digby, R. D. 1982. The falcons of the world. – Harper Collins Colwell, R. K. 2000. Rensch’s rule crosses the line: convergent allometry of sexual size dimorphism in hummingbirds and flower mites. – American Naturalist 156: 495–510. DOI: 10.1086/30340610.1086/30340629587514
  15. Cracraft, J., Barker, F. K., Braun, M. J., Harshman, J., Dyke, G. J., Feinstein, J., Stanley, S., Cibois, A., Schikler, P., Beresford, P., García-Moreno, J. Sorenson, M. D., Yuri, T. & Mindell, D. P. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships among modern birds (Neornithes). – In: Cracraft, J., Donoghue, M. J. & Donoghue, M. M. (eds.) Assembling the tree of life. – New York Oxford University Press, pp. 468–489.10.1093/oso/9780195172348.003.0028
  16. Cramp, S. 1980. Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa: the birds of the western Palearctic, Vol. 2. Hawks to bustards. – Oxford University Press
  17. Csermely, D. & Gaibani, G. 1998. Is foot squeezing pressure by two raptor species sufficient to subdue their prey? – Condor 100(4): 757–763. DOI: 10.2307/136976210.2307/1369762
  18. Csermely, D., Bertè, L. & Camoni, R. 1998. Prey killing by Eurasian Kestrels: the role of the foot and the significance of bill and talons. – Journal of Avian Biology 29(1): 10–16. DOI: 10.2307/367733510.2307/3677335
  19. Csermely, D. & Rossi, O. 2006. Bird claws and bird of prey talons: Where is the difference? – Italian Journal of Zoology 73(1): 43–53. DOI: 10.1080/1125000050050236810.1080/11250000500502368
  20. Dixon, A., Richards, C. & King, A. 2018. Diet of Peregrine Falcons (Falco peregrinus) in relation to temporal and spatial variation in racing pigeon availability in Wales. – Ornis Hungarica 26(2): 188–200. DOI: 10.1515/orhu-2018-002810.1515/orhu-2018-0028
  21. Dumont, E. R. 2003. Bats and fruit: an ecomorphological approach. – In: Kunz, T. H. & Fenton, M. B (eds.) Bat Ecology. – University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 398–429.
  22. Fabbri, M., Koch, N. M., Pritchard, A. C., Hanson, M., Hoffman, E., Bever, G. S., Balanoff, A. M., Morris, Z. S., Field, D. J., Camacho, J., Rowe, T. B., Norell, M. A., Smith, R. M., Abzhanov, A. & Bhullar, B-A. S. 2017. The skull roof tracks the brain during the evolution and development of reptiles including birds. – Nature Ecology & Evolution 1(10): 1543–1550. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-017-0288-210.1038/s41559-017-0288-229185519
  23. Fowler, D. W., Freedman, E. A. & Scannella, J. B. 2009. Predatory functional morphology in raptors: interdigital variation in talon size is related to prey restraint and immobilisation technique. – PloS One 4(11): e7999. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.000799910.1371/journal.pone.0007999277697919946365
  24. Gende, S. M., Wilson, M. F. & Jacobsen, M. 1997. Reproductive success of Bald Eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) and its association with habitat or landscape features and weather in southeast Alaska. – Canadian Journal of Zoology 75(10): 1595–1604. DOI: 10.1139/z97-78610.1139/z97-786
  25. Graham, I. M., Redpath, S. M. & Thirgood, S. J. 1995. The diet and breeding density of Common Buzzards Buteo buteo in relation to indices of prey abundance. – Bird Study 42(2): 165–173. DOI: 10.1080/0006365950947716210.1080/00063659509477162
  26. Graves, G. R. 2017. Sexual monomorphism in wing loading and wing aspect ratio in Black Vulture (Coragyps atratus) and Turkey Vulture (Cathartes aura). – Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 130(1): 240–249. DOI: 10.2988/17-0001810.2988/17-00018
  27. Grant, P. R., Abbott, I., Schluter, D., Curry, R. L. & Abbott, L. K. 1985. Variation in the size and shape of Darwin’s finches. – Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 25(1): 1–39. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1985.tb00384.x10.1111/j.1095-8312.1985.tb00384.x
  28. Guangdi, S. I., Dong, Y., Ma, Y. & Zhang, Z. 2015. Shape similarities and differences in the skulls of scavenging raptors. – Zoological Science 32(2): 71–177. DOI: 10.2108/zs13025310.2108/zs13025325826066
  29. Hackett, S. J., Kimball, R. T., Reddy, S., Bowie, R. C., Braun, E. L., Braun, M. J. & Huddleston, C. J. 2008. A phylogenomic study of birds reveals their evolutionary history. – Science 320(5884): 1763–1768. DOI: 10.1126/science.115770410.1126/.1157704
  30. Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T. & Ryan, P. D. 2001. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. – Palaeontologia Electronica 4: 1–9.
  31. Haring, E., Kvaløy, K., Gjershaug, J. O., Røv, N. & Gamauf, A. 2007. Convergent evolution and paraphyly of the hawk eagles of the genus Spizaetus (Aves, Accipitridae) – phylogenetic analyses based on mitochondrial markers. – Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 45(4): 353–365. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0469.2007.00410.x10.1111/j.1439-0469.2007.00410.x
  32. Helbig, A. J., Seibold, I., Bednarek, W., Gaucher, P., Ristow, D., Scharlau, W., Schmidl, D. & Wink, M. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships among falcon species (genus Falco) according to DNA sequence variation of the cytochrome b gene. – In: Meyburg, B-U. & Chancellor, R. D. (eds.) Raptor Conservation Today, WWGBP/The Pica Press, pp. 593–599.
  33. Heesy, C. P. 2004. On the relationship between orbit orientation and binocular visual field overlap in mammals. – The Anatomical Record Part A: Discoveries in Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology 281(1): 1104–1110. DOI: 10.1002/ar.a.2011610.1002/ar.a.2011615470671
  34. Herrel, A., Podos, J., Huber, S. K. & Hendry, A. P. 2005. Bite performance and morphology in a population of Darwin’s finches: implications for the evolution of beak shape. – Functional Ecology 19(1): 43–48. DOI: 10.1111/j.0269-8463.2005.00923.x10.1111/j.0269-8463.2005.00923.x
  35. Hertel, F. 1995. Ecomorphological indicators of feeding behavior in recent and fossil raptors. – The Auk 112(4): 890–903. DOI: 10.2307/408902110.2307/4089021
  36. Hille, S. M., Korner-Nievergelt, F., Bleeker, M. & Collar, N. J. 2016. Foraging behaviour at carcasses in an Asian vulture assemblage: towards a good restaurant guide. – Bird Conservation International 26(3): 263–272. DOI: 10.1017/S095927091500034910.1017/S0959270915000349
  37. Hinsley, S. A., Bellamy, P. E. & Moss, D. 1995. Sparrowhawk Accipiter nisus prediction and feeding site selection by its. – Ibis 137(3): 418–422. DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1995.tb08042.x10.1111/j.1474-919X.1995.tb08042.x
  38. Houston, D. C. 1986. Scavenging efficiency of Turkey Vultures in tropical forest. – The Condor 88(3): 318–323. DOI: 10.2307/136887810.2307/1368878
  39. Hull, C. 1991. A Comparison of the morphology of the feeding apparatus in the Peregrine Falcon, Falco peregrinus, and the Brown Falcon, Falco berigora (Falconiformes). – Australian Journal of Zoology 39(1): 67–76. DOI: 10.1071/ZO991006710.1071/ZO9910067
  40. Itämies, J. & Mikkola, H. 1972. The diet of Honey Buzzards Pernis apivorus in Finland. – Ornis Fennica 49: 7–10.
  41. Jarvis, E. D., Mirarab, S., Aberer, A. J., Li, B., Houde, P., Li, C., Ho, S. Y. W., Faircloth, B. C., Nabholz, B., Howard, J. T., Suh, A., et al. & Zhang, G. 2014. Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds. – Science 346(6215): 1320–1331. DOI: 10.1126/science.1253451.10.1126/.1253451
  42. Jones, M. P., Pierce, K. E. & Ward, D. 2007. Avian vision: a review of form and function with special consideration to birds of prey. – Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine 16(2): 69–87. DOI: 10.1053/j.jepm.2007.03.01210.1053/j.jepm.2007.03.012
  43. Korpimäki, E. 1985. Prey choice strategies of the Kestrel Falco tinnunculus in relation to available small mammals and other Finnish birds of prey. – Annales Zoologici Fennici 22(1): 91–104.
  44. Kotymán, L., Solt, S., Horváth, É., Palatitz, P. & Fehérvári, P. 2015. Demography, breeding success and effects of nest type in artificial colonies of Red-footed Falcons and allies. – Ornis Hungarica 23(1): 1–21. DOI: 10.1515/orhu-2015-000110.1515/orhu-2015-0001
  45. Kulemeyer, C., Asbahr, K., Gunz, P., Frahnert, F. & Bairlein, F. 2009. Functional morphology and integration of corvid skulls-a 3D geometric morphometric approach. – Frontiers of Zoology 6: 2. DOI: 10.1186/1742-9994-6-210.1186/1742-9994-6-2
  46. Kruuk, H. 1967. Competition for food between vultures of East Africa. – Ardea 55(17): 1–193.
  47. Ladyguin, A. 2000. The morphology of the bill apparatus in the Steller’s Sea Eagle. – In: Ueta, M. & McGrady, M. J. (eds.) First Symposium on Steller’s and White-tailed Sea Eagles in East Asia. – Wild Bird Society of Japan, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 1–10.
  48. Lindberg, P. & Odsjö, T. 1983. Mercury levels in feathers of Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus compared with total mercury content in some of its prey species in Sweden. – Environmental Pollution Series B, Chemical and Physical 5(4): 297–318. DOI: 10.1016/0143-148X(83)90023-X10.1016/0143-148X(83)90023-X
  49. Martin, G. R. 2007. Visual fields and their functions in birds. – Journal of Ornithology 48(Suppl. 2.): S547–S562. DOI: 10.1007/s10336-007-0213-610.1007/s10336-007-0213-6
  50. Marugán-Lobón, J. & Buscalioni, Á. D. 2006. Avian skull morphological evolution: exploring exo- and endocranial covariation with two-block partial least squares. – Zoology 109(3): 217–230. DOI: 10.1016/j.zool.2006.03.00510.1016/j.zool.2006.03.00516828269
  51. Massemin, S., Korpimäki, E. & Wiehn, J. 2000. Reversed sexual size dimorphism in raptors: evaluation of the hypotheses in kestrels breeding in a temporally changing environment. – Oecologia 124(1): 26–32. DOI: 10.1007/s00442005002110.1007/s00442005002128308409
  52. McBrayer, L. D. 2004. The relationship between skull morphology, biting performance and foraging mode in Kalahari lacertid lizards. – Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 140(3): 403–416. DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2003.00106.x10.1111/j.1096-3642.2003.00106.x
  53. McCormack, J. E., Harvey, M. G., Faircloth, B. C., Crawford, N. G., Glenn, T. C. & Brumfield, R. T. 2013. A phylogeny of birds based on over 1,500 loci collected by target enrichment and high-throughput sequencing. – PLoS One 8(1): e54848. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.005484810.1371/journal.pone.0054848355852223382987
  54. Mindell, D. P., Fuchs, J. & Johnson, J. A. 2018. Phylogeny, taxonomy, and geographic diversity of diurnal raptors: Falconiformes, Accipitriformes, and Cathartiformes. – In: Sarasola, J. H., Grande, J. M. & Negro, J. J. (eds.) Birds of Prey. Biology and conservation in the XXI. century, Springer, pp. 3–32.10.1007/978-3-319-73745-4_1
  55. Møller, A. P. & Garamszegi, L. Z. 2012. Sexual selection, range size and population size. – Ornis Hungarica 20(1): 1–25. DOI: 10.2478/orhu-2013-000110.2478/orhu-2013-0001
  56. Moreno-Opo, R., Margalida, A., Arredondo, A., Guil, F., Martín, M., Higuero, R. & Guzman, J. 2010. Factors influencing the presence of the Cinereous Vulture Aegypius monachus at carcasses: food preferences and implications for the management of supplementary feeding sites. – Wildlife Biology 16(1): 25–35. DOI: 10.2981/09-03710.2981/09-037
  57. Mueller, H. C. 1990. The evolution of reversed sexual dimorphism in size in monogamous species of birds. – Biological Reviews 65: 553–585. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1990.tb01238.x10.1111/j.1469-185X.1990.tb01238.x
  58. Nagy, J. & Tökölyi, J. 2014. Phylogeny, historical biogeography and the evolution of migration in accipitrid birds of prey (Aves: Accipitriformes). – Ornis Hungarica 22(1): 15–35. DOI: 10.2478/orhu-2014-000810.2478/orhu-2014-0008
  59. Newton, I. 1978. Feeding and development of Sparrowhawk Accipiter nisus nestlings. – Journal of Zoology 184(4): 65–487. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1978.tb03302.x10.1111/j.1469-7998.1978.tb03302.x
  60. O’Rourke, C. T., Hall, M. I., Pitlik, T. & Fernández-Juricic, E. 2010. Hawk eyes I: diurnal raptors differ in visual fields and degree of eye movement. – PLoS One 5(9): e12802. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.001280210.1371/journal.pone.0012802294390520877645
  61. Owens, I. P. F. & Hartley, I. R. 1998. Sexual dimorphism in birds: why are there so many different forms of dimorphism? – Proceedings of the Royal Society B 265: 397–407. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1998.030810.1098/rspb.1998.0308
  62. Pecsics, T., Laczi, M., Nagy, G. & Csörgő, T. 2017. The cranial morphometrics of the wildfowl (Anatidae). – Ornis Hungarica 25(1): 44–57. DOI: 10.1515/orhu-2017-000410.1515/orhu-2017-0004
  63. Pecsics, T., Laczi, M., Nagy, G., Kondor, T. & Csörgő, T. 2018. Analysis of skull morphometric characters in Owls (Strigiformes). – Ornis Hungarica 26(1): 41–53. DOI: 10.1515/orhu-2018-000310.1515/orhu-2018-0003
  64. Pomichal, K., Vági, B. & Csörgő, T. 2014. A case study on the phylogeny and conservation of Saker Falcon. – Ornis Hungarica 22(1): 1–14. DOI: 10.2478/orhu-2014-000710.2478/orhu-2014-0007
  65. Prum, R. O., Berv, J. S., Dornburg, A., Field, D. J., Townsend, J. P., Lemmon, E. M. & Lemmon, A. R. 2015. A comprehensive phylogeny of birds (Aves) using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing. – Nature 526(7574): 569–573. DOI: 10.1038/nature1569710.1038/15697
  66. Puzović, S. 2008. Nest occupation and prey grabbing by Saker Falcon (Falco cherrug) on power lines in the province of Vojvodina (Serbia). – Archives of Biological Sciences 60(2): 271–277. DOI: 10.2298/ABS0802271P10.2298/ABS0802271
  67. Rohlf, F. J. 2010. TpsDig, version 2.16. – Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook, USA
  68. Schüz, E. & König, C. 1983. Old World vultures and man. – In: Wilbur, S. R. & Jackson, J. A. (eds.) Vulture biology and management. – Berkley, Los Angeles: University of California Press, University of California Press, pp. 461–496.
  69. Si, G., Dong, Y., Ma, Y. & Zhang, Z. 2015. Shape similarities and differences on the skull of scavenging raptors. – Zoological Science 32(2): 171–177. DOI: 10.2108/zs13025310.2108/zs13025325826066
  70. Sulkava, S., Tornberg, R. & Koivusaari, J. 1997. Diet of the White-tailed Eagle Haliaeetus albicilla in Finland. – Ornis Fennica 74(2): 65–78.
  71. Sun, Y., Si, G., Wang, X., Wang, K. & Zhang, Z. 2018. Geometric morphometric analysis of skull shape in the Accipitridae. – Zoomorphology 137: 445–456. DOI: 10.1007/s00435-018-0406-y10.1007/s00435-018-0406-y
  72. Sustaita, D. & Hertel, F. 2010. In vivo bite and grip forces, morphology and prey-killing behavior of North American accipiters (Accipitridae) and falcons (Falconidae). – Journal of Experimental Biology 213(15): 2617–2628. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.04173110.1242/jeb.04173120639423
  73. Szövényi, G. 2015. Orthopteran insects as potential and preferred preys of the Red-footed Falcon (Falco vespertinus) in Hungary. – Ornis Hungarica 23(1): 48–57. DOI: 10.1515/orhu-2015-000410.1515/orhu-2015-0004
  74. Tóth, L. 2014. Numerical response of the Common Buzzard Buteo buteo to the changes in abundance of small mammals. – Ornis Hungarica 22(1): 48–56. DOI: 10.2478/orhu-2014-001010.2478/orhu-2014-0010
  75. Van der Meij, M. A. A. & Bout, R. G. 2004. Scaling of jaw muscle size and maximal bite force in finches. – Journal of Experimental Biology 207(16): 2745–2753. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.0109110.1242/jeb.0109115235003
  76. Verwaijen, D., Van Damme, R. & Herrel, A. 2002. Relationships between head size, bite force, prey handling efficiency. – Functional Ecology 16(6): 842–850. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00696.x10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00696.x
  77. Ward, A. B., Weigl, P. D. & Conroy, R. M. 2002. Functional morphology of raptor hindlimbs: implications for resource partitioning. – The Auk 119(4): 1052–1063.10.1093/auk/119.4.1052
  78. Yuri, T., Kimball, R. T., Harshman, J., Bowie, R. C., Braun, M. J., Chojnowski, J. L., Han, K-L., Hackett, S. J. Huddleston, Ch. J., Moore, W. S., Reddy, S., Sheldon, F. H., Steadman, D. W., Witt, Ch. C. & Braun, E. L. 2013. Parsimony and model-based analyses of indels in avian nuclear genes reveal congruent and incongruent phylogenetic signals. – Biology 2(1): 419–444. DOI: 10.3390/biology201041910.3390/biology2010419400986924832669
  79. Zelditch, M., Swiderski, D., Sheets, D. H. & Fink, W. 2004. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A primer. – Elsevier Academic Press, Waltham, MA.
  80. Zusi, R. L. 1993. Patterns of diversity in the avian skull. – In: Hanken, J. & Hall, B. K. The Skull, Vol. 2. Patterns of Structural and Systematic Diversity. – University of Chicago Press, pp. 391–437.
  81. Zweers, G. A., Berkhoudt, H. & Berge, J. V. 1994. Behavioral mechanisms of avian feeding. – In: Bels, V. L., Chardon, M. & Vandewalle, P. 1994. Biomechanics of feeding in vertebrates. – Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 241–279.10.1007/978-3-642-57906-6_9
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/orhu-2019-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2061-9588 | Journal ISSN: 1215-1610
Language: English
Page range: 117 - 131
Submitted on: Mar 28, 2018
Accepted on: Apr 26, 2019
Published on: Jul 27, 2019
Published by: MME/BirdLife Hungary
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2019 Tibor Pecsics, Miklós Laczi, Gergely Nagy, Tamás Kondor, Tibor Csörgő, published by MME/BirdLife Hungary
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.