Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Using the Nominal Group Technique to Design an Appropriate Communication Strategy Among Strategic Procurement and Internal Stakeholders

Open Access
|Dec 2024

References

  1. Ball, H.L. (2019), ‘Conducting Online Surveys’, Journal of Human Lactation, 35(3), 413–417. DOI: 10.1177/0890334419848734
  2. Bisung, E. and Dickin, S. (2019), ‘Concept mapping: Engaging stakeholders to identify factors that contribute to empowerment in the water and sanitation sector in West Africa’, SSM - Population Health, 9(September 2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100490
  3. Bourne, L. and Walker, D.H. (2006), ‘Visualizing stakeholder influence—Two Australian examples’, Project Management Journal, 37(1), 5–21. DOI: 10.1177/875697280603700102
  4. Chinyio, E. and Olomolaiye, P. (2009), ‘Construction stakeholder management, John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.
  5. Chiwire, P., Evers, S.M., Mahomed, H. and Hiligsmann, M. (2022), ‘Identification and Prioritization of Attributes for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Nominal Group Technique: Patients’ Choice of Public Health Facilities in Cape Town, South Africa’, Value in Health Regional Issues 27, 90–98. DOI: 10.1016/j. vhri.2021.06.005
  6. Companies Act – ZGD-1. Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, No. 42/06 of 19 April 2006). Available at: http://www.pisrs.si/Pis.web/pregledPredpisa?id=ZAKO4291#, last accessed on 03.12.2023.
  7. Cordell, A. and Thompson, I. (2018), ‘The Category Management Handbook, Routledge, New York, USA. DOI: 10.4324/9781351239585
  8. Cronbach, L.J. (1951), ‘Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests’, Psychometrika 1951, 16, 297–334
  9. Črv, S. (2023), ‘Načela menedžmenta sistemov kakovosti kot gradniki uspešnosti gospodarskih družb’, Doctoral dissertation. Faculty for organization studies, Novo mesto, Slovenia.
  10. Diedenhofen, B. and Musch, J. (2016), ‘cocron: A Web Interface and R Package for the Statistical Comparison of Cronbach´s Alpha Coefficients’, International Journal of Internet Science, 11(1), 51–60.
  11. Dimitrova, V. and Gallucci, T. (2017), ‘Reverse Logistics and Circular Economy-Working Together? Izvestia’, Journal of the Union of Scientists-Varna, 2(Economic Sciences Series), 13–20.
  12. Fletcher, A., Guthrie, J., Steane, P., Roos, G. and Pike, S. (2003), ‘Mapping stakeholder perceptions for a third sector organization’, Journal of intellectual capital, 4(4), 505–527. DOI: 10.1108/14691930310504536
  13. García, C. (2012), ‘Using strategic communication for nation-building in contemporary Spain: The Basque case’, International Journal of Strategic Communication, 6(3), 212–231. DOI: 10.1080/1553118X.2012.678523
  14. Ginige, K., Amaratunga, D. and Haigh, R. (2018), ‘Mapping stakeholders associated with societal challenges: A Methodological Framework’, Procedia Engineering, 212, 1195–1202. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.154
  15. Hester, P. (2015), ‘Analyzing Stakeholders Using Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping’, Procedia Computer Science, 61, 92–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.159
  16. Jilani, P.A. (2018), ‘Indirect Procurement Strategies for Supply Chain Sustainability, Doctoral dissertation, Walden University, Walden.
  17. Jones, J. and Hunter, D. (1995), ‘Consensus methods for medical and health services research’, Qualitative Research, (311), 376–380. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.311.7001.376
  18. Ke, G. (2011), ‘Cultural difference effects on business: Holding up Sino-U.S. Business Negotiation as a model/les effets de la difference culturelle sur les affaires: En prenant la négociation sino-américaine comme un modèle. Cross-Cultural Communication, 7(2), 101–104.
  19. Månsson, P. (2018), ‘Mapping challenges and opportunities for aggregating information on systemic risks from multiple stakeholders’, Procedia Engineering, 212(2017), 736–743. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.095
  20. Martín Martínez, L. and Vela Llauradó, E. (2022), ‘Questionnaire on the Training Profile of a Learning Therapy Specialist: Creation and Validation of the Instrument’, Sustainability, 12(21), 1–20. DOI: 103390/su12219159
  21. Mason, S., Ling, J., Mosoiu, D., Arantzamendi, M., Tserkezoglou, A.J., Predoiu, O. and Payne, S. (2021), ‘Undertaking Research Using Online Nominal Group Technique: Lessons from an International Study (RESPACC)’, Journal of Palliative Medicine, 24(12), 1867–1871. DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0216
  22. Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R. and Wood, D.J. (1997), ‘Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts’, Academy of management review 22(4), 853–886.
  23. Mullen, R., Kydd, A., Fleming, A. and McMillan, L. (2021), ‘A practical guide to the systematic application of nominal group technique’, Nurse researcher, 29(1):14–20. DOI: 10.7748/nr. 2021.e1777
  24. Murray-Webster and R., Simon, P. (2006), ‘Making sense of stakeholder mapping’, PM World today, 8(11), 1–5.
  25. O’Brien, J. (2019), ‘Category Management in Purchasing: A Strategic Approach to Maximize Business Profitability’, 4th ed. Kogan Page: London, UK.
  26. Ortbal, K., Frazzette, N. and Mehta, K. (2016), ‘Stakeholder journey mapping: An educational tool for social entrepreneurs’, Procedia Engineering, 159(June), 249–258. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.170
  27. Plešnik, J. (2019), ‘Pripadnost kot gradnik modela vodenja zaposlenih v osnovnih šolah, Doctoral dissertation. Faculty for organisation studies, Novo mesto, Slovenia.
  28. Raum, S. (2018), ‘A framework for integrating systematic stakeholder analysis in ecosystem services research: Stakeholder mapping for forest ecosystem services in the UK’, Ecosystem Services, 29, 170–184. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.001
  29. Rowlinson, S., & Tuuli, M. (2009). Stakeholder management through relationship management. In Performance Improvement in Construction Management (187-207). Routledge.
  30. Savage, G.T., Nix, T.W., Whitehead, C.J. and Blair, J.D. (1991), ‘Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders’, Academy of management perspectives, 5(2), 61–75. DOI: 10.5465/ame.1991.4274682
  31. Stadler, M., Sailer, M. and Fischer, F. (2021), ‘Knowledge as a formative construct: A good ala is not always better’, New Ideas in Psychology, 60(August 2020), 1–4. DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2020.100832
  32. Statstutor. Spearman’s correlation, (2019). Available at: https://www.statstutor.ac.uk/resources/uploaded/spearmans.pdf, last accessed on 03.12.2023
  33. Šćepanović, D. (2020), ‘Gradniki modela nacionalnega programa primarne preventive urinske inkontinence v Sloveniji, Doctoral dissertation. Faculty for organisation studies, Novo mesto, Slovenia.
  34. Tuncel, E., Kong, D.T., McLean Parks, J. and van Kleef, G. A. (2020), ‘Face threat sensitivity in distributive negotiations: Effects on negotiator self-esteem and demands’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161(July), 255–273. DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.004
  35. Turner, R. and Jain, A. (2002), ‘Agile meets CMMI: Culture clash or common cause?’, In Conference on Extreme Programming and Agile Methods. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 153–165.
  36. Voegeli, G. and Finger, D.C. (2021), ‘Conflicting interests over hydropower: Identifying and representing stake-holder perspectives on new projects using causal mapping’, EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, 19–30.
  37. Voegeli, G. and Finger, D.C. (2021), ‘Disputed dams: Mapping the divergent stakeholder perspectives, expectations, and concerns over hydropower development in Iceland and Switzerland’, Energy Research and Social Science, 72(4). DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101872
  38. Vogelnik, M. (2016), ‘Simulacijska tehnika skupinske dinamike, nova kvalitativno-kvantitativna tehnika, bachelor thesis. Univerza v Ljubljana, Ljubljana, 2016.
  39. Wood, D. J., Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Bryan, L. M. (2021). Stakeholder identification and salience after 20 years: Progress, problems, and prospects. Business & Society, 60(1), 196–245. DOI: 10.1177/0007650318816522
  40. Xie, Y., Li, Z., Qi, J., Zhang, K., Zhang, B. and Qi, F. (2020), ‘Optimal video communication strategy for intelligent video analysis in unmanned aerial vehicle applications’, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 33(11), 2921–2929. DOI: 10.1016/j.cja.2020.06.009
  41. Yan, Z., Wang, S., Ma, D., Liu, B., Lin, H. and Li, S. (2019), ‘Meteorological factors affecting pan evaporation in the Haihe River Basin, China’ Water, 11(2), 1–18. DOI: 10.3390/w11020317
  42. Yu, Z., Guindani, M., Grieco, S. F., Chen, L., Holmes, T. C. and Xu, X. (2022), ‘Beyond t test and ANOVA: applications of mixed-effects models for more rigorous statistical analysis in neuroscience research’, Neuron 2022, 110(1), 21–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.10.03
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2024-0027 | Journal eISSN: 1581-1832 | Journal ISSN: 1318-5454
Language: English
Page range: 379 - 391
Submitted on: Nov 17, 2023
Accepted on: May 24, 2024
Published on: Dec 12, 2024
Published by: University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Science
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Božidar Lenarčič, Armand Faganel, published by University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Science
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.