Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Impact of Socially Responsible Reporting on Successful Corporate Operations Cover

The Impact of Socially Responsible Reporting on Successful Corporate Operations

Organizacija
Volume 46 (2013): Issue 2 (March 2013)
By: Anton Peršič and  Mirko Markič  
Open Access
|Apr 2013

References

  1. Amabile, T. M. & Kramer, J. S. (2007). Inner work life. Understanding the subtext of business. Harvard Business Review, 12 (5), 72-83.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Avolio, B.J. & Gardner, W.L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315-338, http://dx.doi. org/10.1016%2Fj.leaqua.2005.03.001.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Bakker, M. (2008). Why CSR reporting in broken - and how it should be fixed, available at: http://www.ethicalcorp.com/ communications-reporting/ethics-and-financial-performance- big-question-%E2%80%93-there-really-business-case (17th february 2013).
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Becker, J., Kugeler, M. & Rosemann, M. (2003). Process Management. Berlin: Heidelberg Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-24798-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Bodlaj, M. (2009). Povezanost med tržno naravnanostjo, inovacijamiin uspešnostjo podjetja - konceptualni model in empiričnapreverba [Link Between the Market Focus, Innovationsand Operational Success - Conceptual Model and EmpiricalExamination], PhD thesis. University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Economics.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Bukovec, B. & Markič, M. (2008). The level of integration of various models for organizational change management in Slovenian organizations. International of Journal Business andSystems Research, 2(4), 431-446, http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ IJBSR.2008.02076810.1504/IJBSR.2008.020768
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Celinšek, D. & Markič, M. (2008). Implementing problem - based learning in a highen education institution. International Journalof Management in Education, 2(1), 88-106, http://dx.doi.org/10.1504%2FIJMIE.2008.016233.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. CSR (2009). Survey on Reporting on Corporate Social Responsibility by the Largest Listed Companies in 11 Central and Easten European Countries. Available at: http://vma.esec.vu.lt/ vma/pluginfile.php/61029/mod_resource/content/0/PFS_ Program-Survey_of_Reporting_on_CSR_in_CEE_BRIC_ and_Ukrane-Septe.pdf (17. 2. 2013).
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Daft, R. L. (2010). New era of management. Mason: South-Western: Cengage Learning.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Dimovski, V., Grah, B., Penger, S. & Peterlin, J. (2010). Authentic Leadership in Contemporary Slovenian Business Environment: Explanatory Case Study of HERMES SoftLab. Organizacija, 43(5), 214-223, http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/ v10051-010-0021-210.2478/v10051-010-0021-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R. & Jackson, D. R. (2008) ManagementResearch. London: SAGE Publications, third editions, ISBN 978-1-84787-176-3.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Eurostat (2012). Employment by sex, age and economic, activity (from 2008, NACE rev.2) (1 000). Available at: http://epp. eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search_ database?_piref458_1209540_458_211810_211810.node_ code=lfsa_egan2 (10th August 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Fink Babič, S. & Biloslavo, R. (2012). Trajnostno poročanje podjetij: priložnosti in izzivi [Sustainable Reporting by Companies: Opportunities and Challenges]. Organizacija, 45(1), 14-26.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Gray, R. & Milne, M. (2004). Towards Reporting on the Triple Bottom Line: Mirages, Methods and Myths. In: A. Henriques & J.Richardson. The Tiple bottom line: does it all add up?, 70-80. London, Earthscan.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Green paper (2010). Promoting an European Framework for CorporateSocial Responsability. Brussels: European Commission.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Hron, J. (2004). New economy and manager behaviour changes. Agric. Econ. - Czech, 50(1): 9-129. Available at: http://www. cazv.cz/attachments/2-Hron.pdf (4th April 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. ISO 26000 (2010). Guidance on Social Responsibility. ISO - the International Organization for Standardization. Available at: http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards/iso26000.htm (17th February 2013).
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Jeston, J. & Nelis, J. (2008). Management by Process. Linacre House. Oxford: Jordan Hill, 248-253, http://dx.doi. org/10.1016%2FB978-0-7506-8761-4.00010-X10.4324/9780080943244
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Kaplan, R. & Norton, D. (2006). How to implement a new strategy without disrupting your organization. Harvard Business Review, 84 (3), 100-109.10.1108/sd.2006.05622had.002
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Kern Pipan, K. (2010). Povzetek temeljnih izsledkov raziskave o uporabiorodij za stalne izboljšave za dvig kakovosti in odličnosti vvelikih podjetjih v Sloveniji [Summary of the Key Findings of theResearch on the Usage of Tools for Constant Improvements withthe Focus on Quality and Excellence Improvements in SlovenianCompanies]. Ljubljana: Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology, Metrology Institute of the Republic of Slovenia.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Kottler, P. & Lee, N. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility: Doingthe Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause. Hoboken: John Wiley&Sons, Inc.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. KPMG (2005). International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting. Available at: http://www.kpmg.com.au/Portals/0/ Kpmg%20Survey%202005_3.pdf (21st June 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. KPMG (2008). International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting. Available at:http://www.kpmg.com/cn/en/issuesandinsights/ articlespublications/pages/corporate-responsibility- survey-200810-o.aspx (17th February 2013).
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. KPMG (2011). International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting. Available at: http://www.kpmg.com/PT/pt/ IssuesAndInsights/Documents/corporate-responsibility2011. pdf (17th February 2013).
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Margolis, J. D. & Elfenbein, H. A. (2008). Do Well by Doing Good? Don’t Count on it. Harvard Business Review, 86(1), 19-20.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Markič, M., Meško, M., Meško Štok, Z. & Markič Hrast, S. (2012). Influence of different components of organizational support for project management on success of the project realization in institutes of public health. African Journal of Business Management, 6(9), 3156-3163, http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJBM11.27210.5897/AJBM11.272
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. McAlister, D. T., Ferrell, O. C. in Ferrell, L. (2005). Business andSociety: A strategic approuch to social responsbility. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Mulej, M. and Hrast, A. (2012). (Nad-)državna strategija družbeneodgovornosti zoper globalno revščino sredi izobilja, Eseji odružbeni odgovornosti, knjiga na zgoščenki [(Supra)nationalStrategy of Social Responsibility against Global Poverty amidstAbundance, Essays on Social Responsibility, CD Book]. Editor: Matjaž Mulej, Anita Hrast, IRDO - Institute for the Development of Social Responsibility. ISBN 978-961-92971-0-0.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Nohria, N., Groysberg, B. & Lee, L. (2008). Emploxee motivation: a powerful new model. Harvard Business Review, 86(7-8), 78-84.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Ortenblad, A. (2004). The Learning Organization: Towards an Integrated Model. The Learning Organization, 11(2/3), 129-130.10.1108/09696470410521592
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Porter, E., Kramer, M & Mark, R. (2006). Strategy and Society: Harvard Business Review, (12), 78-92. Available at: http:// www.compromisoempresarial.com/wp-content/uploads/strategy- society.pdf (17th February 2013).
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Schwarz, S. M. & Carroll, A. B. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: A three domain approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13, 503-530. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq20031343510.5840/beq200313435
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. SFBE (2011). Excellence One Toolbook for Corporate Social Responsibility, Slovenian Foundation for Business Excellence, Available at: http://www.sfpo.org/public/enovice/arhiv_ novic/E-novice_2011_5_mar.pdf (4th April 2012)
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Verle, K., Markič, M. & Kodrič, B. (2012). Kompetence slovenskih managerjev in organizacijska struktura [Competences of Slovenian Managers and Organizational Structure]. Organizacija, 45(1), 2-13.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Wilson, F. M. (2010). Organizatonal Behaviour and Work. New York: Oxford Univesity Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Windsor, D. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Three Key Approaches. Journal ob Management Studies, 43(1), 93-114, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00584.x Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in Organizations. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2013-0007 | Journal eISSN: 1581-1832 | Journal ISSN: 1318-5454
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 47 - 54
Published on: Apr 13, 2013
Published by: University of Maribor
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
sustainable development,
social responsibility,
market services,
operational success
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Business management,
Management, organization, corporate governance

© 2013 Anton Peršič, Mirko Markič, published by University of Maribor
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 46 (2013): Issue 2 (March 2013)Next article