Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Chloroquine degradation in aqueous solution under electron beam irradiation Cover

Chloroquine degradation in aqueous solution under electron beam irradiation

Open Access
|Jun 2024

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

UV-VIS absorption spectrum for 125 mg·L 1 chloroquine solution observed at 343 nm at irradiation doses ranging from 0 kGy to 7 kGy.

Fig. 2.

Degradation of 125 mg·L-1 of chloroquine solution under EB radiation.

Fig. 3.

Degradation of different concentrations of chloroquine solutions under EB irradiation. (a) Removal efficiency of chloroquine at different initial concentrations. (b) k (kGy-1) values for removal of chloroquine at 0.5 kGy. (c) Plot of the rate constant against dose.

Fig. 4.

Removal efficiency of 125 mg·L 1 of chloroquine solution under EB irradiation at different initial pH.

Fig. 5.

Changes in the pH of the solution with dose during the degradation of 125 mg·L-1 chloroquine solution.

Fig. 6.

Changes in the pH concentration during EB irradiation of 125 mg·L-1 chloroquine. The pH varied from slightly acidic before irradiation to acidic at the end of irradiation.

Fig. 7.

Release of Cl with increasing dose during radiolysis of chloroquine (125 mg·L-1) solution under the EB treatment.

Fig. 8.

(a) Reduction in total Kjeldahl nitrogen, formation of NO3−, and (b) generation of NH4+ in the degradation of 125 mg·L-1 of chloroquine solution under EB irradiation.

Fig. 9.

Changes in dissolved oxygen concentration during electron beam irradiation of 125 mg·L-1 chloroquine solution.

Fig. 10.

Variation in COD and TOC during EB degradation of 125 mg·L-1 solution of chloroquine.

Species formed in the radiolysis of water and their corresponding G-values and reaction rates (k) with CQ

SpeciesG (mmol·J-1)Molecules/100 eVk (dm3·mol-1·s-1)
eaq0.282.84.8 × 1010
OH0.282.87.3 × 109
H0.060.6
H3O+0.262.6
H20.0450.45
H2O20.070.7

Methods previously used for the removal of CQ from aqueous solutions

MethodsConditionsRemoval efficiencyRef.
Membranes
Membrane bioreactors – tyrosinase enzyme on Escherichia coli biopolymerpH 7.5, 20 h98% with 140 ± 6 mg·g-1 No apparent capacity loss over three consecutive cycles[33]
Adsorbents
Activated carbon Palm kernel (Elaeis guineensis) shells Large surface areas, strong mechanical characteristics[27]
PPAC-ZnO313 K 10 ppm CQ78.89% Adsorption capacity increases with temperature[28]
A-GO hydrogel Adsorption 63 mg·g-1[29, 30]
GAC-GOEquilibrium time 18 h37.65 mg·g-1 Adsorption[32]
Organo-clay raw kaolinite treated with citric acid20 mg·L-1 CQ 120 min99.28% Maximum sorption capacity is 4.03 mg·g-1
Soybean hull residues functionalized with iron oxide nanoparticles (SBH-Fe3O4)120 min 318 KAdsorption capacity 98.84 mg·g-1 Reuse five cycles[34]
Iron and magnesium comodified rape straw biochar (Fe/Mg-RSB)pH (3–11) CQ 4–25 mg·L-1 at 180 r·min-1 for 8 h 308 KAdsorption capacity of 42.93 mg·g-1[35]
MOF sheet, namely BUC-21(Fe) FeSO4·7H2O, 1,3-dibenzyl-2-imidazoli-done-4,5-dicarboxylic acid (H2L) and 4,4’-bipyridine (bpy)pH = 5.0 30 min100% C•OH 242.5 mmol·L-1, H2O2 consumption 83.2%[36]
Catalysts
Ferrate-Fe(VI)CQ 10 μM Fe(VI) 40–180 mM time 1–20 min59% CQ removal Algae, antimicrobial, toxicity reduction[19]
CWAO HEO – (MgCuMnCoFe) OxOxygen pressure of 15 bar, catalyst dosage of 1.4 g·L-1, and temperature of 230°C34.6% and 41.2% higher than that without the HEO system[11]
Single cobalt atoms in a defined Co–N3 coordination structurepH range (3–11) employing the SA Co-N-C (30)100%[24, 25]
Biochar-supported RM-BC activated persulfate process20 mg·L-1 40 min84.8%[26]
Carbon nanotube-loaded CoFe2O4 (CoFe2O4@CNTs) composite10 mg·L-1 CQ pH 7Mineralization efficiency 33%, removal efficiency 98.7%[37]
Advanced oxidation processes
SR-AOPPeroxymonosulfate (PMS, HSO5) peroxy disulfate (PDS, S2O82) 10.0 mg·L-1P25M175-94.6% within 30 min[23]
UV/PSpH = 6.9 10 min91.3% CQ reactions with OH and SO4· were 8.9 × 109 L·(mol·s)-1 and 1.4 × 1010 L·(mol·s)-1[38]
Photocatalysis-activated SR-AOP over PDINH/MIL-88A(Fe) composites10.0 mg·L-1 CQ P25M175 30 min94.6% Good reusability and stability[23]
Electrocoagulation66.89 mA·cm–2, 600 rpm 60 min electrolysis time 3 mg·L-1 CQ, pH = 6.595% dissolved aluminum electrodes 0.228 kg·m-3 energy consumption of 12.243 kWh·m-3[39]
EFPCarbon felt cathode and BDD anode92% (TOC)[20]
FBERBDD electrodes batch recirculation mode 9 h, pH 5.38, 34.4 mA·cm-2, and liquid flow rate (Q) of 1.42 L·min-1Degradation 89.3%, COD 51.6%, mineralization 53.1% energy consumption 0.041 kWh·L-1[40]
Electro-Fenton with pyrite (FeS2)-modified graphite felt (FeS2/GF) cathodepH of 3.0 FeS2 loading-10 mg, current density 150 mA, electrode spacing 2.0 cm83.3 ± 0.4% 60 min CQ removal, retains 60.0% CQ removal in consecutive batch tests[41]

Reaction rates (k) for degradation of different concentrations of chloroquine and corresponding R2

Concentration CQ (mg·L-1)k (kGy-1)R2
 751.65670.9935
1001.36030.9982
1251.12240.9891
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nuka-2024-0008 | Journal eISSN: 1508-5791 | Journal ISSN: 0029-5922
Language: English
Page range: 53 - 63
Submitted on: Oct 5, 2023
Accepted on: Feb 16, 2024
Published on: Jun 25, 2024
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Stephen Kabasa, Yongxia Sun, Sylwester Bułka, Andrzej G. Chmielewski, published by Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.