Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Are we Ready to Use Microchip Implants? An International Cross-sectional Study

Organizacija
Volume 54 (2021): Issue 4 (December 2021)
By:
Open Access
|Dec 2021

References

  1. Achille, R., Perakslis, C., & Michael, K. (2012). Ethical Issues to Consider for Microchip Implants in Humans. Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine, 3, 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1615/EthicsBiologyEngMed.201300700910.1615/EthicsBiologyEngMed.2013007009
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Albrecht, K. (2010). Microchip-induced tumors in laboratory rodents and dogs: A review of the literature 1990-2006. 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society, 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS.2010.551462210.1109/ISTAS.2010.5514622
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Bansal, G., Zahedi, F. M., & Gefen, D. (2015). Do context and personality matter? Trust and privacy concerns in disclosing private information online. Information & Management, 53(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.08.00110.1016/j.im.2015.08.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Basham, R. (2014). Surveilling the Elderly: Emerging Demographic Needs and Social Implications of RFID Chip Technology Use. In M. G. Michael & K. Michael (Eds.), Uberveillance and the Social Implications of Microchip Implants: Emerging Technologies (pp. 169–185). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4582-0.ch00710.4018/978-1-4666-4582-0.ch007
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Beaujean, A. A. (2014). Latent variable modeling using R: A step-by-step guide. In Latent variable modeling using R: A step-by-step guide. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/978131586978010.4324/9781315869780
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300. http://www.jstor.org/stable/234610110.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Carr, N. K. (2020). As Society Strives for Reduced Contact during the Pandemic, How Can Human Microchipping Help? Villanova Law Review, 65, 46–60. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr/vol65/iss6/3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070551070130183410.1080/10705510701301834
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Cheung, G. W., & Lau, R. S. (2011). A Direct Comparison Approach for Testing Measurement Invariance. Organizational Research Methods, 15(2), 167–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442811142198710.1177/1094428111421987
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. In Structural Equation Modeling (Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 233–255). Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_510.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease Of Use, and User Acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/24900810.2307/249008
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/315131210.2307/3151312
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Fram, B. R., Rivlin, M., & Beredjiklian, P. K. (2020). On Emerging Technology: What to Know When Your Patient Has a Microchip in his Hand. Journal of Hand Surgery, 45(7), 645–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.01.00810.1016/j.jhsa.2020.01.008
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Franks, C., & Smith, R. (2021). Changing perceptions of biometric technologies. In Research Report no. 20. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.52922/rr7814610.52922/rr78146
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Gaffney, M., & Gopini, G. (2020). Attitude Towards Chip Implant Devices for Individual Enhancement Purposes on Example of Estonian Population . [University of Tartu]. https://web-proxy.io/proxy/dspace.ut.ee/bit-stream/handle/10062/67048/gaffney_matthew_and_gopini_gopichand.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Gauttier, S. (2019). “I” ve got you under my skin’ – the role of ethical consideration in the (non-) acceptance of insideables in the workplace. Technology in Society, 56, 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.09.00810.1016/j.techsoc.2018.09.008
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070551990954011810.1080/10705519909540118
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Jorgensen, T. D., Kite, B. A., Chen, P.-Y., & Short, S. D. (2018). Permutation randomization methods for testing measurement equivalence and detecting differential item functioning in multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis. In Psychological Methods (Vol. 23, Issue 4, pp. 708–728). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/met000015210.1037/met0000152
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Jorgensen, T. D., S, P., Schoemann, A. M., Rosseel, Y., Miller, P., Quick, C., Garnier-Villarreal, M., Selig, J., Boulton, A., Preacher, K., Coffmann, D., Rhemtulla, M., Robitzsch, A., Enders, C., Arslan, R., Clinton, B., Panko, P., Merkle, E., Chesnut, S., … Ben-Shachar, M. S. (2020). Useful Tools for Structural Equation Modeling. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/semTools/semTools.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Katz, J. E., & Rice, R. E. (2009). Public views of mobile medical devices and services: A US national survey of consumer sentiments towards RFID healthcare technology. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78, 104–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.06.00110.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.06.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Koufteros, X. A. (1999). Testing a model of pull production: a paradigm for manufacturing research using structural equation modeling. Journal of Operations Management, 17(4), 467–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00002-910.1016/S0272-6963(99)00002-9
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Lai, H. C., Chan, H. W., & Singh, N. P. (2016). Effects of radiation from a radiofrequency identification (RFID) microchip on human cancer cells. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 92(3), 156–161. https://doi.org/10.3109/09553002.2016.113526410.3109/09553002.2016.1135264
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Lockton, V., & Rosenberg, R. S. (2005). RFID: The next serious threat to privacy. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(4), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-006-0014-210.1007/s10676-006-0014-2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.13010.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Miceli, G. N., & Brabaranelli, C. (2016). Structural Equations Modeling: Theory and Applications in Strategic Management. In G. B. Dagnino & C. M. C (Eds.), Research Methods for Strategic Management (pp. 98–136). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org//10.1155/2012/263953
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Michael, K., Aloudat, A., Michael, M. G., & Perakslis, C. (2017). You Want to do What with RFID? Perceptions of radio-frequency identification implants for employee identification in the workplace. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 6(3), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCE.2017.268497810.1109/MCE.2017.2684978
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Michael, K., & Michael, M. G. (2013). The future prospects of embedded microchips in humans as unique identifiers: the risks versus the rewards. Media, Culture & Society, 35(1), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344371246456110.1177/0163443712464561
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Michael, M. G., & Michael, K. (2010). Toward a State of Überveillance [Special Section Introduction]. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 29(2), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2010.93702410.1109/MTS.2010.937024
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Mohamed, M. A. (2020). Modeling of Subcutaneous Implantable Microchip Intention of Use. In T. Ahram, W. Karwowski, A. Vergnano, F. Leali, & R. Taiar (Eds.), Intelligent Human Systems Integration 2020 (pp. 842–847). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org//10.1007/978-3-030-39512-4_12810.1007/978-3-030-39512-4_128
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Perakslis, C., & Michael, K. (2012). Indian Millennials: Are microchip implants a more secure technology for identification and access control? Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Conference on Technology and Society in Asia, T and SA 2012, 2012, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSAsia.2012.639797710.1109/TSAsia.2012.6397977
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Perakslis, C., Michael, K., Michael, M. G., & Gable, R. (2014). Perceived Barriers for Implanting Microchips in Humans : A Transnational Study. In Norbert Wiener in the 21st Century (21CW). https://doi.org/10.1109/NORBERT.2014.689392910.1109/NORBERT.2014.6893929
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.00410.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Rodriguez, D. A. (2019). Chipping in at work: Privacy concerns related to the use of body microchip (“RFID”) implants in the employer-employee context. Iowa Law Review, 104(3), 1581–1611. https://ilr.law.uiowa.edu/assets/Uploads/ILR-104-3-Rodriguez.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Rosseel, Y. (2014). The lavaan tutorial. In The lavaan tutorial. http://lavaan.ugent.be/tutorial/tutorial.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Rotter, P., Daskala, B., & Compano, R. (2008). RFID implants: Opportunities and and challenges for identifying people. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 27(2), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1109/mts.2008.92486210.1109/MTS.2008.924862
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Sarwar, N., Khan, F. N., Ali, A., Rafique, H., Hussain, I., & Irshad, A. (2019). Microchip with Advance Human Monitoring Technique and RFTS. In I. S. Bajwa, F. Kamareddine, & A. Costa (Eds.), Intelligent Technologies and Applications (pp. 560–570). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org//10.1007/978-981-13-6052-7_4810.1007/978-981-13-6052-7_48
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling, 3rd ed. In A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling, 3rd ed. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Smith, C. (2008). Human microchip implantation. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 3(3), 151–156. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-2724200800010001510.4067/S0718-27242008000100015
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2014). Explaining the intention to use technology among university students: a structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(2), 124–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-014-9080-310.1007/s12528-014-9080-3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Turner, W. (2020). Chipping Away at Workplace Privacy: The Implantation of RFID Microchips and Erosion of Employee Privacy. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 61, 275–298. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy/vol61/iss1/18/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Virkki, J., Wei, Z., Liu, A., Ukkonen, L., & Björninen, T. (2017). Wearable passive E-textile UHF RFID tag based on a slotted patch antenna with sewn ground and microchip interconnections. International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, 2017, 27–29. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/347601710.1155/2017/3476017
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. Werber, B., Baggia, A., & Žnidaršič, A. (2018). Factors Affecting the Intentions to Use RFID Subcutaneous Microchip Implants for Healthcare Purposes. Organizacija, 51(2), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2018-001010.2478/orga-2018-0010
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2021-0019 | Journal eISSN: 1581-1832 | Journal ISSN: 1318-5454
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 275 - 292
Submitted on: May 24, 2021
Accepted on: Sep 23, 2021
Published on: Dec 7, 2021
Published by: University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Science
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
Microchip implant,
Near field communication,
Behavioural intentions,
Structural equation model,
Technology acceptance model
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Business management,
Management, organization, corporate governance

© 2021 Anja Žnidaršič, Alenka Baggia, Antonín Pavlíček, Jakub Fischer, Maciej Rostański, Borut Werber, published by University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Science
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 54 (2021): Issue 4 (December 2021)Next article