Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
An Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Sensitivity Analysis for Maintenance Policy Selection Cover

An Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Sensitivity Analysis for Maintenance Policy Selection

Organizacija
Volume 47 (2014): Issue 3 (August 2014)
By: ,  ,  ,   and    
Open Access
|Aug 2014
References

References

  1. Al-Najjar, B. (1996). Total quality maintenance. An approach for continuous reduction in costs of quality products., 2(3), 4-20, http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/13552519610130413
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Al-Najjar, B. (1997).Doctoral thesis, ISSN 0280-722X, ISRN LUTMDN/TMIO-1006-SE, ISBN 91-628-2545-X, Lund University, Inst. of Industrial Engineering, Sweden.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Al-Najjar, B. (2007). The lack of maintenance and not maintenance which costs: A model to describe and quantify the impact of vibration-based maintenance on company's business., 107(1), 260–273, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.09.005
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Al-Najjar, B. (2012). On establishing cost-effective condition-based maintenance: Exemplified for vibration-based maintenance in case companies., 18(4), 401 – 416, http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/13552511211281561
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Al-Najjar, B., & Alsyouf, I. (2000). Improving effectiveness of manufacturing systems using total quality maintenance., 11(4), 267-76, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09576060010326393
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Al-Najjar, B., & Alsyouf, I. (2003). Selecting the most efficient maintenance approach using fuzzy multiple criteria decision making., 83(3), 81–96, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00380-8
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Al-Najjar, B., & Alsyouf, I. (2004). Enhancing a company's profitability and competitiveness using integrated vibration-based maintenance: a case study., 157(3), 643–657, http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00258-3
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Alsyouf, I. (2004).Ph.D. dissertation (Terotechnology), School of Industrial Engineering, Vaxjo University Press, Acta Wexionensia, Vaxjo.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Arts, R.H.P.M., Knapp, G.M.J., & Lawrence, M. (1998). Some aspects of measuring maintenance performance in the process industry., 4(1), 6-11, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13552519810201520
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Aslani, A., & Aslani, F. (2012). Application of Fuzzy AHP Approach to Selection of Organizational Structure with Consideration to Contextual Dimensions., 45(5), 246 - 254, http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10051-012-0025-1
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Azadivar, F., & Shu, V. (1999). Maintenance policy selection for JIT production systems., 37(16), 3725-3738, http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/002075499190013
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Backlund, F., & Akersten, P.A. (2003). RCM introduction: process and requirements management aspects., 9(3), 250 – 264, http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/13552510310493701
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Bayazit, O. (2005). Use of AHP in decision-making for flexible manufacturing systems., 16(7), 808-819, http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/17410380510626204
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Bevilacqua, M., & Braglia, M. (2000) The analytic hierarchy process applied to maintenance strategy selection., 70(1), 71-83, http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0951-8320(00)00047-8
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Bertolini, M., & Bevilacqua, M. (2006). A combined goal program-ming-AHP approach to maintenance selection problem., 91(7), 839–848, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2005.08.006
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Dekker, R. (1996). Applications of maintenance optimization models: a review and analysis., 51(3), 229-240, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(95)00076-3
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Dunn, R. (1987). Advanced maintenance technologies., 40(12), 80-2.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Gits, C.W. (1992). Design of maintenance concepts., 24(3), 217-26, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0925-5273(92)90133-R
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Gits, C.W. (1994). Structuring maintenance control systems., 14(7), 5-17, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443579410062121
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Jaca, C., Viles, E., Paipa-Galeano, L., & Santos, J. (2014). Learning 5S principles from Japanese best practitioners: case studies of five manufacturing companies, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0 0207543.2013.878481
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Jaca, C., Viles, E., Mateo, R., & Santos, J. (2012). Components of sustainable improvement systems: theory and practice., 24(2), 142-154, http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/17542731211215080
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Jardine, A.K.S., Lin, D., & Banjevic, D. (2006). A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance., 20(7), 1483–510, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ymssp.2005.09.012
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Karapetrovic, S,. & Rosenbloom, E.S. (1999). A quality control approach to consistency paradoxes in AHP.119(3), 704-718, http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00334-8
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Lane, E.F., & Verdini, W.A. (1989). A consistency test for AHP decision makers.20(3), 575-590, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1989.tb01568.x
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Ljungberg, O. (1998). Measurement of overall equipment effectiveness as a basis for TPM activities.18(5), 495-507, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443579810206334
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Luxhoj, J., Riis, J., & Thorsteinsson, U. (1997). Trends and perspectives in industrial maintenance management.16(6), 437-53, http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0278-6125(97)81701-3
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Löfsten, H. (1999). Management of industrial maintenance-economic evaluation of maintenance policies.19(7), 716-737, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443579910271683
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Maletič, D., Maletič, M., Al-Najjar, B., & Gomišček, B. (2014). The role of maintenance in improving company's competitiveness and profitability: A case study in a textile company.25(4), 441–456, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-04-2013-0033
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. Mann, L., Saxena, A., & Knapp, G. (1995). Statistical-based or condition-based preventive maintenance?1(1), 46-59, http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/13552519510083156
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Moubray, J. (1997).2nd ed. New York: Industrial Press Inc.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Muchiri, P., Pintelon, L., Gelders, L., & Martin, H. (2011). Development of maintenance function performance measurement framework and indicators.131(1), 295 - 302, http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.04.039
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Murphy, C.K. (1993). Limits on the analytic hierarchy process from its consistency index.65(1), 138-139, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(93)90148-G
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Nakajima, S. (1989).Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press Inc.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Nakajima, S. (1988).Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press Inc.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Nowlan, F.S., & Heap, H.F. (1978).San Fransisco: United Airlines Publications.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  36. Okumura, S., & Okino, N. (2003). A maintenance policy selection method for a critical single-unit item in each workstation composing a FMS with CBM optimization.6(2), 3-9.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Parida, A., & Chattopadhyay, G. (2007). Development of a multi-criteria hierarchical framework for maintenance performance measurement (MPM).13(3), 241-258, http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/13552510710780276
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. Pintelon, L., & Parodi, A. (2008). Maintenance: an evolutionary perspective. In: Kobbacy, K.A.H., & Murthy, D.N.P (Eds),London: Springer, pp. 21-48.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. Reineke, D., Murdock, W., Pohl, E., & Rehmert, I. (1999). Improving Availability and Cost Performance for Complex Systems with Preventive Maintenance.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. Saaty, T.L. (1980)., New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  41. Saaty, T.L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process., 1(1), 83–98, http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  42. Sharabi, M. (2014). Today's quality is tomorrow's reputation (and the following day's business success). Total Quality Management, 25(3-4), 183 – 197, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1 4783363.2013.858877
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Talib, F., Rahman, Z., & Qureshi, M.N. (2011). Prioritising the practices of total quality management: An analytic hierarchy process analysis for the service industries., 22(12), 1331-1351, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2011.625192
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. Tsang, A.H.C., & Chan, P.K., (2000). TPM implementation in China: a case study., 17(2), 144 – 157, http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/02656710010304555
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  45. Wang, L., Chu, J. and Wu, J. (2007). Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytical hierarchy process., 107(1), 151-63, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.08.005
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  46. Waeyenbergh, G., & Pintelon, L. (2002). A framework for maintenance concept development., 77(3), 299–313, http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00156-6
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  47. Zaim, S., Turkyilmaz, A., Acar, M.F., Al-Turki, U., & Demirel, O.F. (2012). Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and ANP algorithms: a case study., 18(1), 16 – 29, http://dx.doi. org/10.1108/13552511211226166
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2014-0016 | Journal eISSN: 1581-1832 | Journal ISSN: 1318-5454
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 177 - 188
Submitted on: Sep 6, 2013
Accepted on: Jul 10, 2014
Published on: Aug 22, 2014
Published by: University of Maribor
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Analytical hierarchy process,
decision-making,
maintenance policy
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Business management,
Management, organization, corporate governance

© 2014 Damjan Maletič, Matjaž Maletič, Viktor Lovrenčić, Basim Al-Najjar, Boštjan Gomišček, published by University of Maribor
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 47 (2014): Issue 3 (August 2014)
Previous article
Next article