Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Leveraging ChatGPT for Enhanced Logical Analysis in the Theory of Constraints Thinking Process Cover

Leveraging ChatGPT for Enhanced Logical Analysis in the Theory of Constraints Thinking Process

By: Tomaž Aljaž  
Open Access
|May 2024

References

  1. Arqum M., and More D. (2023). Aplying TOC Thinking Process Tools in Managing Challenges of Supply Chain Finance: a Case Study.” International Journal of Services and Operations Management 15.4 (2013): 389. Web.
  2. Chen Y., Andiappan M., Jenkin T., and Ovchinnikov A. (2023). A Manager and an AI Walk into a Bar: Does ChatGPT Make Biased Decisions Like We Do? http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4380365
  3. Dettmer, H. W. (2007). The Logical Thinking Process: A Systems Approach to Complex Problem Solving, Amer Society for Quality; 2 edition.
  4. Escape Velocity Labs. (2022). ChatGPT imitates logical reasoning surprisingly well https://medium.com/@evlabs/chatgpt-imitates-logical-reasoning-surprisingly-well-f88b1ac8d6f7, downloaded: July 18th 2023
  5. Fischer R., Luczak-Roesch M., and Karl J. (2023). What does chatgpt return about human values? exploring value bias in chatgpt using a descriptive value theory. http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.03612
  6. Frąckiewicz, M. (2023). The Challenges of Addressing Bias and Stereotyping in ChatGPT Prompt Generation https://ts2.space/en/the-challenges-of-addressing-bias-and-stereotyping-in-chatgpt-prompt-generation/, downloaded: July 18th 2023
  7. Gaspar, M., Cristovão, L., and Tenera, A. (2019). Theory of Constraints Thinking Processes on Operational Lean Programs Management Improvement: An Energy Producer Company Case. In: Camarinha-Matos, L., Almeida, R., Oliveira, J. (eds) Technological Innovation for Industry and Service Systems. DoCEIS 2019. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 553. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17771-3_11
  8. Goldratt, E. M. (2008). Necessary but not sufficient: The theory of constraints and management. North River Press
  9. Hackaday. (2023). ChatGPT Powers A Different Kind Of Logic Analyzer. https://hackaday.com/2023/04/06/chatgpt-powers-a-different-kind-of-logic-analyzer/, downloaded: July 18th 2023
  10. Hanmeng L., Ruoxi N., Zhiyang T., Jian L., Qiji Z., and Yue Z. (2023). Evaluating the Logical Reasoning Ability of ChatGPT and GPT-4. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369911689_Evaluating_the_Logical_Reasoning_Ability_of_ChatGPT_and_GPT-4]
  11. Holt J., and Aljaž, T. (2020), EM 526 Lecture materials, Washington State University
  12. Scheinkopf L. J. (1999). Thinking for a Change: Putting the TOC Thinking Processes to Use, CRC Press; 1st edition
  13. Zamfiroiu A., Vasile D., and Savu D. (2023). ChatGPT–A Systematic Review of Published Research Papers. Informatica Economica. 2023;27(1):5-16. PMID: 36981544
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2024-0014 | Journal eISSN: 1581-1832 | Journal ISSN: 1318-5454
Language: English
Page range: 202 - 214
Submitted on: Dec 17, 2023
|
Accepted on: Jan 23, 2024
|
Published on: May 11, 2024
Published by: University of Maribor
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Tomaž Aljaž, published by University of Maribor
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.