Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effects of Corporate Purpose on Organizational Innovation: An Explanatory Mixed-Methods Analysis Cover

Effects of Corporate Purpose on Organizational Innovation: An Explanatory Mixed-Methods Analysis

Open Access
|May 2025

References

  1. Aguilera, R.V. (2023). Corporate Purpose in Comparative Perspective: The Role of Governance. Strategy Science, 8(2), 193-201. doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2023.0198
  2. Aguinis, H. & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932-968. doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079
  3. Al-Tal, M.J.Y. and Emeagwali, O.L. (2019). Knowledge-based HR Practices and Innovation in SMEs. Organizacija, 52(1), 6-21. doi.org/10.2478/orga-2019-0002
  4. Arraya, M. & Ferreira, J.J. (2024). Are We Competitive? A Firm Competitiveness Fit Scale. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 0, 1–15. doi:10.1002/joe.22284
  5. Arraya, M. (2024). Capabilities configurational method for organizations’ sustainability: antecedents and consequences. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 17(2), 215-233. doi:10.1504/ijmcp.2023.10056206
  6. Ashfaq, B., and Hamid, A. (2021). Person-organization fit and organization citizenship behavior: Modeling the work engagement as a mediator. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 13(1), 19–39. doi:10.1108/apjba-12-2019-0255
  7. Baregheh, A., Rowley, J. & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323-1339. doi:10.1108/00251740910984578
  8. Barney, J.B., Ketchen, Jr, D.J., & Wright, M. (2021). Resource-Based Theory and the Value Creation Framework. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1936-1955. doi:10.1177/01492063211021655
  9. Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  10. Blair, M., & Stout, L.A. (1999). A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law. Virginia Law Review, 85(2), 247-328. doi:10.2139/ssrn.425500
  11. Bocken, N.M.P. & Geradts, T.H.J. (2020). Barriers and drivers to sustainable business model innovation: Organization design and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 53, 101950. doi.org/10.1016/j. lrp.2019.101950
  12. Bonchek, M. (2016). How to Discover Your Company’s DNA. Harvard Business Review Digital Articles, September, 2-5. https://hbr.org/2016/12/how-to-discover-your-companys-dna
  13. Breuer, H. & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2017). Values-Based Network and Business Model Innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(3), Art. 1750028, 1-35. doi.org/10.1142/S1363919617500281
  14. Buzzao, G., & Rizzi, F. (2020). On the conceptualization and measurement of dynamic capabilities for sustainability: Building theory through a systematic literature review. Business Strategy and The Environment, 30,135–175. doi.org/10.1002/bse.2614
  15. Camisón, C., and A. Villar-López. (2014). Organizational Innovation as an Enabler of Technological Innovation Capabilities and firm Performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2891–2902. doi.org/10.1016/j. jbusres.2012.06.004
  16. Carew, D., Kandarian, F., Parisi-Carew, E. & Stoner, J. (2009). Is your organization high performing? In Ken Blanchard (Eds). Leading at a higher level, revised and expanded edition: Blanchard on leadership and creating high performing organizations, 2nd Edition. Pearson.
  17. Ceylan, C. (2013). Commitment-based HR practices, different types of innovation activities and firm innovation performance. International Journal of Human Resources Management, 24(1), 208-226. doi.org/10.1 080/09585192.2012.680601
  18. Chaubey, A., Sahoo, C.K. and Das, K.C. (2022). Examining the effect of training and employee creativity on organizational innovation: a moderated mediation analysis. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(2), 499-524. doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-06-2020-2271
  19. Chen, Q., Wang, C.H. & Huang, S.Z. (2019). Effects of organizational innovation and technological innovation capabilities on firm performance: evidence from firms in China’s Pearl River Delta. Asia Pacific Business Review, 26(1), 72-96. doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2019.1 592339
  20. Colenbaugh, R. and Reigel, B. (2010). Enabling, engaging, and rewarding employees. A Study of World-at-Work Reward Professionals. HayGroup.
  21. Creswell, J.W. & Plano Clarke, V.L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE.
  22. Davies, S.E., Stoermer, S., & Froese, F.J. (2019). When the going gets tough: the influence of expatriate resilience and perceived organizational inclusion climate on work adjustment and turnover intentions. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(8), 1393–1417. doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.15 28558
  23. Drucker, P.F. (1974). Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
  24. Dyer, J., Gregersen, H.B., & Christensen, C. (2011). The Innovator’s DNA: Mastering the Five Skills of Disruptive Innovators. Boston, MA., Harvard Business Review Press.
  25. Eisenhardt, K.M. & Graebner, M.E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32. doi. org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
  26. Ellsworth, R.R. (2002). Leading with Purpose: The New Corporate Realities. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
  27. Farida, I. & Setiawan, D. (2022). Business strategies and competitive advantage: the role of performance and innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3), 163. doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030163
  28. Fay, D., Shipton, H., West, M. & Patterson, M. (2014). Teamwork and organizational innovation: the moderating role of the HRM context. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(2), 261-277. doi.org/10.1111/caim.12100
  29. Felin, T. & Foss, N. (2005). Strategic organization: A field in search of micro-foundations. Strategic Organization, 3(4), 441–455. doi.org/10.1177/1476127005055796
  30. Fornell, C. & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  31. Freeman, R. & Ginena, K. (2015). Rethinking the purpose of the corporation: Challenges from stakeholder theory. Notizie di Politeia, 31, 9-18.
  32. Fu, N., Flood, P.C., Bosak, J., Morris, T. and O’Regan, P. (2015). How do high performance work systems influence organizational innovation in professional service firms?”. Employee Relations, 37(2), 209-231. doi:10.1108/ER-10-2013-0155
  33. Gartenberg, C. (2023). The contingent relationship between purpose and profits. Strategy Science, 8(2), 257-269. doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2023.0194
  34. Gartenberg, C., Prat, A., and Serafeim, G. (2019). Corporate Purpose and Financial Performance. Organization Science, 30(1), 1–18. doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1230
  35. Gibbert, M. and Ruigrok, W. (2010). The ‘what’ and ‘how’ of case study rigor: three strategies based on published work. Organization Research Methods, 13, pp. 710–737. doi.org/10.1177/1094428109351319
  36. Grant, R.M. (2010). Contemporary Strategy Analysis, 7th edition. Wiley.
  37. Grawe, S.J., Chen, H. & Daugherty, P.J. (2009). The relationship between strategic orientation, service innovation, and performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 39(4), 282-300. doi.org/10.1108/09600030910962249
  38. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. & Tatham, R.L. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson, New Jersey.
  39. Halbesleben, J.R., Neveu, J.P., Paustian-Underdahl, S.C., & Westman, M. (2014). Getting to the “COR” understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1334–1364. doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527130
  40. Harrison, J.S., Phillips, R.A. and Freeman, R.E. (2020). On the 2019 business roundtable ‘statement on the purpose of a corporation’. Journal of Management, 46(7), 1223-1237. doi.org/10.1177/0149206319892669
  41. Harsch, K. & Festing, M. (2019). Dynamic talent management capabilities and organizational agility—A qualitative exploration. Human Resource Management, 59, 43–61. doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21972
  42. Henderson, R. & Van den Steen, E. (2015). Why Do Firms Have “Purpose”? The Firm’s Role as a Carrier of Identity and Reputation. American Economic Review, 105(5): 326–30. doi:10.1257/aer.p20151072
  43. Henderson, R. (2020). Innovation in the 21st Century: Architectural Change, Purpose, and the Challenges of Our Time. Management Science, Articles in Advance, 1–10. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2020.3746
  44. Hollensbe, E., Wookey, C., Hickey, L., & George, G. (2014). Organizations with purpose. Academy of Management, 57(5), 1227e1234. doi: 10.5465/amj.2014.4005
  45. Homer, S.T., & Lim, W.M. (2024). Theory development in a globalized world: Bridging “Doing as the Romans Do” with “Understanding Why the Romans Do It”. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 43(3), 127–138. doi.org/10.1002/joe.22234
  46. Huang, J.-C. (2021). Effects of person-organization fit objective feedback and subjective perception on organizational attractiveness in online recruitment. Personnel Review, 51(4), 1262–1276. doi.org/10.1108/PR-06-2020-0449
  47. Joly, H. (2021). Creating a Meaningful Corporate Purpose. Harvard Business Review Digital Articles, October, 1-12. https://hbr.org/2021/10/creating-a-meaningful-corporate-purpose
  48. Kareem, M.A., Kummitha, H.R., and Kolloju, N. (2024). The Mediating Role of Innovation Capabilities on the Relationship between Dynamic Capabilities and Firm Competitive Performance. Organizacija, 57(1), 56-71. doi: 10.2478/orga-2024-0004
  49. Khan, O., Daddi, T., & Iraldo, F. (2020). The role of dynamic capabilities in circular economy implementation and performance of companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27, 3018-3033. doi.org/10.1002/csr.2020
  50. Kianto, A. (2009). Development and validation of a survey instrument for measuring organisational renewal capability. International Journal Technology Management, 42(1/2), 69–88. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2008.018061
  51. Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10. doi: 10.4018/ijec.2015100101
  52. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. 3rd Edition, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  53. Lamberti, L. (2013). Customer centricity: The construct and the operational antecedents. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 21, 588 - 612. doi.org/10.1080/096525 4X.2013.817476
  54. Lawson, B. & Samson, D. (2001). Developing innovation capability in organisations: a dynamic capabilities approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(3), 377-400. doi.org/10.1142/S1363919601000427
  55. Lepeley, M.T. (2017). Human centered management: The five global pillars of organization quality and sustainability. Routledge.
  56. Ma Prieto, I. & Pilar Pérez-Santana, M. (2014). Managing innovative work behavior: the role of human resource practices. Personnel Review, 43(2), 184-208. doi. org/10.1108/PR-11-2012-0199
  57. Madden, B.J. (2017). The Purpose of the Firm, Valuation, and the Management of Intangibles. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 29(2), 76-86. doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12235
  58. Malnight, T.W., Buche, I., & Dhanaraj, C. (2019). Put purpose at the core of your strategy. Harvard Business Review, 97(5), 70-79. https://hbr.org/2019/09/put-purpose-at-the-core-of-your-strategy
  59. Mayer, C. (2021). The Future of the Corporation and the Economics of Purpose. Journal of Management Studies, 58(3), 887-901. doi.org/10.1111/joms.12660
  60. Mehta, M., Chandani, A., Moksha, N., & Parul, C. (2016). Trends in employee engagement practices in global and Indian companies: A technique to curb attrition. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(15), 45–48. doi: 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i15/92128
  61. Meijerink, J., Bos-Nehles, A., & de Leede, J. (2020). How employees’ pro-activity translates high-commitment HRM systems into work engagement: The mediating role of job crafting. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(22), 2893–2918. doi. org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1475402
  62. Metcalf, L. & Benn, S. (2012). The corporation is ailing social technology: creating a “fit for purpose” design for sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics ,111(2), 195–210. doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1201-1
  63. Migdadi, M. (2019). Organizational learning capability, innovation and organizational performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(1), 151-172. doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2018-0246
  64. Morse, J.M. (1989) Strategies for sampling. In: Morse, J. (ed.) Qualitative nursing research: a contemporary dialogue, pp. 117-31. Rockville, MD, USA: Aspen Press.
  65. Morse, J.M. (2018). Reframing rigor in qualitative inquiry. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 796-816). Sage.
  66. Morse, J.M., & Niehaus, L. (2009). Principles and procedures of mixed methods design. Left Coast Press. Mossholder, K.W., Richardson, H.A., & Settoon, R.P. (2011). Human resource systems and helping in organizations: A relational perspective. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 33-52. doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0402
  67. Mourkogiannis, N. (2008). HR’s Return to Purpose-Focused Organizations. Employment Relations, 35(2), 25-30. doi.org/10.1002/ert.20198
  68. Nyimbili, F. & Nyimbili, L. (2024). Types of Purposive Sampling Techniques with Their Examples and Application in Qualitative Research Studies. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies: English Lang., Teaching, Literature, Linguistics & Communication, 5(1),90-99. doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0419
  69. Ocasio, W., Kraatz, M., & Chandler, D. (2023). Making sense of corporate purpose. Strategy Science, 8(2),123-138. doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2023.0054
  70. Peters, T. (1987). Thriving on Chaos: Handbook for a Management Revolution. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.
  71. Pink, D. (2011). Drive: The surprising Truth of What Motivates Us. Riverhead Books.
  72. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539-569. doi. org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
  73. Popa, S, Soto-Acosta, P. & Martinez-Conesa, I. (2017). Antecedents, moderators, and outcomes of innovation climate and open innovation: An empirical study in SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118(C), 134-142. doi.org/10.1016/j.tech-fore.2017.02.014
  74. Porter, M.E. & Kramer, M.R. (2019). Creating shared value. In Managing Sustainable Business; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 323–346.
  75. Reichheld, F.F., Darnell, D., & Burns, M. (2021). Winning on Purpose: The Unbeatable Strategy of Loving Customers. Harvard Business Review Press.
  76. Rey, C. & Bastons, M. (2019). Three Dimensions of Purpose – Knowledge, Motivation and Action. Chapter 3 (pp.29-42) In: Rey, C., Bastons, M., Sotok, P. (eds), Purpose-driven Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan.
  77. Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of In0novations, Free Press, New York, NY.
  78. Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
  79. Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research methods for business students (7th ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
  80. Schultz, J.R. (2014). Framing the Organization’s Purpose With Its Ultimate Goals in Mind. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, March/April, 46-55. doi. org/10.1002/joe.21543
  81. Silva, J.J., & Cirani, C.B.S. (2020). The capability of organizational innovation: systematic review of literature and research proposals. Gestão & Produção, 27(4), e4819. doi.org/10.1590/0104-530X4819-20
  82. Sisodia, R. & Gelb, M.J. (2019). The healing organization. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
  83. Smith, T., Kirkman, B., Chen, G., & Lemoine, G. (2018). Leading Teams Research: When Employees work on Multiple Teams. Harvard Business Review Digital Articles, September, 1-5. https://hbr.org/2018/09/research-when-employees-work-on-multiple-teams-good-bosses-can-have-ripple-effects
  84. Teece, D.J. (2023). The Evolution of the Dynamic Capabilities Framework. In: Adams, R., Grichnik, D., Pundziene, A., Volkmann, C. (eds) Artificiality and Sustainability in Entrepreneurship. FGF Studies in Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Springer, Cham.
  85. Thorpe, L.P. & Schmuller, A.M. (1958). Personality: An Interdisciplinary Approach. D Van Nostrand Company: New York, NY, USA.
  86. Tsang, E.W.K. (2014). Generalizing from Research Findings: The Merits of Case Studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16, 369–383. doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12024
  87. Upadhyay, P. & Kumar, A. (2020) The intermediating role of organizational culture and internal analytical knowledge between the capability of big data analytics and a firm’s performance. International Journal of Information Management, 52, 102100. doi.org/10.1016/j. ijinfomgt.2020.102100
  88. van Ingen, R., Peters, P., De Ruiter, M., & Robben, H. (2021). Exploring the meaning of organizational purpose at a new dawn: The development of a conceptual model through expert interviews. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 675543. doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675543
  89. Verquer, M.L., Beehr, T.A., & Wagner, S.H. (2003). A meta-analysis of relations between person-organization fit and work attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 473-489. doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00036-2
  90. Weerawardena, J., Mort, G.S., Salunke, S., Knight, G., & Liesch, P.W. (2015). The role of the market sub-system and the socio-technical sub-system in innovation and firm performance: a dynamic capabilities approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(2), 221–239. doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0382-9
  91. Yemiscigil, A. (2019). Purpose: A New Paradigm with Implications for Policy, Business, and Individual Lives. Global Relations Forum, Young Academics Program Analysis Paper Series No.5. https://www.gif.org.tr/files/ayse-yemiscigil-makale.pdf
  92. Yin, R.K. (2009). Case study research. Design and methods. 4th edition. Thousand Oaks, Sage, California.
  93. Yin, Y., Wang, Y., & Lu, Y. (2019). Antecedents and outcomes of employee empowerment practices: a theoretical extension with empirical evidence. Human Resource Management Journal, 29(4), 564–584. doi. org/10.1111/1748-8583.12243
  94. Zhang., L, Zhang, Y., Dallas, M., Xu, S., & Hu, J. (2018). How perceived empowerment HR practices influence work engagement in social enterprises–a moderated mediation model. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(20):2971–2999. doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1479874
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2025-0011 | Journal eISSN: 1581-1832 | Journal ISSN: 1318-5454
Language: English
Page range: 175 - 195
Submitted on: Nov 22, 2024
Accepted on: Mar 3, 2024
Published on: May 23, 2025
Published by: University of Maribor
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Marco Arrayaa, Anabela Monteirob, published by University of Maribor
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.