How Academic Context Shapes Students’ Ethical Behaviour: New Evidence from a Transitional Society

Ivan Matić; Ana Juras; Marina Lovrinčević

doi:10.2478/orga-2026-0001

Abstract

Background/Purpose

An ongoing problem of the ethical transgression of students poses a fundamental threat to the functioning of higher education institutions and translates to their behaviour in the future workplace. The aim of the paper is to examine the relationship between the academic context in higher education institutions in a transitional society and students’ ethical behaviour.

Methods

Two-source empirical research was conducted using samples of 235 students and 112 faculty and administrative staff from 12 higher education institutions in Croatia. Data on the ethical infrastructure of higher education institutions and the ethical behaviour of students and employees were collected from both groups. Descriptive statistics were used to provide insights into various aspects of the academic context and the characteristics of students’ and employees’ ethical behaviour. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to examine the relationships between the academic context and the ethical behaviour of students and employees.

Results

Perceptions of students and employees differed on a number of aspects of the academic context in their higher education institutions, while the formal ethical framework, individual-level ethics, and witnessing and sanctioning of unethical behaviour are found to be the factors that play a role in shaping students’ ethical behaviour. Students enrolled in natural sciences-related programmes are less susceptible to the effects of academic context than those studying programmes in other scientific fields.

Conclusion

The current state of academic context at higher education institutions in a typical transitional society leaves considerable room for improvement in developing ethical infrastructure and promoting a culture of academic integrity and ethical values. Translating the ‘words’ into ‘actions’ at both organisational and individual levels is a primary goal for these institutions to establish an effective ethical framework and culture, and to be perceived as ethical by their stakeholders.

References

Aguinis, H., Werner, S., Lanza Abbott, J., Angert, C., Park, J. H., & Kohlhausen, D. (2010). Customer-centric science: Reporting significant research results with rigor, relevance, and practical impact in mind. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 515–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109333339
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ballantine, J. A., Guo, X., & Larres, P. (2018). Can future managers and business executives be influenced to behave more ethically in the workplace? The impact of approaches to learning on business students’ cheating behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 149, 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3039-4
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bandura, A. (1988). Organisational applications of social cognitive theory. Australian Journal of Management, 13(2), 275–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/031289628801300210
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Birtch, T. A., & Chiang, F. F. (2014). The influence of business school’s ethical climate on students’ unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 123, 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1795-y
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cheng, Y. C., Hung, F. C., & Hsu, H. M. (2021). The relationship between academic dishonesty, ethical attitude and ethical climate: The evidence from Taiwan. Sustainability, 13(21), 11615. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111615
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chowdhury, M. (2016). Emphasizing morals, values, ethics, and character education in science education and science teaching. MOJES: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2), 1–16.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Credo, K., Ianuzzi, A., & Armenakis, A. (2010). Organizational ethics perceptions: A qualitative and quantitative assessment. In Meeting of the Southern Management Association. St. Pete, FL.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cronan, T. P., Mullins, J. K., & Douglas, D. E. (2018). Further understanding factors that explain freshman business students’ academic integrity intention and behavior: Plagiarism and sharing homework. Journal of Business Ethics, 147, 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2988-3
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dabis, A., & Csáki, C. (2024). AI and ethics: Investigating the first policy responses of higher education institutions to the challenge of generative AI. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03526-z
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Davis, A. (2023). Academic integrity in the time of contradictions. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2289307. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2289307
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Deshpande, S. P., Joseph, J., & Berry, K. (2012). Ethical misconduct of business students: Some new evidence. American Journal of Business Education (AJBE), 5(6), 719–726.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Elango, B., Paul, K., Kundu, S. K., & Paudel, S. K. (2010). Organizational ethics, individual ethics, and ethical intentions in international decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(4), 543–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0524-z
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Elliott, T. L., Marquis, L. M., & Neal, C. S. (2013). Business ethics perspectives: Faculty plagiarism and fraud. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(1), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1234-5
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Farnese, M. L., Tramontano, C., Fida, R., & Paciello, M. (2011). Cheating behaviors in academic context: Does academic moral disengagement matter? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 356–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.250
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Field, A. (2024). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (6th ed.). London, United Kingdom: Sage Publications Ltd.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Hampshire, United Kingdom: Cengage Learning.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hair, J. F., Page, M., & Brunsveld, N. (2019). Essentials of business research methods (4^th ed.). New York, USA: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429203374
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hendy, N. T., & Montargot, N. (2019). Understanding academic dishonesty among business school students in France using the theory of planned behavior. The International Journal of Management Education, 17(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2018.12.003
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hendy, N. T., Montargot, N., & Papadimitriou, A. (2021). Cultural differences in academic dishonesty: A social learning perspective. Journal of Academic Ethics, 19(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09391-8
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Heyneman, S. (2011). The corruption of ethics in higher education. International Higher Education, 62. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2011.62.8530
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kuntz, J. R., & Butler, C. (2014). Exploring individual and contextual antecedents of attitudes toward the acceptability of cheating and plagiarism. Ethics & Behavior, 24(6), 478–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2014.908380
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Preacher, K. J., & Hong, S. (2001). Sample size in factor analysis: The role of model error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(4), 611–637. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3604_06
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84–99. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MacLeod, P. D., & Eaton, S. E. (2020). The paradox of faculty attitudes toward student violations of academic integrity. Journal of Academic Ethics, 18(4), 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-020-09363-4
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327019EB1103_2
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McLeod, M. S., Payne, G. T., & Evert, R. E. (2016). Organizational ethics research: A systematic review of methods and analytical techniques. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(3), 429–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2436-9
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mirshekary, S., & Lawrence, A. D. (2009). Academic and business ethical misconduct and cultural values: A cross national comparison. Journal of Academic Ethics, 7(3), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-009-9093-0
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Momete, D. C. (2019). Ethical behaviour as a means to deliver quality outcomes in higher education. Calitatea, 20(172), 41-44.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Moore, G. (2006). Managing ethics in higher education: Implementing a code or embedding virtue? Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00462.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ocen, S., Elasu, J., Aarakit, S. M., & Olupot, C. (2025). Artificial intelligence in higher education institutions: review of innovations, opportunities and challenges. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1530247. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1530247
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7^th ed.). London, United Kingdom: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117452
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Park, C. (2017). In other (people’s) words: Plagiarism by university students - literature and lessons. Academic Ethics, 525–542. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315263465
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Prisacariu, A., & Shah, M. (2016). Defining the quality of higher education around ethics and moral values. Quality in Higher Education, 22(2), 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2016.1201931
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rakovski, C. C., & Levy, E. S. (2007). Academic dishonesty: Perceptions of business students. College Student Journal, 41(2), 466-482.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Robie, C., & Kidwell, R. E. (2003). The “ethical” professor and the undergraduate student: Current perceptions of moral behavior among business school faculty. Journal of Academic Ethics, 1, 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JAET.0000006893.06303.41
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rothman, P. (2017). Ethics in Higher Education: A study of the perceived ethical climate of administrators and faculty at a higher education institution. Education Doctoral. Paper 287.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Simkin, M. G., & McLeod, A. (2010). Why do college students cheat? Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 441–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0275-x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sisti, D. A. (2007). How do high school students justify internet plagiarism? Ethics & Behavior, 17(3), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508420701519163
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stephens, J. M. (2015). Creating cultures of integrity: A multi-level intervention model for promoting academic honesty. Handbook of Academic Integrity, 996–1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_13-1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stevens, J. P. (2012). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5^th ed.). New York, USA: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203843130
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Treviño, L. K., Butterfield, K. D., & McCabe, D. L. (1998). The ethical context in organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 447–476. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857431
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Usher, M., Barak, M., & Erduran, S. (2025). What role should higher education institutions play in fostering AI ethics? Insights from science and engineering graduate students. International Journal of STEM Education, 12(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-025-00567-x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zopiatis, A. A., & Krambia-Kapardis, M. (2008). Ethical behaviour of tertiary education students in Cyprus. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9538-6.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article